EDARP
Project Review Comments
- File Number
- PPR2426
- Project Name
- BOCES Campus Site Development Plan
- Description
- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - SUBSEQUENT PPR/CDR REVIEW IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION. Approval of BOCES campus site development plan does not include engineering approval, including all components related to access, transportation / traffic, and drainage. These components will be required under separate application. Construction of this site shall not commence until engineering approval is complete.
- Parcels
- 4200000362 4200000362
- Applicant
-
William Guman & Associates, Ltd.
Bill Guman ( bill@guman.net )
(719) 633-9700 Bill Guman ( bill@guman.net )
(719) 633-9700 - EA Number
- EA2364
- File Number
- PPR2426
- Project Manager
- Ryan Howser
- Status
- Active
- Created
- 7/26/2023 10:42:36 AM
View: Project Documents
| Agency | Review # | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Peyton 23
4/8/2026 8:13:03 AM |
2 | Peyton School District 23jt does not have any new concerns at this time, please see previous response. | 4/8/2026 8:13:03 AM | |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/7/2026 12:06:38 PM |
2 | LOI | 4/7/2026 12:06:38 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/7/2026 11:55:54 AM |
2 | Drainage Report | 4/7/2026 11:55:54 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/7/2026 11:55:36 AM |
2 | Abbreviated LOI | 4/7/2026 11:55:36 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
4/7/2026 1:37:50 PM |
2 |
Review 2: EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report (Informational only, revisions not required for approval) Approval of BOCES Campus Site Development Plan - Phase 1 - Not for Construction does not include engineering approval related to access, transportation / traffic, and drainage. Development Services Engineering review was limited to the Letter of Intent, and there was no additional review of engineering documents for Phase 1. The updated engineering documents that were submitted as a part of the second review shall not be seen as fully addressing the first round of engineering comments nor as being approved in any way as preliminary engineering documents. These components will be required and reviewed under a separate application. Based on a preliminary review, the following documents will be required by EPC DPW Stormwater for the BOCES Phase 2 submittal. Please address V1 & V2 comments from this project and ensure all documents are the most current version, as many have been updated since the 2024 submittal: - Drainage Report - ESQCP - FAE - GEC Plan - GEC Checklist - PCM Applicability Form - SWMP - SWMP Checklist - PCM Maintenance Agreement - PCM - MHFD Detention Calcs or SDI Form - PCM O&M Manual - PCM - Notice of Intent to Construct a Non-Jurisdictional Water Impoundment Structure (proof of submittal) Reviewed by: Zachary Jannusch Associate Engineer - Stormwater 719.500.3170 ZacharyJannusch@elpasoco.com Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer III 719.675.2654 GlennReese@elpasoco.com |
4/7/2026 1:37:50 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2026 11:49:15 AM |
2 |
Review 2. Approval of BOCES Campus Site Development Plan - Phase 1 - Not for Construction does not include engineering approval related to access, transportation / traffic, and drainage. Development Services Engineering review was limited to the Letter of Intent, and there was no additional review of engineering documents for Phase 1. The updated engineering documents that were submitted as a part of the second review shall not be seen as fully addressing the first round of engineering comments nor as being approved in any way as preliminary engineering documents. These components will be required and reviewed under a separate application. Engineering comments provided on the following documents (to be uploaded by stormwater engineering): - Letter of Intent (comments are for reference only and only the abbreviated LOI is to be resubmitted per PCD Planning comment). A condition of approval will be placed on the Site Development Plan reflecting the conceptual approval of the Phase 1 application. Reviewed by: Joe Sandstrom, EIT, Associate Engineer josephsandstrom@elpasoco.com (719) 520-6314 |
4/7/2026 11:49:15 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
4/6/2026 11:09:02 AM |
2 |
No comments from County Attorney - Development Review at this time. Reviewed by: Erika Keech, Sr. County Attorney, erikakeech2@elpasoco.com. |
4/6/2026 11:09:02 AM | |
|
Peyton Fire Protection District
4/4/2026 10:13:52 AM |
2 |
Fire Station & Training Facility - Jurisdictional coordination required. The submitted Development Plan indicates the inclusion of a fire station and firefighting training facility as part of the prosed BOCES campus. However, no detailed information has been provided regarding: - Ownership and operational control of the proposed fire station. - Response area and integration with Peyton Fire Protection District services - Apparatus assignments and operational capabilities - Dispatch, communications, and mutual aid coordination As this project is located within the Peyton Fire Protection District jurisdiction, any proposed fire station or emergency response facility must be coordinated directly with the District. Additional information should be provided addressing the above items. Approval of a fire station or training facility is not granted under this Development Plan submittal. Fire apparatus access roads - IFC compliance required. The Development Plan indicates internal private roads; however, fire apparatus access design criteria have not been demonstrated. All fire apparatus access roads shall comply with 2021 International Fire Code (IFC), Appendix D and Section 503, including but not limited to the following: - Load Capacity (IFC D102.1): Roads shall be designed to support 75,000 lbs. gross vehicle weight and 25,000 lbs. single axle load. - Turning Radius (IFC D103.3): Minimum 25 ft inside radius and 50 ft outside radius - Grad (IFC D103.2): Maximum 10% grade, unless otherwise approved - Road Width (IFC 503.2.1): Minimum 20 feet unobstructed width, increased to 26 feet where required (Aerial fire apparatus access D105.1 or where fire hydrants are location D103.1) - Surface (IFC 503.2.3): Roads shall be all-weather driving surface capable of supporting imposed loads - Fire Lanes Widths (IFC D103.6) - Access Distance (IFC 503.1.1): All portions of structures shall be within 150 feet of a fire apparatus access road - Residential Access Remoteness (IFC D107.2): One- and Two-family residential developments (campus housing) shall comply with access and remoteness requirements, including secondary access where applicable. Fire Flow & Water Supply - Additional Information Required. The Development Plan references a proposed on-site community water system, but no fire protection design criteria have been provided. Provide a detailed fire protection water supply analysis, including: - Available fire flow (hydrant flow test or engineered supply) - Required fire flow per IFC Appendix B (based on building size/type) - Hydrant spacing and distribution per IFC Appendix C - Identification of water system capabilities, storage volumes, and pumping system (if applicable) If a municipal-style water system cannot meet required fire flow, provide alternative compliance per NFPA 1142 (Water Supplies of Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting). Include cistern design, drafting locations, and access details. Approval of this Development Plan does not constitute approval of fire protection infrastructure or emergency response facilities. All fire protection systems, access, and facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the Peyton Fire Protection District prior to construction. |
4/4/2026 10:13:52 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/3/2026 11:17:21 AM |
2 | Please note that approval of phase 1 (not for construction) does not include approval of landscaping, lighting, parking, or any other Land Development Code requirement for this project. Approval is limited to the conceptual use of the property as proposed. Future reviews of the site for phase 2 (for construction) may warrant a change in layout to the site in order to address planning or engineering comments. | 4/3/2026 11:17:21 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/3/2026 11:14:46 AM |
2 |
Review 2: PCD Planning Division will provide comments on the following uploaded documents: - Letter of Intent (to be uploaded by Engineering) |
4/3/2026 11:14:46 AM | |
|
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
8/22/2024 8:20:46 AM |
1 | CDOT staff does not have any comments for this development and a CDOT Access Permit will not be required. | 8/22/2024 8:20:46 AM | |
| View |
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
8/20/2024 1:14:00 PM |
1 | 8/20/2024 1:14:00 PM | |
| View |
County Attorney - Development Review
8/20/2024 9:59:27 AM |
1 |
The Detention Maintenance Agreement was not prepared using the correct template. Please use the attached template and resubmit. Reviewed by: Erika Keech, Senior County Attorney, erikakeech2@elpasoco.com, 719-520-7013 |
8/20/2024 9:59:27 AM |
|
County Attorney - Water
8/13/2024 12:22:25 PM |
1 | The County Attorney's Office does not perform water reviews for Site Development Plans. Please let us know if any other review is needed. Thanks. | 8/13/2024 12:22:25 PM | |
| View |
Peyton 23
8/12/2024 4:33:41 PM |
1 | 8/12/2024 4:33:41 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/8/2024 10:59:53 PM |
1 | letter of intent comments | 8/8/2024 10:59:53 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/8/2024 10:58:59 PM |
1 | Site Development Plan comments | 8/8/2024 10:58:59 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/8/2024 10:57:59 PM |
1 | Financial Assurance Estimate comments | 8/8/2024 10:57:59 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/8/2024 10:57:00 PM |
1 | GEC comments | 8/8/2024 10:57:00 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/8/2024 10:55:58 PM |
1 | - TIS comments | 8/8/2024 10:55:58 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/8/2024 10:55:07 PM |
1 | - Final Drainage Report comments | 8/8/2024 10:55:07 PM |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
8/8/2024 3:20:41 PM |
1 |
Enumerations has the following comments: 1. It does not appear the PPRBD Enumerations has jurisdiction for this project, as it appears to fall under State control. However, Enumerations is available to assist in creating a comprehensive addressing plan for this project. Please contact us if needed. Brent Johnson Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2888 E: brent@pprbd.org W: pprbd.org |
8/8/2024 3:20:41 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
8/8/2024 1:45:52 PM |
1 |
Please see the attached comments to landscape plan. The following documents will be included with engineering review (planning comments in green): - Letter of Intent - Site Development Plan |
8/8/2024 1:45:52 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
8/8/2024 10:51:33 PM |
1 |
Review 1 - EPC Engineering Comments have been provided on the following documents: - Final Drainage Report - TIS - GEC - Financial Assurance Forms - Site Development Plan -Letter of Intent Please submit Construction drawings for the proposed on-site and off-site infrastructure. All documents are uploaded with this comment. Due to the volume and complexity of these comments and the additional information and details required in the plans and reports, additional comments should be expected on the revised submittal documents. Hao Vo haovo@elpasoco.com Joseph Sandstrom josephsandstrom@elpasoco.com Daniel Torres danieltorres@elpasoco.com |
8/8/2024 10:51:33 PM | |
| View |
Meadow Lake Airport Association
8/8/2024 12:11:23 PM |
1 | We note and appreciate the Avigation Easement contained in the Site Development Plan. However, it appears to be written in such legalese that neither we, nor or attorney, understand what it actually says. We suggest a more simple statement that refers to "an avigation easement dated ____ as recorded with the El Paso County Clerk and Recorder at recording number ___." Our recommended easement (as used with Saddlehorn Ranch and requested for Waterbury) is attached. | 8/8/2024 12:11:23 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
8/6/2024 4:13:03 PM |
1 | SWMP Checklist | 8/6/2024 4:13:03 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
8/6/2024 4:12:26 PM |
1 | SWMP | 8/6/2024 4:12:26 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
8/6/2024 4:10:10 PM |
1 | PBMP Applicability Form | 8/6/2024 4:10:10 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
8/6/2024 4:09:48 PM |
1 | O&M Manual | 8/6/2024 4:09:48 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
8/6/2024 4:09:03 PM |
1 | MS4 Post Construction Form | 8/6/2024 4:09:03 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
8/6/2024 4:08:49 PM |
1 | GEC Checklist | 8/6/2024 4:08:49 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
8/6/2024 4:08:30 PM |
1 | ESQCP | 8/6/2024 4:08:30 PM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
8/6/2024 4:13:19 PM |
1 |
Review 1: EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report...(to be uploaded with Development Services comments) - ESQCP - FAE.......................(to be uploaded with Development Services comments) - GEC Plan..............(to be uploaded with Development Services comments) - GEC Checklist - Letter of Intent......(to be uploaded with Development Services comments) - MS4 Post Construction Form - O&M Manual - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP - SWMP Checklist Please provide the following documents upon resubmittal (the planner will send an upload request): - Notice of Intent to Construct a Non-Jurisdictional Water Impoundment Structure (proof of submittal only) Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer III 719.675.2654 GlennReese@elpasoco.com |
8/6/2024 4:13:19 PM | |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
8/5/2024 1:48:52 PM |
1 | See attached comments | 8/5/2024 1:48:52 PM |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
7/25/2024 2:27:52 PM |
1 | 7/25/2024 2:27:52 PM |