View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCD Engineering Division
8/31/2023 9:18:27 AM |
No additional comments. Approved documents have been uploaded onto EDARP. reviewed by: Daniel Torres danieltorres@elpasoco.com |
8/31/2023 9:18:27 AM | |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
8/31/2023 8:27:05 AM |
The Parks review attached reflects a change in the number of lots from 49 to 42. | 8/31/2023 8:27:05 AM |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
8/31/2023 8:26:02 AM |
See administrative Parks review attached. Fees have been adjusted to reflect the change in number of lots. | 8/31/2023 8:26:02 AM |
| View |
County Attorney - Development Review
8/24/2023 2:24:14 PM |
Signature to SIA attached. | 8/24/2023 2:24:14 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
8/24/2023 1:52:31 PM |
Please have the zero balance tax cert, contracts, title comt, collateral, fees, stamped PPRBD Mylar prepared for plat recording meeting. | 8/24/2023 1:52:31 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
8/24/2023 1:51:20 PM |
Please see CAO comments on legal docs, if applicable. | 8/24/2023 1:51:20 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
8/24/2023 1:50:40 PM |
Channel Improvements are required prior to the adjacent Fil 4 Plat recording. | 8/24/2023 1:50:40 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/8/2023 12:55:23 PM |
(LOI redlines) | 8/8/2023 12:55:23 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/8/2023 12:55:01 PM |
(SIA redlines) | 8/8/2023 12:55:01 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
8/8/2023 12:55:55 PM |
Review 4: See redlines on the SIA and Letter of Intent. The previously submitted drainage report and CDs were already approved and we can keep that drainage report. If you wish to have the drainage report reapproved, replace the fee calculations as they were previously, based on the initial submittal date. The CDs will be forwarded for ECM Administrator's approval pending response on the drainage report. Reviewed by Jeff Rice -- 719-520-7877 jeffrice@elpasoco.com |
8/8/2023 12:55:55 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
8/2/2023 1:35:59 PM |
Plat comments from Planning only. Planning staff has uploaded planner comments only. Please note, Engineering will upload their comments on or around August 8, 2023. | 8/2/2023 1:35:59 PM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
7/17/2023 4:20:54 PM |
EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer III glennreese@elpasoco.com |
7/17/2023 4:20:54 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/18/2022 12:13:42 PM |
Add the park, school, drainage, bridge fee amounts (credits used) to the plat. | 10/18/2022 12:13:42 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/18/2022 12:14:19 PM |
Plat- Same Comment not addressed from previous reviews. Provide the executed copy of the trail easement / maintenance road OR create it with this plat with label, plat note, and depiction on the plat. | 10/18/2022 12:14:19 PM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
9/27/2022 7:29:33 AM |
EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
9/27/2022 7:29:33 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
7/25/2022 7:27:47 AM |
Provide a copy of the approved executed trail easement prior to plat recording or revise plat so plat creates trail / ( road easement for maintenance) as recommended. . | 7/25/2022 7:27:47 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
7/25/2022 7:26:12 AM |
Please sign and stamp all documents to be approved by ECM administrator. | 7/25/2022 7:26:12 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/25/2022 7:25:30 AM |
Final Drainage report redline comments. Please make changes and sign & stamp for approval. |
7/25/2022 7:25:30 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/25/2022 7:24:21 AM |
CD Redlines version 2 | 7/25/2022 7:24:21 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
7/22/2022 5:32:57 PM |
Review 2: EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - Drainage Report - ESQCP - FAE - GEC Plan - GEC Checklist - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP - SWMP Checklist Please sign, date, and stamp (if applicable) all documents as needed and resubmit them. EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
7/22/2022 5:32:57 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
7/21/2022 4:32:34 PM |
Review 2 minor comments on the following documents will be uploaded by the project manager: -Final Drainage Report -CD's PCD Engineering comments on the following documents have been resolved: -GEC -PBMP Applicability form -TIS -ESQCP -Letter of Intent -FAE -Plat Joshua Palmer is officially the County Engineer/ECM Administrator. Please remove the Interim label on the Signature Blocks. Provided the minor PCD comments and any comments from DPW stormwater are addresssed, then signed engineering comments may be provided on the subsequent submittal. reviewed by: Daniel Torres danieltorres@elpasoco.com |
7/21/2022 4:32:34 PM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
7/19/2022 9:27:28 AM |
No further comments. | 7/19/2022 9:27:28 AM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
6/11/2022 8:53:47 PM |
6/11/2022 8:53:47 PM | |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
6/10/2022 7:39:40 AM |
See Park Advisory Board endorsed motion attached. Thanks, Greg |
6/10/2022 7:39:40 AM |
|
Woodmen Hills Metro
5/27/2022 7:29:28 AM |
Woodmen Hills Metropolitan District has no comments at this time | 5/27/2022 7:29:28 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
5/25/2022 8:24:39 AM |
Comments were uploaded by the engineer. | 5/25/2022 8:24:39 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/25/2022 8:01:43 AM |
Letter of Intent redlines | 5/25/2022 8:01:43 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/25/2022 8:01:13 AM |
ESQCP redlines | 5/25/2022 8:01:13 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/25/2022 8:00:33 AM |
Traffic Study redlines | 5/25/2022 8:00:33 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/25/2022 7:59:55 AM |
PBMP Applicability Form redlines | 5/25/2022 7:59:55 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/25/2022 7:59:12 AM |
FAE redline | 5/25/2022 7:59:12 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/25/2022 7:58:40 AM |
GEC redlines | 5/25/2022 7:58:40 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/25/2022 7:58:07 AM |
Construction drawings redlines | 5/25/2022 7:58:07 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/25/2022 7:57:27 AM |
Final Drainage Report redlines | 5/25/2022 7:57:27 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/25/2022 7:56:25 AM |
Final plat redlines | 5/25/2022 7:56:25 AM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
5/25/2022 7:55:57 AM |
Review 1 comments on the following documents will be uploaded: -Plat -Final Drainage Report -CD's -GEC -FAE -PBMP Applicability form -TIS -ESQCP -Letter of Intent reviewed by: Daniel Torres danieltorres@elpasoco.com |
5/25/2022 7:55:57 AM | |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
5/23/2022 11:01:36 AM |
SWMP Checklist | 5/23/2022 11:01:36 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
5/23/2022 11:01:20 AM |
SWMP | 5/23/2022 11:01:20 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
5/23/2022 11:00:51 AM |
PBMP Applicability Form | 5/23/2022 11:00:51 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
5/23/2022 11:00:36 AM |
GEC Checklist | 5/23/2022 11:00:36 AM |
|
Woodmen Road Metro
5/19/2022 1:46:38 PM |
This proposed project is located within the Woodmen Road Metropolitan District boundaries. The District assess’ platting and building permit fees for new development within the District Boundaries, the District also assess’ a mill levy on property within the District Boundaries. The fees for this year are as follows: Platting Fees: Commercial- $1540/ACRE Residential- $385.00/LOT Building Permit Fees: Commercial- Destination retail/hotel- $1.37/SQUARE FOOT Convenience Commercial- $5.51/SQUARE FOOT All Other Uses- $1.10/SQUARE FOOT Residential- Single Family- $550/UNIT Multi Family- $385/UNIT |
5/19/2022 1:46:38 PM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
5/23/2022 11:00:16 AM |
Review 1: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report....(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - ESQCP..................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - FAE........................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Plan...............(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Checklist - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP - SWMP Checklist Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
5/23/2022 11:00:16 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
5/17/2022 1:52:09 PM |
No proposed changes to SIA. | 5/17/2022 1:52:09 PM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
5/17/2022 1:25:41 PM |
The Falcon Meadows at Bent Grass Filing 3 (38.9507, -104.6241) development will include 49 single-family residential lots and 2 tracts on approximately 12.74 acres. The available referral documents include a Soil and Geology Study (Rocky Mountain Group (RMG), Revised December 3, 2021), Letter of Intent (N.E.S., Inc., February 2022), Final Plat (Galloway, June 2, 2021), Construction Drawings (Galloway, January 20, 2022), and other documents. Filing No. 3 is located outside the area designated as a floodplain per FEMA (Unnamed Tributary to Black Squirrel Creek No. 2, issued December 7, 2018). However, seasonally wet areas may occur within the west side of Filing No. 3 (Lots 38-45). CGS agrees with RMG on page 16 of their study, “The most significant geologic constraints to development recognized at this site are expansive/compressible soils and shallow groundwater.” CGS offers the following comments and recommendations. Shallow groundwater and basement feasibility: Groundwater will fluctuate depending on the season, variations in rainfall, new development, proximity to drainages, etc. As a result, mitigation for shallow groundwater often becomes guesswork due to the inexact method of determining its impact on inhabitable below-grade areas (basements and crawlspaces). Groundwater measurements in test borings are limited to the time of year measured (a snapshot) and are inherently inaccurate in predicting depth to groundwater during the engineering life of a structure/development. The extent of the yearly variation in depth to groundwater must be known to determine basement feasibility. As stated on page 14 in RMG’s report, “In areas where groundwater is anticipated to be within 14 feet of the original ground surface, Challenger Homes is proposing the use of non-basement foundations.” RMG’s soil borings indicate groundwater depths from 14 to 27 feet in the three test borings drilled in RMG’s 2019 preliminary study within Filing No. 3. RMG’s report did not provide groundwater measurements following this drilling program. Additionally, no test borings were drilled in Filing No. 3 during RMG’s 2020 drilling program. RMG’s engineering and geology map (Figure 10) depicts lots 1-4 “to be restricted to non-basement construction,” while lots 5-49 include no restrictions. However, groundwater was encountered at a depth of 10 feet below grade in RMG’s test borings 6 and 11 (Filing No. 2) drilled near lots 33-38 of Filing No. 3. Therefore, if basement levels are planned for lots 5-49, CGS recommends the county require groundwater monitoring/observation to verify that groundwater is at depths greater than 14 feet of the original ground surface. This monitoring/observation program should be conducted immediately (before final plat approval) and checked frequently following drilling operations to determine if basements are feasible based on the developer’s restrictions. Additionally, the proposed floor levels must be at least three feet above maximum anticipated groundwater levels and maintained year-round. If groundwater is determined to be within 14 feet of the original ground surface, then these lots should also be “restricted to non-basement construction” and noted on the final plat. By not addressing this issue early in development, it becomes the homeowner who eventually learns if basements are feasible or not based on lot-specific soil investigations. CGS agrees with RMG’s recommendation (page 20), “a site-specific subsurface soil investigations should be performed for all proposed structures, including (but not limited to) residences, retaining walls and pumphouses, commercial buildings, etc.” The site-specific soils and engineering investigations will be required to evaluate the expansive/compressible soils, the requirement for overexcavation and replacement with structural fill (page 12), depth to bedrock and groundwater, and to develop recommendations for foundations, floor systems, subsurface drainage, pavement, etc. Submitted 5/17/2022 by Amy Crandall, Engineering Geologist, Colorado Geological Survey |
5/17/2022 1:25:41 PM | |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
5/16/2022 3:14:28 PM |
See attached comments | 5/16/2022 3:14:28 PM |
| View |
Falcon Fire Protection District
5/11/2022 8:24:18 AM |
5/11/2022 8:24:18 AM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
5/10/2022 6:20:35 AM |
1. Provide a 100 scale copy or larger of the entire APPROVED development plan (d.p.) to this department so that addressing can be assigned. Once received, the development plan will be placed on a list to be addressed. Development plans that are not yet approved may be addressed, however additional plan review fees will accrue if changes are made to the D.P. after initial addressing. 2. Standard Final Plat Comments; a. Enumerations will review the mylar prior to plat for address placement, street names, and title block. b. A $10.00 per lot and tract platting fee will be due at the time of the review of the mylar, (two addresses per lot and tract). If an address is not needed on a tract then no fee applies. Check should be made out to PIKES PEAK REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT or PPRBD. Paid directly to the Enumerations Department. An additional over the phone transaction fee of $3.50 will apply for any credit card payment. Total amount due for this project is for 49 lots and Zero tracts with addresses. Total due is $490.00. c. A copy of the final recorded plat is required prior to plan submittal for RESIDENTIAL. Amy@pprbd.org; (Please email the Enumerations staff that reviewed your project). Mylar reviews can be reviewed via “pdf”. The mylar will be stamped by Enumerations for accuracy and returned to the applicant and the planner. All payments to be mailed to RBD via a check or credit card payment over the phone. Plats should not be recorded prior to Enumerations receiving payment. If you would like an in-person review, please make an appointment on our website. Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org W: 719-327-2953 |
5/10/2022 6:20:35 AM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
5/5/2022 9:39:35 AM |
Street naming previously approved under separate correspondence. G. West |
5/5/2022 9:39:35 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
5/4/2022 1:09:39 PM |
Contact CSU field engineering with any questions on Gas. 719-668-4985. No action item is required. Approval can be recommended. Corey Masoumi | Engineering Support Coordinator Utilities Development Services | Colorado Springs Utilities O: 719-668-1856 | Main: 719-668-8259 cmasoumi@csu.org | www.csu.org |
5/4/2022 1:09:39 PM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
4/28/2022 12:37:50 PM |
4/28/2022 12:37:50 PM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
4/28/2022 9:11:38 AM |
See preliminary Parks comments attached. Thanks, Greg |
4/28/2022 9:11:38 AM |
|
Bent Grass Metro
4/27/2022 3:42:43 PM |
This proposed project is located within the Bent Grass Metropolitan District boundaries. The District assess’ platting and building permit fees for new development within the District Boundaries, the District also assess’ a mill levy on property within the District Boundaries. The fees for this year are as follows: Traffic Signal Fee: Commercial - $10,000 Residential - $1,000 Platting Fees: Commercial- $5500/ACRE Residential- $5500/ACRE Building Permit Fees: Commercial- Commercial/Industrial/Other non-residential- $1.00/SQUARE FOOT Residential- Single Family- $500/UNIT Multi Family- $350/UNIT |
4/27/2022 3:42:43 PM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
4/26/2022 4:19:58 PM |
FALCON MEADOWS AT BENT GRASS FILING NO 3, is not with the SFHa , no comment. | 4/26/2022 4:19:58 PM |
EDARP