View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| View |
County Attorney - Development Review
3/29/2022 3:39:33 PM |
1. County Attorney Office's signature on SIA is attached. 2. All requirements in paragraph 8 of the DMA have been satisfied. |
3/29/2022 3:39:33 PM |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
3/3/2022 1:01:21 PM |
The proposed covenants comply with paragraphs 8.b. and 8.c. of the Detention Maintenance Agreement. I still do not find in the submittal documents a copy of meeting minutes or other evidence that the HOA has approved the Agreement. Please provide. | 3/3/2022 1:01:21 PM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
2/3/2022 10:29:21 AM |
Review 3: EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - CD - Drainage Report EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
2/3/2022 10:29:21 AM | |
|
Black Forest Fire Protection District
2/1/2022 3:16:46 PM |
No comments at this time. | 2/1/2022 3:16:46 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
2/1/2022 1:36:43 PM |
Planning Division has no further comments at this time. | 2/1/2022 1:36:43 PM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
2/1/2022 1:11:53 PM |
The following comments from 10/11/21 has not been addressed: Applicant has submitted most of the documentation required by paragraph 8.a. of the Agreement. Please provide a copy of meeting minutes or other evidence that the HOA has approved the Agreement. Please amend the draft covenants to comply with paragraphs 8.b. and 8.c. of the Agreement. |
2/1/2022 1:11:53 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
1/31/2022 5:29:57 PM |
All PCD Engineering comments have been resolved. The project manager will upload any approved documents. Reviewed by: Lupe Packman Review Engineer lupepackman@elpasoco.com |
1/31/2022 5:29:57 PM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
1/20/2022 12:14:10 PM |
1/20/2022 12:14:10 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
12/7/2021 9:45:16 AM |
All engineering comments have been resolved. Please submit documents with appropriate stamps/signatures once PCD Engineering comments and EPC Stormwater comments have been fully resolved: -Traffic study -Drainage report -Construction drawings -Financial assurance form If you have any questions please feel free to contact Lupe Packman at 719-313-6215. EPC Stormwater comments have been uploaded with this comment. Reviewed by: Lupe Packman Review Engineer lupepackman@elpasoco.com |
12/7/2021 9:45:16 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/7/2021 9:44:30 AM |
Drainage report-Stormwater comments | 12/7/2021 9:44:30 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/7/2021 9:44:03 AM |
Construction Drawings Redlines-Stormwater Comments | 12/7/2021 9:44:03 AM |
| View |
County Attorney - Development Review
12/3/2021 8:38:19 PM |
Attached is a clean version of the DMA. Please update the exhibits: Ex. A should be a legal description of the entire subdivision, and Ex. B should be the legal description of the lots and tracts on which the detention basin and rain gardens will lie. Please also address the additional outstanding comments regarding the covenants and the HOA minutes in the previous from the previous referral response. |
12/3/2021 8:38:19 PM |
| View |
County Attorney - Development Review
12/3/2021 8:35:13 PM |
Attached is a clean version of the SIA. | 12/3/2021 8:35:13 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
12/3/2021 1:38:59 PM |
PCD Planning Division has no further comments on the plat drawing. | 12/3/2021 1:38:59 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
12/3/2021 1:35:55 PM |
PCD Planning comments on the letter of intent were not addressed. Please reference comments on review #1 and provide corrections accordingly. | 12/3/2021 1:35:55 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
12/3/2021 1:24:29 PM |
Same comment applied to the neighbor notification. Please provide the second half of notices. Twelve owners are identified and only six of the certified return receipts are provided and duplicated. It appears that they may have been scanned in and the second page of return receipts never made it into the document while the first page was duplicated. The same document was submitted for the second submittal and half the notices were not received. | 12/3/2021 1:24:29 PM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
12/2/2021 1:22:54 PM |
Review 2: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - CD.........................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - Drainage Report...(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - ESQCP - Detention Maintenance Agreement - GEC Checklist - MS4 Post Construction Form - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP Checklist - SWMP Please sign and resubmit the following docs: - ESQCP & GEC Plan Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
12/2/2021 1:22:54 PM | |
|
Black Forest Fire Protection District
11/19/2021 9:46:28 AM |
Black Forest Fire I do not see in the final Plat the firefighting water cistern in the first turn out as discussed previously. This would be a requirement according to LDC. |
11/19/2021 9:46:28 AM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
11/17/2021 1:59:26 PM |
11/17/2021 1:59:26 PM | |
|
Black Forest Fire Protection District
10/26/2021 9:45:03 AM |
Black Forest Fire Rescue has no further comments at this time. | 10/26/2021 9:45:03 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
10/25/2021 3:35:38 PM |
These favorable comments are still applicable | 10/25/2021 3:35:38 PM |
| View |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
10/22/2021 1:22:35 PM |
10/22/2021 1:22:35 PM | |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
10/22/2021 11:53:34 AM |
See PAB endorsed version attached. Greg |
10/22/2021 11:53:34 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/13/2021 1:07:13 PM |
PCD Engineering - traffic impact study comments | 10/13/2021 1:07:13 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/13/2021 1:06:53 PM |
PCD Planning - letter of intent comments | 10/13/2021 1:06:53 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/13/2021 1:06:31 PM |
PCD Engineering - grading & erosion control plan comments | 10/13/2021 1:06:31 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/13/2021 1:05:58 PM |
PCD Engineering - financial assurance form comment | 10/13/2021 1:05:58 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/13/2021 1:05:38 PM |
PCD Planning and PCD Engineering - plat comments | 10/13/2021 1:05:38 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/13/2021 1:05:19 PM |
EPC Stormwater - ESQCP comments | 10/13/2021 1:05:19 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/13/2021 1:05:00 PM |
PCD Engineering and EPC Stormwater - drainage report comments | 10/13/2021 1:05:00 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/13/2021 1:04:10 PM |
PCD Engineering and EPC Stormwater - construction drawing comments | 10/13/2021 1:04:10 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/13/2021 1:03:49 PM |
PCD Planning - application comments | 10/13/2021 1:03:49 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/13/2021 1:03:32 PM |
PCD Planning - adjacent property owner notification comments | 10/13/2021 1:03:32 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
10/13/2021 12:50:45 PM |
The project manager will upload comments. Please address comments on the following documents: -Drainage report -Financial Assurance Estimate -Construction Drawings -Final Plat -Grading and Erosion Control Plan -Traffic Impact Study Note to planner: please close the submittal slot for grading and erosion control plan. Reviewed by: Lupe Packman Review Engineer lupepackman@elpasoco.com |
10/13/2021 12:50:45 PM | |
| View |
County Attorney - Development Review
10/11/2021 8:47:32 PM |
Comments and proposed changes to Detention Maintenance Agreement attached. Applicant has submitted most of the documentation required by paragraph 8.a. of the Agreement. Please provide a copy of meeting minutes or other evidence that the HOA has approved the Agreement. Please amend the draft covenants to comply with paragraphs 8.b. and 8.c. of the Agreement. |
10/11/2021 8:47:32 PM |
| View |
County Attorney - Development Review
10/11/2021 8:45:14 PM |
Proposed changes to SIA attached. | 10/11/2021 8:45:14 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/7/2021 9:36:19 AM |
SWMP_V1 | 10/7/2021 9:36:19 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/7/2021 9:35:20 AM |
SWMP Checklist _V1 | 10/7/2021 9:35:20 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/7/2021 9:35:02 AM |
PBMP Applicability Form_V1 | 10/7/2021 9:35:02 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/7/2021 9:34:39 AM |
MS4 Post Construction Form_V1 | 10/7/2021 9:34:39 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/7/2021 9:34:23 AM |
GEC Checklist_V1 | 10/7/2021 9:34:23 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/7/2021 9:34:01 AM |
Detention Maintenance Agreement_V1 | 10/7/2021 9:34:01 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
10/7/2021 9:33:29 AM |
Review 1: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - CD.........................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - Drainage Report...(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - ESQCP...................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - Detention Maintenance Agreement - GEC Checklist - MS4 Post Construction Form - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP Checklist - SWMP - Note: GEC Plan comments made in CD's. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
10/7/2021 9:33:29 AM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
10/4/2021 3:44:28 PM |
1. Same comments from my review in May: Here is the link to change the address to proposed lot 1, which has an existing home. https://www.pprbd.org/File/Resources/Downloads/Addressing/SECONDARY_ADDRESS_REQUEST_FORM.pdf 2. Once the development plan is approved contact Enumerations to get the project placed on a list to be addressed. 3. Standard Final Plat Comments: A. Enumerations will review the mylar prior to plat for address placement, street names, and title block. B. A $10.00 per lot and tract platting fee will be due at the time of the review of the mylar, (two addresses per lot and tract). If an address is not needed on a tract then no fee applies. Check should be made out to PIKES PEAK REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT or PPRBD. Paid directly to the Enumerations Department. An additional over the phone transaction fee of $3.50 will apply for any credit card payment. C. A copy of the final recorded plat is required prior to plan submittal for RESIDENTIAL. Amy@pprbd.org; (Please email the Enumerations staff that reviewed your project). *New standard comment*: All mylar reviews will be reviewed via “pdf”. The mylar will be stamped by Enumerations for accuracy and returned to the applicant and the planner. All payments to be mailed to RBD via a check or credit card payment over the phone. Plats should not be recorded prior to Enumerations receiving payment. If you would like an in person review, you will have to make an appointment on our website. |
10/4/2021 3:44:28 PM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
9/29/2021 11:38:27 AM |
With this referral, we received a request to provide Review Comments (Email dated September 13, 2021); a copy of the Application Form (signed August 5, 2021); and Final Plat (LWA Land Surveying, Inc., June 29, 2021). The updated soils and geology report (Cornell Engineering, June 15, 2020) was provided with the original submittal on September 10, 2020. The Colorado Geological Survey (CGS) previously reviewed this submittal and presented our comments on October 1, 2020, and February 15, 2005 (CGS Review No. EP-05-0039). CGS has no objection to approval of the final plat. We offer the following comments and recommendations (some of which are repeated from our previous correspondence). As noted in Cornell Engineering’s report (page 2), “Increased surface flows, particularly along the north rim of Burgess Creek drainage basin flowing into the channel below where slopes are much steeper, can be expected,” and “avoidance of areas of increased erosion potential (i.e. along steep slopes or below steep slopes) is highly recommended.” Lots 6 through 9 (Final Plat, LWA Land Surveying, June 29, 2021) are located north of Burgess Creek and are associated with steeper slopes. CGS recommends that erosional setbacks associated with Burgess Creek be evaluated and, if necessary, included in the drainage plans. Proposed structures should be located outside these setback limits. CGS agrees with Cornell Engineering “An erosion control plan for the site and re-vegetation of disturbed areas are also highly recommended.” Additionally, CGS recommends: 1. Site-specific geotechnical investigations must be performed for each lot once the building locations have been identified. These investigations should consist of drilling, sampling, lab testing, and analysis to characterize soil and bedrock engineering properties such as density, strength, water content, and swell/consolidation potential; identify potentially moisture-sensitive (expansive and collapsible) soils and expansive claystone bedrock; determine depths to groundwater and bedrock; verify the feasibility of a full-depth basement, if planned; and provide earthwork, foundation, floor system, surface and subsurface drainage, and pavement recommendations for design purposes. 2. Site-specific septic investigations, including percolation testing, should be performed prior to building to determine design parameters and whether engineered systems are needed. Septic locations should remain out of drainage swales. 3. Minimal ground disturbance and best management practices during construction should take place to minimize erosion. Prompt reseeding should follow construction to re-establish ground cover and reduce noxious weed growth. 4. Building sites should be located in areas where building and septic footprints will not encroach on the natural drainage swales or drainage easements. Submitted 9/29/2021 by Amy Crandall, Colorado Geological Survey: acrandall@mines.edu |
9/29/2021 11:38:27 AM | |
|
Colorado State Forest Service
9/24/2021 8:46:46 AM |
The primary wildland fuel type for this proposal is grassland with scattered trees having a low wildfire hazard potential. No special fire mitigation plans or other actions are necessary for final approval by the Colorado State Forest Service. | 9/24/2021 8:46:46 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Parks and Wildlife
9/23/2021 1:11:23 PM |
9/23/2021 1:11:23 PM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
9/20/2021 1:30:00 PM |
9/20/2021 1:30:00 PM | |
|
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
9/20/2021 9:35:54 AM |
Mountain View Electric Association has no objections to the current plan. | 9/20/2021 9:35:54 AM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
9/16/2021 1:29:21 PM |
See preliminary Parks comments attached. Greg |
9/16/2021 1:29:21 PM |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
9/15/2021 8:44:06 AM |
Street name previously approved. No action for E911. Thank you Justin |
9/15/2021 8:44:06 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Water
9/14/2021 9:49:33 AM |
County Attorney provided water sufficiency on June 8, 2021 at preliminary plan (PUDSP-20-6) so no further review appears necessary. Note: Requirement I of County Attorney letter dated June 8th requires the following: I. Prior to recording the final plat, Applicant shall upload to eDARP a current Water Resources Report that meets the requirements of Section 8.4.7 (B) of the Land Development Code. Applicant shall also upload to eDARP a corrected Letter of Intent which reflects the water demand of 8.4 acre-feet instead of 9.9 acre-feet as currently indicated. This requirement is not yet completed. Thank you. |
9/14/2021 9:49:33 AM | |
|
Academy SD 20 Building Fund
9/14/2021 8:56:33 AM |
Academy District 20 is in receipt of File# SF2131 for approval of the Eagle Forest Filing 1 Final Plat. The District is requesting fess in lieu of land dedication per the existing El Paso County Code for all residential units in this development. If you need additional information, please contact me. Don Smith Planning Consultant |
9/14/2021 8:56:33 AM |
EDARP