EDARP
Project Review Comments
- Project Name
- Flying Horse North PUD/SP Amendment (Major/Filings 6-7)
- Description
- Location
- Parcels
- 5100000291 5100000291 5100000437 5100000437 5130000002 5130000002 5130000003 5130000003 5130000005 5130000005 5130000006 5130000006 5131000002 5131000002 6136000011 6136000011
- Applicant
-
HR Green Inc.
Blaine Perkins ( blaine.perkins@hrgreen.com )
(719) 394-2430 Blaine Perkins ( blaine.perkins@hrgreen.com )
(719) 394-2430 - File Number
- PUDSP252
- Project Manager
- Ryan Howser
- Status
- Active
- Created
- 2/7/2025 3:08:51 PM
View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| View |
EPC Health Department
6/20/2025 5:37:06 PM |
6/20/2025 5:37:06 PM | |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
6/17/2025 8:43:26 AM |
El Paso County Parks Department, Final Comments - Please See Attached Documentation (Endorsed by the Park Advisory Board on June 6, 2025) | 6/17/2025 8:43:26 AM |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
5/30/2025 4:02:33 PM |
El Paso County Parks Department, Preliminary Comments - Please See Attached Documentation (To be presented to the Park Advisory Board for endorsement on June 11, 2025) | 5/30/2025 4:02:33 PM |
| View |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
5/29/2025 1:35:35 PM |
Please see the attached letter. | 5/29/2025 1:35:35 PM |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
5/28/2025 3:06:40 PM |
5/28/2025 3:06:40 PM | |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
5/28/2025 8:19:45 AM |
See attached comment | 5/28/2025 8:19:45 AM |
| View |
Colorado Parks and Wildlife
5/23/2025 10:44:04 AM |
5/23/2025 10:44:04 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/22/2025 4:43:09 PM |
(PCM Applicability Form redlines) | 5/22/2025 4:43:09 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/22/2025 4:42:18 PM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 5/22/2025 4:42:18 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/22/2025 4:41:42 PM |
(PDR redlines) | 5/22/2025 4:41:42 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/22/2025 4:39:52 PM |
(TIS redlines summary) | 5/22/2025 4:39:52 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/22/2025 4:39:14 PM |
(TIS redlines) | 5/22/2025 4:39:14 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
5/22/2025 4:37:53 PM |
Review 1: Comments have been provided (in blue text) on the following documents - Letter of Intent (uploaded by the project manager) - PUDPS Plan (uploaded by the project manager) - Preliminary Drainage Report - Traffic Study - PCM Applicability Form Reviewed by: Jeff Rice 719-520-7877 JeffRice@elpasoco.com |
5/22/2025 4:37:53 PM | |
|
County Attorney - Water
5/22/2025 1:33:02 PM |
County Attorney’s Office will review for water sufficiency following receipt of findings from the Colorado Division of Water Resources. Thank you. | 5/22/2025 1:33:02 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
5/21/2025 4:40:16 PM |
Due to the volume and complexity of the comments provided, subsequent reviews may have additional comments. The next review will be treated as a first review. Please feel free to contact the PCD Project Manager if you have any questions regarding this review. | 5/21/2025 4:40:16 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
5/21/2025 4:30:00 PM |
V1: Zoning Map comments | 5/21/2025 4:30:00 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
5/21/2025 4:29:21 PM |
V1: PUD Development Plan comments | 5/21/2025 4:29:21 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
5/21/2025 4:10:36 PM |
V1: Water Resources Report comments | 5/21/2025 4:10:36 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
5/21/2025 4:08:14 PM |
V1: Natural Gas Commitment Letter comments | 5/21/2025 4:08:14 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
5/21/2025 4:07:54 PM |
V1: Letter of Intent comments | 5/21/2025 4:07:54 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
5/21/2025 4:06:35 PM |
Review 1: PCD Planning Division comments have been provided (in green) on the following uploaded documents: - Letter of Intent (includes Engineering comments) - PUD Development Plan (includes Engineering comments) - Natural Gas Commitment Letter - Water Resources Report (also will require updates to WSIS) - Zoning Map |
5/21/2025 4:06:35 PM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
5/21/2025 3:01:35 PM |
No comments from County Attorney – Development Review at this time. Reviewed by: Erika Keech, Senior County Attorney, erikakeech2@elpasoco.com. |
5/21/2025 3:01:35 PM | |
| View |
EPC Fire and Wildfire Program Manager
5/21/2025 1:07:04 PM |
Comments added to Forestry Management Plan | 5/21/2025 1:07:04 PM |
| View |
EPC Fire and Wildfire Program Manager
5/21/2025 1:01:01 PM |
Comments added to Wildland Fire and Hazard Mitigation Plan. | 5/21/2025 1:01:01 PM |
|
EPC DPW Stormwater
5/21/2025 12:34:12 PM |
Review 1: EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents (to be uploaded by the project manager): - Drainage Report - PCM Applicability Form Reviewed by: Mikayla Hartford, P.E. Engineer - Stormwater 719.339.5053 MikaylaHartford@elpasoco.com |
5/21/2025 12:34:12 PM | |
| View |
EPC Fire and Wildfire Program Manager
5/21/2025 12:00:52 PM |
Comments added to Fire Protection Report | 5/21/2025 12:00:52 PM |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
5/20/2025 1:51:56 PM |
The proposed Flying Horse North Fil No 6-7_PUDSP MJ Amend project is outside of the CSU gas and electric service area. | 5/20/2025 1:51:56 PM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
5/20/2025 10:01:45 AM |
The available referral documents include the PUD Development Plan (HR Green Development, LLC, April 17, 2025), the Letter of Intent (HR Green Development, LLC, February 19, 2025), the Soil and Geology Study (Entech Engineering, Inc., January 24, 2025), and other relevant documents. We understand that the applicant desires a major amendment to the approved 2016 PUD preliminary plan for the proposed Filing Nos. 6 and 7, which involves the development of 106 single-family residential units (47 lots within Filing No. 6 and 59 lots within Filing No. 7). The amendment also includes improvements to roadways and the proposed construction of detention ponds. Entech identifies areas that will impose geologic constraints, including (page 1) “seasonal and potentially seasonal shallow groundwater areas, drainage areas, areas of ponded water, floodplain, erosion, artificial fill, expansive soils, and areas of downslope creep.” Entech’s characterization of the geologic hazards and constraints associated with the site is valid. Provided Entech’s recommendations are adhered to, CGS has no objection to approval of the PUD Development plan amendment as proposed. We offer the following comments: 1. Entech did not encounter groundwater in their test borings or pits within Filings 6 or 7. Even so, groundwater levels tend to fluctuate, and perched water is likely to collect above clayey, less permeable soil layers on top of the bedrock surface. If basements are being considered, CGS recommends the county require groundwater monitoring/observation holes to obtain groundwater data to verify that proposed floor levels are at least three feet (preferably 5 feet) above maximum anticipated groundwater levels and maintained year-round. To be effective, however, this monitoring should include measurements/observations through fall, winter, and spring and not merely during site-specific building investigations. 2. CGS agrees with Entech (page 10), “Subsurface perimeter drains are recommended for any usable below grade areas including crawlspaces. Should groundwater be encountered at within 3 feet of foundation grade additional drains that could include but not limited to interceptor drains, underslab drain (capillary break), and overexcavation drains may be needed.” An underdrain system should be allowed ONLY if it can gravity discharge to a daylight outfall or is connected to an existing underdrain system that gravity discharges to a daylight outfall. Individual foundation perimeter drains are intended to handle small amounts of intermittent, perched water and may NOT be used to mitigate persistent shallow groundwater conditions. 3. Multiple drainages exist within the project area that are designated as existing wetlands per the National Wetlands Inventory (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Standards and Support Team, wetlands_team@fws.gov). Erosional setbacks should be established near drainages and noted in the plans. 4. Erosional setbacks should be established near drainages and noted in the plans. Submitted 5/20/2025 by Amy Crandall, Engineering Geologist, Colorado Geological Survey (303-384-2632 or acrandall@mines.edu) |
5/20/2025 10:01:45 AM | |
|
Black Forest Land Use Committee
5/18/2025 6:34:14 PM |
The Black Forest Land Use Committee commends the applicant for returning to the original plan for lots 2.5-acres and larger. This will maintain the Black Forest as a rural, residential community that has larger lots and is preserving natural trees and wildlife habitat. The Committee recommends approval. P.S. On page 2 of the LOI, second to the last line, the reference to 2.0 DU/AC must be a misprint of some kind because it doesn't match the rest of the plan. |
5/18/2025 6:34:14 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
5/14/2025 12:55:32 PM |
Engineering Development Review has no comments on this item. Reviewed by Hao Vo, hao.vo@coloradosprings.gov |
5/14/2025 12:55:32 PM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
5/8/2025 10:26:25 AM |
1. Re-addressing fees will apply to each filing. No further comment. Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org |
5/8/2025 10:26:25 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
5/7/2025 3:34:36 PM |
See attached pdf for comments | 5/7/2025 3:34:36 PM |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
5/7/2025 2:26:47 PM |
5/7/2025 2:26:47 PM | |
|
Academy SD 20 Building Fund
5/5/2025 8:01:11 AM |
Academy District 20 is in receipt of File #PUDSP252 for approval of the Flying Horse North PUD/SP Amendment (Major/Filings 6-7). The District is requesting fees in lieu of land dedication per the existing County Code for all residential units within this development. The District is experiencing ongoing residential development. The District gained approximately 12,000 new residential units between 2018 and 2024 which included 5,278 Single Family, 1,156 Single Family Attached, and 5,576 Apartments as reported to the District by local developers. During that same timeframe, the District only experienced a total membership increase of 138 students. This information is updated annually in October. A drop in the birth rate plus the significant increase in the cost of housing has slowed student growth in the District. The District is able to serve each student who is a resident of District 20. If you need additional information, please contact me. Don Smith Planning Consultant |
5/5/2025 8:01:11 AM | |
| View |
Black Forest Fire Protection District
5/3/2025 8:04:16 PM |
In regards to the Fire Protection report, please review uploaded files | 5/3/2025 8:04:16 PM |
|
PCD Administrative Notice
5/2/2025 3:57:43 PM |
On 05/02/2025, PCD mailed "Notice of Application" letters to surrounding property owners within a 500-foot range (84 addresses). Copies of the notice, mailing labels, and selected range have been uploaded to the EDARP file. Cost of postage to be billed to the applicant = $57.96. JM | 5/2/2025 3:57:43 PM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
5/1/2025 11:11:45 AM |
Streetnames previously approved. No action for E911 on this submittal. Thank you. Justin |
5/1/2025 11:11:45 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
5/1/2025 7:04:35 AM |
Traffic Engineering has no comments on this item. Brian Shevock Public Works/Traffic Engineering Traffic Engineer City of Colorado Springs brian.shevock@coloradosprings.gov (719) 385-7620 |
5/1/2025 7:04:35 AM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
4/30/2025 3:17:57 PM |
no floodplain impact from this amendment. | 4/30/2025 3:17:57 PM |