View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| View |
EPC Health Department
4/23/2020 9:16:45 AM |
Re-attached comments submitted in February, 2020. | 4/23/2020 9:16:45 AM |
|
EPC County Attorney's Office
4/14/2020 2:21:35 PM |
County Attorney's Office provided a review of water sufficiency on February 19, 2020. If anything further is required from our office, please let us know. Thank you! | 4/14/2020 2:21:35 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
4/13/2020 1:45:18 PM |
4/13/2020 1:45:18 PM | |
| View |
Woodmoor Water and Sanitation District
4/8/2020 4:13:11 PM |
The Woodmoor Water and Sanitation District No. 1 (the District) has received plans and documents related to the development applications referenced above. The District has the following concerns and/or recommendations: General Comments 1. This review is a general overview of the drawing set received March, 2020. Sheet 12 of 21 1. The last PSV vault that was proposed to be moved for a subdivision project was too heavy for the contractor to move. It had a pour-in-place vault. The project manager decided to install a new vault instead. That said, do you want to include the District’s PRV/PSV Vault Detail in case this happens again? Otherwise, include a note stating that if the existing assembly cannot be reused, coordinate with the District for specifications on a new assembly. 2. Please show more detail on pumped water storage pipeline demolition, repair, and new alignment. a. Show the existing facilities to be demolished with hatching. b. On new work plan, show in bold the areas to be repaired after existing facilities removed. Add note stating repair work must be performed under Woodmoor Water & Sanitation District System Specifications. c. Please show more detail on the pumped water storage pipeline terminal at Lake Woodmoor. It appears that the flow will make an apx. 90-degree bend to enter the lake. Detail must include erosion control measures taken, which should account for head cut and effects of flow on the bend. If you should have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Ariel Hacker District Engineer Cc: Jessie J. Shaffer Randy Gillette |
4/8/2020 4:13:11 PM |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
4/8/2020 12:28:49 PM |
CGS previously reviewed this project in our letter dated December 19, 2016 and with comments up-loaded to the County’s webpage on 1.6.20. The comments of our previous letter remain relevant for this review. In addition, we previously stated: “retaining walls are depicted on the grading plan that include 3-tiers of 4-foot high walls with a total retained height of up to 15 feet. CGS recommends that the geotechnical engineer be given the opportunity to evaluate the global stability of the retaining wall system and provide engineering recommendations for the retaining walls prior to approval of the preliminary PUD Development Plan.” It remains prudent to require global stability evaluation of the retaining wall system prior to approval of the preliminary PUD Development Plan. | 4/8/2020 12:28:49 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/6/2020 10:11:06 AM |
All comments have been addressed. Staff anticipates the item being heard on the 5/5/2020 PC hearing date. | 4/6/2020 10:11:06 AM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
4/2/2020 8:17:00 AM |
Review 5: Comments resolved on the PUD and Letter of Intent. Reminder: After BoCC approval of the PUD Modification to ECM, the applicant shall submit said modification as a Deviation Request for approval. Deviation Form to include exhibits. Reviewed by: Gilbert LaForce, PE gilbertlaforce@elpasoco.com |
4/2/2020 8:17:00 AM | |
|
EPC County Attorney's Office
3/31/2020 2:42:01 PM |
County Attorney's Office provided a review of water sufficiency on February 19, 2020. If anything further is required from our office, please let us know. Thank you! | 3/31/2020 2:42:01 PM | |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
3/31/2020 9:37:07 AM |
3/31/2020 9:37:07 AM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
3/31/2020 8:37:44 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #5 - Please See Attached Documents (PAB Endorsed 01/11/2017) | 3/31/2020 8:37:44 AM |
|
Tri-Lakes-Monument Fire Protection District
3/30/2020 2:50:01 PM |
We have no additional comments at this time. JCB | 3/30/2020 2:50:01 PM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
3/30/2020 7:57:13 AM |
Street names previously approved. No action for E911. Thank you. Justin |
3/30/2020 7:57:13 AM | |
|
Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)
3/29/2020 11:15:59 AM |
Planning Commission: Please see our review for the Northbay at Lake Woodmoor Final Plat, dated March 29, 2020. No further comments at this time. Thank you. | 3/29/2020 11:15:59 AM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
3/26/2020 12:42:40 PM |
3/26/2020 12:42:40 PM | |
|
Lewis Palmer 38
3/26/2020 12:08:33 PM |
Lewis-Palmer School District 38 has no additional comments at this time regarding this development, except to remind the County that the district does request cash in-lieu-of land funds (see previous comment submitted 12.18.19). | 3/26/2020 12:08:33 PM | |
| View |
EPC County Attorney's Office
2/19/2020 11:58:01 AM |
2/19/2020 11:58:01 AM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
2/8/2020 4:57:06 PM |
2/8/2020 4:57:06 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/22/2020 10:56:32 AM |
Deviation Redline Review 4 | 1/22/2020 10:56:32 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/6/2020 1:41:54 PM |
PUD Redline | 1/6/2020 1:41:54 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/6/2020 1:41:35 PM |
LOI Redline | 1/6/2020 1:41:35 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/6/2020 1:41:19 PM |
Deviation Redline | 1/6/2020 1:41:19 PM |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
1/6/2020 9:40:49 AM |
CGS previously reviewed this project in our letter dated December 19, 2016. The comments of our previous letter remain relevant for this review. In addition, retaining walls are depicted on the grading plan that include 3-tiers of 4-foot high walls with a total retained height of up to 15 feet. CGS recommends that the geotechnical engineer be given the opportunity to evaluate the global stability of the retaining wall system and provide engineering recommendations for the retaining walls prior to approval of the preliminary PUD Development Plan. | 1/6/2020 9:40:49 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/26/2019 9:31:30 AM |
PUDSP Checklist | 12/26/2019 9:31:30 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
12/26/2019 9:32:09 AM |
Please note that comments were last send on 10/17/18 and a re-submission was not received until 13 months later. There may be new comments provided by PCD Engineering due to updates to their criteria. The previous reviews only reviewed for consistency with the initial comments provided by another Planner in 2017. To ensure a quality product for the applicant, staff has reviewed as if this was a first review and provided additional comments/suggestions. Please be aware that the LDC has been amended to allow for administrative final plats provided certain findings can be made with the PUDSP. You may opt to follow the current LDC. If you choose to do so please update the LOI to reflect your intentions and the revised criteria. A maintenance plan was not previously provided. Please see the attached PUDSP checklist with includes a maintenance plan as a requirement. Additional comments and redlines will be provided upon completion of the PCD Engineering Division review. |
12/26/2019 9:32:09 AM | |
| View |
Woodmoor Water and Sanitation District
12/23/2019 2:48:50 PM |
12/23/2019 2:48:50 PM | |
| View |
Woodmoor Water and Sanitation District
12/23/2019 2:48:08 PM |
12/23/2019 2:48:08 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
12/30/2019 12:26:48 PM |
Review 4: * Redline comment on the following document will be uploaded by the project manager: - PUD development plan - Letter of Intent - Deviation Requests (All) - The drainage report and traffic study will be reviewed with the final plat application. See PCD File Number SF-16-021 for comments. Reviewed by: Gilbert LaForce, PE gilbertlaforce@elpasoco.com |
12/30/2019 12:26:48 PM | |
| View |
Tri-Lakes-Monument Fire Protection District
12/19/2019 12:00:34 PM |
Attached, JCB | 12/19/2019 12:00:34 PM |
| View |
Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)
12/18/2019 3:03:41 PM |
12/18/2019 3:03:41 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
12/18/2019 2:35:30 PM |
12/18/2019 2:35:30 PM | |
|
Lewis Palmer 38
12/18/2019 1:07:30 PM |
At their regularly scheduled meeting on December 21, 2017, the Lewis-Palmer Board of Education voted to take no formal action to oppose the development plan and final plat submitted by Lake Woodmoor Holdings, LLC and NES, Inc regarding the 7.23 acre site located southeast of the intersection of Woodmoor Drive and Deer Creek Road. The applicant requested final plat approval for a 28-unit townhome. NES has discussed the project with the school district and the development has been in the district’s long-term plan for a number of years. The district has updated the county as to current capacity and enrollment, as well as concerns moving forward. The district will continue to discuss needs with the developer. However, the Board of Education does request cash in-lieu-of land funds from El Paso County. |
12/18/2019 1:07:30 PM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
12/18/2019 10:31:10 AM |
No further comment. | 12/18/2019 10:31:10 AM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
12/11/2019 10:33:47 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #4 - Please See Attached Documents (PAB Endorsed on 01/11/2017). | 12/11/2019 10:33:47 AM |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
12/11/2019 10:29:28 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #4 - Please See Attached Documents (PAB Endorsed on 01/11/2017). | 12/11/2019 10:29:28 AM |
|
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
12/3/2019 10:52:33 AM |
Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. No additional comments at this time. Cathy Mountain View Electric Association, Inc. |
12/3/2019 10:52:33 AM | |
|
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
12/3/2019 10:51:59 AM |
Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. No additional comments at this time. Cathy Mountain View Electric Association, Inc. |
12/3/2019 10:51:59 AM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
12/2/2019 10:59:36 AM |
12/2/2019 10:59:36 AM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
12/2/2019 10:58:47 AM |
12/2/2019 10:58:47 AM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
12/2/2019 8:21:47 AM |
No action necessary for E911. | 12/2/2019 8:21:47 AM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
12/2/2019 8:21:14 AM |
No action necessary for E911. | 12/2/2019 8:21:14 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
11/5/2018 10:43:48 AM |
The Water Supply Report projects they need approximately double the amount of water committed by Woodmoor Water and Sanitation District. The report projects a need for approximately 16 acre-feet/year and the District is only committing approximately 7.5 acre-feet/year. This is the discrepancy that needs attention before a second favorable review can be issued. | 11/5/2018 10:43:48 AM |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
10/22/2018 1:13:52 PM |
10/22/2018 1:13:52 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/17/2018 10:20:01 AM |
PUDSP Redlines | 10/17/2018 10:20:01 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/17/2018 7:43:25 AM |
Please add the adjacent ownership as required on the preliminary plan checklist. | 10/17/2018 7:43:25 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/17/2018 7:40:25 AM |
1. A few trees/shrubs are shown within the ROW. Please either relocate or submit a landscaping within the ROW agreement. | 10/17/2018 7:40:25 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/16/2018 1:42:32 PM |
Review 3: Letter of intent comments unresolved. (see attached) | 10/16/2018 1:42:32 PM |
|
EPC County Attorney's Office
9/26/2018 3:30:08 PM |
Water Supply Information Supply Summary shows water demand of 525 gpd for 28 units (16.47 acre-feet/year total - as noted by State Engineer). District letter dated 2/27/17 commits to 7.527 acre-feet/year. Please resolve discrepancy. | 9/26/2018 3:30:08 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
1/8/2018 3:47:40 PM |
The final drainage report identified sections of Dirty Woman Creek that exceeds the drainage criteria for velocity and Froude number. The report provided additional analysis (shear stress) to show that channel is non-erosive. Staff will discuss this conclusion with the County Engineer to determine if the proposed design/analysis is acceptable. | 1/8/2018 3:47:40 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
1/4/2018 4:46:37 PM |
Letter of Intent 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. 3. Regarding Criteria No. 3, the site is not currently suitable for development due to floodplain, wetland, and shallow groundwater impacts. Revise the statement to identify these hazards and the proposed mitigation per the Entech report, specifically, CLOMR/LOMR finalization for floodplain, avoidance of wetland, and construction engineering and grading for the shallow groundwater. 4. Revise the response to Criteria No. 4 to include the approximate and/or average size of the natural buffer to the east and provide a statement regarding the additional landscaping provided with this plan. 5. Revise response to Criteria No. 7 to include the amount/percentage of open space provided and to identify the trails as being intended for public use to access Lake Woodmoor. 6. Include the discussion of the modification requests in the response to Criteria No. 1. Modifications are needed to authorize the use of private roads in the PUD, smaller road cross section for the private road (private roads are required to meet County standards which required 28’ pavement width), and for the depiction of lots within the floodplain. 7. Revise the preliminary plan Criteria No. 6 to include the discussion from comment no. 3 above, or refer to that discussion. 8. Revise response to preliminary plan Criteria No. 7 to include grading and erosion control plan, construction drawings for stormwater facilities. The reader may never see the drainage report. 9. Revise response to Criteria No. 9.2 to state the plan was designed to minimize cost of transportation and utility infrastructure improvements. PUD Development Plan 1. Change all departmental references from “DSD/Development Services” to “Planning and Community Development Department”. 2. Addressed. 3. Any accessory uses and/or special uses should be identified on the development plan, otherwise they will be prohibited by omission. If referencing the LDC, there are no sections only Chapters. 4. Addressed. 5. Addressed but the line types are difficult to read. Consider new line types to clearly define the existing and proposed floodplain. 6. Addressed. Tract E and D do not have a separating lot line shown. 7. Addressed. 8. Addressed. Please also remove existing trees/shrubs from the sign triangle. 9. Include a parking table. 10. Consider the adequacy of the proposed guest parking. Guest parking in townhome developments is absorbed quickly by quests and/or as tenants “third parking space”. |
1/4/2018 4:46:37 PM | |
|
Colorado Division of Water Resources
1/2/2018 1:55:21 PM |
It does not appear the estimated demand or proposed water supply for the development has changed since our last review; therefore, please refer to our letter dated December 28, 2016. | 1/2/2018 1:55:21 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/21/2017 1:33:57 PM |
Redline comments on the following documents will be uploaded by the project manager. - PUD Development Plan - Traffic Study |
12/21/2017 1:33:57 PM |
EDARP