View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCD Project Manager
10/11/2022 3:34:42 PM |
No planning comment. Item was approved by the BOCC with a water finding of sufficiency water quality, quantity and dependability. Plats within this filing should be administratively approved. Please obtain the PID resolution for the plats. | 10/11/2022 3:34:42 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
10/3/2022 4:45:02 PM |
The revised Grading and Erosion Control Plan (addition of Sheet 8) has been approved and will be uploaded to EDARP. -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
10/3/2022 4:45:02 PM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
9/22/2022 4:59:40 PM |
EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - GEC Plan EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
9/22/2022 4:59:40 PM | |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
9/6/2022 5:21:04 PM |
- GEC Plan | 9/6/2022 5:21:04 PM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
9/6/2022 5:20:41 PM |
Review 6: EPC Comments have been provided on the following uploaded document (orange = stormwater, blue = PCD): - GEC Plan Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
9/6/2022 5:20:41 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
9/6/2022 1:35:56 PM |
Redlines to sheet 8 of the GEC Plan will be uploaded when complete. -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
9/6/2022 1:35:56 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
5/16/2022 3:58:23 PM |
The engineering documents have been approved/accepted and will be uploaded to EDARP. -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
5/16/2022 3:58:23 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/27/2022 10:24:05 AM |
See comment letter (link to left) and redlines. The Preliminary Plan needs revisions on sheet 4 per comment letter. The following items need to be signed and submitted: - GEC Checklist - SWMP Checklist - Pre-development Site Grading Form -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
4/27/2022 10:24:05 AM |
| View |
EPC Health Department
4/23/2022 4:29:21 PM |
4/23/2022 4:29:21 PM | |
| View |
County Attorney - Water
4/15/2022 8:46:50 AM |
Water review as attached. Please note Requirements on page 3. Thank you. | 4/15/2022 8:46:50 AM |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
4/14/2022 9:57:15 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #4 - Please See Attached Documents (Originally PAB Endorsed 01/13/2021) | 4/14/2022 9:57:15 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/11/2022 12:44:38 PM |
NEW PARCEL NUMBERS FOR 2021 ARE (LEFTOVER 52330-00-015 & 017) *** 014 is no longer a valid parcel; please check parcels and change LOI and prelim to include 017 & 030. | 4/11/2022 12:44:38 PM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
3/31/2022 8:20:22 AM |
Review 6: EPC Stormwater still has no further comments at this time. Thanks. | 3/31/2022 8:20:22 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
3/30/2022 3:01:10 PM |
3/30/2022 3:01:10 PM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
3/17/2022 2:16:02 PM |
Review 5: EPC Stormwater still has no further comments at this time. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
3/17/2022 2:16:02 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
3/17/2022 1:59:33 PM |
(Utility CDs redlined sheet) | 3/17/2022 1:59:33 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
3/17/2022 1:58:44 PM |
(GEC redlined sheet) | 3/17/2022 1:58:44 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
3/17/2022 1:58:10 PM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 3/17/2022 1:58:10 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
3/17/2022 1:57:46 PM |
(PDR redlines) | 3/17/2022 1:57:46 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
3/17/2022 1:57:04 PM |
(Preliminary Plan redlines summary) | 3/17/2022 1:57:04 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
3/17/2022 1:56:42 PM |
(Preliminary Plan redlines) | 3/17/2022 1:56:42 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
3/17/2022 1:56:05 PM |
See comment letter (link to left) and redlines. The following items need to be revised and resubmitted: - PDR - Preliminary Plan - GEC Plan sheet - Utility Plan sheet - Other items highlighted in blue on the Engineering checklist need to be provided when available, with signatures where applicable. -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
3/17/2022 1:56:05 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
3/17/2022 12:31:15 PM |
The note provided on the preliminary plan addresses the CGS comments thank you. No further Planning Comments. | 3/17/2022 12:31:15 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
3/17/2022 12:30:28 PM |
Planning is awaiting a water finding to schedule item for PC and BOCC. | 3/17/2022 12:30:28 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
3/16/2022 1:36:58 PM |
Engineering Development Review has no comments on this item. Joel Dagnillo, P.E. Engineering Development Review City of Colorado Springs (719)385-5412 Joel.dagnillo@coloradosprings.gov |
3/16/2022 1:36:58 PM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
3/16/2022 9:56:03 AM |
Entech Engineering’s report (Entech Job No. 201421; July 22, 2020) identified uncontrolled artificial fill, frost heave, potentially unstable slopes adjacent to Sand Creek, expansive soils and claystone bedrock, flooding along Sand Creek, and potentially seasonal shallow groundwater areas as geologic hazards and constraints impacting the proposed development. As stated in our previous comments (August 25, 2021), Entech provides a good description of the site’s subsurface conditions based on eight test borings and laboratory testing results and makes appropriate recommendations for mitigation of these hazards. Additionally, sheet 25 of the revised Preliminary Plan (N.E.S. Inc., February 15, 2022) states, “Potentially unstable slopes will be mitigated with regrading to slopes no greater than 4:1 and use of retaining walls per the recommendations of the soils report. This will be addressed with final design.” CGS’s August 25, 2021 review comments for this project remain valid and are generally repeated below. Seasonal Shallow Groundwater: Entech identifies potentially seasonal shallow groundwater areas in Figure 7 of their July 22, 2020 report. Groundwater levels ranged from 8.5 feet to 18.5 feet below ground surface in four borings mainly found along drainage swales and Sand Creek. Groundwater was encountered in Entech’s previous study (Appendix D: Entech Job No. 82556) at depths of 8 and 11 feet below existing grades. Seasonal shallow groundwater is common in eastern El Paso County. Groundwater levels can rise following construction and irrigation. The feasibility of basements due to potentially seasonal shallow groundwater and perched groundwater on shallow bedrock is not discussed in Entech’s report, and it is unknown if basements are planned. If basements are planned, CGS recommends the county require a groundwater monitoring/observation program prior to the preliminary plan’s approval to determine if basements are feasible and if an underdrain system could be employed for this site. To be effective, however, this monitoring should include measurements/observations through fall, winter, and spring and not merely during site-specific building investigations. Proposed floor levels should be at least three feet (preferably five feet) above maximum anticipated groundwater levels and maintained year-round. CGS recommends no below-grade construction in areas with seasonal shallow groundwater levels within three feet of proposed floor levels. If basements are not being considered for this development, a note indicating such should be included on the plans, and the above comments may not be applicable. Entech recommends subsurface perimeter drains where high subsurface moisture conditions are anticipated, a practice we believe is prudent. According to the geologic hazard disclosure statement on sheets 1 and 25 of the preliminary plan, “In Areas of High Groundwater: Due to high groundwater in the area, all foundations shall incorporate an underground drainage system. Under drains to be maintained by the District.” CGS recommends the underground drainage system and maintenance requirements are shown in the plans, and the “District” understands the maintenance requirements throughout the life of the development. The underground drainage system must gravity discharge to a daylight outfall. Please note that individual foundation perimeter drains are intended to handle small amounts of intermittent, perched water and may NOT be used as sole mitigation of persistent shallow groundwater conditions. Comments uploaded to El Paso County Development Application Review on March 16, 2022 by Amy Crandall, P.E., Colorado Geological Survey, acrandall@mines.edu. |
3/16/2022 9:56:03 AM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
3/15/2022 3:22:00 PM |
1. Enumerations will need to see phase 2, to see how Perry Owns Drive will extend for this filing No 1 for addressing accuracy. Also, Phase 2 will be needed to see how to address Aspen Valley Road north that will connect to the existing Retreat at Timberridge Fil No. 1. 2. I am not certain that Robert Allison Circle should be a Circle suffix. Contact El Paso-Teller County 9-1-1 Authority for clarification. Also, I am not finding Jane Kirkham Drive as a reserved street name from the prior reserved list of street names from E-9-1-1 Authority. I will need an email from this department clarifying this information. 3. Standard Preim. Comments apply: Provide a 100 scale copy or larger of the entire APPROVED development plan (D.P./Prelim.Plan) to this department so that addressing can be assigned. Once received, the development plan will be placed on a list to be addressed. Development plans that are not yet approved may be addressed, however additional plan review fees will accrue if changes are made to the D.P. after initial addressing. Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org W: 719-327-2953 |
3/15/2022 3:22:00 PM | |
|
Colorado State Forest Service
3/15/2022 12:36:22 PM |
The primary wildland fuel type for this proposal is grassland with scattered trees having a low wildfire hazard potential. No special fire mitigation plans or other actions are necessary for final approval by the Colorado State Forest Service. | 3/15/2022 12:36:22 PM | |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
3/15/2022 12:20:16 PM |
See attached comments | 3/15/2022 12:20:16 PM |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
3/11/2022 3:34:23 PM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #4 - Please See Attached Documents (Originally PAB Endorsed 01/13/2021) | 3/11/2022 3:34:23 PM |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
3/3/2022 2:17:04 PM |
Traffic Engineering has no comments on this item. Zaker Alazzeh, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager/Deputy City Traffic Engineer City of Colorado Springs (719) 385-5468 Zaker.Alazzeh@coloradosprings.gov |
3/3/2022 2:17:04 PM | |
|
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
3/1/2022 1:55:01 PM |
The Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD does not have any comments at this time but respectfully reserves the right to comment on future submittals. | 3/1/2022 1:55:01 PM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
2/28/2022 11:50:27 AM |
2/28/2022 11:50:27 AM | |
|
Academy SD 20 Building Fund
2/28/2022 7:19:07 AM |
Academy School District 20 is in receipt of File# SP208 for approval of the Homestead North Preliminary Plan. The District is requesting land dedication in lieu of fees per the existing El Paso County Code for all residential units in the Sterling Ranch Sketch Plan that are located within the boundaries of District 20. One specific item that the District OPPOSES is found on Page 3 of the Letter Of Intent for the Homestead North Preliminary Plan. The letter states in part ".....the 11.53 acres identified and the proposed location northwest of Sterling Ranch Road and Dines Boulevard is acceptable." Discussion have been held with representatives of Sterling Ranch noting that this site is NOT ACCEPTABLE to the District due to the high pressure gas line that runs through the center of the site. Discussions have been held with Jim Morley regarding the relocation of this site and are ongoing with Classic Homes as the District has been told that Classic is now developing everything east of Cottonwood Creek. The District and Classic Homes are discussing the final details for relocating the site to the southeast of Sterling Ranch Road and Dines Boulevard (a portion of Sterling Ranch Sketch Plan Parcel 16). As soon as the details regarding this site are finalized, the District will notify the appropriate El Paso County representatives of the acceptable change. If you need additional information, please contact me. Don Smith Planning Consultant |
2/28/2022 7:19:07 AM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
2/24/2022 7:57:10 AM |
2/24/2022 7:57:10 AM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
2/24/2022 7:53:01 AM |
2/24/2022 7:53:01 AM | |
|
Black Forest Land Use Committee
2/23/2022 11:50:25 AM |
The Black Forest Land Use Committee has no comments or inputs to this project. | 2/23/2022 11:50:25 AM | |
|
Colorado Parks and Wildlife
2/23/2022 11:49:59 AM |
Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) has reviewed the plans for the Homestead North Preliminary Plan in El Paso County. Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) is in receipt of the above referenced permit application and is familiar with the site. CPW has commented on this plan previously and also commented on the entire Sterling Ranch project site. Other than the previous comments, CPW anticipates that the impacts to the wildlife resource from this project would be negligible. We appreciate being given the opportunity to comment. Please feel free to contact District Wildlife Manager, Aaron Berscheid, should you have any questions or require additional information at 719-439-9601 or via email at aaron.berscheid@state.co.us |
2/23/2022 11:49:59 AM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
2/23/2022 11:06:41 AM |
per construction notes NO EARLY GRADING IS TO OCCUR WITH IN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN. | 2/23/2022 11:06:41 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/12/2021 8:41:27 PM |
(FAE redlines) | 12/12/2021 8:41:27 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/12/2021 8:40:54 PM |
(MS4 form redlines) | 12/12/2021 8:40:54 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/12/2021 8:40:20 PM |
(GEC redlines summary) | 12/12/2021 8:40:20 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/12/2021 8:39:52 PM |
(GEC redlines) | 12/12/2021 8:39:52 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/12/2021 8:39:07 PM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 12/12/2021 8:39:07 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/12/2021 8:38:36 PM |
(PDR redlines) | 12/12/2021 8:38:36 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/12/2021 8:38:00 PM |
(TIS redlines summary) | 12/12/2021 8:38:00 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/12/2021 8:37:37 PM |
(TIS redlines) | 12/12/2021 8:37:37 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/12/2021 8:37:04 PM |
(Preliminary Plan redlines summary) | 12/12/2021 8:37:04 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/12/2021 8:36:32 PM |
(Preliminary Plan redlines) | 12/12/2021 8:36:32 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/12/2021 8:35:48 PM |
See comment letter (link to left) and redlines. The following items need to be revised and resubmitted: - PDR - Preliminary Plan - TIS - GEC Plan - Deviation request for intersection spacing, signed and PE-stamped - 2 FAEs - Signed ESQCP - MS4 forms - Other items highlighted in blue on the Engineering checklist need to be provided when available, with signatures where applicable. -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
12/12/2021 8:35:48 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
12/6/2021 10:11:27 AM |
Engineering comments will be forth coming. | 12/6/2021 10:11:27 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
12/6/2021 10:07:19 AM |
Please work with Lori to complete water review for a finding of sufficiency. | 12/6/2021 10:07:19 AM | |
| View |
US Fish Wildlife, Ecological Svcs. (USDOI, Fish & Wildlife Svc.)
12/3/2021 12:37:00 PM |
12/3/2021 12:37:00 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
11/24/2021 8:48:47 AM |
Engineering Development Review has no comments on this item. Joel Dagnillo, P.E. Engineer III Engineering Development Review City of Colorado Springs (719)385-5412 Joel.dagnillo@coloradosprings.gov |
11/24/2021 8:48:47 AM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
11/22/2021 3:11:06 PM |
Review 4: EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - Drainage Report - GEC Plan EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
11/22/2021 3:11:06 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
11/18/2021 5:54:32 AM |
Traffic Engineering has no comments on this item. Zaker Alazzeh, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager City of Colorado Springs (719) 385-5468 Zaker.Alazzeh@coloradosprings.gov |
11/18/2021 5:54:32 AM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
11/3/2021 7:46:45 AM |
Work in the floodway will require a no rise or CLOMR. Any change in water surface elevation up or down in excess of 0.3ft will trigger a post project LOMR. |
11/3/2021 7:46:45 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Water
11/3/2021 7:41:09 AM |
County Attorney's Office comments of 9/7/21 remain unaddressed. We will proceed with water review following receipt of SEO findings. | 11/3/2021 7:41:09 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/13/2021 11:45:49 AM |
(Deviation request redlines) | 9/13/2021 11:45:49 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/13/2021 11:45:13 AM |
(GEC redlines summary) | 9/13/2021 11:45:13 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/13/2021 11:44:50 AM |
(GEC redlines) | 9/13/2021 11:44:50 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/13/2021 11:44:15 AM |
(TIS redlines summary) | 9/13/2021 11:44:15 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/13/2021 11:43:45 AM |
(TIS redlines) | 9/13/2021 11:43:45 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/13/2021 11:43:22 AM |
(Preliminary Plan redlines summary) | 9/13/2021 11:43:22 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/13/2021 11:42:45 AM |
(Preliminary Plan redlines) | 9/13/2021 11:42:45 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/13/2021 11:42:03 AM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 9/13/2021 11:42:03 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/13/2021 11:41:33 AM |
(PDR redlines) | 9/13/2021 11:41:33 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/13/2021 11:40:50 AM |
See comment letter (link to left) and redlines. The following items need to be revised and resubmitted: - PDR - Preliminary Plan - TIS - GEC Plan - 2 deviation requests - 2 FAEs (one for grading east of the Sand Creek channel) - Other items highlighted in blue on the Engineering checklist, with signatures -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
9/13/2021 11:40:50 AM |
|
County Attorney - Water
9/7/2021 12:45:26 PM |
The SEO stated in its letter dated 12/22/20 that it was offering only a preliminary opinion and that its final opinion would not be issued until the pending court decree has been signed and the water supply plan has been resubmitted for review. A final opinion from the SEO must be provided for the County Attorney’s office to begin its water review. | 9/7/2021 12:45:26 PM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
9/5/2021 1:06:52 PM |
9/5/2021 1:06:52 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2021 8:39:07 AM |
Engineering comments are forthcoming. Staff has asked CAO to clarify water comments in EDARP. PCD staff has not received a finding from CAO for water as indicated by applicant's comment. | 9/3/2021 8:39:07 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2021 8:37:55 AM |
Planning only comments | 9/3/2021 8:37:55 AM |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
8/31/2021 11:56:57 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #3 - Please See Attached Documents and Additional Comments - Originally PAB Endorsed January 13, 2021) | 8/31/2021 11:56:57 AM |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
8/31/2021 11:55:29 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #3 - Please See Attached Documents and Additional Comments - Originally PAB Endorsed January 13, 2021) | 8/31/2021 11:55:29 AM |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
8/27/2021 10:30:16 AM |
Engineering Development Review has no comments on this item. Joel Dagnillo, P.E. Engineering Development Review City of Colorado Springs (719)385-5412 Joel.dagnillo@coloradosprings.gov |
8/27/2021 10:30:16 AM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
8/26/2021 8:20:32 AM |
8/26/2021 8:20:32 AM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
8/25/2021 2:30:03 PM |
8/25/2021 2:30:03 PM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
8/25/2021 1:10:05 PM |
Colorado Geological Survey review of the resubmittal for Homestead North Phase 1 Preliminary Plan SP208 (Amy Crandall, P.E., acrandall@mines.edu): With the resubmittal documents, we received the revised Preliminary Plan (N.E.S. Inc., August 2, 2021) and the Grading and Erosion Control Plan (J.R. Engineering, June 30, 2021). An updated soil and geology report addressing our previous correspondence or the proposed infrastructure plans (Briargate Parkway and Sterling Ranch Road to include channel crossings) was not provided with the recent referral documents. Entech Engineering’s report (Entech Job No. 201421; July 22, 2020) identified uncontrolled artificial fill, frost heave, potentially unstable slopes adjacent to Sand Creek, expansive soils and claystone bedrock, flooding along Sand Creek, and potentially seasonal shallow groundwater areas as geologic hazards and constraints impacting the proposed development. As stated in our previous comments (April 7, 2021), Entech provides a good description of the site’s subsurface conditions based on eight test borings and laboratory testing results and makes appropriate recommendations for mitigation of these hazards. We offer the following comments and recommendations: Seasonal Shallow Groundwater: Entech identifies potentially seasonal shallow groundwater areas in Figure 7 of their July 22, 2020 report. Groundwater levels ranged from 8.5 feet to 18.5 feet below ground surface in four borings mainly found along drainage swales and Sand Creek. Groundwater was encountered in Entech’s previous study (Appendix D: Entech Job No. 82556) at depths of 8 and 11 feet below existing grades. Seasonal shallow groundwater is common in eastern El Paso County. Groundwater levels can rise following construction and irrigation. The feasibility of basements due to potentially seasonal shallow groundwater and perched groundwater on shallow bedrock is not discussed in Entech’s report, and it is unknown if basements are planned. Proposed floor levels should be at least three feet (preferably five feet) above maximum anticipated groundwater levels and maintained year-round. A groundwater monitoring/observation program should be performed if basements are planned. CGS recommends no below-grade construction in areas with seasonal shallow groundwater levels within three feet of proposed floor levels. Entech recommends (page 11) subsurface perimeter drains where high subsurface moisture conditions are anticipated, a practice we believe is prudent. Individual foundation perimeter drains are needed around any below-grade (basement) space. According to the geologic hazard disclosure statement on sheets 1 and 25 of the preliminary plan, “In Areas of High Groundwater: Due to high groundwater in the area, all foundations shall incorporate an underground drainage system. Under drains to be maintained by the District.” CGS recommends the underground drainage system and maintenance requirements are shown in the plans, and the “District” understands the maintenance requirements throughout the life of the development. The underground drainage system must gravity discharge to a daylight outfall. Please note that individual foundation perimeter drains are intended to handle small amounts of intermittent, perched water and may NOT be used as sole mitigation of persistent shallow groundwater conditions. Expansive Soil and Bedrock: Entech states that moderate to highly expansive soil underlies parts of the site. Entech recommends two different mitigation options that include overexcavation of expansive soil or the use of drilled pier foundations. According to the geologic hazard disclosure statement on sheets 1 and 25 of the preliminary plan (N.E.S, Inc., Revised June 2, 2021), “In Areas of Expansive Soils: Incorporate special foundation design.” Therefore, the applicant should evaluate and discuss what mitigation option will be performed for expansive soil before final plans are approved. In summary, the site does not appear to contain any hazards that will prevent development. However, the site does have geologic hazards and constraints that the developer will need to mitigate adequately. The county should consider the recommendations outlined above and in our previous correspondence. As noted on page 16 of Entech’s July 22, 2020 report, “Specific recommendations should be made after additional investigation prior to construction.” Therefore, the county should require site-specific investigations for each lot and the channel crossings. |
8/25/2021 1:10:05 PM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
8/25/2021 11:34:18 AM |
1. Willey Picket Drive street name was accepted not Willie Picket Drive, as shown on the preliminary plan. 2. Enumerations will need to see the future development extending north from Perry Owens Dr. & Aspen Valley Rd, to complete the addressing on these streets correctly for the future. 3. • For assignment of addressing for lots and tracts, place addressing marker (xxx) where they are intended to be utilized. Addressing marker for lots should be front door. • Provide a 100 scale copy or larger of the entire APPROVED development plan (d.p.) to this department so that addressing can be assigned. Once received, the development plan will be placed on a list to be addressed. Development plans that are not yet approved may be addressed, however additional plan review fees will accrue if changes are made to the D.P. after initial addressing. Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org |
8/25/2021 11:34:18 AM | |
|
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
8/24/2021 1:54:31 PM |
The Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD comments and concerns submitted on April 8, 2021 continue to be the same. Please refer to that submittal. | 8/24/2021 1:54:31 PM | |
|
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
8/23/2021 12:04:38 PM |
Please reference the letter dated July 23, 2020 for easements and show on plat. | 8/23/2021 12:04:38 PM | |
|
Academy SD 20 Building Fund
8/16/2021 7:42:21 AM |
Academy District 20 is in receipt of File #SP208 for approval of the Homestead North Preliminary Plan. The District is requesting land dedication in lieu of fees per the existing El Paso County Code for all residential units developed within the approved Sterling Ranch Sketch Plan. The District has previously discussed 2 future school sites in the portion of the Sterling Ranch Sketch Plan that is within the District 20 boundaries with the developers of the property. If you need additional information, please contact me. Don Smith Planning Consultant Academy District 20 |
8/16/2021 7:42:21 AM | |
|
Colorado State Forest Service
8/13/2021 10:37:16 AM |
The primary wildland fuel type for this proposal is grassland with scattered trees having a low wildfire hazard potential. No special fire mitigation plans or other actions are necessary for final approval by the Colorado State Forest Service. | 8/13/2021 10:37:16 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
8/12/2021 1:04:41 PM |
Traffic Engineering has no comments on this item. Zaker Alazzeh, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager City of Colorado Springs (719) 385-5468 Zaker.Alazzeh@coloradosprings.gov |
8/12/2021 1:04:41 PM | |
|
Black Forest Land Use Committee
8/11/2021 6:16:01 AM |
The Black Forest Land Use Committee has no inputs to this proposal. | 8/11/2021 6:16:01 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
8/10/2021 3:11:03 PM |
No comments from County Attorney - Development Review at this time. | 8/10/2021 3:11:03 PM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
8/23/2021 11:26:53 AM |
Review 3: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report....(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Plan...............(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - SWMP Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
8/23/2021 11:26:53 AM | |
| View |
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
8/10/2021 7:16:00 AM |
Revised Street Name List attached. G.West |
8/10/2021 7:16:00 AM |
|
County Attorney - Water
8/9/2021 2:34:21 PM |
County Attorney's Office comments of 3/18/21 remain unaddressed. Thank you. | 8/9/2021 2:34:21 PM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
8/9/2021 8:42:48 AM |
FEMA approved base flood elevation data and 100-year floodplain boundaries shall be provided and shown on plats for subdivision proposals and other proposed developments that contain at least fifty lots or five (5) acres, whichever is less; All buildable lots less than two and one half (2½) acres in size are required to be located entirely outside of the 100-year floodplain. Lands within the 100-year floodplain shall be established in a tract, and require that the owner maintain the tract. Buildable lots two and one half (2½) acres and larger, are required to have the 100-year floodplain contained in a drainage easement dedicated by plat in the name of the governing body with the restrictions of “No Build” and “No Storage of any Materials”; and If subdivision proposals are located within three hundred (300) feet of a Zone A floodplain, FEMA approved base flood elevations and boundaries are required to be determined and shown on the plat, or provide a Floodplain Certification Letter by a professional engineer or architect licensed by the state of Colorado, stating that “Based on field verified characteristics of the property, the property is reasonably safe from flooding and to the best of the engineer’s knowledge if the 100-year floodplain were studied it would not enter the property in question”. |
8/9/2021 8:42:48 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/23/2021 6:32:10 PM |
(GEC redlines summary) | 4/23/2021 6:32:10 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/23/2021 6:31:45 PM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 4/23/2021 6:31:45 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/23/2021 6:31:10 PM |
(PDR redlines) | 4/23/2021 6:31:10 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/23/2021 6:30:34 PM |
(Preliminary Plan redlines summary) | 4/23/2021 6:30:34 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/23/2021 6:29:58 PM |
(Preliminary Plan redlines) | 4/23/2021 6:29:58 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/23/2021 6:29:15 PM |
See comment letter and redlines. -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
4/23/2021 6:29:15 PM |
| View |
EPC Health Department
4/20/2021 3:05:51 PM |
4/20/2021 3:05:51 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/16/2021 11:55:46 AM |
Preliminary Plan Comments Planning Only. Please note the PCD engineer will upload comments after they complete their review. | 4/16/2021 11:55:46 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/16/2021 9:18:07 AM |
Please continue to work with the State Engineers Office to resolve the water court decrees so item can receive a water finding and be scheduled for hearing. "Pursuant to Section 30-28-136(1)(h)(I), C.R.S., the State Engineer offers the preliminary opinion that the proposed water supply plan, when decreed by the water court as proposed, will not cause material injury to existing water rights. However, we will provide our final opinion only after the water court decree is signed and the county has resubmitted the water supply plan for our review. Additionally, the letter of commitment from the District does not commit to providing the full estimated water demand for the proposed subdivision, so the proposed source of water is inadequate." SEO December 2020 |
4/16/2021 9:18:07 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/16/2021 9:13:07 AM |
Letter of Intent Comments (Planning Only) | 4/16/2021 9:13:07 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/16/2021 10:42:03 AM |
The legal, preliminary plan and subdivision summary form incorporate the requested approval to construct the Briargate BLVD, Sterling Ranch Road and two channel crossings. Thank you. Please update the State Water form and LOI to include the corrected acreage. | 4/16/2021 10:42:03 AM | |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
4/14/2021 7:58:30 AM |
See attached comments | 4/14/2021 7:58:30 AM |
|
Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)
4/8/2021 4:08:32 PM |
Please see our attached review from Dec 2020. It continues to remain relevant for this latest application. In addition, we recommend you scrutinize all assumptions from the updated Traffic Impact Study (especially the ones concerning roadway segment improvement assigned responsibility to El Paso County or “others”); re-look at the wisdom of allowing this development to use so much water that it has to rely on complex contract arrangements, construction of pipelines, and a number of expected projections in order to provide water to it in the future; and re-evaluate this development’s zoning compatibility, especially with regard to how one views the PUD zoning to the north (it doesn’t have to be “urban density” and therefore these urban lots do not necessarily provide a transition from them). We can only hope that El Paso County will no longer allow huge, population-dense, water-intensive, traffic-producing, infrastructure-stressing, urban-like, developments anywhere near our community and NEPCO neighborhoods. | 4/8/2021 4:08:32 PM | |
| View |
Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)
4/8/2021 4:05:29 PM |
4/8/2021 4:05:29 PM | |
| View |
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
4/8/2021 4:04:05 PM |
4/8/2021 4:04:05 PM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
4/7/2021 1:29:28 PM |
Our previous comments (dated December 22, 2020) recommended that all geologic hazards and constraints indicated in the soil, geology, and geologic hazard study (Entech Engineering, July 22, 2020) are identified on the revised preliminary plan (N.E.S. Inc., March 12, 2021). The revised geologic hazard statement (sheet 1) and the site constraints exhibit (sheet 25) address our comments. The grading and erosion control plans (J.R. Engineering, February 15, 2021) have also been revised to show erosion protection at the toe of the slopes along the steep banks adjacent to Sand Creek. The remainder of CGS’s review comments for this project remain valid and are generally repeated below. Entech Engineering (Entech Job No. 201421; July 22, 2020) identifies uncontrolled artificial fill, frost heave, potentially unstable slopes adjacent to Sand Creek, expansive soils and claystone bedrock, flooding along Sand Creek, and potentially seasonal shallow groundwater areas as geologic hazards and constraints impacting the proposed development. Entech provides a good description of the site's subsurface conditions based on eight test borings and laboratory testing results and makes appropriate recommendations for mitigation of these hazards based on the development phase of the project. We offer the following additional comments for your consideration: Seasonal Shallow Groundwater: Seasonal shallow groundwater is common in eastern El Paso County. Also, groundwater levels can rise following construction and irrigation. Entech identifies groundwater at 8.5 feet to 18.5 feet below ground surface in four of their borings. Groundwater is mainly found along drainage swales and Sand Creek. The geotechnical engineer did not find groundwater in the other four test borings drilled to 20 feet. Entech recommends subsurface perimeter drains where high subsurface moisture conditions are anticipated, a practice we believe is prudent. The grading and erosion control plan shows a main subsurface groundwater collection line below and parallel to the sanitary sewer but do not show stub outs to individual lots. If feasible, it would be prudent to provide service lines to individual lots and connect perimeter drains to the central collection system. If not possible, CGS recommends no below-grade construction in areas where seasonal high groundwater levels are within three feet of proposed foundations. Unstable Slopes: The geotechnical report identifies potentially unstable slopes, mostly along steep banks adjacent to Sand Creek. Entech recommends two mitigation methods. The first is to place structures at least 20 feet from the crest of slopes. The second method is to regrade steep slopes to grades no steeper than 3H:1V and protect the toe of slopes from erosion with retaining walls or other measures to prevent undercutting of slopes by Sand Creek. The plans show that steep slopes will be regraded to no steeper than 3H:1V with erosion protection. Expansive Soil and Bedrock: Entech states that moderate to highly expansive soil underlies parts of the site. The engineer recommends two different mitigation options. Options include overexcavation of expansive soil or the use of deep pier foundations. The engineer suggests the two options be considered on a lot by lot basis. However, given the site of some lots, it may not be possible to overexcavate to the necessary depths within a single lot boundary. The applicant should evaluate and discuss what mitigation of expansive soil before final plans are approved. Highly Erodible Soil: The soil that underlies the site is moderate to highly erodible. Erosion control is the most effective method to prevent erosion due to water. The plans show the installation of silt fence around the perimeter of the site. In places, the silt fence is placed perpendicular to the contour. This placement concentrates flow along the fence and can cause more erosion than if the silt fence had not been installed. The plans also show that the primary method of sediment control will be modifying a detention pond to serve as a sediment basin during construction. The pond will be an essential sediment control measure since the disturbed area's size will exceed the design limitations of other erosion control measures such as silt fence. However, the pond will be constructed partially in fill, and it is not clear from the plans if the developer will build the sediment basin before overlot grading. If feasible, the pond should be in place before grading and flows directed to the pond through all phases of construction. In summary, the site does not appear to contain any hazards that will prevent development. However, the site does have geologic hazards and constraints that the developer will need to mitigate adequately. The city should consider the recommendations outlined above and ensure recommendations by the geotechnical engineer are followed. |
4/7/2021 1:29:28 PM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
4/7/2021 11:04:53 AM |
no further comment. | 4/7/2021 11:04:53 AM | |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/5/2021 1:40:06 PM |
SWMP V_2 | 4/5/2021 1:40:06 PM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
4/5/2021 1:39:14 PM |
Review 2: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report....(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Plan...............(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - SWMP Please include the following documents on resubmittal: - PBMP Applicability Form EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - ESQCP - FAE - GEC Checklist - MS4 Post Construction Form - SDI - SWMP Checklist Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer I glennreese@elpasoco.com |
4/5/2021 1:39:14 PM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
4/2/2021 12:56:02 PM |
Street naming previously approved. No action required by E911 G.West |
4/2/2021 12:56:02 PM | |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
4/1/2021 3:04:04 PM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #2 - Please See New Comments in Attached Documents (PAB Endorsed 01/13/2021) | 4/1/2021 3:04:04 PM |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
4/1/2021 3:02:15 PM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #2 - Please See New Comments in Attached Documents (PAB Endorsed 01/13/2021) | 4/1/2021 3:02:15 PM |
|
Black Forest Land Use Committee
3/27/2021 6:58:32 AM |
The Black Forest Land Use Committee has no comments on this proposal. | 3/27/2021 6:58:32 AM | |
|
Academy SD 20 Building Fund
3/22/2021 7:36:54 AM |
Academy District 20 is in receipt of File #SP208 for approval of the Homestead North Preliminary Plan.. The District is requesting land dedication in lieu of fees per the existing El Paso County Code for all residential units developed within the approved Sterling Ranch Sketch Plan. The District has previously discussed 2 future school sites in the portion of the Sterling Sketch Plan that is within the District 20 boundaries with the developers of the property. If you need additional information, please contact me. Don Smith Planning Consultant Academy District 20 |
3/22/2021 7:36:54 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Water
3/18/2021 4:07:15 PM |
Colorado Division of Water Resources letter dated 12/22/20 indicates they will provide their final opinion after "the water court decree is signed and the county has resubmitted the water supply plan." County Attorney's Office will provide their findings after receipt of CDWR updated review. Thank you. | 3/18/2021 4:07:15 PM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
3/18/2021 7:36:14 AM |
Work within sand creek will require CLOMR/LOMR or no-rise letter. If no-rise is used and post project WSE changes more than 0.3ft a post project LOMR will be required | 3/18/2021 7:36:14 AM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
1/30/2021 1:48:21 PM |
1/30/2021 1:48:21 PM | |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
1/14/2021 9:44:17 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments - Please See Attached Documents (PAB Endorsed 01/13/2021) | 1/14/2021 9:44:17 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
1/12/2021 5:19:06 PM |
Post conversation with PCD Staff and applicant, please submit two separate CDR files for Briargate Blvd. at Sand Creek Channel (4 lanes full buildout) , and a separate CDR for Sterling Ranch Road at Sand Creek Channel (two lanes w median full buildout). Please include these in the Preliminary plan LOI, Legal and plan set. They can be platted with or without Homestead North Final Plat... | 1/12/2021 5:19:06 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
1/7/2021 5:14:35 PM |
Please add the Noise wall to the FAE, and provide details on the prelim plan and the associated notes. | 1/7/2021 5:14:35 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/7/2021 5:13:37 PM |
Letter of Intent Redlines | 1/7/2021 5:13:37 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/7/2021 5:12:52 PM |
Preliminary Plan redlines | 1/7/2021 5:12:52 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/6/2021 6:50:19 PM |
(ESQCP redlines) | 1/6/2021 6:50:19 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/6/2021 6:49:50 PM |
(MS4 PC Form redlines) | 1/6/2021 6:49:50 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/6/2021 6:49:05 PM |
(GEC redlines summary) | 1/6/2021 6:49:05 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/6/2021 6:48:35 PM |
(GEC redlines) | 1/6/2021 6:48:35 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/6/2021 6:48:00 PM |
(Cursory FAE redlines) | 1/6/2021 6:48:00 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/6/2021 6:47:30 PM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 1/6/2021 6:47:30 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/6/2021 6:46:55 PM |
(PDR redlines) | 1/6/2021 6:46:55 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/6/2021 6:46:26 PM |
(TIS redlines summary) | 1/6/2021 6:46:26 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/6/2021 6:45:51 PM |
(TIS redlines) | 1/6/2021 6:45:51 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/6/2021 6:45:03 PM |
See comment letter and redlines. | 1/6/2021 6:45:03 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
1/6/2021 7:42:35 AM |
Please work with Academy School District 20 to determine where the land dedication is to occur for the development in lieu of fees. Please provide correspondence that the district supports the land location and size in lieu of fees. | 1/6/2021 7:42:35 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/5/2021 1:58:40 PM |
The Water Commitment letter, State Water Form, Water Report and Subdivision Summary form appear to have different numbers allocated for uses. See screen snip attached. | 1/5/2021 1:58:40 PM |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
12/22/2020 4:51:48 PM |
12/22/2020 4:51:48 PM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
12/22/2020 12:06:09 AM |
Entech Engineering (Entech Job No. 201421; July 22, 2020) identifies uncontrolled artificial fill, frost heave, potentially unstable slopes adjacent to Sand Creek, expansive soils and claystone bedrock, flooding along Sand Creek, and potentially seasonal shallow groundwater areas as geologic hazards and constraints impacting the proposed development. Entech provides a good description of the site's subsurface conditions based on eight test borings and laboratory testing results and makes appropriate recommendations for mitigation of these hazards based on the development phase of the project. We offer the following additional comments for your consideration: Seasonal Shallow Groundwater: Seasonal shallow groundwater is common in eastern El Paso County. Also, groundwater levels can rise following construction and irrigation. Entech identifies groundwater at 8.5 feet to 18.5 feet below ground surface in four of their borings. Groundwater is mainly found along drainage swales and Sand Creek. The geotechnical engineer did not find groundwater in the other four test borings drilled to 20 feet. Entech recommends subsurface perimeter drains where high subsurface moisture conditions are anticipated, a practice we believe is prudent. The grading and erosion control plan shows a main subsurface groundwater collection line below and parallel to the sanitary sewer but do not show stub outs to individual lots. If feasible, it would be prudent to provide service lines to individual lots and connect perimeter drains to the central collection system. If not possible, CGS recommends no below-grade construction in areas where seasonal high groundwater levels are within three feet of proposed foundations. Unstable Slopes: The geotechnical report identifies potentially unstable slopes, mostly along steep banks adjacent to Sand Creek. Entech recommends two mitigation methods. The first is to place structures at least 20 feet from the crest of slopes. The second method is to regrade steep slopes to grades no steeper than 3H:1V and protect the toe of slopes from erosion with retaining walls or other measures to prevent undercutting of slopes by Sand Creek. The plans show that steep slopes will be regraded to no steeper than 3H:1V, but the plans do not appear to show erosion protection at the toe of slopes. Expansive Soil and Bedrock: Entech states that moderate to highly expansive soil underlies parts of the site. The engineer recommends two different mitigation options. Options include overexcavation of expansive soil or the use of deep pier foundations. The engineer suggests the two options be considered on a lot by lot basis. However, given the site of some lots, it may not be possible to overexcavate to the necessary depths within a single lot boundary. The applicant should evaluate and discuss what mitigation of expansive soil before final plans are approved. Highly Erodible Soil: The soil that underlies the site is moderate to highly erodible. Erosion control is the most effective method to prevent erosion due to water. The plans show the installation of silt fence around the perimeter of the site. In places, the silt fence is placed perpendicular to the contour. This placement concentrates flow along the fence and can cause more erosion than if the silt fence had not been installed. The plans also show that the primary method of sediment control will be modifying a detention pond to serve as a sediment basin during construction. The pond will be an essential sediment control measure since the disturbed area's size will exceed the design limitations of other erosion control measures such as silt fence. However, the pond will be constructed partially in fill, and it is not clear from the plans if the developer will build the sediment basin before overlot grading. If feasible, the pond should be in place before grading and flows directed to the pond through all phases of construction. Geologic Hazards Statement: The Preliminary Plan contains a geologic hazard statement; however, it only includes seasonal shallow groundwater. We recommend adding all geologic hazards and constraints that Entech identifies (potentially unstable slopes, potentially expansive soil and bedrock, flooding, and potentially seasonal shallow groundwater) to the geologic hazards statement on the Preliminary Plan. In summary, the site does not appear to contain any hazards that will prevent development. However, the site does have geologic hazards and constraints that the developer will need to mitigate adequately. The city should consider the recommendations outlined above and ensure recommendations by the geotechnical engineer are followed. |
12/22/2020 12:06:09 AM | |
| View |
Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)
12/18/2020 10:36:32 AM |
12/18/2020 10:36:32 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Parks and Wildlife
12/17/2020 10:54:53 AM |
12/17/2020 10:54:53 AM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
12/16/2020 11:58:30 AM |
When submitting the development plan please email a copy of the second phase of this project so that the addressing for the street Perry Owens can be assigned accurately for this filing and the next. Please provide a list of the approved street names from El Paso/Teller County E 9-1-1 Authority in an email to Amy@pprbd.org No comments to this preliminary plan. Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 |
12/16/2020 11:58:30 AM | |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
12/14/2020 10:09:27 AM |
SWMP V_1 | 12/14/2020 10:09:27 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
12/14/2020 10:08:33 AM |
SWMP Checklist V_1 | 12/14/2020 10:08:33 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
12/14/2020 10:08:09 AM |
SDI V_1 | 12/14/2020 10:08:09 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
12/14/2020 10:07:52 AM |
MS4 V_1 | 12/14/2020 10:07:52 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
12/14/2020 10:09:50 AM |
GEC Checklist V_1 | 12/14/2020 10:09:50 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
12/16/2020 8:34:21 AM |
Review 1: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report....(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - ESQCP...................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - FAE........................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Plan...............(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Checklist - MS4 Post Construction Form - SDI - SWMP Checklist - SWMP Please include the following documents on resubmittal: - PBMP Applicability Form Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer I glennreese@elpasoco.com |
12/16/2020 8:34:21 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
12/12/2020 10:02:03 PM |
No comments from County Attorney's Office - Development Review at this time. | 12/12/2020 10:02:03 PM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
12/11/2020 8:26:32 AM |
Street names previously approved. No action for E911. Thank you. Justin |
12/11/2020 8:26:32 AM | |
| View |
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
12/10/2020 9:26:56 AM |
12/10/2020 9:26:56 AM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
12/9/2020 11:35:42 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Park Preliminary Comments - Please See Attached Documents (To be presented to the Park Advisory Board on 01/13/21) | 12/9/2020 11:35:42 AM |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
12/8/2020 1:32:47 PM |
12/8/2020 1:32:47 PM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
12/3/2020 3:34:23 PM |
12/3/2020 3:34:23 PM | |
|
Black Forest Land Use Committee
12/1/2020 11:42:48 AM |
The Black Forest Land Use Committee has no comments regarding this proposal. | 12/1/2020 11:42:48 AM | |
|
Academy SD 20 Building Fund
12/1/2020 8:45:08 AM |
Academy District 20 is in receipt of file number SP208 for the Homestead North Preliminary Plan within the approved Sterling Ranch Sketch Plan area. Academy District 20 is requesting land dedication in lieu of fees per the existing El Paso County Code for all residential units within the Homestead North Preliminary Plan area as specified on the approved Sketch Plan for Sterling Ranch. If you need additional information, please contact me. Don Smith Planning Consultant 492-4972. |
12/1/2020 8:45:08 AM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
12/1/2020 7:49:08 AM |
12/1/2020 7:49:08 AM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
12/1/2020 7:48:11 AM |
12/1/2020 7:48:11 AM | |
|
Colorado State Forest Service
11/30/2020 10:15:50 AM |
The primary wildland fuel type for this proposal is grassland with scattered trees having a low wildfire hazard potential. No special fire mitigation plans or other actions are necessary for final approval by the Colorado State Forest Service. | 11/30/2020 10:15:50 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Water
11/30/2020 8:36:03 AM |
County Attorney's Office will review for water sufficiency following receipt of findings from Colorado Division of Water Resources. Thank you. | 11/30/2020 8:36:03 AM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
11/30/2020 7:40:26 AM |
floodplain note :change Zone " A" to "AE" and change firm panel number from 533G to 535G | 11/30/2020 7:40:26 AM |
EDARP