View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCD Project Manager
8/3/2022 2:01:21 PM |
Please provide response letter as requested for the engineering review comments. | 8/3/2022 2:01:21 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
8/3/2022 11:40:21 AM |
The engineering documents have been forwarded for ECM Administrator approval. The following comment from the previous comment letters still needs a response. 1. Clarify whether the footings are to be constructed only on sandstone subgrade (and how the depth of the footings interacts with the depth of undisturbed sandstone). Please provide a formal response to these comments. a. Section 5.1.1 of the Subsurface Soil Investigation states that extensive subgrade improvements are anticipated and a maximum ultimate bearing pressure of 5,000 psf is recommended, but for undisturbed sandstone, the allowable bearing capacity is 5,800 psi. The footing design report states that Ultimate Bearing Resistance is 14,500, resulting in a factored bearing resistance of 8,700 psf. Please clarify. c. Address how the footings will tie in to undisturbed sandstone if it is higher or lower than the bottom of the footings. Note: Bridge material design life certifications will be required prior to acceptance. -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
8/3/2022 11:40:21 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
7/22/2022 3:54:15 PM |
Engineering Development Review has no comments on this item. Joel Dagnillo, P.E. Engineering Development Review City of Colorado Springs (719)385-5412 Joel.dagnillo@coloradosprings.gov |
7/22/2022 3:54:15 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
7/13/2022 12:28:53 PM |
Traffic Engineering has no comments on this item. Zaker Alazzeh, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager/Deputy City Traffic Engineer City of Colorado Springs (719) 385-5468 Zaker.Alazzeh@coloradosprings.gov |
7/13/2022 12:28:53 PM | |
|
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
7/12/2022 8:04:47 AM |
No additional comments from the October 7, 2021 letter. | 7/12/2022 8:04:47 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
7/11/2022 7:28:45 AM |
Please provide email response to Jeff Rice and copy Kari. Thank you. | 7/11/2022 7:28:45 AM | |
|
Traffic Review Consultant
7/8/2022 3:55:25 PM |
FHU has no additional comments on this project. Thanks. | 7/8/2022 3:55:25 PM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
7/8/2022 5:27:33 PM |
Review 5: EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
7/8/2022 5:27:33 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
7/7/2022 3:42:41 PM |
Nothing has changed since the prior review. Our earlier recommendation remains. ___________________________________________________ Corey Masoumi | Engineering Support Coordinator Utilities Development Services | Colorado Springs Utilities 1521 S Hancock Expy Colorado Springs, CO 80903 O: 719-668-1856 | Main: 719-668-8259 cmasoumi@csu.org | www.csu.org |
7/7/2022 3:42:41 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/7/2022 4:08:21 PM |
See comment letter (link at left) for reference. The following items need to be submitted for review: - Geotech/SSI comment response (this can be by email) - Detail on SE access road (separate email redline provided) The engineering documents have been forwarded for ECM Administrator approval, pending review of the SWMP checklist. Note: Bridge material design life certifications will be required prior to acceptance. -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
7/7/2022 4:08:21 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/3/2022 11:57:42 AM |
(Independent check redlined pages) | 6/3/2022 11:57:42 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/3/2022 11:57:06 AM |
(ESQCP redlines) | 6/3/2022 11:57:06 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/3/2022 11:55:24 AM |
(GEC redlines) | 6/3/2022 11:55:24 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/3/2022 11:55:01 AM |
(CD redlines summary) | 6/3/2022 11:55:01 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/3/2022 11:54:40 AM |
(CD redlines) | 6/3/2022 11:54:40 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/3/2022 11:54:11 AM |
(Bridge report redlines summary) | 6/3/2022 11:54:11 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/3/2022 11:53:50 AM |
(Bridge report redlines) | 6/3/2022 11:53:50 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/3/2022 11:56:37 AM |
See comment letter (link at left) for reference. The following items need to be revised and resubmitted for review: - Bridge design report - CDs - GEC Plan (one comment) - ESQCP The following items are required prior to approval of this project: - All Items highlighted in blue on the Engineering Final Submittal Checklist Bridge material design life certifications will be required prior to acceptance. -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
6/3/2022 11:56:37 AM |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
6/2/2022 2:44:38 PM |
Engineering Development Review has no comments on this item. Joel Dagnillo, P.E. Engineering Development Review City of Colorado Springs (719)385-5412 Joel.dagnillo@coloradosprings.gov |
6/2/2022 2:44:38 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
6/1/2022 4:08:25 PM |
Traffic Engineering has no comments on this item. Zaker Alazzeh, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager/Deputy City Traffic Engineer City of Colorado Springs (719) 385-5468 Zaker.Alazzeh@coloradosprings.gov |
6/1/2022 4:08:25 PM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
5/31/2022 3:51:57 PM |
Review 4: EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - SWMP. The latest SWMP was emailed to me on 5/26 for review to expedite the process since Kari was out of town. Please upload this latest SWMP to EDARP. - SWMP Checklist. Sign and date the last page and resubmit. EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
5/31/2022 3:51:57 PM | |
| View |
Traffic Review Consultant
5/18/2022 4:33:12 PM |
FHU has reviewed the updated documents for incorporation of our Review #2 comments. We have only one additional comment, which has been added to the Bluebeam session. We have also provided our back-check of the comment response form attached to this comment. There is not a need for another submittal. | 5/18/2022 4:33:12 PM |
|
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
5/12/2022 10:36:45 AM |
No additional comments | 5/12/2022 10:36:45 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
5/11/2022 7:19:15 AM |
Utilities Development Services has no comments. If you have any questions regarding CSU gas services, you may contact the CSU field engineering department at 719-668-4985. ____________________________________________________ Corey Masoumi | Engineering Support Coordinator Utilities Development Services | Colorado Springs Utilities 1521 S Hancock Expy Colorado Springs, CO 80903 O: 719-668-1856 | Main: 719-668-8259 cmasoumi@csu.org | www.csu.org |
5/11/2022 7:19:15 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2022 7:34:46 PM |
(GEC redlines summary) | 4/7/2022 7:34:46 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2022 7:34:09 PM |
(GEC redlines) | 4/7/2022 7:34:09 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2022 7:33:24 PM |
(CD redlines summary) | 4/7/2022 7:33:24 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2022 7:32:46 PM |
(CD redlines) | 4/7/2022 7:32:46 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2022 7:31:46 PM |
(Bridge Design Report redlines summary) | 4/7/2022 7:31:46 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2022 7:31:06 PM |
(Bridge Design Report redlines) | 4/7/2022 7:31:06 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2022 7:30:07 PM |
(FAE redlines) | 4/7/2022 7:30:07 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2022 7:29:33 PM |
(ESQCP redlines) | 4/7/2022 7:29:33 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2022 7:28:59 PM |
See comment letter (link at left) for reference. A comment matrix spreadsheet has been emailed separately. The following items need to be revised and resubmitted for review: - Bridge design report - CDs - GEC Plan - FAE - ESQCP - Geotechnical Report Addendum The following items are required prior to approval of this project: - Independent Design Check Calculations - All Items highlighted in blue on the Engineering Final Submittal Checklist Bridge material design life certifications will be required prior to acceptance. -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
4/7/2022 7:28:59 PM |
|
Traffic Review Consultant
3/30/2022 3:34:41 PM |
I will also be sending a follow up email with Excel comment resolution forms. There will be one file with our back-check of the Review 1 comments and a second file with our Review 2 comments. | 3/30/2022 3:34:41 PM | |
| View |
Traffic Review Consultant
3/30/2022 3:33:11 PM |
Please see attached PDF documents for comments on the Briargate Parkway Bridge Design Report. These comments have also been copied into the Bluebeam Session. | 3/30/2022 3:33:11 PM |
| View |
Traffic Review Consultant
3/30/2022 3:30:37 PM |
Please see attached PDF documents for comments on the Briargate Parkway Grading and Erosion Control Plans. These comments have also been copied into the Bluebeam Session. | 3/30/2022 3:30:37 PM |
| View |
Traffic Review Consultant
3/30/2022 3:27:51 PM |
Please see attached PDF documents for comments on the Briargate Parkway Construction Plans. These comments have also been copied into the Bluebeam Session. | 3/30/2022 3:27:51 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
3/28/2022 11:11:43 AM |
SWMP Checklist | 3/28/2022 11:11:43 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
3/28/2022 11:11:13 AM |
SWMP | 3/28/2022 11:11:13 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
3/28/2022 11:10:35 AM |
Review 3: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - SWMP - SWMP Checklist EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - ESQCP - PBMP Applicability Form Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
3/28/2022 11:10:35 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
3/14/2022 3:38:03 PM |
The proposed construction looks to be outside of the utility easement in the area. It appears like CS utilities is not the only utility in the area, however if the engineer of record or contractor believes there are additional CS utilities in the area, please notify us. If the intended work interfered with CS utilities' gas during construction, please call our gas field engineers at 719-668-7858. ____________________________________________ Corey Masoumi | Engineering Support Coordinator Colorado Springs Utilities | Utilities Development Services PHYSICAL: 1521 S Hancock Expressway, Colorado Springs, CO 80903 MAILING: PO BOX 1103, MC 1812, Colorado Springs, CO 80947-0010 Direct (719) 668-1856 | Main (719) 668-8259 www.csu.org • www.csu.org/Pages/BuildingDevelopment.aspx |
3/14/2022 3:38:03 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/28/2022 4:07:39 PM |
(ESQCP redlines) | 1/28/2022 4:07:39 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/28/2022 4:07:09 PM |
(FAE redlines) | 1/28/2022 4:07:09 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/28/2022 4:06:45 PM |
(Combined Geotech Report/SSI redlines summary) | 1/28/2022 4:06:45 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/28/2022 4:06:21 PM |
(Combined Geotech Report/SSI redlines) | 1/28/2022 4:06:21 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/28/2022 4:05:45 PM |
(Combined GEC redlines summary) | 1/28/2022 4:05:45 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/28/2022 4:05:08 PM |
(Combined GEC redlines) | 1/28/2022 4:05:08 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/28/2022 4:04:38 PM |
(Combined CD redlines summary) | 1/28/2022 4:04:38 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/28/2022 4:04:18 PM |
(Combined CD redlines) | 1/28/2022 4:04:18 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/28/2022 4:03:49 PM |
(Combined Bridge Report redlines summary) | 1/28/2022 4:03:49 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/28/2022 4:03:10 PM |
(Combined Bridge Report redlines) | 1/28/2022 4:03:10 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/28/2022 1:11:44 PM |
See comment letter (link at left) for reference. A comment matrix spreadsheet will be emailed separately. The following items need to be revised and resubmitted - Bridge design report - CDs - GEC Plan - FAE - ESQCP - Geotechnical Report / SSI - PBMP Applicability Form The following items are required prior to approval of this project: - Project Specifications (including site/channel work and Conspan) - Design Calculations - Independent Design Check Calculations Bridge material design life certifications will be required prior to acceptance. -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
1/28/2022 1:11:44 PM |
| View |
Traffic Review Consultant
1/28/2022 8:05:53 AM |
Comment Resolution matrix. Excel version to follow by e-mail. | 1/28/2022 8:05:53 AM |
| View |
Traffic Review Consultant
1/28/2022 8:02:41 AM |
SSI Comments | 1/28/2022 8:02:41 AM |
| View |
Traffic Review Consultant
1/28/2022 8:02:06 AM |
CD comments | 1/28/2022 8:02:06 AM |
| View |
Traffic Review Consultant
1/28/2022 8:01:23 AM |
Bridge Design Report comments | 1/28/2022 8:01:23 AM |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
1/26/2022 3:57:08 PM |
Engineering Development Review has no comments on this item. Joel Dagnillo, P.E. Engineering Development Review City of Colorado Springs (719)385-5412 Joel.dagnillo@coloradosprings.gov |
1/26/2022 3:57:08 PM | |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
1/25/2022 9:40:29 PM |
PBMP Applicability Form | 1/25/2022 9:40:29 PM |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
1/25/2022 1:48:26 PM |
The signing & striping plans are not provided for traffic review. Zaker Alazzeh, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager/Deputy City Traffic Engineer City of Colorado Springs (719) 385-5468 Zaker.Alazzeh@coloradosprings.gov |
1/25/2022 1:48:26 PM | |
|
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
1/25/2022 1:43:35 PM |
See comment letter dated October 7, 2021. No additional comments at this time. | 1/25/2022 1:43:35 PM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
1/25/2022 9:40:47 PM |
Review 2: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - ESQCP..................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - PBMP Applicability Form Please upload the following documents: - SWMP - SWMP Checklist EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - FAE - GEC Plan - GEC Checklist Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
1/25/2022 9:40:47 PM | |
|
CIG Colorado Interstate Gas
10/28/2021 12:01:04 PM |
Colorado Interstate Gas (CIG) does not have any comments on the Sand Creek Channel Bridge. This infrastructure is approximately 2,600 east of the CIG pipelines. CIG has two active 20" high pressure gas pressure pipelines. Magellan Pipelines runs parallel to CIG with a 6" high pressure gas pipeline. Both CIG and Magellan Pipelines will require an Encroachment Agreement(s) for this crossing. CIG has the following comments regarding the expansion of Briargate Parkway: 1. The depth of cover over the CIG pipeline shall not be reduced nor drainage altered without CIG’s written approval. 2. No parking, stockpiling of equipment or material is allowed on the CIG easement. 3. Construction of any permanent structure, building(s) or obstructions with CIG easement is not permitted, including fences. 4. AC Electrical lines must be installed in conduit and properly insulated with a 36” vertical clearance under CIG pipeline at a 90 degree angle only. Constant line elevation must be maintained across CIG’s entire right of way width. 5. Roads running parallel over the CIG pipeline are not allowed. 6. Road crossing are permitted at a 90 degree crossing only. Road crossings must be determined for safe crossing of heavy equipment by potholing of pipeline for true depth of the pipelines. A list of ALL heavy equipment crossing this location must be provided to CIG to complete load calculations before ANY heavy equipment can cross at determined location. An encroachment agreement must be signed before heavy equipment can cross. 7. CIG’s pipeline cannot be land locked by fencing. CIG needs 24/7 access in the event of a pipeline emergency. 8. No power poles, light standards, etc. shall be installed in CIG’s easement. 9. Heavy equipment will not be allowed to operate directly over the CIG pipelines or within easement. Heavy equipment shall be allowed to cross pipelines at locations approved by CIG. When inclement weather exists, provisions must be made to compensate for soil displacement due to subsidence of tires. 10. Contractor is required to follow all Colorado 811 State laws. 11. A CIG representative is required to be onsite anytime work is being conducted within 25’ of the CIG pipeline. |
10/28/2021 12:01:04 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/21/2021 2:04:27 PM |
(FAE redlines) | 10/21/2021 2:04:27 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/21/2021 2:03:50 PM |
(GEC redlines summary - response required) | 10/21/2021 2:03:50 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/21/2021 2:03:16 PM |
(GEC redlines) | 10/21/2021 2:03:16 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/21/2021 2:02:24 PM |
(CDR redlines summary - response required) | 10/21/2021 2:02:24 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/21/2021 2:01:45 PM |
(CDR redlines) | 10/21/2021 2:01:45 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/21/2021 2:00:53 PM |
(Drainage report redlines summary - response required) | 10/21/2021 2:00:53 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/21/2021 1:59:43 PM |
(Drainage report redlines) | 10/21/2021 1:59:43 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/21/2021 1:55:26 PM |
See comment letter (link at left) for reference. The following items need to be revised and resubmitted - LOI - Bridge design report - CDs - GEC Plan - FAE - PBMP Applicability Form (if this will be a standalone construction project) -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
10/21/2021 1:55:26 PM |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
10/11/2021 9:19:42 AM |
10/11/2021 9:19:42 AM | |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/6/2021 9:57:43 AM |
GEC Checklist V_1 | 10/6/2021 9:57:43 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
10/6/2021 9:57:23 AM |
Review 1: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - FAE.......................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Plan...............(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Checklist If it is determined that an separate ESQCP is needed for this bridge project, then the following documents will also need to be uploaded and reviewed: - ESQCP - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP - SWMP Checklist Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
10/6/2021 9:57:23 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
10/5/2021 2:43:16 PM |
In order for this section Briargate Pkwy. to better match the current Briargate Pkwy. when they connect in the future, recommend a 10' wide sidewalk on the south of the road and 8' wide sidewalk on the north of the road instead of the 6' sidewalks as shown. Joel Dagnillo, P.E. Engineering Development Review City of Colorado Springs (719)385-5412 Joel.dagnillo@coloradosprings.gov |
10/5/2021 2:43:16 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
9/30/2021 9:22:38 AM |
CSU does not usually review EPC "CDR" projects. Was there a specific reason it was sent to us? BML | 9/30/2021 9:22:38 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
9/28/2021 11:13:39 AM |
The signing & striping plans are not provided for traffic review. Brian Shevock Public Works/Traffic Engineering Traffic Engineer City of Colorado Springs brian.shevock@coloradosprings.gov (719) 385-7620 |
9/28/2021 11:13:39 AM |
EDARP