EDARP
Project Review Comments
- Project Name
- Joyful View Subdivision
- Description
- combined preliminary plan and Final Plat - 9 lots
- Location
- Parcels
- 3300000466 3300000466 3300000467 3300000467
- Applicant
-
Vertex consulting services
Nina Ruiz ( nina.ruiz@vertexcos.com )
(719) 733-8606 x6606 Nina Ruiz ( nina.ruiz@vertexcos.com )
(719) 733-8606 x6606 - EA Number
- EA20160
- File Number
- SF2231
- Project Manager
- Ryan Howser
- Status
- Active
- Created
- 9/12/2022 4:29:13 PM
View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCD Engineering Division
2/20/2024 3:13:29 PM |
Engineering Review Ver.6 No further engineer comments. Routed for approval Thank you. Edward Schoenheit, Engineer I E.P.C. Dept. of Public Works 2880 International Circle Colorado Springs, CO. 80910 Office: 719.520.6813 Cell: 719.502.9659 https://planningdevelopment.elpasoco.com/ |
2/20/2024 3:13:29 PM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
2/20/2024 1:19:32 PM |
Please correct the exhibits to the Detention Maintenance Agreement. Exhibit A is a legal description of the subdivision property. Exhibit B is a legal description of the lot on which the stormwater facility will lie. Please provide for review all documents mentioned in Paragraph 8 of the Detention Maintenance Agreement. |
2/20/2024 1:19:32 PM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
2/9/2024 2:12:50 PM |
2/9/2024 2:12:50 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
1/31/2024 4:50:23 PM |
Engineering Review Ver.5 Please send the corrected FAE per email sent on 1/31/24. Please sign Detention Maintenance Agreement and return. Documents will be routed for approval once the corrected FAE and signed DMA are received. No further engineer comments. Thank you. Edward Schoenheit, Engineer I E.P.C. Dept. of Public Works 2880 International Circle Colorado Springs, CO. 80910 Office: 719.520.6813 Cell: 719.502.9659 https://planningdevelopment.elpasoco.com/ |
1/31/2024 4:50:23 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
1/31/2024 2:27:14 PM |
Planning has no comments. | 1/31/2024 2:27:14 PM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
1/24/2024 3:17:52 PM |
Review 5: EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - CDs - Detention Maintenance Agreement - Drainage Report - FAE EPC DPW Stormwater has no further comments. Planner: no re-review necessary. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer III GlennReese@elpasoco.com |
1/24/2024 3:17:52 PM | |
|
Ellicott Fire Protection District
1/19/2024 12:48:35 PM |
Somhow my notification email was changed in EDARP and I was not notified of this Final Plat Submittal. The Fire protection Report is false. A 30,000 Gallon Cistern has been requested and is reequired. There are currenntly no in-service appuratus in the Jones road (Falcon Fire Station) Mid Jones Road has a single Tender Pumper. I do not know what the Fondis Station is. Sevral of the vehicles listed have been out of service for years. Per my previous conversation with El Paso County Planning Department and per out Fire District Attorney the only information that will be provided for a Fire protection Report is the following: "Ellicott Fire protection District is currently an ISO 6/9, and provides structural and wildland fire supression services through the district. Ellicott Station 2 is our headqurters station servicein g this area, located at 75 N Ellicott Highway, Calahan, Colorado, which is approcimately 7.0 miles away." The Ellicott Fire district does not peovide specific fire appuratus station assignments per the Department Homland Secuity recomendations. The Ellicott Fire Department would like to see the design specifications for the required 30,000 Gallon Cistern. Cistern is required to be inplace prior to bringing combustible building materials on site. There is a $100.00 revier free payable to the Ellicott Fire Department checks payable to the Ellicott Fire Department can be mailed to 75 N Ellicott Hwy, Calhan, CO 80808. Please include the project name on the check. There are no other objections to this submittal. Mark Stanwood Fire Marshal. |
1/19/2024 12:48:35 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/9/2024 3:18:39 PM |
V4: FAE (Stormwater comments) | 1/9/2024 3:18:39 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/9/2024 11:47:06 AM |
V4: FDR (Stormwater comments; includes markup summary) | 1/9/2024 11:47:06 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/9/2024 11:46:41 AM |
V4: DMA (Stormwater comments) | 1/9/2024 11:46:41 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/9/2024 11:45:36 AM |
V4: CDs (Stormwater comments) | 1/9/2024 11:45:36 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
1/9/2024 11:06:45 AM |
Planning Division has no further comments at this time. Please address Engineering and Stormwater comments prior to project scheduling for public hearings. | 1/9/2024 11:06:45 AM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
1/8/2024 9:53:38 AM |
Engineering Review Ver.4 Please see engineering review comments on the following documents: PCD Planner to program a 5-business day re-review for engineering. - TIS V4: Owner signature - FAE V4: Pond as-built and cert. cost missing. Please add. Owner to sign. Resolve SW comment. - Final Drainage Report V4: Engineer Stamp and Sign, Owner Sign - ESQCP V4: Update project schedule timeline, Owner Sign - BMP Pond Maintenance Agreement: Sign document, Resolve SW comment - CD V4: Owner sign Resolve SW comments - GEC Plan V4: Engineer Stamp/sign all pages, Owner sign Engineer comments addressed on the following documents: Final Plat V4 Cul-de-sac Deviation Thank you Edward Schoenheit, Engineer I E.P.C. Dept. of Public Works 2880 International Circle Colorado Springs, CO. 80910 Office: 719.520.6813 Cell: 719.502.9659 https://planningdevelopment.elpasoco.com/ |
1/8/2024 9:53:38 AM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
1/8/2024 9:44:30 AM |
Review 4: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - CDs........................(to be uploaded by PM) - Detention Maintenance Agreement....(to be uploaded by PM) - Drainage Report.....(to be uploaded by PM) - FAE........................(to be uploaded by PM) Uresolved comment from Review #2 and #3, respectively (the applicant emailed these docs to me on 1/3/2024 and I have no comments, but they still need to get uploaded to EDARP): Please provide the following documents upon resubmittal (ask the planner to send an upload request): - O&M Manual - The State's Non-Jurisdictional Water Impoundment Structure Application EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - Final Plat - GEC Plan Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer III GlennReese@elpasoco.com |
1/8/2024 9:44:30 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/12/2023 5:16:26 PM |
V3 - FAE comments | 12/12/2023 5:16:26 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/12/2023 5:16:08 PM |
V3 - final plat comments | 12/12/2023 5:16:08 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/12/2023 5:15:50 PM |
V3 - Drainage report comments | 12/12/2023 5:15:50 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/12/2023 5:15:32 PM |
V3 - Cul-de-sac deviation comments | 12/12/2023 5:15:32 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/12/2023 5:14:48 PM |
V3 - CDs comments | 12/12/2023 5:14:48 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/12/2023 5:17:53 PM |
V3 - GEC plan comments | 12/12/2023 5:17:53 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
12/12/2023 5:19:38 PM |
Review 3: PCD Planning Division comments have been provided (in green) on the following uploaded documents: - Final Plat (includes Engineering comments) |
12/12/2023 5:19:38 PM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
12/12/2023 10:05:27 AM |
Per Entech’s Report (Entech Engineering, Revised November 16, 2023), the geologic conditions that will pose constraints on the site include areas of artificial fill, potentially expansive soils, hydrocompactive soils, potentially seasonal shallow groundwater areas, and floodplains. Entech’s characterization of the geologic hazards and constraints associated with the site is valid. Provided Entech’s recommendations are adhered to, CGS has no objection to approval of the final plat as proposed. We offer the following comments: 1. The southern portion of the site contains an Unnamed Tributary mapped as a FEMA Floodplain (Map Number 08041C0805G, December 7, 2018). This area is designated as a “No-Build Area” on the Final Plat (SMH Consultants, March 16, 2023) and impacts lots 4 and 5. Entech’s recommendations for erosion control measures (pages 7-8) must be incorporated during the design and construction of the lots. 2. Individual investigations for new building sites and septic systems should be conducted prior to construction. 3. The Geologic Hazard Note on the Final Plat should be updated to reference Entech’s revised report. 4. Note 28 of the Grading & Erosion Control Plans (HR Green, October 16, 2023) should be updated to include Entech’s revised report. Submitted 12/12/2023 by Amy Crandall, Engineering Geologist, Colorado Geological Survey (303-384-2632 or acrandall@mines.edu) |
12/12/2023 10:05:27 AM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
12/12/2023 4:56:07 PM |
Engineering Review Ver.3 Please see engineering review comments on the following documents: PCD Planner to program a 7-business day re-review. - Cul-de-sac Deviation V3: See comments on form. Unresolved from V2. -TIS V3: Owner signature - FAE V3: Pond as-built and cert. line item costs to be added. See SW comment. - Plat Drawings V3: Correction of drainage/bridge fee - Final Drainage Report V3 - ESQCP V3 Owner Sign - Submit BMP Pond Maintenance Agreement Thank you Edward Schoenheit, Engineer I E.P.C. Dept. of Public Works 2880 International Circle Colorado Springs, CO. 80910 Office: 719.520.6813 Cell: 719.502.9659 https://planningdevelopment.elpasoco.com/ |
12/12/2023 4:56:07 PM | |
| View |
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
12/7/2023 8:16:10 AM |
No further comment regarding this exhibit. See attached for addressing plan. Feel free to give me a call if anyone has any questions. Becky Allen Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-799-2707 W: pprbd.org E: beckya@pprbd.org |
12/7/2023 8:16:10 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
12/12/2023 2:21:45 PM |
Review 3: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - CDs........................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - Drainage Report.....(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - FAE........................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - Final Plat................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Plan...............(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) Uresolved comment from Review #2: Please provide the following documents upon resubmittal (ask the planner to send an upload request): - O&M Manual (the document that was uploaded to EDARP for Submittal #1 & #2 was just a duplicate copy of the SWMP. Include an O&M Manual for both the Runoff Reduction areas and the EDB. See O&M Manual templates on the City's website for Grass Buffers/Swales and EDB: https://coloradosprings.gov/stormwater-enterprise/page/operations-and-maintenance-permanent-bmps?mlid=6126 - Private Detention Basin / Stormwater Quality BMP Maintenance Agreement And now that an EDB has been included in the plans, provide the following document: - The State's Non-Jurisdictional Water Impoundment Structure Application EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - ESQCP - GEC Checklist - MS4 Post Construction Form - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP - SWMP Checklist Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer III GlennReese@elpasoco.com |
12/12/2023 2:21:45 PM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
11/30/2023 8:16:31 AM |
Comments for E911 as follows: Ellas May Vw – Approved and reserved No other action for E911 on this submittal. Thank you Justin |
11/30/2023 8:16:31 AM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
8/10/2023 1:51:26 PM |
Hello: 1. Please clarify with 911 Authority a new street name based on their comments regarding Ellas Way. Once the street name has been approved, please email Becky Allen (beckya@pprbd.org) the approval from E-911. 2. Also be sure to update the Construction Documents to show the new approved street name. 3. Please add Joyful view in its location to the Final Plat. 4. Once the street name is clarified, Enumerations can provide addresses for this subdivision. 5. Previous comments regarding the street name on the construction documents have not been addressed. The street name is Joyful View not Joyful View Road. Please be sure to update all plan pages in the Construction documents to reflect the correct spelling of the street name. Becky Allen Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-799-2707 W: pprbd.org E: beckya@pprbd.org |
8/10/2023 1:51:26 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/1/2023 4:02:00 PM |
V2_Plat Drawing | 8/1/2023 4:02:00 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/1/2023 4:01:12 PM |
V2_LOI | 8/1/2023 4:01:12 PM |
| View |
County Attorney - Water
8/1/2023 3:47:37 PM |
See Water Supply Review and Recommendations included here. | 8/1/2023 3:47:37 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/1/2023 11:34:18 AM |
Final Drainage Report V2 | 8/1/2023 11:34:18 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/1/2023 11:33:53 AM |
GEC Plan V2 | 8/1/2023 11:33:53 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/1/2023 11:33:24 AM |
FAE V2 | 8/1/2023 11:33:24 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/1/2023 11:33:03 AM |
CDs V2 | 8/1/2023 11:33:03 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/1/2023 11:32:39 AM |
TIS V2 | 8/1/2023 11:32:39 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/1/2023 11:32:13 AM |
Local Road Standards Deviation V2 | 8/1/2023 11:32:13 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/1/2023 11:31:52 AM |
Cul-de-sac Deviation V2 | 8/1/2023 11:31:52 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/1/2023 11:31:29 AM |
ESQCP V2 | 8/1/2023 11:31:29 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
7/28/2023 7:25:28 AM |
Informational comment: please note that El Paso County Planning and Community Development cannot and will not accept collateral or escrow (use whichever necessary) payment until plat recording (for plats), escrow agreement is signed and recorded (for escrow), financial assurance form is signed and approved (for FAE no plat). Any collateral or escrow payments that are received prior to the appropriate conditions being met will not be accepted and will be returned until such time payment is deemed as appropriate. Please coordinate with PCD Project Manager prior to making any collateral or escrow payments. | 7/28/2023 7:25:28 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
7/28/2023 7:25:19 AM |
Review 2: PCD Planning Division comments have been provided (in green text boxes) on the following documents: - Subdivision Summary Form (same comments as Review 1 - form was not resubmitted with corrections) - Final Plat - Letter of Intent |
7/28/2023 7:25:19 AM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
7/28/2023 6:44:13 AM |
floodplain note line work and BFEs all appear correct no further comment | 7/28/2023 6:44:13 AM | |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
7/27/2023 2:17:21 PM |
SWMP Checklist | 7/27/2023 2:17:21 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
7/27/2023 2:17:05 PM |
SWMP | 7/27/2023 2:17:05 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
7/27/2023 2:16:40 PM |
PBMP Applicability Form | 7/27/2023 2:16:40 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
7/27/2023 2:16:18 PM |
MS4 Post Construction Form | 7/27/2023 2:16:18 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
7/27/2023 2:15:52 PM |
GEC Checklist | 7/27/2023 2:15:52 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
8/1/2023 3:58:31 PM |
Engineering Review Ver.2 Please see engineering review comments on the following documents: -ESQCP V2 - LOI V2 - Cul-de-sac Deviation V2 - Local Road Standards Deviation V2- Deviation is not approved. -TIS V2 -CDs V2 -FAE V2 - Plat Drawings V2 - GEC Plan V2 - Final Drainage Report V2 Thank you Edward Schoenheit, Engineer I E.P.C. Dept. of Public Works 2880 International Circle Colorado Springs, CO. 80910 Office: 719.520.6813 Cell: 719.502.9659 https://planningdevelopment.elpasoco.com/ |
8/1/2023 3:58:31 PM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
7/27/2023 12:05:41 PM |
Review 2: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - CDs........................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - Drainage Report.....(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - ESQCP...................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - FAE........................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - Final Plat................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Plan...............(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Checklist - MS4 Post Construction Form - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP - SWMP Checklist Please provide the following documents upon resubmittal (ask the planner to send an upload request): - O&M Manual (the document that was uploaded to EDARP for Submittal #1 was just a duplicate copy of the SWMP. See my comment on PDF pg 12 of the FDR). - Private Detention Basin / Stormwater Quality BMP Maintenance Agreement Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer III GlennReese@elpasoco.com |
7/27/2023 12:05:41 PM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
7/6/2023 8:14:33 AM |
Ellas Way – Not available, phonetically similar to existing Ellis St. As a private roadway, the suffix should be Grove, Heights, Point, or View. Streetnaming criteria, along with lists of existing/reserved names can be found at http://elpasoteller911.org/191/Street-Name-Database Please feel free to send any questions to jannan@eptc911.org Thank you Justin |
7/6/2023 8:14:33 AM | |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
11/14/2022 11:23:16 AM |
See Park Advisory Board endorsed review attached. Thanks, Greg |
11/14/2022 11:23:16 AM |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
11/4/2022 5:22:24 PM |
No comments from County Attorney - Development Review at this time. | 11/4/2022 5:22:24 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
11/2/2022 8:24:35 AM |
11/2/2022 8:24:35 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
11/2/2022 7:51:31 AM |
Section 8.4.9 Geology And Soils Report Comments | 11/2/2022 7:51:31 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
11/2/2022 7:50:28 AM |
“Absorption field must be located a minimum of 100 feet from any well, including those on adjacent properties. Absorption fields must also be located a minimum of 50 feet from any drainages, floodplains, or ponded areas and 25 feet from dry gulches.” Please add note in regard to On-site wastewater systems | 11/2/2022 7:50:28 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
11/2/2022 7:45:39 AM |
Plat Redlines- Please incorporate checklist items. | 11/2/2022 7:45:39 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
11/2/2022 7:18:13 AM |
Letter of Intent Comments please add the criteria for approval for the combination of a prelim and final plat as provided to the applicant in the comments. Please make sure to address how the application meets the criteria (supporting docs such as the Master Plan, Geo reports, etc can be referenced in the answer) | 11/2/2022 7:18:13 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
11/2/2022 7:09:51 AM |
Subdivision Summary Sheet comments | 11/2/2022 7:09:51 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
11/1/2022 12:02:00 PM |
Minor Subdivision (combined Prelim and plat criteria approved by Lori) Applies to minor final plats where no preliminary plan Last edited: 8/3 Approval Criteria The proposed subdivision is in general conformance with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Master Plan. The subdivision is consistent with the purposes of the Land Development Code (“Code”). The subdivision is in conformance with the subdivision design standards and regulations and meets all planning, engineering, and surveying requirements of the County for maps, data, surveys, analysis, studies, reports, plans, designs, documents, and other supporting materials. A sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards [C.R.S. § 30-28-133(6)(a)] and the requirements of Chapter 8 of the Code. A public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, the system complies with state and local laws and regulations, [C.R.S. § 30-28-133(6) (b)] and the requirements of Chapter 8 of the Code. All areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified and the proposed subdivision is compatible with such conditions. [C.R.S. § 30-28-133(6)(c)]. Adequate drainage improvements complying with State law [C.R.S. § 30-28-133(3)(c)(VIII)] and the requirements of the Code and the Engineering Criteria Manual (“ECM’”) are provided by the design. The location and design of the public improvements proposed in connection with the subdivision are adequate to serve the needs and mitigate the effects of the development. Legal and physical access is or will be provided to all parcels by public rights-of-way or recorded easement, acceptable to the County and in compliance with the Code and the ECM. The proposed subdivision has established an adequate level of compatibility by (1) incorporating natural physical features into the design and providing sufficient open spaces considering the type and intensity of the subdivision; (2) incorporating site planning techniques to foster the implementation of the County's plans, and encourage a land use pattern to support a balanced transportation system, including auto, bike and pedestrian traffic, public or mass transit if appropriate, and the cost effective delivery of other services consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations of the County; (3) incorporating physical design features in the subdivision to provide a transition between the subdivision and adjacent land uses; (4) incorporating identified environmentally sensitive areas, including but not limited to, wetlands and wildlife corridors, into the design; and (5) incorporating public facilities or infrastructure, or provisions therefor, reasonably related to the proposed subdivision so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of County services and facilities. Necessary services, including police and fire protection, recreation, utilities, open space and transportation system, are or will be available to serve the proposed subdivision. The subdivision provides evidence to show that the proposed methods for fire protection comply with Chapter 6 of the Code. The proposed subdivision meets other applicable sections of Chapters 6 and 8 of the Code. Off-site impacts were evaluated, and related off-site improvements are roughly proportional and will mitigate the impacts of the subdivision in accordance with applicable requirements of Chapter 8 of the Code. Adequate public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, for impacts reasonably related to the proposed subdivision have been constructed or are financially guaranteed through the SIA so the impacts of the subdivision will be adequately mitigated. The extraction of any known commercial mining deposit shall not be impeded by this subdivision [C.R.S. §§ 34-1-302(1), et seq.]. |
11/1/2022 12:02:00 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
11/1/2022 9:33:38 AM |
Please add a request for a waiver for the Fire Protection Report as a submittal items. The District has indicated they are unable to provide the applicant with the necessary data to craft a fire protection report due to security reason's. I recommend you discuss with the chief and upload his statement as to why into EDARP. | 11/1/2022 9:33:38 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
11/1/2022 9:30:54 AM |
FAE Comments All staff Review 1 | 11/1/2022 9:30:54 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/31/2022 3:08:07 PM |
The property owner on record does not appear to be Craig Dossey; Please have the property owner sign the application authorizing the final plat (no preliminary plan is required) | 10/31/2022 3:08:07 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/31/2022 3:06:21 PM |
Adjacent property owner has the incorrect consultant on it. Please update with the appropriate firm. It has 3 people on the mailing. Is that accurate? | 10/31/2022 3:06:21 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/25/2022 11:44:34 PM |
Traffic study redlines | 10/25/2022 11:44:34 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/25/2022 11:44:04 PM |
Grading and Erosion Control Plans redlines | 10/25/2022 11:44:04 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/25/2022 11:43:10 PM |
Drainage Report Redlines | 10/25/2022 11:43:10 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/25/2022 11:43:27 PM |
Deviation-Cul-de-sac length redlines | 10/25/2022 11:43:27 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/25/2022 11:42:05 PM |
Construction drawings redlines | 10/25/2022 11:42:05 PM |
| View |
Colorado Parks and Wildlife
10/25/2022 6:10:22 PM |
10/25/2022 6:10:22 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
10/25/2022 5:04:53 PM |
Engineer Review Ver.1 Please see engineer redline comments on the following documents. Due to the nature and extent of the comments and missing documents certain documents will be treated as a first review on subsequent submittals. -Construction Drawings -Deviation-Cul-de-sac length -Drainage Report -FAE Form-To be uploaded by Planner/PM -Final Plat Drawing-To be uploaded by Planner/PM -Grading & Erosion Control Plan -Traffic Impact Study -Soil & Geology Report- To be uploaded by Planner/PM -Letter of Intent-To be uploaded by Planner/PM Please submit missing documents - ESQCP - MS4 Post Construction Form - O&M Manual - Private Detention Basin / Stormwater Quality BMP Maintenance Agreement Deviations (2) for culvert coverage-under tech review Edward Schoenheit, Engineer I E.P.C. Planning & Community Development 2880 International Circle Colorado Springs, CO. 80910 Office: 719.520.6813 Cell: 719.502.9659 https://planningdevelopment.elpasoco.com/ |
10/25/2022 5:04:53 PM | |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/24/2022 5:19:12 PM |
SWMP Checklist | 10/24/2022 5:19:12 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/24/2022 5:18:54 PM |
SWMP | 10/24/2022 5:18:54 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/24/2022 5:18:30 PM |
PBMP Applicability Form | 10/24/2022 5:18:30 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/24/2022 5:18:06 PM |
GEC Checklist | 10/24/2022 5:18:06 PM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
10/24/2022 5:17:38 PM |
Review 1: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report....(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - FAE........................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Plan...............(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Checklist - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP - SWMP Checklist Please provide the following documents upon resubmittal (ask the planner to send an upload request): - ESQCP - MS4 Post Construction Form - O&M Manual - Private Detention Basin / Stormwater Quality BMP Maintenance Agreement Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II GlennReese@elpasoco.com |
10/24/2022 5:17:38 PM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
10/24/2022 3:34:57 PM |
Brief comments attached as a .pdf. | 10/24/2022 3:34:57 PM |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
10/24/2022 1:07:04 PM |
Hello: Please see my comments below: 1. Joyful View Circle does not follow proper street naming criteria, please contact the 911 Authority, El Paso/Teller County, regarding street name approval. Once approved, please email Becky Allen the approval from E911. Beckya@pprbd.org. 2. Also, once the street name is approved, the construction drawings will need to be updated to show the correct/new street name. 3. The Construction drawings will need to be updated to show the correct street name, also remove the word “Road” from the street name for Joyful View. The street name is Joyful Vw not Joyful View Rd. 4. Once the street name has been approved, send Becky Allen a request to address the area. Beckya@pprbd.org. The addresses will need to be shown on the mylar for our review. 5. The lot locations on the first page of the C sheets do not match the locations on the final plat. Please update the construction drawings to show the correct lot locations. Final Plat Comments Apply: 1. Enumerations will review the mylar prior to plat for address placement, street names, and title block. 2. A $10.00 per lot and tract platting fee will be due at the time of the review of the mylar, (two addresses per lot and tract). If an address is not needed on a tract then no fee applies. Check should be made out to PIKES PEAK REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT or PPRBD. Paid directly to the Enumerations Department. As of September 28th, 2022, an additional over the phone transaction fee of 2.95% of the total transaction will apply for any credit card payment. 3. A copy of the final recorded plat is required prior to plan submittal for RESIDENTIAL. BeckyA@pprbd.org (Please email the Enumerations staff that reviewed your project). 4. Mylar reviews can be reviewed via “pdf”. The mylar will be stamped by Enumerations for accuracy and returned to the applicant and the planner. All payments to be mailed to RBD via a check or credit card payment over the phone. Plats should not be recorded prior to Enumerations receiving payment. If you would like an in-person review, please make an appointment on our website. Becky Allen Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-799-2707 W: pprbd.org E: beckya@pprbd.org |
10/24/2022 1:07:04 PM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
10/24/2022 10:27:31 AM |
Per Entech’s Report (Entech Engineering, September 22, 2021), the geologic conditions that will pose constraints on the site include areas of artificial fill, potentially expansive soils, hydrocompactive soils, potentially seasonal shallow groundwater areas, and floodplains. In addition, erosion is a geologic condition associated with the site soils. The southern portion of the site contains an Unnamed Tributary mapped as a FEMA Floodplain (Map Number 08041C0805G, December 7, 2018). This area is designated as a “No-Build Area” on the Final Plat (LWA Land Surveying, September 26, 2022). Two drainage channels are also located within the site. Entech mapped these drainages as “seasonal wet areas” and stated (page 6), “In order to reduce any hazards related to the seasonally wet areas on this site it is suggested that all building and construction be out-side of the marked seasonally wet areas.” We agree with Entech (page 7), “Due to the size of the proposed lots these areas can be avoided or redirected around proposed structures or proposed soil treatment areas.” CGS also agrees with Entech’s recommendations in their wastewater study (page 5), “Absorption field must be located a minimum of 100 feet from any well, including those on adjacent properties. Absorption fields must also be located a minimum of 50 feet from any drainages, floodplains, or ponded areas and 25 feet from dry gulches.” CGS recommends: 1. An erosional non-buildable setback is established from the floodplain boundary (impacting lots 7 and 9) and near the drainage channels. Setbacks must be noted in the final plat. 2. Entech’s recommendations for erosion control measures (pages 7-8) must be incorporated during the design and construction of the lots. 3. Individual investigations for new building sites and septic systems should be conducted prior to construction. 4. Note 16 of the Final Plat should be updated to include Entech’s September 22, 2021, report. 5. Note 29 of the Grading & Erosion Control Plans (RESPEC, September 22, 2022) should be updated to include Entech’s report. 6. Entech’s recommendations should be strictly adhered to. Submitted 10/24/2022 by Amy Crandall, Engineering Geologist, Colorado Geological Survey (303-384-2632 or acrandall@mines.edu) |
10/24/2022 10:27:31 AM | |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
10/24/2022 9:06:50 AM |
See attached comments | 10/24/2022 9:06:50 AM |
|
Ellicott Fire Protection District
10/19/2022 6:10:59 PM |
The Fire Protection Report is inaccurate. This report should be removed from the submission. The commitment letter contains the required fire protection report information. Contact me for a more accurate vehicle deployment. FYI Primary response will always be out of Ellicott Fire Station 2 at 75 N Ellicott HWY. Second we have not yet commented on Fire Water Supply since this is the first review of this project. Water Supply - Yes a 30,000 Gallon water Cistern is required for this development per the Land Development Code and Per the 2015 IFC as adopted by the Ellicott Fire Department. Per the Ellicott Fire Department Commitment Letter "Additional construction will necessitate the need for infrastructure to maintain the proper level of service" This means the addition of a cistern to provide proper fire protection service. The private Road as discussed earlier is approximately 1,698 ft dead end road, this road has a required R-60 FT turnaround and exceeds the minimum width of 26 FT. in addition 2 "Node" mid road turn around's approximately 600 to 700 FT apart will be required. There is an additional 885 FT Dead end road/driveway after the end of the private road. This is initially 20 FT wide and then reduced to 10 FT. This will require a turn around at the end and an unobstructed shoulder of 4 FT on each side of the improved road/driveway surface. There is a $179.00 Review fee payable to the Ellicott Fire Department at 75 N Ellicott HWY, Callahan, CO 80808. This must be paid in Cash or Check we are unable to accept credit cards. Please review and address the above comments. Thank you. | 10/19/2022 6:10:59 PM | |
|
Colorado State Forest Service
10/19/2022 8:09:08 AM |
The primary wildland fuel type for this proposal is grassland with scattered trees having a low wildfire hazard potential. No special fire mitigation plans or other actions are necessary for final approval by the Colorado State Forest Service. | 10/19/2022 8:09:08 AM | |
|
Meadow Lake Airport Association
10/18/2022 9:54:47 AM |
This subdivision appears to be well outside the Meadow Lake AIA. We have no objection or comment. | 10/18/2022 9:54:47 AM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
10/18/2022 8:36:53 AM |
See preliminary Parks comments attached. | 10/18/2022 8:36:53 AM |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
10/17/2022 7:46:16 AM |
Comments for E911 as follows: The private roadway depicted in the plan should be assigned a name. Streetnaming criteria, along with lists of existing/reserved names can be found at: http://elpasoteller911.org/191/Street-Name-Database Please feel free to send any questions to jannan@elpasoteller911.org Thank you Justin |
10/17/2022 7:46:16 AM | |
|
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
10/13/2022 10:58:10 AM |
CDOT has no comments. This development will not increase traffic volumes by more than 20% for the intersection of SH94 and Peyton Highway. Therefore, CDOT access permit will not be required for this development. | 10/13/2022 10:58:10 AM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
10/12/2022 1:59:20 PM |
10/12/2022 1:59:20 PM | |
|
County Attorney - Water
10/12/2022 9:10:04 AM |
County Attorney's Office will provide review of water sufficiency following receipt of findings from Colorado Division of Water Resources. Thank you. | 10/12/2022 9:10:04 AM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
10/12/2022 6:57:53 AM |
show BFE lines on plat add citation for LOMR case number 20-08-0369p to note 17 |
10/12/2022 6:57:53 AM |