View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCD Engineering Division
3/4/2024 4:20:17 PM |
Engineering Comments have been addressed. Reviewed by: Charlene Durham, PE charlenedurham@elpasoco.com |
3/4/2024 4:20:17 PM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
2/29/2024 11:59:43 AM |
Review 12: EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following document: - GEC Plan EPC DPW Stormwater has no further comments. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer III GlennReese@elpasoco.com |
2/29/2024 11:59:43 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
2/15/2024 2:35:50 PM |
ESQCP Redlines | 2/15/2024 2:35:50 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
2/15/2024 2:34:59 PM |
Grading & Erosion Control Redlines | 2/15/2024 2:34:59 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
2/15/2024 2:08:37 PM |
The following items need to be revised and resubmitted: - ESQCP (correct parcel number) - Grading & Erosion Control Plan - Please provide responses to comment letter attached at left. Since property ownership has changed, please provide new Pre-subdivision Site Grading Acknowledgement & Right of Access form (Early Grading Request) signed by Melody Homes. Also needed when available: - Wetland mitigation plan and USACE approval Reviewed by: Charlene Durham, PE charlenedurham@elpasoco.com |
2/15/2024 2:08:37 PM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
2/15/2024 12:48:30 PM |
Review 11: EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - GEC Plan.........(to be uploaded by others with Development Services comments) Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer III GlennReese@elpasoco.com |
2/15/2024 12:48:30 PM | |
|
EPC Sheriff's Department
2/8/2024 1:31:34 PM |
No concerns from EPSO | 2/8/2024 1:31:34 PM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
12/8/2023 12:59:15 PM |
12/8/2023 12:59:15 PM | |
| View |
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
12/5/2023 4:52:38 PM |
12/5/2023 4:52:38 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
10/31/2023 8:17:35 PM |
10/31/2023 8:17:35 PM | |
| View |
Peyton 23
10/31/2023 4:56:38 PM |
10/31/2023 4:56:38 PM | |
| View |
Meadow Lake Airport Association
10/25/2023 4:31:37 PM |
MLAA letter attached | 10/25/2023 4:31:37 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/20/2023 5:12:04 PM |
(SWMP redlined page) | 10/20/2023 5:12:04 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/20/2023 5:11:34 PM |
(ESQCP redlines) | 10/20/2023 5:11:34 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/20/2023 5:11:04 PM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 10/20/2023 5:11:04 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/20/2023 5:10:31 PM |
(PDR redlines) | 10/20/2023 5:10:31 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/20/2023 5:08:51 PM |
See comment memo attached at left. The following items need to be revised and resubmitted: - PDR - ESQCP (correct parcel number) - SWMP (update dates on page 6) - Responses to comment letter Also needed when available: - Wetland mitigation plan and USACE approval -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
10/20/2023 5:08:51 PM |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
10/19/2023 2:59:44 PM |
El Paso County Park and Community Services Final Comments, Review #4 - Please See Attached Documents (Administrative Comments Only - No PAB Endorsement Necessary for this Review) | 10/19/2023 2:59:44 PM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
10/18/2023 1:22:50 PM |
EPC DPW Stormwater does not have any additional comments. - Glenn |
10/18/2023 1:22:50 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/18/2023 1:16:38 PM |
Planning has no comments. Please remember to add the landscape, trails, and fencing costs to the FAE for the final plat for this area. Looking forward to the 1041 resubmittal. | 10/18/2023 1:16:38 PM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
10/17/2023 2:22:37 PM |
1. For assignment of addressing for lots and tracts, place addressing marker (xxx) where they are intended to be utilized. Addressing marker for lots should be front door. 2. For any of the streets that continue into the next filing, Enumerations will need to see that continuation to provide accurate addressing for this file and the future filing. 2. FINAL PLAT: a. Enumerations will review the mylar prior to plat for address placement, street names, and title block. b. A $10.00 per lot and tract platting fee will be due at the time of the review of the mylar, (two addresses per lot and tract). If an address is not needed on a tract then no fee applies. Check should be made out to PIKES PEAK REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT or PPRBD. Paid directly to the Enumerations Department. As of September 28th, 2022, an additional over the phone transaction fee of 2.95% of the total transaction will apply for any credit card payment. c. A copy of the final recorded plat is required prior to plan submittal for RESIDENTIAL. Amy@pprbd.org; Brent@pprbd.org; or BeckyA@pprbd.org (Please email the Enumerations staff that reviewed your project). d. Mylar reviews can be reviewed via “pdf”. The mylar will be stamped by Enumerations for accuracy and returned to the applicant and the planner. All payments to be mailed to RBD via a check or credit card payment over the phone. Plats should not be recorded prior to Enumerations receiving payment. If you would like an in-person review, please make an appointment on our website, https://www.pprbd.org/Home/BookAppt Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org |
10/17/2023 2:22:37 PM | |
|
County Attorney - Water
10/12/2023 1:50:23 PM |
Applicant is requesting that a review of water supply sufficiency be deferred to final plat. | 10/12/2023 1:50:23 PM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
9/29/2023 6:31:01 AM |
Street names previously approved, no action from E911. G. West |
9/29/2023 6:31:01 AM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
9/28/2023 2:43:44 PM |
Records indicate that the CLOMR 22-08-0386R for channel improvements was suspended in June of 2023. An approved CLOMR will be required prior to grading permit. Please provide an update on the FEMA approval. |
9/28/2023 2:43:44 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/13/2022 11:32:55 AM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 10/13/2022 11:32:55 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/13/2022 11:32:11 AM |
(PDR redlines) | 10/13/2022 11:32:11 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/11/2022 3:00:37 PM |
Please print the PUDSP on Mylar for recording. The first sheet is $13.00 and each additional sheet is $10.00. Please set up a time with Kari Parsons to do the recording. | 10/11/2022 3:00:37 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/13/2022 11:31:12 AM |
The following items need to be revised and resubmitted: - PDR - GEC (Submit with developer signatures for final approval) - FAE (Submit with developer signatures for final approval) - Responses to comment letter Redline comments on the following documents are resolved: - PUD/Preliminary Plan - GEC - GEC Checklist - SWMP - SWMP Checklist Also needed when available: - Wetland mitigation plan and USACE approval -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
10/13/2022 11:31:12 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
9/27/2022 7:23:20 AM |
Review 6: EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
9/27/2022 7:23:20 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/22/2022 6:10:53 PM |
(FAE redlines) | 6/22/2022 6:10:53 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/22/2022 6:10:15 PM |
(GEC redlines summary) | 6/22/2022 6:10:15 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/22/2022 6:09:39 PM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 6/22/2022 6:09:39 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/22/2022 6:09:04 PM |
(PDR redlines) | 6/22/2022 6:09:04 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/22/2022 6:06:05 PM |
(PUDSP redlines summary) | 6/22/2022 6:06:05 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/22/2022 6:05:26 PM |
See comment memo (link at left) and redlines. The following items need to be revised and resubmitted: 1. PUD/Preliminary Plan 2. PDR 3. GEC 4. GEC Checklist 5. FAE 6. SWMP 7. SWMP Checklist 8. Responses to comment letter Also needed when available: - Wetland mitigation plan and USACE approval -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
6/22/2022 6:05:26 PM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
6/21/2022 3:08:41 PM |
Review 5: EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - GEC Plan EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
6/21/2022 3:08:41 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
5/31/2022 2:03:53 PM |
See attached letter. | 5/31/2022 2:03:53 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/26/2022 5:13:28 PM |
(PDR redlines ) | 5/26/2022 5:13:28 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/26/2022 5:11:00 PM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 5/26/2022 5:11:00 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/26/2022 5:10:07 PM |
(FAE redlines) | 5/26/2022 5:10:07 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/26/2022 5:09:37 PM |
(GEC redlines summary) | 5/26/2022 5:09:37 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/26/2022 5:09:10 PM |
(GEC redlines) | 5/26/2022 5:09:10 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/26/2022 4:03:11 PM |
(TIS redlines summary) | 5/26/2022 4:03:11 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/26/2022 4:02:20 PM |
(PUDSP redlines) | 5/26/2022 4:02:20 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/26/2022 3:54:31 PM |
See comment memo (link at left) and redlines. The following items need to be revised and resubmitted: 1. PUD/Preliminary Plan 2. TIS (Figure 2b only) 3. PDR 4. GEC 5. FAE (2022 form) 6. GEC Checklist 7. SWMP Checklist 8. Responses to comment letter Also needed when available: - Wetland mitigation plan and USACE approval -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
5/26/2022 3:54:31 PM |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
5/25/2022 3:25:56 PM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #3 - Please See Attached Documents (Originally PAB Endorsed on 10/13/2021) | 5/25/2022 3:25:56 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
5/25/2022 2:25:47 PM |
Please note a partial PDR comment was sent via one drive link to address; engineering will provide additional comments. | 5/25/2022 2:25:47 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
5/25/2022 11:36:40 AM |
State water form does not have the correct number of commercial and residential lots, nor irrigation. It should match the sub sum form., | 5/25/2022 11:36:40 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
5/25/2022 11:35:20 AM |
Mike McCarthy MikeMcCarthy@elpasoco.com; Kat McGarvy katmcgarvy@elpasoco.com Please reach out to the State, EPC Health for a water finding as requested in the letter of intent. It is unclear that a water finding can be made in the short review cycle. After the State makes a finding , the County Attorneys Office still needs to make a finding. |
5/25/2022 11:35:20 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
5/25/2022 11:34:25 AM |
Mike McCarthy MikeMcCarthy@elpasoco.com; Kat McGarvy katmcgarvy@elpasoco.com Please reach out to the State, EPC Health for a water finding as requested in the letter of intent. It is unclear that a water finding can be made in the short review cycle. After the State makes a finding , the County Attorneys Office still needs to make a finding. |
5/25/2022 11:34:25 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
5/25/2022 11:18:10 AM |
PUDSP Commens review 4 (Pre meeting on 5/25/) | 5/25/2022 11:18:10 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
5/25/2022 2:29:24 PM |
Review 4: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded document: - GEC Plan..........(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
5/25/2022 2:29:24 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/20/2022 6:34:48 PM |
(Eastonville Exhibit redlines) | 4/20/2022 6:34:48 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/20/2022 6:33:46 PM |
(CLOMR report redlined pages) | 4/20/2022 6:33:46 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/20/2022 6:32:20 PM |
(Channel CDs redlines summary) | 4/20/2022 6:32:20 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/20/2022 6:31:32 PM |
(Channel CDs redlines) | 4/20/2022 6:31:32 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/20/2022 6:30:18 PM |
(Channel deviation redlines) | 4/20/2022 6:30:18 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/20/2022 6:28:41 PM |
(PBMP App Form redlines) | 4/20/2022 6:28:41 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/20/2022 6:26:53 PM |
(GEC redlines summary) | 4/20/2022 6:26:53 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/20/2022 6:23:42 PM |
(GEC redlines) | 4/20/2022 6:23:42 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/20/2022 6:22:08 PM |
(PDR WQ redlines) | 4/20/2022 6:22:08 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/20/2022 6:21:21 PM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 4/20/2022 6:21:21 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/20/2022 6:20:16 PM |
(PDR redlines) | 4/20/2022 6:20:16 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/20/2022 6:17:02 PM |
(TIS redlines summary) | 4/20/2022 6:17:02 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/20/2022 6:16:17 PM |
(TIS redlines) | 4/20/2022 6:16:17 PM |
|
RBD Floodplain
4/19/2022 2:43:19 PM |
Original comment still applicable, last email I have indicates CLOMR was submitted in or around January of 2022, no updates on approval at this date4/19/22 | 4/19/2022 2:43:19 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/19/2022 11:27:12 AM |
Jeff Rice will publish the engineering comments on the GEC and drainage, and TIS reports shortly. | 4/19/2022 11:27:12 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/19/2022 11:26:14 AM |
The stand-alone deviation for Rex Road still needs to be submitted to File DEV211 | 4/19/2022 11:26:14 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/19/2022 11:24:41 AM |
Letter of intent comments-minor Is water sufficiency still NOT requested? I understand water rights have been finalized. |
4/19/2022 11:24:41 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/19/2022 11:23:11 AM |
PUDSP Comments review 3. | 4/19/2022 11:23:11 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/19/2022 11:22:15 AM |
A response is NOT necessary for all documents. Engineering related documents responses are appreciated. | 4/19/2022 11:22:15 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/19/2022 11:02:10 AM |
The Eastonville Road culverts that exist appear to dead end into lots...Please address in GEC and Drainage reports. | 4/19/2022 11:02:10 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/20/2022 6:14:21 PM |
See comment memo (link at left) and redlines. The following items need to be revised and resubmitted: 1. LOI 2. Geohazard and Geotechnical report 3. PUD/Preliminary Plan 4. TIS (see combined PCD and on-call consultant comments) 5. PDR 6. GEC 7. Channel CDs and design report (if not in PDR) 8. PBMP Applicability Form 9. Deviation Request -- Channel design (if pursued) 10. Deviation Request for Rex Road (deviation form) (or submit under DEV-21-001) 11. FAE (2022 form) Also needed when available: - Pre-Development Site Grading/ROA Acknowledgement (signed and notarized) - ESQCP (signed) - Wetland mitigation plan and USACE approval -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
4/20/2022 6:14:21 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/19/2022 11:21:23 AM |
The Lot count is no longer 568 for residential lots-its 567 max. and two commercial lots totaling 569 lot for the overall PUDSP. All Documents should match the lot count.; Subdivision summary form, pudsp, state water form, loi, commitment letters, water reports, ww reports | 4/19/2022 11:21:23 AM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
4/7/2022 4:46:38 PM |
Review 3: EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - FAE - GEC Checklist - GEC Plan - PBMP Applicability Form - PDB BMP O&M EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
4/7/2022 4:46:38 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Geological Survey
4/6/2022 11:11:12 AM |
4/6/2022 11:11:12 AM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
4/4/2022 2:40:34 PM |
1. Street name Galmpton Drive was on the list of approved street names, Glampton Drive WAS NOT APPROVED. Enumerations will need an email with this approved street name from E-9-1-1. 2. All corner lots will receive an address on both sides of the lot. This will now be a requirement at the time of mylar review. 3. For assignment of addressing for lots and tracts, place addressing marker (xxx) where they are intended to be utilized. Addressing marker for lots should be front door. No further comments at this time. Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org W: |
4/4/2022 2:40:34 PM | |
|
Cherokee Metro Dist
4/1/2022 11:26:24 AM |
Cherokee has committed 500 MGD wastewater treatment capacity of our Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) for the Grandview Development as stated in our Commitment Letter to 4 Site Investments, LLC dated July 20, 2021. | 4/1/2022 11:26:24 AM | |
| View |
Traffic Review Consultant
3/28/2022 11:06:12 AM |
FHU has completed our review of the traffic study. Please see the attached meme and comments uploaded to Bluebeam for details. | 3/28/2022 11:06:12 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/23/2022 7:29:35 PM |
(Channel CDs redlines) | 1/23/2022 7:29:35 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/23/2022 7:27:24 PM |
(PBMP App redlines) | 1/23/2022 7:27:24 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/23/2022 7:25:43 PM |
(GEC redlines summary) | 1/23/2022 7:25:43 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/23/2022 7:24:34 PM |
(GEC redlines) | 1/23/2022 7:24:34 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/23/2022 7:22:23 PM |
(TIS redlines summary) | 1/23/2022 7:22:23 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/23/2022 7:21:51 PM |
(TIS redlines) | 1/23/2022 7:21:51 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/23/2022 7:20:17 PM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 1/23/2022 7:20:17 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/23/2022 7:17:37 PM |
(PDR redlines) | 1/23/2022 7:17:37 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/23/2022 7:12:35 PM |
(LS Plan redlines) | 1/23/2022 7:12:35 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/23/2022 7:11:53 PM |
(Geohazard and Geotech report redlines) | 1/23/2022 7:11:53 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/23/2022 7:10:54 PM |
(PUDSP redlines summary) | 1/23/2022 7:10:54 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/23/2022 7:10:03 PM |
(PUDSP redlines) | 1/23/2022 7:10:03 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/23/2022 7:08:23 PM |
(LOI redlines) | 1/23/2022 7:08:23 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/23/2022 7:09:06 PM |
See comment memo (link at left) and redlines. Please do not resubmit documents that have not been revised as review time is wasted reviewing these documents and searching for whatever has been revised. Obtain and provide E911-approved street names on all of the applicable documents. The following items need to be revised and resubmitted: 1. LOI 2. Geohazard and Geotechnical report 3. PUD/Preliminary Plan 4. Landscaping Plan 5. TIS (see combined PCD and on-call consultant comments) 6. PDR 7. GEC 8. Channel CDs and design report (if not in PDR) 9. PBMP Applicability Form 10. Deviation Request -- Channel design 11. Deviation Request for Rex Road (deviation form) (or submit under DEV-21-001) Also needed when available: - Pre-Development Site Grading/ROA Acknowledgement (signed and notarized) - Utility CDs (standalone CD set) - ESQCP (signed) -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
1/23/2022 7:09:06 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
1/18/2022 11:20:49 AM |
Code Chapter 6 reference: Required Buffer and Screen Areas. (1)Buffer Between Non-Residential and Residential Districts Separated by a Non-Arterial Road or Public Alley. (a)Where Required. A buffer is required along the road-side lot, parcel, or tract line of any non-residential use where the use is separated from a residential zoning district by a non-arterial road or public alley. (b)Depth and Planting Standards. The required buffer shall be a minimum of 15 feet deep. The minimum number of trees in the buffer shall be 1 tree for every 15 feet of the road frontage. A minimum of ? of the trees shall be evergreen trees.(c)Opaque Fence or Wall Required. An opaque fence or wall with a minimum height of 6 feet is required along the inside edge of the required buffer when the area immediately adjacent to the 15 foot buffer is used as a service corridor for loading, maneuvering or storage. If the area is used for parking, the required parking lot screening shall be applicable.(d)Minimum Ground Covering Required. The required buffer area shall require a ground cover at maturity with a minimum of 75% living plant materials. Bark, wood chips, rock, stone, or other natural landscape material shall be used as a non-living ground cover. Areas of a required buffer not covered in approved living ground cover material shall be covered in an approved non-living ground cover. (2)Buffer Between Non-Residential, Multifamily Residential and Single-Family/Duplex Uses. (a)Where Required. A buffer is required in the following situations:(i)Along the lot, parcel, or tract line on the non-residential use property between the non-residential use and a residential zoning district. (ii)Along the lot, parcel, or tract line on the multifamily use property between the multifamily use and a single-family or duplex zoning district. (iii)On the residential side of the project when use to use compatibility is a concern. |
1/18/2022 11:20:49 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/18/2022 11:19:53 AM |
Landscape plan checklist- see redlines and verify checklist items are included ; Note Buffer between residential lots and non- residential lots apply, as do the major roadway landscape for the PUD zone- see chapter 6. | 1/18/2022 11:19:53 AM |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
1/14/2022 11:38:23 AM |
Grandview Reserve, Filing 1 proposes up to 568 residential units at varying densities, community park, church, and school on 190 acres. CTL Thompson Inc. (CTL) performed a Geologic Hazard Evaluation and Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for the Grandview Reserve, Filing 1 (dated January 6, 2022). CTL’s report provides a valid description of surface and subsurface conditions and soil and bedrock engineering properties. There are no geologic hazards or unusual geotechnical constraints present that would preclude the proposed uses and density. CTL states on page 7, “Geologic hazards we identified at this site include expansive soils, hard bedrock, and shallow groundwater.” Provided CTL’s recommendations are adhered to and lot-specific subsurface soil investigations are performed, CGS has no objection to the proposed PUD/preliminary plan approval. However, we offer the following comments and recommendations. Shallow groundwater and basement feasibility: CTL observed groundwater in their borings at shallow depths (4.5 to 16.5 feet measured days after drilling), which, depending on grading plans, may preclude full depth basement construction unless mitigation is implemented. CTL states on page 7, “The presence of shallow groundwater can impact basement level construction. Current groundwater depths indicate proximity of groundwater to basement level foundation systems may be a concern, particularly near drainages.” CGS agrees with CTL (page 7), “The depth to groundwater will also be impacted by proposed grading and depth of foundations” and “This condition can be mitigated through use of foundation drains, active underdrains (if allowed and installed by the developer), or cut-off drains.” Full-depth basements should not be considered unless mitigation measures are implemented to ensure that a minimum separation distance of three feet between the shallowest seasonal water levels and the lowermost floor and crawlspace elevations can be maintained year-round. It would be prudent for the county to require groundwater monitoring/observation to determine if basements are feasible and/or if a groundwater collection or underdrain system could be employed for this site during the preliminary plan stage. Individual foundation perimeter drains are intended to handle small amounts of intermittent water and should not be used to mitigate a persistent shallow groundwater condition. PUD/Preliminary Plan: The Geological Conditions on the PUD / Preliminary Plan (Galloway, Undated) should be updated to include CTL’s preliminary geotechnical investigation (January 6, 2022). Submitted 1/14/2022 by Amy Crandall, Engineering Geologist, Colorado Geological Survey (303-384-2632 or acrandall@mines.edu) |
1/14/2022 11:38:23 AM | |
|
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
1/13/2022 2:22:25 PM |
-CDOT Staff does not have any updated comments regarding this submittal and all other planning comments prior still apply. -CDOT Access has made the Access Permit Offer to the development and is awaiting their review for Access to SH24G. |
1/13/2022 2:22:25 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/13/2022 12:35:58 PM |
Wastewater report was not resubmitted in EDARP. Please address review 1 comments, in addition to updating the wastewater report with Cherokees information as they will be providing wastewater connectivity to the Grandview Metro District. Applicant submitted a response to wastewater but not the revised report. | 1/13/2022 12:35:58 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/13/2022 12:29:12 PM |
Water Resource Report comments | 1/13/2022 12:29:12 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
1/13/2022 12:11:24 PM |
Please provide electric commitment letter from MVEA specific to this preliminary plan/PUD. This shall include easements that the provider is requesting. Those easements shall be noted on the plan set. Comment not resolved from review 1. | 1/13/2022 12:11:24 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
1/13/2022 12:09:33 PM |
Please provide the Black Hills Energy Gas Commitment letter. The letter shall include any easements necessary to serve the development.. Comment not resolved from review 1 | 1/13/2022 12:09:33 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
1/13/2022 12:05:38 PM |
Water Commitment-Please add the usage for the recreation facility and church lot so that it can be included in the finding. Also, I think you may have meant to write 10-acres not 10 church and rec sites... Comment was not addressed with resubmittal 2, comment remains. Include the institutional uses in the commitment letter and calculate demand. Once sufficiency is made at prelim plan, administratively approved plats can not change water useage so remove that comment in the commitment letter. | 1/13/2022 12:05:38 PM | |
| View |
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
1/11/2022 2:59:53 PM |
1/11/2022 2:59:53 PM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
1/10/2022 3:07:26 PM |
1. The approved street names need to be added to the PUD development. 2. Elbert Road is not in the center of the future development but to the east of the project not a part of this project. The vicinity map needs to be revised. Elbert road is shown on 42000-00-380 2. Will the current water tank access change with this new development? Current address for the Water Tank per RBD Enumerations is10255 Eastonville Road, with no permit history. When was the water tank built? Is there another address associated with the water tank? 2409 Strickler Road seems to be the land owners home address and not the address to the water tank. 3. New water tank location & lift station will receive separate addresses. 4. Standard PUD comments that still apply: A. For assignment of addressing for lots and tracts, place addressing marker (xxx) where they are intended to be utilized. Addressing marker for lots should be front door. B. Provide a 100 scale copy or larger of the entire APPROVED development plan (d.p.) to this department so that addressing can be assigned. Once received, the development plan will be placed on a list to be addressed. Development plans that are not yet approved may be addressed, however additional plan review fees will accrue if changes are made to the D.P. after initial addressing. Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org W: 719-327-2953 |
1/10/2022 3:07:26 PM | |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
1/10/2022 8:45:00 AM |
GEC Checklist | 1/10/2022 8:45:00 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
1/10/2022 8:44:29 AM |
Review 2: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - GEC Plan...........(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Checklist EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - Drainage Report (sign, date, and resubmit once PCD comments have also been resolved) - ESQCP (sign, date, and resubmit once PCD comments have also been resolved) - MS4 Post Construction Form - SWMP - SWMP Checklist (sign, date, and resubmit) The following documents need to be revised and resubmitted. It appears that the incorrect version of each file was uploaded on accident (as noted next to each): - FAE (a duplicate of the Fire Commitment Letter was uploaded to EDARP instead) - PBMP Applicability Form (the V1 doc was re-uploaded with none of my comments addressed) - PDB BMP O&M (the V1 doc was re-uploaded with none of my comments addressed) Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
1/10/2022 8:44:29 AM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
1/7/2022 3:04:41 PM |
1/7/2022 3:04:41 PM | |
|
Peyton 23
1/5/2022 12:55:01 PM |
The Peyton School District has reviewed the application and at this time, we do not have any new concerns but all previously listed concerns / issues remain. | 1/5/2022 12:55:01 PM | |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
1/4/2022 10:29:43 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #2 - Please See Attached Documents (PAB Endorsed 10/13/2021) | 1/4/2022 10:29:43 AM |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
1/4/2022 10:28:46 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #2 - Please See Attached Documents (PAB Endorsed 10/13/2021) | 1/4/2022 10:28:46 AM |
|
Cherokee Metro Dist
1/3/2022 3:35:18 PM |
Letter of Intent: Page 20 - Item 4, last line: Cherokee will not be the water provider for this development. Delete reference to Cherokee. Page 23 - 3rd paragraph below Table 1: Cherokee currently has no right to pump treated effluent from the alluvium. Cherokee is pursuing a reuse plan but is is not currently approved. Delete the last sentence of this paragraph. |
1/3/2022 3:35:18 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
1/3/2022 9:51:15 AM |
See attached letter. | 1/3/2022 9:51:15 AM |
| View |
Traffic Review Consultant
1/3/2022 8:01:49 AM |
See attached comment memo and additional comments recorded in the Bluebeam session. | 1/3/2022 8:01:49 AM |
| View |
Falcon Fire Protection District
12/30/2021 10:40:58 AM |
12/30/2021 10:40:58 AM | |
|
Cherokee Metro Dist
12/27/2021 4:23:46 PM |
Document titled "Wastewater Disposal Report" opens document titled Water Resource Report. Repost Wastewater Disposal Report with the correct document. | 12/27/2021 4:23:46 PM | |
|
Black Forest Land Use Committee
12/19/2021 11:27:39 AM |
The Grandview Reserve is well outside the area of responsibility for the Black Forest Land Use Committee so we will not be providing any comments for this review. | 12/19/2021 11:27:39 AM | |
|
Black Forest Fire Protection District
12/17/2021 8:05:39 AM |
This project is entirely within the Falcon FD and Peyton FD area of response. BFFR has no comments at this time. | 12/17/2021 8:05:39 AM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
12/16/2021 8:31:53 AM |
original comment still applicable from the summary memo "As the design will affect the current floodplain delineation along Main Stem and Main Stem Tributary through the Grandview Reserve site HR Green will submit a CLOMR application in September/October of 2021 and a LOMR upon the completion of all improvement construction" Approved CLOMR required prior to floodplain earth work permit issuance Final FEMA approved Base Flood Elevations and lateral extents of the SFHA will be required to be shown on the plat prior to final plat approval. |
12/16/2021 8:31:53 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/28/2021 5:21:44 PM |
Pre-Subdivision Site Grading Form | 10/28/2021 5:21:44 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/28/2021 5:20:59 PM |
Deviation Request Form with a PUD | 10/28/2021 5:20:59 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/28/2021 4:48:24 PM |
(ESQCP redlines) | 10/28/2021 4:48:24 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/28/2021 4:47:49 PM |
(MS4 form redlines) | 10/28/2021 4:47:49 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/28/2021 4:46:58 PM |
(FAE redlines) | 10/28/2021 4:46:58 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/28/2021 4:46:26 PM |
(GEC redlines summary) | 10/28/2021 4:46:26 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/28/2021 4:45:51 PM |
(GEC redlines) | 10/28/2021 4:45:51 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/28/2021 4:44:57 PM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 10/28/2021 4:44:57 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/28/2021 4:44:28 PM |
(PDR redlines) | 10/28/2021 4:44:28 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/28/2021 4:43:41 PM |
(TIS redlines summary) | 10/28/2021 4:43:41 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/28/2021 4:43:06 PM |
(TIS redlines) | 10/28/2021 4:43:06 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/28/2021 4:42:30 PM |
(PUDSP redlines summary) | 10/28/2021 4:42:30 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/28/2021 4:41:59 PM |
(PUDSP redlines) | 10/28/2021 4:41:59 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/28/2021 4:41:04 PM |
(LOI redlines) | 10/28/2021 4:41:04 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/28/2021 4:38:01 PM |
See comment memo (link at left) and redlines. The following items need to be revised and resubmitted: 1. LOI 2. PUD/Preliminary Plan 3. TIS 4. PDR 5. GEC 6. FAE 7. ESQCP 8. MS4 Post-Construction Form and SDI sheets 9. Deviation Requests with a PUD Form 10. Deviation Requests (deviation form) - Items with Stormwater comments Also needed when available: - Pre-Development Site Grading/ROA Acknowledgement - Utility CDs, if applicable -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
10/28/2021 4:38:01 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/26/2021 2:00:21 PM |
Soils and Geology Comment Redlines. This report needs to meet standards. | 10/26/2021 2:00:21 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/26/2021 12:54:28 PM |
Wastewater Disposal report comment | 10/26/2021 12:54:28 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/26/2021 12:21:53 PM |
Water Resource Report | 10/26/2021 12:21:53 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/25/2021 12:58:16 PM |
Subdivision Summary Sheet- | 10/25/2021 12:58:16 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/25/2021 12:53:13 PM |
Water Summary State Form shall be specific to this PUD Preliminary plan application. Please correct. Don't for get to include the lots for the church or rec site. The Sketch Plan version was submitted by mistake. | 10/25/2021 12:53:13 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/25/2021 12:46:25 PM |
Please provide electric commitment letter from MVEA. This shall include easements that the provider is requesting. Those easements shall be noted on the plan. | 10/25/2021 12:46:25 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/25/2021 12:43:42 PM |
Please provide the Black Hills Energy Gas Commitment letter. The letter shall include any easements necessary to serve the development.. | 10/25/2021 12:43:42 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/25/2021 12:49:17 PM |
Water Commitment-Please add the usage for the recreation facility and church lot so that it can be included in the finding. Also, I think you may have meant to write 10-acres not 10 church and rec sites... | 10/25/2021 12:49:17 PM | |
| View |
Peyton 23
10/14/2021 3:46:06 PM |
10/14/2021 3:46:06 PM | |
| View |
Peyton 23
10/14/2021 2:22:59 PM |
10/14/2021 2:22:59 PM | |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
10/14/2021 11:13:01 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments - Please See Attached Documents (PAB Endorsed 10/13/2021) | 10/14/2021 11:13:01 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/14/2021 10:13:54 AM |
SWMP Checklist_V1 | 10/14/2021 10:13:54 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/14/2021 10:13:19 AM |
Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP)_V1 | 10/14/2021 10:13:19 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/14/2021 10:11:57 AM |
PDB BMP Operations & Maintenance Manual_V1 | 10/14/2021 10:11:57 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/14/2021 10:11:36 AM |
PBMP Applicability Form_V1 | 10/14/2021 10:11:36 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/14/2021 10:11:23 AM |
MS4 Post Construction Form_V1 | 10/14/2021 10:11:23 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
10/14/2021 10:11:09 AM |
Grading & Erosion Control checklist_V1 | 10/14/2021 10:11:09 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
10/14/2021 10:10:34 AM |
Review 1: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report...(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - ESQCP...................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - FAE.......................(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Plan...............(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Checklist - MS4 Post Construction Form - O&M Manual - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP - SWMP Checklist Please provide the following documents on resubmittal: - Private Detention Basin / Stormwater Quality BMP Maintenance Agreement - Stormwater Detention & Infiltration Design Data Worksheet (SDI Worksheet) Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II glennreese@elpasoco.com |
10/14/2021 10:10:34 AM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
10/11/2021 2:20:35 PM |
1. Looks as though, the street name Elbert Road does not run in the center of this project as shown on page C0.01. Elbert Road is north and east of this project road. Edit to correct the vicinity map. 2. What is the street name a the south end of this project that looks like it will connect to the Waterbury subdivision? Please clarify. 3. The address to the water tank in the south west corner of the lot, on parcel 42000-00-397 is addresses as 10255 Eastonville Road. Will the access to this water tank change? Regional Building Department does not show permit history under this address. Is there another address associated with the water tank? Please clarify. STANDARD PUD COMMENTS: 1. For assignment of addressing for lots and tracts, place addressing marker (xxx) where they are intended to be utilized. Addressing marker for lots should be front door. 2. Rear Loaded homes will have unique address assignment and placement. A plat note will be required showing address placement. Clarify if any of these homes will be rear loaded. 3. Provide a 100 scale copy or larger of the entire APPROVED development plan (d.p./pud) to this department so that addressing can be assigned. Once received, the development plan will be placed on a list to be addressed. Development plans that are not yet approved may be addressed, however additional plan review fees will accrue if changes are made to the D.P. after initial addressing. 4. An email from Glenn West, Gwest@elpasoteller911.org , reserving the remaining street names is required to be emailed to the Enumerations department. Amy Vanderbeek Amy@pprbd.org Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org |
10/11/2021 2:20:35 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Parks and Wildlife
10/9/2021 9:50:58 AM |
10/9/2021 9:50:58 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
10/8/2021 10:35:00 AM |
See attached letter. | 10/8/2021 10:35:00 AM |
|
Black Forest Land Use Committee
10/8/2021 6:55:09 AM |
Grandview Reserve is outside the boundaries of the Black Forest Land Use Committee so we will not be making any comments on this proposal. | 10/8/2021 6:55:09 AM | |
|
Cherokee Metro Dist
10/6/2021 3:04:03 PM |
Letter of Intent - Page 19, Item 4. Cherokee has not committed or does it plan to provide water for this development. Delete the last sentence of this section. |
10/6/2021 3:04:03 PM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
10/6/2021 2:42:55 PM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Preliminary Comments - Please See Attached Documents (To be presented to the PAB for endorsement on 10/13/2021) | 10/6/2021 2:42:55 PM |
| View |
Peyton 23
10/5/2021 2:28:18 PM |
10/5/2021 2:28:18 PM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
10/5/2021 8:35:47 AM |
10/5/2021 8:35:47 AM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
10/4/2021 10:47:15 AM |
10/4/2021 10:47:15 AM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
10/4/2021 10:24:59 AM |
10/4/2021 10:24:59 AM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
9/30/2021 1:05:48 PM |
Grandview Reserve, Filing 1 proposes up to 568 residential units at varying densities, institutional use (i.e., potential church site), and parks & open space on 189.479 acres. CTL’s Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Grandview Reserve (December 23, 2020), provides a valid description of surface and subsurface conditions and soil and bedrock engineering properties. There are no geologic hazards or unusual geotechnical constraints present that would preclude the proposed uses and density. CTL states on page 5, “Geologic hazards at the site include expansive soils and bedrock and areas of shallow groundwater.” Provided CTL’s recommendations are adhered to, and lot-specific subsurface soil investigations are performed, CGS has no objection to the proposed PUD/preliminary plan approval. However, we offer the following comments and recommendations. Shallow groundwater and basement feasibility: CTL observed groundwater in their borings at shallow depths (5.5 to 15 feet measured days after drilling), which, depending on grading plans, may preclude full depth basement construction unless mitigation is implemented. Also, lots 429, 445, 446, and 447 are within the wetland line (PUD, sheet C2.05). Shallow groundwater or flooding potential may be heightened in these areas. Full-depth basements should not be considered unless mitigation measures are implemented to ensure that a minimum separation distance of three feet between the shallowest seasonal water levels and the lowermost floor and crawlspace elevations can be maintained year-round. It would be prudent for the county to require groundwater monitoring/observation to determine if basements are feasible and/or if a groundwater collection or underdrain system could be employed for this site during the preliminary plan stage. CGS agrees with CTL (page 7), “Depending on design finish grade elevations shallow groundwater may necessitate raising grades in some areas or utilizing crawl space construction” and “shallow groundwater conditions can be mitigated through the use of foundation drains and active underdrains (if allowed and installed by the developer).” Individual foundation perimeter drains are intended to handle small amounts of intermittent water and should not be used to mitigate a persistent shallow groundwater condition. PUD/Preliminary Plan: The Geological Conditions on the PUD / Preliminary Plan (Galloway, Undated) should be updated to include CTL’s preliminary geotechnical investigation (December 23, 2020). Submitted 9/30/21 by Amy Crandall, Engineering Geologist, Colorado Geological Survey (303-384-2632 or acrandall@mines.edu) |
9/30/2021 1:05:48 PM | |
|
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
9/29/2021 12:48:58 PM |
Mountain View Electric Association has no objections to the current plan. No comments at this time. | 9/29/2021 12:48:58 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/29/2021 12:17:01 PM |
For the Adjacent Property Owner Notifications, there are a few missing: Both properties directly north have not been notified. They both have the same owner and mailing address: JMJK HOLDINGS LLC, 3450 BIG BEAR DR SEDALIA CO, 80135 but have two different parcel numbers (4200000321 and 4200000380). The only other notification that appears to have not been created/sent out is for Johnson-Conne Linda D, 2409 STRICKLAND RD COLORADO SPRINGS CO, 80906-3321, parcel number 4200000328. The remaining properties were notified. | 9/29/2021 12:17:01 PM | |
|
US Fish Wildlife, Ecological Svcs. (USDOI, Fish & Wildlife Svc.)
9/28/2021 2:50:09 PM |
September 28, 2021 Kari Parsons (kariparsons@elpasoco.com) 2021-TA-1347 Grandview Reserve Planned Use Development near Falcon Hello Kari Parsons, The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the documents associated with the Grandview Reserve 1200 PUDSP, File #: PUDSP2110 in Flacon, CO. Consistent with our determination of April 29, 2020, the Service has no concerns with this project resulting in impacts to species listed as candidate, proposed, threatened, or endangered. We appreciate your efforts to ensure the conservation of threatened and endangered species. Thank you for contacting us and please let me know if you have any further questions. George L. San Miguel Wildlife Biologist Colorado Ecological Services Field Office US Fish & Wildlife Service 134 Union Blvd., Suite 670 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 (303)236-4752 George_SanMiguel@FWS.gov |
9/28/2021 2:50:09 PM | |
| View |
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
9/27/2021 1:56:11 PM |
9/27/2021 1:56:11 PM | |
|
Colorado State Forest Service
9/24/2021 8:44:19 AM |
The primary wildland fuel type for this proposal is grassland with scattered trees having a low wildfire hazard potential. No special fire mitigation plans or other actions are necessary for final approval by the Colorado State Forest Service. | 9/24/2021 8:44:19 AM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
9/23/2021 7:08:44 AM |
The following are the street names E911 reserved for this project back in April of 2019 REX ROAD (public)– Approved, provided this is part of El Paso Counties road expansion plan GRANDVIEW LAKE HEIGHTS (private) – Approved LAKESIDE POINT (private) – Approved PEACEFUL VISTA POINT (private) – Approved HAWK ESTATES POINT (private) – Approved – RESERVE ESTATES GROVE (private) – Approved VISTA POND POINT (private) – Approved SOLITUDE MANOR POINT (private) – Approved HAWKEYE PERCH POINT (private) – Approved RABBIT RUN HEIGHTS (private) – Approved MEADOW BELLE GROVE (private) – Approved However could not find any drawing in the submittals that show the location of the above names for review. Request the contractor submit a plat drawing with the proposed street names for final approval. From reviewing the PUD drawing this will require additional street names than what has already been reserved. G. West |
9/23/2021 7:08:44 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
9/20/2021 11:34:02 AM |
No comments from County Attorney - Development Review at this time. | 9/20/2021 11:34:02 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
9/16/2021 12:20:53 PM |
See attached letter. | 9/16/2021 12:20:53 PM |
|
US Postal Service
9/16/2021 8:14:03 AM |
this does not require mail service - if needed please contact Kevin.S.Orlowitz@usps.gov | 9/16/2021 8:14:03 AM | |
|
Black Forest Fire Protection District
9/14/2021 10:18:02 AM |
Black Forest Fire Rescue Protection District This project is in Falcon Fire Protection District not BFFR. |
9/14/2021 10:18:02 AM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
9/14/2021 9:57:29 AM |
from the summary memo "As the design will affect the current floodplain delineation along Main Stem and Main Stem Tributary through the Grandview Reserve site HR Green will submit a CLOMR application in September/October of 2021 and a LOMR upon the completion of all improvement construction" Approved CLOMR required prior to floodplain earth work permit issuance Final FEMA approved Base Flood Elevations and lateral extents of the SFHA will be required to be shown on the plat prior to final plat approval. |
9/14/2021 9:57:29 AM |
EDARP