View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCD Project Manager
9/13/2022 12:55:42 PM |
Please complete PID note and provide the PID Inclusion resolution. If you have not worked with Lori to include the filings into a PID, please do so. | 9/13/2022 12:55:42 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
9/13/2022 11:46:55 AM |
EPC Engineering has no further comments at this time. Reviewed by: Charlene Durham, P.E. charlenedurham@elpasoco.com |
9/13/2022 11:46:55 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
8/16/2022 10:50:14 AM |
Please provide a completed legal description; | 8/16/2022 10:50:14 AM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
8/15/2022 7:33:18 AM |
EPC Engineering has not further comments at this time. Reviewed by: Charlene Durham, P.E. charlenedurham@elpasoco.com |
8/15/2022 7:33:18 AM | |
| View |
County Attorney - Development Review
8/2/2022 10:41:59 AM |
1. Signature to ROW license agreement attached. 2. Comments to SIA have been addressed. FAE must be added as exhibit and amount filled in blank in paragraph 1. |
8/2/2022 10:41:59 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
7/25/2022 7:14:34 AM |
Please work with Ms Seago to include the plats into the PID. | 7/25/2022 7:14:34 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
7/25/2022 7:14:09 AM |
Remove the Assessors signature block from the plat please as we no longer need his signature with the two Traffic fee program notes depicted on plat. | 7/25/2022 7:14:09 AM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
7/20/2022 5:44:19 PM |
Review 3: EPC Engineering comments have been resolved on the following documents: - Construction Drawings - Final Plat - GEC Plan set Please provide CAD base files with signed plan sets. NOTE: Please see SF224 - Lorson Ranch Filing No.1 for any outstanding comments on the Final Drainage Report & Traffic Impact Study. Reviewed by: Charlene Durham, PE charlenedurham@elpasoco.com |
7/20/2022 5:44:19 PM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
7/19/2022 9:31:05 AM |
1. April 19 edits to ROW license agreement not addressed. 2. SIA uploaded by applicant is my redlined draft. If proposed changes are acceptable, please accept and upload a clean draft. |
7/19/2022 9:31:05 AM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
7/13/2022 9:08:51 AM |
Review 3: EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - Drainage Report EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
7/13/2022 9:08:51 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
5/5/2022 3:54:52 PM |
Plat redlines | 5/5/2022 3:54:52 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/5/2022 2:39:25 PM |
GEC Redlines | 5/5/2022 2:39:25 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/5/2022 2:38:48 PM |
FDR Redlines | 5/5/2022 2:38:48 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/5/2022 2:38:22 PM |
FAE Redlines | 5/5/2022 2:38:22 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/5/2022 2:36:26 PM |
CD Redlines | 5/5/2022 2:36:26 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
5/5/2022 2:32:42 PM |
Review 2 redline comments to the following documents will be uploaded as separate comments. Markup Summary is located at the end of the document: - Construction Drawings - Final Drainage Report (See SF22004) - Final Plat - Grading & Erosion Control Plans - FAE -Traffic Impact Study (See SF22004) Note: 1.Due to the volume and/or complexity of the comments given, the county reserves the right to make additional comments. 2. Comments were provided on the drainage report with SF22004 (The Ridge at Lorson Ranch Filing No. 1). Please address those comments and include revised copy of report in the next package. 3. Include copy of TIS which was submitted with SF22004 (The Ridge at Lorson Ranch Filing No. 1) in next package. Reviewed by: Charlene Durham, PE charlenedurham@elpasoco.com |
5/5/2022 2:32:42 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/27/2022 3:53:12 PM |
Minor comments on plat | 4/27/2022 3:53:12 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/27/2022 3:52:50 PM |
Provide the documentation that Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo)/Xcel Energy encroachments have been approved by PSCo/Xcel.. | 4/27/2022 3:52:50 PM | |
| View |
County Attorney - Development Review
4/19/2022 2:26:42 PM |
Proposed edits to SIA attached. | 4/19/2022 2:26:42 PM |
| View |
County Attorney - Development Review
4/19/2022 2:24:08 PM |
Proposed edits to ROW License Agreement attached. | 4/19/2022 2:24:08 PM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
4/20/2022 9:39:03 AM |
Review 2: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report.....(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
4/20/2022 9:39:03 AM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
3/19/2022 9:16:44 PM |
3/19/2022 9:16:44 PM | |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
3/9/2022 4:26:45 PM |
See attached. The Park Advisory Board recommends that the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners include the following condition(s) when considering and/or approving The Ridge at Lorson Ranch Filing No. 2 Final Plat: Require fees in lieu of land dedication for regional park purposes in the amount of $127,420 and urban park purposes in the amount of $80,330. A park lands agreement may be an acceptable alternative to urban park fees provided the agreement is approved by the County and executed prior to recording the Filing No. 2 Final Plat. | 3/9/2022 4:26:45 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
3/1/2022 7:23:58 AM |
GEC Redlines | 3/1/2022 7:23:58 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
3/1/2022 7:23:15 AM |
CD Redlines | 3/1/2022 7:23:15 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
3/1/2022 7:19:41 AM |
FDR-Redlines | 3/1/2022 7:19:41 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
3/1/2022 7:14:42 AM |
Review 1 redline comments to the following documents will be uploaded as separate comments. Markup Summary is located at the end of the document: - Construction Drawings - Final Plat - Grading & Erosion Control Plans - FAE Note: Traffic Memo for Filing 2 will need to be provided next submittal. Please see attached review comment letter. See comments on Filing 1 Final Drainage Report. Reviewed by: Charlene Durham, PE charlenedurham@elpasoco.com |
3/1/2022 7:14:42 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
2/28/2022 9:30:25 PM |
Review 1: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report.....(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
2/28/2022 9:30:25 PM | |
|
PCD Administrative
2/25/2022 8:03:26 AM |
adjacent property notifications have been mailed indicating the anticipated decision date and how to provide comment. | 2/25/2022 8:03:26 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
2/23/2022 4:43:59 PM |
FAE redlines | 2/23/2022 4:43:59 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
2/23/2022 4:42:51 PM |
Letter of Intent Redlines | 2/23/2022 4:42:51 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
2/23/2022 4:42:22 PM |
Plat redlines | 2/23/2022 4:42:22 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
2/23/2022 4:36:24 PM |
Provide the documentation that Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo)/Xcel Energy encroachments have been approved by PSCo/Xcel.. | 2/23/2022 4:36:24 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
2/23/2022 4:34:36 PM |
Please see engineering comments regarding TIS. Please provide a memo specific to the filing | 2/23/2022 4:34:36 PM | |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
2/21/2022 12:50:35 PM |
See attached comments | 2/21/2022 12:50:35 PM |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
2/18/2022 9:33:12 AM |
CGS previously reviewed the planned unit development and preliminary plan referral (PUDSP216) for 994 single-family units on approximately 206.473 acres located east of Marksheffel Road and Fontaine Blvd. We understand that Filing No. 2 will consist of 277 single-family lots and 7 tracts within 57.898 acres. Rocky Mountain Group’s (RMG, July 2, 2021) response to CGS’s comments for PUDSP216 satisfactorily addresses our previous concerns. The site does not contain steep slopes or mapped floodplains, nor is it exposed to any geologic hazards that preclude the proposed development. As noted on page 14 of RMG’s Soils and Geology Study (RMG, July 2, 2021), geologic constraints are present and include expansive soils and bedrock, faults, seismicity, radon, and erosion. We offer the following comments. 1. As noted on page 16 of RMG’s report, “The subexcavation should extend to minimum depths of 5 to 10 feet (as indicated on Figure 3, Subexcavation Recommendations) below the bottom of all proposed foundations components, and at least those same distances (laterally) beyond the proposed “buildable” area on each lot.” CGS agrees with RMG that “the subexcavation and replacement process does not guarantee that the swell potential will be reduced to acceptable levels.” The earthwork contractor should be made aware that additional “overexcavation and replacement of some or all of the previously placed fill material may be required,” as stated by RMG on page 13. 2. As noted on page 13 of RMG’s report, “lot-specific subsurface soil investigations are still required at the time of construction to verify that the expansive potential of the claystone has been reduced to acceptable levels by the recommended moisture-conditioning and replacement operations.” CGS recommends a note be added to the plans stating that prior to residential construction, lot-specific subsurface soil investigations are required for site-specific foundation design and other engineering aspects related to development. Also, the geologic constraints listed in Note 21 of the Final Plat (MS Civil Consultants, Inc., January 11, 2022) and Item 6 of the Final Plat Criteria in the Letter of Intent (Matrix Design Group, undated) should be updated to include the constraints listed in RMG’s report (page 14). Hydrocompactive soils, steep slopes, and fill soils were indicated in the Final Plat and Letter of Intent, however, these hazards/constraints were not identified in RMG’s investigation. 3. As noted on page 19 of RMG’s report, “A subsurface perimeter drain is recommended around portions of the structures which will have habitable or storage space located below the finished ground surface.” RMG did not encounter groundwater in their borings during drilling. As noted by RMG (page 19), “depending on the conditions encountered during site-specific subsurface soil investigations and the conditions observed at the time of the open excavation observations, additional subsurface drainage systems may be recommended.” CGS agrees with RMG that “surface and subsurface drainage systems should be implemented” and that “Exterior, perimeter foundation drains should be installed around below-grade habitable or storage spaces.” 4. The Geotechnical Report Note on the Grading Plans (CORE, December 2021) should be updated to include RMG’s most recent revision (July 2, 2021). Provided RMG’s recommendations are adhered to, and lot-specific subsurface soil investigations are performed, CGS has no objection to the proposed residential use and density for Filing No. 2. Submitted 2/18/2022 by Amy Crandall, Engineering Geologist, Colorado Geological Survey (303-384-2632 or acrandall@mines.edu) |
2/18/2022 9:33:12 AM | |
|
Public Service Company of Colorado dba X-cel Energy
2/17/2022 3:07:51 PM |
Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo)/Xcel Energy has existing electric transmission lines and associated land rights as shown within this property. Any activity including grading, proposed landscaping, erosion control or similar activities involving our existing right-of-way will require Public Service Company approval. Encroachments across Public Service Company’s easements must be reviewed for safety standards, operational and maintenance clearances, liability issues, and acknowledged with a Public Service Company License Agreement to be executed with the property owner. PSCo is requesting that, prior to any final approval of the plat, it is the responsibility of the property owner/developer/contractor to have this project assigned to a Land Rights Agent for plat review and execution of a License Agreement (via website www.xcelenergy.com/rightofway or email coloradorightofway@xcelenergy.com). | 2/17/2022 3:07:51 PM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
2/17/2022 2:24:12 PM |
1. Reserved/approved street names have been received by Enumerations. 2. Street name issues will need to be worked out for addressing purposes. FINAL PLAT STANDARD COMMENTS: 1. Enumerations will review the mylar prior to plat for address placement, street names, and title block. 2. A $10.00 per lot and tract platting fee will be due at the time of the review of the mylar, (two addresses per lot and tract). If an address is not needed on a tract then no fee applies. Check should be made out to PIKES PEAK REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT or PPRBD. Paid directly to the Enumerations Department. An additional over the phone transaction fee of $3.50 will apply for any credit card payment. 3. A copy of the final recorded plat is required prior to plan submittal for RESIDENTIAL. BeckyA@pprbd.org (Please email the Enumerations staff that reviewed your project). 4. *New standard comment*: All mylar reviews will be reviewed via “pdf”. The mylar will be stamped by Enumerations for accuracy and returned to the applicant and the planner. All payments to be mailed to RBD via a check or credit card payment over the phone. Plats should not be recorded prior to Enumerations receiving payment. If you would like an in person review, you will have to make an appointment on our website. |
2/17/2022 2:24:12 PM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
2/17/2022 7:11:01 AM |
Parks staff recommends fees in lieu of land dedication for regional park purposes in the amount of $127,400 and urban park purposes in the amount of $80,330. A park lands agreement may be an acceptable alternative to urban park fees provided the agreement is approved by the County and executed prior to recording of this final plat. Again, this application will be presented to the Park Advisory Board on March 9, 2022, and its recommendation will be provided after the meeting. | 2/17/2022 7:11:01 AM |
| View |
Widefield SD 3
2/16/2022 3:38:26 PM |
2/16/2022 3:38:26 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
2/14/2022 12:11:02 PM |
2/14/2022 12:11:02 PM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
2/10/2022 2:43:44 PM |
1. Please provide ROW License Agreement and Detention Maintenance Agreement in Word for ease of editing. 2. The SIA appears to have comments from an older draft. Please delete those. Please confirm that the correct parties are included; the Assessor's Office only shows Love in Action as the property owner. |
2/10/2022 2:43:44 PM | |
|
Colorado Parks and Wildlife
2/9/2022 1:59:36 PM |
Colorado Parks and Wildlife does not have any additional comments to add. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. For any additional information please contact District Wildlife Manager Drew Vrbenec at 719.439.9638 or by email at drew.vrbenec@state.co.us | 2/9/2022 1:59:36 PM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
2/4/2022 10:07:27 AM |
2/4/2022 10:07:27 AM | |
|
US Postal Service
2/3/2022 7:31:01 AM |
Pad location are subject to change once final plats are completed with addressing for Enumerations | 2/3/2022 7:31:01 AM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
2/2/2022 6:26:55 AM |
Street naming previously approved via separate correspondence. G. West |
2/2/2022 6:26:55 AM |
EDARP