EDARP
Project Review Comments
- File Number
- SP267
- Project Name
- Waterview East Commercial - Amendment to Prelim Plan
- Description
- Amendment to change the lot configuration of the Preliminary Plan (SP229) in preparation for submitting for subdivision of 2 of the proposed 9 lots. Administrative Amendment.
- Parcels
- 5509200004 5509200004 5509300001 5509300001 5509300002 5509300002 5509300004 5509300004 5509300005 5509300005 5509300006 5509300006
- Applicant
-
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
mr Heath Herber ( hherber@wheatlandscapital.com ) mr Heath Herber ( hherber@wheatlandscapital.com ) - EA Number
- EA2617
- File Number
- SP267
- Project Manager
- Lacey Dean
- Status
- Active
- Created
- 2/25/2026 8:19:08 AM
View: Project Documents | Submit/View Public Comment
| Agency | Review # | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| View |
PCD Project Manager
8/18/2026 5:02:48 PM |
1 | V1_Amended Preliminary Plan Drawings_comments | 8/18/2026 5:02:48 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
8/18/2026 5:02:15 PM |
1 | V1_Letter of Intent_comments | 8/18/2026 5:02:15 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
8/18/2026 5:01:59 PM |
1 | V1_Application-Petition Form_comments | 8/18/2026 5:01:59 PM |
|
Widefield Water & Sanitation District
8/18/2026 4:57:41 PM |
1 |
WATER COMMENTS 1. WWSD Standards section 2.1.2 requires a 20’ minimum easement for all water mains not installed in public rights-of-way. Please indicate these on the amendment plan/PUD. 2. WWSD Standards section 2.3.1 indicates that watermains are to be installed 10’ North or East from centerline. The proposed alignment does not appear to meet these setbacks. Please correct placement or provide justification for an exception. 3. Page 02 – You have proposed extension of watermain from Frontside Drive (W of round about) north across storm pond and swale to Basin Grove. It is unusual for a watermain to pass under a swale in this manner. Please provide reasoning for this alignment choice. 4. Page 02 - WWSD Standards 2.4.1b - all tees shall have 3 valves. 5. Page 06 – waterline on north loop of Tract C, where it crosses under storm sewer, doesn’t actually appear to connect to the waterline. Please provide an inset or detail for sections that are difficult to read due to crowding. 6. Page 07 – why doesn’t N/S waterline connect to E/W waterline? 7. Page 07 – on the southeast section of waterline, does the E/W main connect to an existing main? Will it be stubbed? 8. It appears that the plan is to connect to the 12” watermain running along Frontside Drive, developed for Trails at Aspen Ridge, which is supposed to connect to the existing (empty) section of 12” water main underneath the Frontside/Legacy round-about. That main is under review with concerns for its condition. WWSD will require coordination with the Trails at Aspen Ridge development to ensure connection to active services. 9. Per WWSD Standards 3.3.6, please note that a water sampling station will be required for every filing or every 500 homes, whichever is greater. Please consider potential location and coordination with surrounding development, as this will need to be incorporated into CDs. SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS 1. As with water, WWSD requires a minimum 20’ easement for sanitary sewers. Please note these easements on the plans. 2. WWSD Standards section 5.3 indicate sewer lines shall be installed along the centerline of the road. Given the width of the road and horizontal offset (10’) required for waterlines, this may not be possible. Instead please note proposed setbacks for water and sewer lines on cover page. STORM SEWER COMMENTS 1. Does proposed storm running N/S between Tract C and Lot 6 connect to existing storm running E/W along Basin Grove? If so, how is that connection planned? 2. Similar question for storm running alongside Reservoir View. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION COMMENTS 1. If planning to tap mains for irrigation line(s), please indicate proposed tap locations and confirm that meter and backflow pit locations are outside of easements/ROW. 2. Please check that planned landscaping does not plant directly over any utilities. 3. Please note for future that WWSD requires 90% of landscaping to be xeriscaping, and only 10% may be irrigated. |
8/18/2026 4:57:41 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
8/18/2026 5:01:04 PM |
1 |
Review 1: EPC Planning Division has comments in green text boxes on the following documents: - Application/Petition Form - Letter of Intent - Amended Preliminary Plan Drawings ***REMINDER*** As discussed in the issue resolution meeting held on 6/25/2026, this amended preliminary plan must be approved prior to subsequent review cycles for the associated Final Plat at SF269 which is currently in its 2nd cycle. Reviewed by: Lacey Dean, Associate Planner laceydean2@elpasoco.com |
8/18/2026 5:01:04 PM | |
|
EPC DPW Development Services - Engineering
8/18/2026 10:10:17 AM |
1 |
SP267 Waterview East Commercial - Amendment to Prelim Plan EPC DPW DS- Engineering Review EDARP Review 1 Ladies & Gentlemen, Engineering Comments have been provided on the following document (to be uploaded by Project Manager): V1– Amended Preliminary Plan Drawings The Comments on the following documents (if any) they will be with “SF269 Waterview East Commercial Fil No 1” review comments: V1- UPDATED Drainage Report – Preliminary V1- UPDATED Traffic Impact Study The applicant must upload the revised and missing items indicated below with his/her resubmittal: V2– Amended Preliminary Plan Drawings Reviewed by: Jalal Saleh, PE, MBA, Senior Engineer EPC DPW DS-Engineering jalalsaleh@elpasoco.com |
8/18/2026 10:10:17 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
8/17/2026 11:38:48 AM |
1 |
Colorado Springs Utilities has no comment currently for this application. Additional comments will be provided with the submittal of any required Preliminary Utility and Public Facilities Plan associated with future development plan entitlements and building permits, if applicable. Information Item Only: Final Plat Contact Customer Contract Administration (CCA) at 719.668.8111 for an estimate of development charges, fees, Recovery Agreement Charges or other utility-related costs that may apply to this development. Colorado Springs Utilities requires an Application for Gas Line Extension to be submitted along with an Application for Gas Service Line Approval and/or Application for Elevated Pressure Approval prior to natural gas system design for service to the project. Refer to the Colorado Springs Utilities Line Extension and Service Standards or contact Field Engineering at 719-668-4985. Regarding natural gas extensions, Colorado Springs Utilities may require an extension contract and an advance payment for the estimated cost to construct the necessary gas extensions. Improvements, structures and trees must not be located directly over or within 6 feet of any underground gas distribution facilities and shall not violate any applicable natural gas regulations or Colorado Springs Utilities’ policies. Landscaping shall be designed to provide the required clearances for utility facilities, to allow continuous access for utility equipment, and to minimize conflicts with such facilities. Plans can be submitted electronically to Utilities Development Services via www.csu.org. |
8/17/2026 11:38:48 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
8/14/2026 2:20:17 PM |
1 |
1-The city will require $200,000 from the south section of Bradley Road/Legacy Hill Drive intersection to cover their portion of the future signal at this intersection. 2- Please submit the construction plans to ProjectDox for the city's review. 3- If Lots 1 and 2 are developed, sidewalk and curb and gutter along Bradley Rd will be required to be constructed to City standards. Reviewed by Hao Vo, hao.vo@coloradosprings.gov |
8/14/2026 2:20:17 PM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
8/12/2026 1:10:49 PM |
1 |
As requested (Email dated July 28, 2026), the Colorado Geological Survey has been requested to review the resubmittal documents for Waterview East Commercial – Amendment to the Preliminary Plan. We received the Preliminary Plan (Kimley Horn, July 22, 2026); Preliminary Grading Plan (Kimley Horn, July 22, 2026); Letter of Intent (Kimley Horn, July 20, 2026; and other documents. The most current Entech report should be referenced in the Preliminary Plan. CGS has no further comments regarding the amendment to change the lot configuration of the Preliminary Plan. Submitted 8/12/2026 by Amy Crandall, Engineering Geologist, Colorado Geological Survey (303-384-2632 or acrandall@mines.edu) |
8/12/2026 1:10:49 PM | |
|
County Attorney - Water
8/12/2026 9:24:05 AM |
1 | This application does not propose an increase or decrease in the estimated water demand for the subdivision or any other changes in water supply. The County Attorney’s Water Supply Review dated 8/29/23 in File No. SP229 remains valid. | 8/12/2026 9:24:05 AM | |
|
EPC DPW Stormwater
8/12/2026 8:51:59 AM |
1 |
Review 1: Update SP docs per any related comments that I provided in the SF269 review. Besides that, I have no specific comments on the SP documents. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Principal Engineer - Stormwater 719.675.2654 GlennReese@elpasoco.com |
8/12/2026 8:51:59 AM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
8/10/2026 2:27:39 PM |
1 |
Enumerations has the following comments: 1. Once this development plan is approved, submit a copy of this plan to Enumerations for address assignment to be used on the corresponding plat. Brent Johnson Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2888 E: brent@pprbd.org W: pprbd.org |
8/10/2026 2:27:39 PM | |
|
EPC Sheriff's Department
8/9/2026 5:55:09 PM |
1 | Given the zone, code, land use of this application, EPSO defers comments to County Planning & Development | 8/9/2026 5:55:09 PM | |
| View |
Widefield School District 3
8/6/2026 7:29:16 AM |
1 | 8/6/2026 7:29:16 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
8/4/2026 3:27:14 PM |
1 |
No Comments from County Attorney – Development Review at this time. Reviewed by: Erika Keech, Sr. County Attorney, erikakeech2@elpasoco.com. |
8/4/2026 3:27:14 PM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
8/4/2026 2:29:52 PM |
1 | 8/4/2026 2:29:52 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
8/4/2026 12:59:32 PM |
1 |
Traffic Engineering previous comments were not addressed. 1-The city will require $200,000 from the south section of Bradley Road/Legacy Hill Drive intersection to cover their portion of the future signal at this intersection. 2- Please submit the construction plans to ProjectDox for the city's review. Zaker Alazzeh, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager/Deputy City Traffic Engineer City of Colorado Springs (719) 385-5468 Zaker.Alazzeh@coloradosprings.gov |
8/4/2026 12:59:32 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
7/28/2026 4:57:09 PM |
1 | Please see the attached letter for CDOT's comments regarding this development. | 7/28/2026 4:57:09 PM |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
7/28/2026 11:27:29 AM |
1 |
Comments for E911 as follows: Reservoir View - Available Basin Grove – Not available, existing West View – Not acceptable, directionals cannot be used within streetname Streetnaming information (criteria, existing/reserved names) can be found on our website at https://www.elpasoteller911.org/street-emergency-number-databases Thank you. Justin |
7/28/2026 11:27:29 AM |