View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
EPC Stormwater Review
10/11/2022 5:03:04 PM |
Review 3: EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - Drainage Report EPC Stormwater has no further comments. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
10/11/2022 5:03:04 PM | |
|
Fountain Mutual Irrigation Company
9/6/2022 10:20:43 AM |
FMIC has provided comments previously for the Creekside development project(s) within the Lorson Ranch development and identified the relocation of the FMIC canal on the west side of the main stem of Jimmy Camp Creek and siphon pipe crossing this channel. Due to this relocation of the canal system back in the mid 2005/2006 time frame, the proposed Creekside at Lorson Ranch Filing No.2 located east of the East Fork of Jimmy Camp Creek will have no impact on the existing FMIC canal system. FMIC takes no exception to this proposed development project for Creekside at Lorson Ranch Filling No. 2. | 9/6/2022 10:20:43 AM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
8/31/2022 1:17:03 PM |
Engineering Comments have been resolved. Reviewed by: Charlene Durham, P.E. charlenedurham@elpasoco.com |
8/31/2022 1:17:03 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/29/2022 4:41:54 PM |
TIS Redlines | 8/29/2022 4:41:54 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
8/29/2022 4:46:34 PM |
Engineering Review 3 redline comments to the following documents will be uploaded as separate comments. Markup Summary is located at the end of the document: - TIS (copy of redlines will be uploaded) Comment 1 - Signal costs in the report narrative for remaining developments did not match with the costs shown in the table. Please update. Comment 2 - Since the updated table for the Marksheffel/Lorson traffic signal has been included in the narrative portion of the report, please remove the table shown at the end of the report. Comment 3 - Upload CAD base drawing per ECM 5.9.3. Comments have been resolved on the following documents: -Preliminary Drainage Report Reviewed by: Charlene Durham, P.E. charlenedurham@elpasoco.com |
8/29/2022 4:46:34 PM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
8/23/2022 9:36:06 PM |
8/23/2022 9:36:06 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
8/23/2022 12:59:17 PM |
update LOI to giver breakdown of open space and usable open space / TRACT A is 100 percent usable correct no detention? | 8/23/2022 12:59:17 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
8/23/2022 12:58:34 PM |
PUD review 2 | 8/23/2022 12:58:34 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/22/2022 5:37:03 PM |
TIS Redlines | 8/22/2022 5:37:03 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/22/2022 9:26:32 AM |
PDR Redlines | 8/22/2022 9:26:32 AM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
8/22/2022 9:24:08 AM |
Review 2 redline comments to the following documents will be uploaded as separate comments. Markup Summary is located at the end of the document: - Preliminary Drainage Report - TIS Comments have been resolved on the following documents: -GEC Plans -Stormwater CD's -Utility CD's -Early Grading Permit -PUD Development Plan -Deviation Requests -FAE |
8/22/2022 9:24:08 AM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
8/22/2022 8:23:36 AM |
Review 2: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report...(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) Please upload an existing or new ESQCP Form and the SWMP Checklist (which were both emailed to me by Rich on 8/18 for review). EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - FAE - GEC Plan - GEC Checklist - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP - SWMP Checklist Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
8/22/2022 8:23:36 AM | |
| View |
County Attorney - Water
8/15/2022 12:02:57 PM |
Please see attached Water Supply Review and Recommendations that addresses the quality comment. This version supersedes any previous versions. | 8/15/2022 12:02:57 PM |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
6/9/2022 12:42:16 PM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments - Please See Attached Documents (PAB Endorsed 06/08/2022) | 6/9/2022 12:42:16 PM |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
6/8/2022 9:41:26 AM |
6/8/2022 9:41:26 AM | |
|
US Postal Service
6/3/2022 2:29:18 PM |
In order to establish mail delivery please submit the following to Elaine Kelly elaine.f.kelly@usps.gov and Rita Minnard oreta.j.minnard@usps.gov for approval: • Development Plan. • Make an appointment to go over pad locations and mailboxes. • Building and Site plan showing proposed locations of mailboxes. • Type of mail receptacle proposed for development. • Mailboxes must be approved prior to purchase • Final Plat with addresses. • Type of Development (business/residential/mixed). • Date of first occupancy. • If the community is Apartments - a letter from the owner regarding oversized parcels. Can you clarify what this letter would look like? Effective October 5, 2006, all new designs approved for NEW CONSTRUCTION AND MAJOR RENOVATION require U.S. Postal Service approved CBU’s to be installed. Effective July 2020 all new apartment projects or apartment remodels must provide 1 parcel locker for every 5 mailbox compartments. Once the information is submitted, we will follow-up with any additional questions and we will set up a time to discuss the project for final approval. |
6/3/2022 2:29:18 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
6/2/2022 7:49:47 AM |
Impact Identification comment | 6/2/2022 7:49:47 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
6/2/2022 7:49:22 AM |
LOI review 1 | 6/2/2022 7:49:22 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
6/2/2022 7:49:03 AM |
PUDSP review 1 | 6/2/2022 7:49:03 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
6/2/2022 7:48:06 AM |
Please verify new edits to the landscape plan are incorporated into the FAE. Please add any breeze. | 6/2/2022 7:48:06 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/1/2022 3:36:29 PM |
FAE Redlines | 6/1/2022 3:36:29 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/1/2022 2:26:10 PM |
Utility CD's Redlines | 6/1/2022 2:26:10 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/1/2022 2:25:38 PM |
Traffic Impact Study Redlines | 6/1/2022 2:25:38 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/1/2022 2:25:09 PM |
Storm Sewer CD's Redlines | 6/1/2022 2:25:09 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/1/2022 2:24:38 PM |
Predevelopment (Early) Grading Request Redlines | 6/1/2022 2:24:38 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/1/2022 2:23:49 PM |
Drainage Report Redlines | 6/1/2022 2:23:49 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/1/2022 2:23:20 PM |
Grading & Erosion Control Plan Redlines | 6/1/2022 2:23:20 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/1/2022 2:22:43 PM |
Deviation Request Redlines | 6/1/2022 2:22:43 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
6/1/2022 2:21:34 PM |
Review 1: Engineering comments have been provided on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report - FAE - GEC Plan - Storm CD's - Utility CD's - Predevelopment (Early) Grading Request - Traffic Impact Study - Deviation Request - PUD Plan (Uploaded with PM Comments) Reviewed by: Charlene Durham, P.E. charlenedurham@elpasoco.om |
6/1/2022 2:21:34 PM | |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
5/26/2022 1:12:32 PM |
SWMP Checklist | 5/26/2022 1:12:32 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
5/26/2022 1:12:14 PM |
SWMP | 5/26/2022 1:12:14 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
5/26/2022 1:11:55 PM |
PBMP Applicability Form | 5/26/2022 1:11:55 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
5/26/2022 1:11:34 PM |
GEC Checklist | 5/26/2022 1:11:34 PM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
5/26/2022 12:02:51 PM |
Review 1: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report...(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - FAE.......................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Plan...............(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Checklist - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP - SWMP Checklist (please upload a completed form with the next submittal) Please upload an existing or new ESQCP Form. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
5/26/2022 12:02:51 PM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
5/24/2022 2:16:14 PM |
Regarding a request for approval of a PUD development plan for Creekside at Lorson Ranch Filing No. 2, Enumerations has the following comments: 1. Per Regional Building Code, section RBC312.8 addresses must appear on plats. Submit a 100 scale copy of the plat to our office for addressing. Place an (xxxx) on all lots and tracts which will require an address, in the location the address will be needed. Once addressing is completed, the addresses will be returned so that they may be placed on the mylar prior to recording. 2. Prior to recording, Enumerations will review the mylar for addressing, title block, street names and floodplain statement. A fee of $10 per lot/tract addressed, payable to Pikes Peak Regional Building Department will be due at the time of mylar review. 3. Provide a copy of the final recorded plat to Enumerations. Approval of any plans submitted for this development will be pending receipt in our office of a copy of the final recorded plat. Brent Johnson Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2888 E: brent@pprbd.org W: pprbd.org |
5/24/2022 2:16:14 PM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
5/24/2022 1:21:22 PM |
We understand this planned unit development and preliminary plan referral consists of 38 single-family units on approximately 6.01 acres at Lorson Boulevard and Trappe Drive. The site is outside the mapped floodplain of the Jimmy Camp Creek East Tributary. CGS agrees with RMG’s assessment that the site is not exposed to any geologic hazards that preclude the proposed development. On page 16 of RMG’s Soils and Geology Study (Rocky Mountain Group, February 21, 2022), geologic constraints include expansive soils, drainageways/floodplains, faults, and radon. RMG’s preliminary recommendations should be adhered to during initial project planning. We offer the following comments and recommendations. 1. RMG states (page 13), “The BFE’s (Base Flood Elevation) along the creek, west of the Creekside South, Filing No. 2 boundary, ranges between 5709.2 and 5704.7 feet.” RMG also states, “Provided that the final floodplain extents do not encroach within the boundaries of the proposed buildable lots and the bottom of foundations remain one foot above the BFE, it is our opinion that additional mitigation is not required at this time.” The proposed lots are outside the 100-year floodplain based on the PUD plan. However, CGS cannot determine if the basement foundations will be 1 foot above the BFE. Therefore, CGS recommends the project civil and geotechnical engineer verify this condition is met. 2. According to the construction drawings (CORE Engineering Group, March 2022), the site will include a groundwater underdrain that will be installed below the sanitary sewer drain that will outfall to the existing detention pond/water quality basin system. A statement indicating that an underdrain system will be installed for the site should also be included in the PUD development plan. 3. RMG states (page 11) that “It is anticipated basement foundations will have more than 4 to 6 feet of separation from the bottom of foundation floor slabs to groundwater.” RMG did not encounter groundwater in their borings during drilling; groundwater measurements following drilling operations were not provided in RMG’s report. Groundwater levels as shallow as 12 feet were measured in CGS’s previous reviews in the project vicinity (such as Creekside South at Lorson Ranch). Groundwater levels typically rise after development, and measurements of groundwater variations provide a basis for anticipating future groundwater levels. Since below-grade levels are planned and the proximity to the Jimmy Camp Creek East Tributary floodplain, CGS recommends the groundwater levels are monitored/observed throughout the spring, summer, and fall to verify that proposed floor levels are at least 3 feet (preferably 5 feet) above the maximum anticipated groundwater levels and maintained year-round. We recommend this occurs during the planning stages of the development (PUD/preliminary plan) and not solely during site-specific investigations. 4. CGS agrees with RMG (page 18), “A subsurface perimeter drain is recommended around portions of the structures which will have habitable or storage space located below the finished ground surface.” RMG notes (page 17) that “depending on the conditions encountered during site-specific subsurface soil investigations and the conditions observed at the time of construction, additional subsurface drainage systems may be recommended.” We recommend that subsurface drainage systems (underslab drain) be determined during the preliminary plan stage and not during site-specific investigations. 5. RMG states on page 16, “it is our opinion that the existing geologic and engineering conditions can be satisfactorily mitigated through proper engineering, design and contraction practices.” This should be “...proper engineering, design, and construction practices...”. Submitted 5/24/2022 by Amy Crandall, Engineering Geologist, Colorado Geological Survey (303-384-2632 or acrandall@mines.edu) |
5/24/2022 1:21:22 PM | |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
5/23/2022 2:29:18 PM |
See attached comments | 5/23/2022 2:29:18 PM |
| View |
Colorado Parks and Wildlife
5/21/2022 9:06:44 AM |
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. Please see the original comment for Creekside at Lorson Ranch that was provided by Colorado Parks and Wildlife. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact District Wildlife Manager Drew Vrbenec at 719.439.9638 or at drew.vrbenec@state.co.us. | 5/21/2022 9:06:44 AM |
| View |
Widefield SD 3
5/19/2022 4:09:51 PM |
5/19/2022 4:09:51 PM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
5/17/2022 7:06:47 AM |
Please see attached preliminary comments on behalf of El Paso County Parks. This application will be presented to the Park Advisory Board on June 8. The Park Advisory Board recommends that the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners include the following condition(s) when considering and/or approving Creekside at Lorson Ranch Filing No. 2 PUDSP: Require fees in lieu of land dedication for regional park purposes in the amount of $17,480 and urban park purposes in the amount of $11,020 will be required upon recording of the forthcoming final plat(s). | 5/17/2022 7:06:47 AM |
|
Fountain
5/12/2022 10:05:25 AM |
No comments. | 5/12/2022 10:05:25 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
5/10/2022 12:31:47 PM |
No comments from County Attorney - Development Review at this time. | 5/10/2022 12:31:47 PM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
5/6/2022 8:54:22 AM |
5/6/2022 8:54:22 AM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
5/5/2022 9:53:36 AM |
Street names previously approved, natural continuations. G. West |
5/5/2022 9:53:36 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Water
5/4/2022 9:58:37 AM |
County Attorney's Office will provide review of water sufficiency following receipt of findings from Colorado Division of Water Resources. Thank you. | 5/4/2022 9:58:37 AM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
5/4/2022 9:10:03 AM |
According to the project boundary in the PUD the project lies outside the FEMA SFHA. The floodplain note, which is not required if the project does not have floodplain exposure, references the wrong map panel suffix, which should be 957G |
5/4/2022 9:10:03 AM |
EDARP