Project Review Comments
- Project Name
- Silverado Ranch Filing No. 2
- Description
- 15 single family lots; private gravel roads built to County Standards to be owned and maintained by HOA; no County Ownership Due to public road turning into a private road Silverado Hill Loop and Drover Hill Lane changed to Silverado Hill View and Drover Hill View
- Location
- Parcels
- 3516000001 3516000001
- Applicant
-
JPS Engineering, Inc.
John Schwab ( john@jpsengr.com )
(719) 477-9429 John Schwab ( john@jpsengr.com )
(719) 477-9429 - EA Number
- EA21137
- File Number
- SF246
- Project Manager
- Kylie Bagley
- Status
- Active
- Created
- 6/30/2022 12:01:19 PM
View: Project Documents
Agency | Comment | ||
---|---|---|---|
View |
County Attorney - Development Review
11/12/2024 4:25:03 PM |
With respect to SIA, no comments from County Attorney - Development Review at this time. With respect to DMA, please see edits to attached document. Reviewed by: Erika Keech, Senior County Attorney, erikakeech2@elpasoco.com, 719-520-7013 |
11/12/2024 4:25:03 PM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
10/31/2024 8:41:11 AM |
Grading and erosion control plan redlines | 10/31/2024 8:41:11 AM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
10/31/2024 8:40:48 AM |
Financial assurance forms redlines | 10/31/2024 8:40:48 AM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
10/31/2024 8:40:29 AM |
Final plat drawing redlines | 10/31/2024 8:40:29 AM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
10/31/2024 8:40:10 AM |
Deviation request redlines | 10/31/2024 8:40:10 AM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
10/31/2024 8:39:50 AM |
Deviation request for crushed asphalt roadway redlines | 10/31/2024 8:39:50 AM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
10/31/2024 8:39:22 AM |
Construction drawing redlines | 10/31/2024 8:39:22 AM |
PCD Project Manager
10/31/2024 8:38:53 AM |
No further planning comments | 10/31/2024 8:38:53 AM | |
PCD Engineering Division
10/30/2024 4:18:46 PM |
Review 3 - EPC Engineering Comments have been provided on the following documents (to be uploaded by project manager): - Drainage Report - Construction Drawings - Deviation Request-For Crushed Asphalt Roadway - Deviation Request - For Cul-de-sacs - Final Plat - GEC Plans - FAE The following documents have no further comments: - TIS Reviewed by: Hao Vo, PE haeovo@elpasoco.com Bret Dilts, PE bretdilts@elpasoco.com |
10/30/2024 4:18:46 PM | |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/30/2024 4:05:53 PM |
EPC DPW Stormwater review completed by Development Services Engineers for this submittal. The DMA is under review with the County Attorney Office. Reviewed by: Christina Prete, P.E. Stormwater Manager ChristinaPrete@elpasoco.com |
10/30/2024 4:05:53 PM | |
Colorado Geological Survey
10/28/2024 10:34:11 AM |
The updated referral documents include the following: Soil and Geology Study (Entech Engineering, Inc., October 8, 2024). Entech identified areas where geologic conditions would impose some minor constraints, including “areas of artificial fill, hydrocompaction, potentially expansive soils, potential seasonally shallow groundwater areas, and potential for elevated radon levels” (page 1). Entech’s interpretation of the geologic conditions and mitigation measures is valid. The final plat (LWA Land Surveying, Inc., October 15, 2024) references a geology report by Front Range Geotechnical dated October 5, 2006. CGS recommends that the plat be updated to include Entech’s October 8, 2024 report and the geologic conditions and mitigation measures identified in the report. No-build areas are present within Lots 10 and 11; no improvements should be planned within these areas. Submitted 10/28/2024 by Amy Crandall, Colorado Geological Survey: acrandall@mines.edu |
10/28/2024 10:34:11 AM | |
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
10/25/2024 11:29:44 AM |
Please provide Enumerations with the new overall projected layout for the entire area, for addressing purposes. Email me directly. Contact me when you are ready for addressing for the plat. Once addresses are received they will need to be placed on the plat. Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org |
10/25/2024 11:29:44 AM | |
County Attorney - Water
10/23/2024 9:35:49 AM |
1. There are two WSIS forms in the file. Each seems to address the per lot demand in Section 9. Please upload only one form that contains the total demand for the subdivision in Section 9. 2. The Water Resource Report refers to an email string to address water quantity. The email string states that this office will rely on the portions of the 2006 Water Resource Report that address water quantity. There is no 2006 Water Resource Report in this file. Please upload. 3. The water quality information in the Water Resource Report does not appear to meet the requirements of the Land Development Code. Please see section 8.4.7 (B)(10). |
10/23/2024 9:35:49 AM | |
View |
PCD Project Manager
7/12/2024 3:31:56 PM |
Final Plat Redlines | 7/12/2024 3:31:56 PM |
View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/12/2024 9:36:44 AM |
V2_Traffic Impact Study | 7/12/2024 9:36:44 AM |
View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/12/2024 9:36:14 AM |
V2_FAE | 7/12/2024 9:36:14 AM |
View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/12/2024 9:35:45 AM |
V2_Grading & Erosion Control Plan | 7/12/2024 9:35:45 AM |
View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/12/2024 9:35:13 AM |
V2_Final Plat Drawings | 7/12/2024 9:35:13 AM |
View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/12/2024 9:34:38 AM |
V2_Deviation Request for Cul-de-sacs | 7/12/2024 9:34:38 AM |
View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/12/2024 9:33:57 AM |
V2_Deviation Request for Crushed Asphalt Roadway | 7/12/2024 9:33:57 AM |
View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/12/2024 9:33:30 AM |
V2_Construction Drawings (Plans-Profiles) | 7/12/2024 9:33:30 AM |
View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/12/2024 9:32:36 AM |
V2_Final Drainage Report | 7/12/2024 9:32:36 AM |
PCD Engineering Division
7/12/2024 9:37:05 AM |
Review 2 - EPC Engineering Comments have been provided on the following documents (to be uploaded by project manager): - Drainage Report - Construction Drawings - Deviation Request-For Crushed Asphalt Roadway - Deviation Request - For Cul-de-sacs - Final Plat - GEC Plans - FAE - TIS All documents are uploaded with this comment. Due to the nature and volume of comments provided, additional comments may be generated with the third review. Reviewed by: Hao Vo, PE haeovo@elpasoco.com Bret Dilts, PE bretdilts@elpasoco.com Charlene Durham, PE charlenedurham@elpasoco.com |
7/12/2024 9:37:05 AM | |
Colorado Geological Survey
7/10/2024 9:43:10 AM |
The updated referral documents include the following: Soils & Geology – Additional Information, dated 6/21/2024, prepared by Patten Associates, Inc. Patten provides two documents they indicate address our comment (CGS, 4/1/2024): “Although Front Range Geotechnical’s report is outdated, the conclusions and identification of geologic hazards and constraints are still valid. However, the test holes only extended to depths ranging from 10 to 12 feet. If basements or significant cuts are planned, these depths are not sufficient to properly characterize the subsurface materials.” Patten states: 1. Entech, the firm that has done much of the drilling for the residential wells in Silverado Ranch, states they typically drill test borings to 20-30 feet and sample at 5 foot intervals. 2. A letter from Kunau Drilling states that the Silverado wells “have shown not to encounter groundwater above 50’.” CGS agrees that test borings should be drilled to depths of 20-30 feet. Although wells constructed within Silverado Ranch were not shown to include groundwater (per Kunau Drilling), variations and fluctuations in groundwater levels occur depending on the season and location within the site. As stated in our previous comments (4/1/2024), CGS continues to recommend that the county require an updated geology and soil report to evaluate the geologic constraints including test borings drilled to determine groundwater and bedrock depths where both are likely to be shallow. Submitted 7/10/2024 by Amy Crandall, Colorado Geological Survey: acrandall@mines.edu |
7/10/2024 9:43:10 AM | |
EPC Stormwater Review
7/9/2024 10:32:11 AM |
Review 2: EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report...(to be uploaded with Development Services comments) - GEC Plan..............(to be uploaded with Development Services comments) EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - FAE - GEC Checklist - O&M Manual - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP - SWMP Checklist Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer III GlennReese@elpasoco.com |
7/9/2024 10:32:11 AM | |
County Attorney - Water
7/5/2024 11:00:33 AM |
-Please upload or direct us to deeds showing chain of title for the water from Space Center LLP (the applicant in 325-BD) to Silverado Ranch Inc., (the applicant in this file requesting a water finding). -Please remove the documents currently under "Signed Court Decrees". Thank you. |
7/5/2024 11:00:33 AM | |
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
7/2/2024 10:27:17 AM |
1. The configuration has changed from the original layout. Before the area can be assigned addressing, Enumerations will need to see the overall layout. Please email to Amy Vanderbeek Amy@pprbd.org 2. Standard Final Plat comments: a. Enumerations will review the pre-plat (mylar) prior to plat for address placement, street names, and title block. b. A $10.00 per lot and tract platting fee will be due at the time of the review of the pre-plat, (two addresses per lot and tract). If an address is not needed on a tract then no fee applies. Check should be made out to PIKES PEAK REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT or PPRBD. Paid directly to the Enumerations Department. As of December 5th 2023, the fee for all credit/debit cards has changed from the flat 2.95% fee to the following: Over the phone Credit/Debit Card payments will be 2.3% and In-Person Debit Card payments will be 1.5% (in-person only). c. A copy of the final recorded plat is required prior to plan submittal for RESIDENTIAL. A copy of the final recorded plat is required prior to approval in the Enumerations department on any COMMERCIAL plan submittal. Please email the Enumerations staff member that reviewed your project. Amy@pprbd.org; Brent@pprbd.org; or BeckyA@pprbd.org d. Pre-plat reviews can be reviewed via “pdf” or in-person. The pre-plat will be stamped by Enumerations for accuracy and returned to the applicant and the planner. All payments to be mailed to RBD via a check or credit card payment over the phone. Plats should not be recorded prior to Enumerations stamping the pre-plat and receiving payment of plat fees. If any pre-plat changes occur, even if changes do not apply to Enumerations, we still need to re-stamp the pre-plat. The Enumerations stamped pre-plat copy should match the recorded document minus a few signatures. If you would like an in-person review, please make an appointment on our website, https://www.pprbd.org/Home/BookAppt Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org |
7/2/2024 10:27:17 AM | |
View |
Parks Advisory Board
4/12/2024 8:38:57 AM |
El Paso County Parks and Community Services Department Final Comments - Please See Attached Documents (Park Advisory Board Endorsed 04/10/2024) | 4/12/2024 8:38:57 AM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
4/2/2024 2:44:20 PM |
Water resources report redlines | 4/2/2024 2:44:20 PM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
4/2/2024 2:43:56 PM |
Traffic impact study redlines | 4/2/2024 2:43:56 PM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
4/2/2024 2:43:20 PM |
subdivision summary sheet redlines | 4/2/2024 2:43:20 PM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
4/2/2024 2:42:56 PM |
Soils and Geology report redlines | 4/2/2024 2:42:56 PM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
4/2/2024 2:42:24 PM |
Letter of intent redlines | 4/2/2024 2:42:24 PM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
4/2/2024 2:41:59 PM |
GEC plan redlines | 4/2/2024 2:41:59 PM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
4/2/2024 2:41:23 PM |
Fire Protection Report Redlines | 4/2/2024 2:41:23 PM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
4/2/2024 2:40:59 PM |
FAE redlines | 4/2/2024 2:40:59 PM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
4/2/2024 2:40:40 PM |
Final Plat Drawing Redlines | 4/2/2024 2:40:40 PM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
4/2/2024 2:40:04 PM |
Final drainage report redlines | 4/2/2024 2:40:04 PM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
4/2/2024 2:38:52 PM |
Deviation request redlines | 4/2/2024 2:38:52 PM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
4/2/2024 2:36:25 PM |
Construction Drawing Redlines | 4/2/2024 2:36:25 PM |
PCD Engineering Division
4/2/2024 9:38:56 AM |
Review 1 - EPC Engineering Comments have been provided on the following documents (to be uploaded by project manager): - Application - Construction Drawings - Deviation Request - Drainage Report - ESQCP - Plat - FAE - GEC Plans - LOI - Subdivision Summary - TIS Due to the nature and volume of comments provided, additional comments may be generated with the second review. Reviewed by: Hao Vo, PE haeovo@elpasoco.com Bret Dilts, PE bretdilts@elpasoco.com Charlene Durham, PE charlenedurham@elpasoco.com |
4/2/2024 9:38:56 AM | |
View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/2/2024 7:54:57 AM |
SWMP Checklist | 4/2/2024 7:54:57 AM |
View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/2/2024 7:54:39 AM |
SWMP | 4/2/2024 7:54:39 AM |
View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/2/2024 7:54:21 AM |
PBMP Applicability Form | 4/2/2024 7:54:21 AM |
View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/2/2024 7:54:02 AM |
O&M Manual | 4/2/2024 7:54:02 AM |
View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/2/2024 7:53:43 AM |
GEC Checklist | 4/2/2024 7:53:43 AM |
View |
PCD Project Manager
4/2/2024 2:35:54 PM |
Application Redlines | 4/2/2024 2:35:54 PM |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/2/2024 7:53:23 AM |
Review 1: EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report...(to be uploaded with Development Services comments) - FAE.......................(to be uploaded with Development Services comments) - GEC Plan..............(to be uploaded with Development Services comments) - GEC Checklist - O&M Manual - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP - SWMP Checklist. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer III GlennReese@elpasoco.com |
4/2/2024 7:53:23 AM | |
Colorado Geological Survey
4/1/2024 9:41:12 AM |
As page 3 of the Preliminary Geology report (Front Range Geotechnical, Inc., October 5, 2006) states, “The subject site is relatively free from serious geologic hazards except as noted. The most significant hazard to the proposed subdivision is the potential for erosion.” Additionally, on page 5, “It is likely that considerable settlement or hydrocompaction may take place in these soils if very heavily loaded structures are placed upon them.” Although Front Range Geotechnical’s report is outdated, the conclusions and identification of geologic hazards and constraints are still valid. However, the test holes only extended to depths ranging from 10 to 12 feet. If basements or significant cuts are planned, these depths are not sufficient to properly characterize the subsurface materials. CGS recommends that the county require an updated geology and soil evaluation to evaluate the geologic constraints including test borings drilled to a sufficient depth (generally at least 20 feet) to determine groundwater and bedrock depths where both are likely to be shallow. If shallow groundwater is encountered or expected based on the subsurface conditions, the report should discuss the expected seasonal groundwater fluctuation expected at the site based on site-specific data and the feasibility of basements or other anticipated habitable below-grade space. CGS agrees with Front Range Geotechnical (p. 5) that “a site investigation by a qualified soils engineer prior to the construction of foundations” be performed. This recommendation should be noted in the plat. Submitted 4/1/2024 by Amy Crandall, Colorado Geological Survey: acrandall@mines.edu |
4/1/2024 9:41:12 AM | |
View |
Colorado Parks and Wildlife
3/31/2024 9:49:55 AM |
3/31/2024 9:49:55 AM | |
View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
3/28/2024 2:13:55 PM |
See attached comments | 3/28/2024 2:13:55 PM |
Ellicott Fire Protection District
3/22/2024 11:04:24 AM |
The Ellicott Fire Department requests that this application for a Phase #2 Final Plat be rejected. The Commitment letter used was the previous 2018 commitment letter for Phase #1. We belive the use of this commitment letter was diseptive since the current commitment letter has stipulations on Fire Protection water Supply and Access. The Fire Protection Report is also diseptive and incorect. Per my pervious discussions with the planning department the only approved for protection report fo the Ellicott Fire Department is contained in the body of the commitment letter. This is approve by the Fire District Attorney and Homeland Security. - Please provid the correct Commitment letter, a 30,000 Gallon Cister will be required, Proper driveway access will be reqired without andy shrp (hairpin) 90 degree turns. A $100 review fee is required to be paid prior to Ellicott Fire Department Approval. | 3/22/2024 11:04:24 AM | |
View |
EPC Environmental Services
3/21/2024 12:21:40 PM |
3/21/2024 12:21:40 PM | |
County Attorney - Water
3/20/2024 1:11:57 PM |
-Please upload an updated Water Resources Report that meets the requirements of Section 8.4.7(B)(3) of the LDC. Specifically, it should evaluate this specific subdivision and include updated water quality information. -Please upload or direct us to deeds showing chain of title for the water from Space Center LLP to Silverado Ranch Inc. -Please remove the previous WSIS and the documents currently under "Signed Court Decrees". Thank you. |
3/20/2024 1:11:57 PM | |
County Attorney - Development Review
3/19/2024 2:44:25 PM |
No requested changes to SIA. | 3/19/2024 2:44:25 PM | |
PCD Administrative
3/19/2024 11:52:26 AM |
On 3/19/2024, PCD mailed "Notice of Application" letters to surrounding property owners within a 500-foot range (11 addresses). Copies of the notice, mailing labels, and selected range have been uploaded to the EDARP file. Cost of postage to be billed to the applicant = $7.04. MB | 3/19/2024 11:52:26 AM | |
View |
EPC Parks Department
3/15/2024 2:59:53 PM |
El Paso County Parks and Community Services Department Preliminary Comments - Please See Attached Documents (To be presented to the Park Advisory Board for endorsement on April 10, 2024) | 3/15/2024 2:59:53 PM |
View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
3/15/2024 1:15:54 PM |
3/15/2024 1:15:54 PM | |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
3/15/2024 6:58:01 AM |
CDOT has no comments regarding this development. The traffic volume to Peyton Highway/SH94 is less than 20%. | 3/15/2024 6:58:01 AM | |
US Fish Wildlife, Ecological Svcs. (USDOI, Fish & Wildlife Svc.)
3/14/2024 10:17:03 AM |
Hello, Thank you for contacting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service). The Service has reviewed the Silverado Ranch project and has no concerns with this project resulting in impacts to species listed as candidate, proposed, threatened, or endangered. We appreciate your efforts to ensure the conservation of threatened and endangered species. Thank you for contacting us and please let me know if you have any further questions. Sincerely, Emily Berchem |
3/14/2024 10:17:03 AM | |
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
3/14/2024 7:33:57 AM |
Silverado Hill Vw - Acceptable logical continuation of existing road. No action required for E911. Thank you. Justin |
3/14/2024 7:33:57 AM | |
Colorado State Forest Service
3/13/2024 10:15:42 AM |
The primary wildland fuel type for this proposal is grassland with scattered trees having a low to moderate wildfire hazard potential. No special fire mitigation plans or other actions are necessary for final approval by the Colorado State Forest Service. | 3/13/2024 10:15:42 AM | |
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
3/13/2024 1:46:15 PM |
1. The configuration has changed from the original layout. Before the area can be assigned addressing, Enumerations will need to see the overall layout. Please email to Amy Vanderbeek Amy@pprbd.org 2. Provide a 100-scale copy or larger of the entire APPROVED development plan (PUD) to this department so that addressing can be assigned. Once received, the development plan will be placed on a list to be addressed. Development plans that are not yet approved may be addressed; however additional plan review fees will accrue if changes are made to the D.P. after initial addressing. 3. Standard Final Plat comments: a. Enumerations will review the pre-plat (mylar) prior to plat for address placement, street names, and title block. b. A $10.00 per lot and tract platting fee will be due at the time of the review of the pre-plat, (two addresses per lot and tract). If an address is not needed on a tract then no fee applies. Check should be made out to PIKES PEAK REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT or PPRBD. Paid directly to the Enumerations Department. As of December 5th 2023, the fee for all credit/debit cards has changed from the flat 2.95% fee to the following: Over the phone Credit/Debit Card payments will be 2.3% and In-Person Debit Card payments will be 1.5% (in-person only). c. A copy of the final recorded plat is required prior to plan submittal for RESIDENTIAL. A copy of the final recorded plat is required prior to approval in the Enumerations department on any COMMERCIAL plan submittal. Please email the Enumerations staff member that reviewed your project. Amy@pprbd.org; Brent@pprbd.org; or BeckyA@pprbd.org d. Pre-plat reviews can be reviewed via “pdf” or in-person. The pre-plat will be stamped by Enumerations for accuracy and returned to the applicant and the planner. All payments to be mailed to RBD via a check or credit card payment over the phone. Plats should not be recorded prior to Enumerations stamping the pre-plat and receiving payment of plat fees. If any pre-plat changes occur, even if changes do not apply to Enumerations, we still need to re-stamp the pre-plat. The Enumerations stamped pre-plat copy should match the recorded document minus a few signatures. If you would like an in-person review, please make an appointment on our website, https://www.pprbd.org/Home/BookAppt Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org |
3/13/2024 1:46:15 PM |