View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/15/2021 2:04:07 PM |
See comment letter (link to left) for reference. The engineering documents are ready for ECM Administrator approval and will be uploaded to EDARP when available. The following items need to be submitted when available: - Updated USACE permit (if required by USACE prior to construction in this area) -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
12/15/2021 2:04:07 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/8/2021 10:35:04 AM |
See comment letter (link to left) for reference. The engineering documents are ready for ECM Administrator approval and will be uploaded to EDARP when available. The following items need to be submitted when available: - Signed ESQCP - Signed Pre-subdivision Site Grading Acknowledgment/ROA Form - Updated USACE permit (if required by USACE) -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
10/8/2021 10:35:04 AM |
| View |
Colorado Springs Airport Advisory Commission
10/6/2021 4:56:04 PM |
The attached summary with comments will be presented at the October 27, 2021 Airport Advisory Commission meeting. | 10/6/2021 4:56:04 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/5/2021 1:07:23 PM |
Planning has no comments and is anticipating scheduling item for the November 4th PC. Engineering comments are uploaded below. | 10/5/2021 1:07:23 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/5/2021 12:48:10 PM |
Planning has no comments and is anticipating scheduling item for the November 4th PC. Engineering comments are uploaded below. | 10/5/2021 12:48:10 PM | |
|
Academy SD 20 Building Fund
8/30/2021 9:48:08 AM |
Sterling Ranch II Preliminary Plan and Sterling Ranch Filing No. 2 (Phase 1) Academy School District 20 is in receipt of File #SP2015 for approval of the Sterling Ranch II Preliminary Plan and File #SP203 for approval of the Sterling Ranch Filing No. 2 (Phase 1). The District is opposed to the plans as presented. The following issues need to be resolved before the District can agree that the proposed school site of 11.47 acres is acceptable to the District. PERMENANT 20’ GAS LINE EASEMENT The proposed site is totally unacceptable to the District if the 20’ permanent gas line easement is not removed from the site. The district was assured via the email below that the gas line would be moved to an adjacent street. One certainly would not build an elementary school on top of a gas line running through the site. From: John Maynard [mailto:JMaynard@nescolorado.com] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 8:20 AM To: Donald Smith Cc: virgils@mscivil.com Subject: FW: Sterling Ranch - Proposed School Site Don - See attached for revised school site. Per Virgil, there will be no detention required on this site, hence it is 11 acres. The existing gas line will be relocated to adjacent streets and vacated, so that will not be a constraint. The trail easement on the north is intended to allow people to walk to the parks to the east and to the school site, as well as for general pedestrian circulation. It will be owned and maintained by the Metro District. Let me know if you have questions. - John John A. Maynard, AICP Principal N.E.S. Inc. 508 South Tejon St. Colorado Springs, CO 80903 719.471.0073, Fax 719.471.0267 www.nescolorado.com ? Please consider the environment before printing this email. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ON THE SITE The current site documents indicate a proposed drainage easement adjacent to the western boundary of the school site. If this is going to be a buried storm drainpipe it is not an issue if it runs adjacent to the western boundary of the site. In addition, there are additional easements for drainage on the site. Once again, if this represents a buried storm drainpipe adjacent to the western boundary of the site it is not a problem. However, the drainage easement entering from the southwest corner of the site appears to be servicing an open drainage area on the site and is not acceptable as it is located directly in line with one of the anticipated entries to the site from Hazlett Drive. Any type of open ditch drainage easement on the site is not acceptable as anytime there is water in the ditch it will create an attractive nuisance for elementary students and significant liability for the District. If you need additional information, please contact me. Don Smith Planning Consultant |
8/30/2021 9:48:08 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/26/2021 7:47:25 PM |
(FAE redlines) | 8/26/2021 7:47:25 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/26/2021 7:46:53 PM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 8/26/2021 7:46:53 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/26/2021 7:46:18 PM |
(PDR redlines) | 8/26/2021 7:46:18 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/26/2021 7:45:38 PM |
(Preliminary Plan redlines summary) | 8/26/2021 7:45:38 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/26/2021 7:45:10 PM |
(Preliminary Plan redlines) | 8/26/2021 7:45:10 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
8/26/2021 1:20:26 PM |
It appears that the comment regarding dimensioning the tract boundaries is not addressed. Some dimensions were added but not all were added to every tract on all preliminary plan sheets. Tracts are no different from lots, they must be dimensioned and the SF or acreage must be labeled. On the other hand roadways are required to have dimensions and bearings or angles. | 8/26/2021 1:20:26 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/26/2021 7:44:30 PM |
See comment letter (link to left) and redlines. The following items need to be revised and resubmitted: - PDR - Preliminary Plan - FAE -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
8/26/2021 7:44:30 PM |
|
County Attorney - Water
7/26/2021 9:42:38 AM |
County Attorney's water review was provided March 17. Unless the project or the water supply information has changed, and please advise if they have, that review is still valid. | 7/26/2021 9:42:38 AM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
7/19/2021 8:27:54 PM |
7/19/2021 8:27:54 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/12/2021 3:00:46 PM |
(PBMP Applicability Form redlines) | 7/12/2021 3:00:46 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/12/2021 2:49:30 PM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 7/12/2021 2:49:30 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/12/2021 2:48:51 PM |
(PDR redlines) | 7/12/2021 2:48:51 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/12/2021 2:47:33 PM |
(Deviation request redlines) | 7/12/2021 2:47:33 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/12/2021 2:46:57 PM |
(LOI redlines) | 7/12/2021 2:46:57 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/12/2021 2:46:20 PM |
See comment letter and redlines. The following items need to be revised and resubmitted: - Deviation request - LOI - PBMP Applicability Form - PDR - Preliminary Plan - FAE - Draft construction and drainage easement on school site (EPC-owned - to be discussed with County Attorneys Staff) -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
7/12/2021 2:46:20 PM |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
7/9/2021 12:56:15 PM |
Colorado Geological Survey review of the resubmittal for Sterling Ranch Phase 2 Preliminary Plan SP203 (Amy Crandall, P.E., acrandall@mines.edu): With this resubmittal referral, CGS received the revised Soil, Geology, and Geologic Hazard Study (Entech Engineering, Inc., revised May 4, 2021). CGS provided review comments for this project on March 25, 2021 and June 17, 2021, some of which are repeated herein. 1. Entech’s May 4, 2021 Report and Grading and Erosion Control Plan. As noted on page 11 of Entech’s report, “Areas within the drainage swale along the western portions of the site have been identified as seasonal and potentially seasonal shallow groundwater areas,” and “surface waters in this drainage are to be collected and piped along the western boundary to a detention pond south of the site.” CGS recommends these drain systems in tributary drainages filled in by development are noted on the plans. Additionally, according to the Grading and Erosion Control Plans (sheet 3), a “temporary drainage swale” appears to be located within the western and southern portions of the site traversing proposed lots, collected in a basin between lots 137 and 138. CGS has concerns with future improvements constructed over drainages filled in during development (temporary or permanent). Therefore, CGS recommends that these drainages be further evaluated during site-specific geotechnical investigations to determine their effect (i.e., saturated conditions, differential movement, variable subsurface conditions (fill/native material), etc.) on future development. Note 28 of the Grading and Erosion Control plan (J.R. Engineering, LLC, Revised May 3, 2021) references Entech’s June 25, 2020 report and should be updated to Entech’s most recent revision. 2. Shallow groundwater and basement feasibility. As noted in Entech’s report (Table 2), groundwater was encountered in two test borings at depths of 7 and 9.5 feet, and bedrock was encountered at depths of 4 to 14 feet. Entech also identifies seasonal and potentially seasonal shallow groundwater areas in Figure 7. The feasibility of basements due to shallow groundwater, seasonally shallow groundwater, and perched groundwater on shallow bedrock is not discussed in Entech’s report. CGS recommends the county require groundwater monitoring/observation to obtain groundwater data that can also be used to determine the feasibility of basements. This monitoring/observation program should be conducted prior to the preliminary plan’s approval to determine if basements are feasible and/or if an underdrain system could be employed for this site. To be effective, however, this monitoring should include measurements/observations through fall, winter, and spring and not merely during site-specific building investigations. Proposed floor levels should be at least three feet above maximum anticipated groundwater levels and maintained year-round. According to the geologic hazard disclosure statement on sheet 1 and note 3 in sheet 17 of the preliminary plan (N.E.S., Inc., Revised May 17, 2021), “In areas of high groundwater in the area, all foundations shall incorporate an underground drainage system.” Individual foundation perimeter drains are needed around any below-grade (basement) space, if determined to be feasible, and may discharge to an underdrain system if constructed, that gravity discharges to a daylight outfall. Individual foundation perimeter drains are intended to handle small amounts of intermittent, perched water and may NOT be used as sole mitigation of persistent shallow groundwater conditions. In summary, CGS recommends: • Drain systems in tributary drainages that will be filled in by development are noted on the plans; • The county requires groundwater monitoring/observation to obtain groundwater data that can be used to determine the feasibility of basements and/or if an underdrain system could be employed for this site; • Entech’s recommendations are incorporated in the project planning and design. |
7/9/2021 12:56:15 PM | |
|
Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)
6/27/2021 7:30:52 PM |
NEPCO would like to reiterate comments from our 3/12 letter. We have significant concerns with the projects water use as excessive and disproportional to the offsite impacts. The development allows more than 24 times the water use the community was expecting. We believe this level of density without consideration to nearby RR-5 zones property is unwise. | 6/27/2021 7:30:52 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
6/25/2021 12:49:08 PM |
Please let staff know what you want to do about basements/foundations on impacted groundwater lots; we can't defer it to the plat(s)…Are there some basements that will not be feasible- identify those lots in detail which is different than lots w groundwater that may be mitigated with drains verses no basements? | 6/25/2021 12:49:08 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
6/25/2021 12:47:20 PM |
Prelim plan version 4 comment planner only- Looks like the tracts are still missing some of the dimensions that would close their boundaries | 6/25/2021 12:47:20 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
6/25/2021 12:44:06 PM |
Wetland Report from Review 3 comments | 6/25/2021 12:44:06 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
6/25/2021 12:38:30 PM |
Complete landscape plan sheet set 1-11 comments not addressed from 4/2021 | 6/25/2021 12:38:30 PM | |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
6/25/2021 10:37:12 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #3 - Please See Attached Documents (Originally PAB Endorsed March 2019) | 6/25/2021 10:37:12 AM |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
6/25/2021 9:07:48 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #3 - Please See Attached Documents (Originally PAB Endorsed March 2019) | 6/25/2021 9:07:48 AM |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
6/21/2021 11:31:02 AM |
Is the street name from Sterling Ranch Fil No 2, Cordgrass Drive changing names at Bynum Drive to Ennis Drive? No further comment. Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org |
6/21/2021 11:31:02 AM | |
|
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
6/17/2021 9:54:23 AM |
Mountain View Electric Association has no additional comments at this time. Reference all comment letters dated June 22, 2020, August 19, 2020 and April 1, 2021. | 6/17/2021 9:54:23 AM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
6/17/2021 9:08:50 AM |
Colorado Geological Survey review of the resubmittal for Sterling Ranch Phase 2 Preliminary Plan SP203 (Amy Crandall, P.E., acrandall@mines.edu): With this resubmittal referral, CGS received a request to provide Review Comments (Email dated June 22, 2021); Preliminary Drainage Report (J.R. Engineering, LLC, May 2021); Grading and Erosion Control Plans (J.R. Engineering, LLC, Revised May 3, 2021); Preliminary Plan (N.E.S., Inc., Revised May 17, 2021); and Letter of Intent (N.E.S., Inc., Revised May 2021). A revised Soils, Geology, and Geologic Hazard Study was not included with the updated documents. Entech’s March 3, 2021 report was referenced in these comments. CGS provided review comments for this project on March 25, 2021, that remain valid, some of which are repeated herein. 1. Entech’s March 3, 2021 Report, Preliminary Plan, and Grading and Erosion Control Plan. As noted on page 11 of Entech’s report, “Areas within the drainage swale along the western portions of the site have been identified as seasonal and potentially seasonal shallow groundwater areas,” and “surface waters in this drainage are to be collected and piped along the western boundary to a detention pond south of the site.” CGS recommends these drain systems in tributary drainages filled in by development are noted on the plans. Additionally, according to the Grading and Erosion Control Plans (sheet 3), a “temporary drainage swale” appears to be located within the western and southern portions of the site traversing proposed lots, collected in a basin between lots 137 and 138. CGS has concerns with future improvements constructed over drainages filled in during development (temporary or permanent). Therefore, CGS recommends that these drainages be further evaluated during site-specific geotechnical investigations to determine their effect (i.e., saturated conditions, differential movement, variable subsurface conditions (fill/native material), etc.) on future development. The geologic hazard disclosure statement on sheet 1 and the site constraints exhibit on sheet 17 of the Preliminary Plan (NES, Inc., May 17, 2021) reference Entech’s revised report dated May 4, 2021; this revised report was not included with the resubmittal documents. Also, Note 28 of the Grading and Erosion Control plan references Entech’s June 25, 2020 report and should be updated to Entech’s most recent revision. 2. Shallow groundwater and basement feasibility. As noted in Entech’s report (Table 2), groundwater was encountered in two test borings at depths of 7 and 9.5 feet, and bedrock was encountered at depths of 4 to 14 feet. Entech also identifies seasonal and potentially seasonal shallow groundwater areas in Figure 7. The feasibility of basements due to shallow groundwater, seasonally shallow groundwater, and perched groundwater on shallow bedrock is not discussed in Entech’s report. CGS recommends the county require groundwater monitoring/observation to obtain groundwater data that can also be used to determine the feasibility of basements. This monitoring/observation program should be conducted prior to the preliminary plan’s approval to determine if basements are feasible and/or if an underdrain system could be employed for this site. To be effective, however, this monitoring should include measurements/observations through fall, winter, and spring and not merely during site-specific building investigations. Proposed floor levels should be at least three feet above maximum anticipated groundwater levels and maintained year-round. According to the geologic hazard disclosure statement on sheet 1 and note 3 in sheet 17, “In areas of high groundwater in the area, all foundations shall incorporate an underground drainage system.” Individual foundation perimeter drains are needed around any below-grade (basement) space, if determined to be feasible, and may discharge to an underdrain system if constructed, that gravity discharges to a daylight outfall. Individual foundation perimeter drains are intended to handle small amounts of intermittent, perched water and may NOT be used as sole mitigation of persistent shallow groundwater conditions. In summary, CGS recommends: • Drain systems in tributary drainages that will be filled in by development are noted on the plans; • The county requires groundwater monitoring/observation to obtain groundwater data that can be used to determine the feasibility of basements and/or if an underdrain system could be employed for this site; • Entech’s recommendations are incorporated in the project planning and design. |
6/17/2021 9:08:50 AM | |
|
Woodmen Hills Metro
6/15/2021 9:48:28 AM |
Woodmen Hills Metropolitan District has no comment at this time. | 6/15/2021 9:48:28 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
6/10/2021 10:04:01 AM |
6/10/2021 10:04:01 AM | |
|
Falcon Fire Protection District
6/8/2021 9:40:38 AM |
not within the Falcon Fire District. No comments provided. | 6/8/2021 9:40:38 AM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
6/9/2021 5:25:31 PM |
Review 3: EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - GEC Checklist - GEC Plan - SWMP Checklist - SWMP EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer I glennreese@elpasoco.com |
6/9/2021 5:25:31 PM | |
|
Academy SD 20 Building Fund
6/4/2021 7:15:37 AM |
Academy District 20 is in receipt of File #SP203 for approval of Sterling Ranch II Preliminary Plan---Phase 2. The District is requesting land dedication in lieu of fees per the existing El Paso County Code for all residential units developed within the approved Sterling Ranch Sketch Plan. The District has previously discussed 2 future school sites in the portion of the Sterling Sketch Plan that is within the District 20 boundaries with the developers of the property. If you need additional information, please contact me. Don Smith Planning Consultant Academy district 20S |
6/4/2021 7:15:37 AM | |
|
Black Forest Land Use Committee
6/3/2021 3:46:50 PM |
The Black Forest Land Use Committee has no inputs to this proposal. | 6/3/2021 3:46:50 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
6/2/2021 1:48:14 PM |
Hey Kari, Same as previous comments *No apparent conflicts – recommend approval. This site is outside of CSU service territory for Water and Wastewater, no comments will be provided on utilities outside of our service territory.* Thanks, Ryne Solberg rsolberg@csu.org |
6/2/2021 1:48:14 PM | |
|
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
6/2/2021 1:23:37 PM |
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD previous comments regarding Sterling Ranch water and waste water are still the main concern to the district. Please refer to previous comments. | 6/2/2021 1:23:37 PM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
6/1/2021 3:06:59 PM |
6/1/2021 3:06:59 PM | |
|
US Fish Wildlife, Ecological Svcs. (USDOI, Fish & Wildlife Svc.)
6/1/2021 1:59:01 PM |
Hello Kari Parsons, The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has reviewed the documents associated with the Sterling Ranch II Preliminary Plan in Colorado Springs, CO. The Service has no concerns with this project resulting in impacts to species listed as candidate, proposed, threatened, or endangered. We appreciate your efforts to ensure the conservation of threatened and endangered species. Thank you for contacting us and please let me know if you have any further questions. George L. San Miguel Wildlife Biologist Colorado Ecological Services Field Office US Fish & Wildlife Service 134 Union Blvd., Suite 670 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 (303)236-4752 George_SanMiguel@FWS.gov |
6/1/2021 1:59:01 PM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
6/1/2021 9:57:04 AM |
6/1/2021 9:57:04 AM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
6/1/2021 9:56:19 AM |
6/1/2021 9:56:19 AM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
6/1/2021 8:50:49 AM |
Street naming previously approved by J. Annan. No additional comments. |
6/1/2021 8:50:49 AM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
6/1/2021 8:34:15 AM |
floodplain note should call out zone AE with Floodway, not " Zone A". Add BFE lines to plans and plat |
6/1/2021 8:34:15 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
4/16/2021 8:31:24 AM |
Previous Comments on the downstream pond still apply - Anna Bergmark | 4/16/2021 8:31:24 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Planning & Community Development
4/16/2021 8:29:27 AM |
Previous comments concerning the downstream pond approval still apply. Thanks, Anna Bergmark |
4/16/2021 8:29:27 AM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
4/10/2021 3:00:51 PM |
4/10/2021 3:00:51 PM | |
| View |
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
4/8/2021 4:01:41 PM |
4/8/2021 4:01:41 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2021 9:57:51 AM |
(Preliminary Plan redlines summary) | 4/7/2021 9:57:51 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2021 9:56:56 AM |
(Preliminary Plan redlines) | 4/7/2021 9:56:56 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2021 9:56:14 AM |
(PBMP Applicability Form and Plan redlines) | 4/7/2021 9:56:14 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2021 9:55:09 AM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 4/7/2021 9:55:09 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2021 9:54:19 AM |
(PDR redlines) | 4/7/2021 9:54:19 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2021 9:53:41 AM |
(LOI redlines) | 4/7/2021 9:53:41 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/7/2021 9:44:29 AM |
See comment letter and redlines. | 4/7/2021 9:44:29 AM |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
4/1/2021 5:34:46 PM |
See attached comments | 4/1/2021 5:34:46 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/1/2021 7:58:09 AM |
There was language in the wetland mitigation report that wetland soils would be excavated and moved to the area that will establish wetlands. How will this be ensured in the field? | 4/1/2021 7:58:09 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/1/2021 7:50:20 AM |
Preliminary Plan Comments redlines Planning Comments Only | 4/1/2021 7:50:20 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/1/2021 7:49:27 AM |
Landscape Comment Planning Only | 4/1/2021 7:49:27 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/1/2021 7:48:53 AM |
Geology Report (Planning Only) see CGS comments | 4/1/2021 7:48:53 AM |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
3/31/2021 4:07:48 PM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #2 - Please See Attached Documents (PAB Endorsed 03/13/2019) | 3/31/2021 4:07:48 PM |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
3/31/2021 4:05:48 PM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #2 - Please See Attached Documents (PAB Endorsed 03/13/2019) | 3/31/2021 4:05:48 PM |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
3/31/2021 10:19:11 AM |
Emailed Mike Bramlett from JR Engineering comments on the Marksheffel Rd. Street Improvement plans 3-18-21. Will await revised plans to be resubmitted to ensure all comments were addressed. Joel Dagnillo, P.E. Engineering Development Review City of Colorado Springs (719)385-5412 Joel.dagnillo@coloradosprings.gov |
3/31/2021 10:19:11 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
3/31/2021 7:33:57 AM |
It is noted the applicant intends to relocate wetland soil from the western portion area of the project to the banks of the Sand Creek channel. How will this carry over into the field? | 3/31/2021 7:33:57 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
3/30/2021 12:16:24 PM |
Please see EPC Environmental comments regarding the USACE permit (see their letter in EDARP): "The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) authorization dated February 29, 2016 identified as Action Number SPA-2015-00428-SCO expired on March 1, 2021. Additionally, this authorization stated that the “Permittee shall implement and abide by the compensatory mitigation plan titled ‘Conceptual Mitigation Plan for Sterling Ranch Residential Development prepared by Core Consultants, Inc. on October 29, 2015.” Documentation of the extension of this permit as well as approval of the Conceptual Mitigation Plan prepared Bristlecone Ecology in June 2020 by the USACE shall be provided to the Planning and Community Development Department. Documentation regarding adherence to the mitigation plan shall be provided to the Planning and Community Development Department by December 31 of each year beginning at the time of initial ground disturbing activities and continuing until the permit is closed." | 3/30/2021 12:16:24 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/1/2021 7:56:48 AM |
Regarding CGS Comment: Please let staff know what you want to do about basements/foundations on impacted groundwater lots; we can't defer it to the plat(s)…Are there some basements that will not be feasible or will you be providing detailed mitigation in a revised report ? |
4/1/2021 7:56:48 AM |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
3/29/2021 12:46:19 PM |
No comments at this time. Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org |
3/29/2021 12:46:19 PM | |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
3/25/2021 2:56:59 PM |
SWMP V_3 | 3/25/2021 2:56:59 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
3/25/2021 2:55:42 PM |
SWMP Checklist V_3 | 3/25/2021 2:55:42 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
3/25/2021 2:55:25 PM |
GEC V_3 | 3/25/2021 2:55:25 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
3/25/2021 2:54:30 PM |
GEC Checklist V_3 | 3/25/2021 2:54:30 PM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
3/25/2021 2:54:12 PM |
Review 2: Stormwater comments have been provided on the following uploaded documents: - GEC Checklist - GEC Plan - SWMP Checklist - SWMP EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - Drainage Report - FAE - PBMP Applicability Form Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer I glennreese@elpasoco.com |
3/25/2021 2:54:12 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Geological Survey
3/25/2021 10:58:35 AM |
3/25/2021 10:58:35 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
3/24/2021 11:30:01 AM |
City traffic previous comments were not addressed. City Traffic Engineering previous comments: 1- The developer will be responsible to construct a 10 foot multi-use trail on the west side of the future Marksheffel Road. 2- Prior to construction plans approval, the developer is required to remit the amount of $75,000 for the future anticipated traffic signal at the intersection of Marksheffel Road with Vollmer Road. 3- Prior to construction plans approval, the developer is required to remit the amount of $150,000 for the future anticipated traffic signal at the intersection of Marksheffel Road with Sterling Ranch Road. Zaker Alazzeh, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager City of Colorado Springs (719) 385-5468 Zaker.Alazzeh@coloradosprings.gov |
3/24/2021 11:30:01 AM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
3/23/2021 9:54:02 AM |
3/23/2021 9:54:02 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
3/22/2021 11:18:27 AM |
3/22/2021 11:18:27 AM | |
| View |
County Attorney - Water
3/17/2021 8:22:55 AM |
3/17/2021 8:22:55 AM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
3/17/2021 7:48:31 AM |
3/17/2021 7:48:31 AM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
3/17/2021 7:41:07 AM |
3/17/2021 7:41:07 AM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
3/16/2021 10:27:21 AM |
Comments for E911 as follows: Grenough Drive - Available Clancy Drive - Available Ennis Drive - Previously Approved Hazlett Drive - Previously Approved Pennydale Drive - Previously Approved Moore Drive - Previously Approved Trago Drive - Previously Approved Pendroy Street - Previously Approved Polson Drive - Previously Approved School House Drive - Previously Approved Thank you Justin |
3/16/2021 10:27:21 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Parks and Wildlife
3/16/2021 8:27:08 AM |
3/16/2021 8:27:08 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
3/9/2021 7:19:08 PM |
Same as previous comments *No apparent conflicts – recommend approval. This site is outside of CSU service territory for Water and Wastewater, no comments will be provided on utilities outside of our service territory.* Thanks, Ryne Solberg rsolberg@csu.org |
3/9/2021 7:19:08 PM | |
|
Academy SD 20 Building Fund
3/8/2021 7:15:53 AM |
Academy District 20 is in receipt of File #SP203 for approval of Sterling Ranch II Preliminary Plan. The District is requesting land dedication in lieu of fees per the existing El Paso County Code for all residential units developed within the approved Sterling Ranch Sketch Plan. The District has previously discussed 2 future school sites in the portion of the Sterling Sketch Plan that is within the District 20 boundaries with the developers of the property. If you need additional information, please contact me. Don Smith Planning Consultant Academy district 20 |
3/8/2021 7:15:53 AM | |
|
Black Forest Land Use Committee
3/6/2021 9:54:58 AM |
The Black Forest Land Use Committee has no comments on this proposal. | 3/6/2021 9:54:58 AM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
3/5/2021 3:48:30 PM |
channel work will require a no rise with water surface elevation comparison table . if post project water surface elevations end up lower by more than 0.3 ft a post project LOMR will be required. If the no-rise cant not be achieved a CLOMR approved by FEMA will be required prior to commencement of site work. | 3/5/2021 3:48:30 PM | |
|
Falcon Fire Protection District
3/5/2021 2:42:08 PM |
not within the boundaries of the Falcon Fire District. NO comments provided. | 3/5/2021 2:42:08 PM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
9/9/2020 3:46:43 PM |
9/9/2020 3:46:43 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/2/2020 6:11:38 PM |
Applicant agreed to update water and waste water report with resubmittal. | 9/2/2020 6:11:38 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/2/2020 6:07:35 PM |
The engineer has provided duplicate comments for the traffic study in the plat folder. | 9/2/2020 6:07:35 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
9/2/2020 6:06:45 PM |
Drainage Report Redlines | 9/2/2020 6:06:45 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
9/2/2020 6:06:14 PM |
Drainage Report comments | 9/2/2020 6:06:14 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
9/2/2020 6:04:51 PM |
Letter of Intent Comments | 9/2/2020 6:04:51 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
9/2/2020 6:04:12 PM |
Natural Features Letter comments | 9/2/2020 6:04:12 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
9/2/2020 6:03:43 PM |
Preliminary Plan Comments | 9/2/2020 6:03:43 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
9/2/2020 6:03:16 PM |
Geology Report Comments. Please incorporate CGS into these comments. | 9/2/2020 6:03:16 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/2/2020 4:48:48 PM |
(PDR redlines summary) | 9/2/2020 4:48:48 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/2/2020 4:48:16 PM |
(PDR redlines) | 9/2/2020 4:48:16 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/2/2020 4:47:29 PM |
See comment letter and redlines. -- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877 |
9/2/2020 4:47:29 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
9/2/2020 1:03:21 PM |
Bristlecone June 2020 Wetland report not provided in submittal as referenced in 3 page of the natural feature report written by NES. This report should address the previous comments also. New comments could be forthcoming based on the report. | 9/2/2020 1:03:21 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/1/2020 3:08:52 PM |
States Water Summary form and the Subdivision Summary form do not match land acerage of overall project, nor is water usage same. Please verify that these match and that the Water report and LOI all match as well... | 9/1/2020 3:08:52 PM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
9/1/2020 9:29:23 AM |
See Parks comments attached. | 9/1/2020 9:29:23 AM |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
8/28/2020 3:22:41 PM |
See preliminary Parks comments attached. | 8/28/2020 3:22:41 PM |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
8/24/2020 11:55:44 AM |
8/24/2020 11:55:44 AM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
8/23/2020 12:39:42 PM |
Recommendations in Entech’s excellent report should be strictly adhered to. As recommended by Entech, additional subsurface investigations will be required for individual lot development to determine engineering properties of the soils and bedrock, depth to bedrock and groundwater and to develop site specific engineering recommendations for foundation design, subdrains, etc. We recommend consistency of Lot numbering on the Preliminary and Grading Plans; and the following recommendations from Entech’s report be depicted and/or noted on the plans: • Planned erosion control adjacent to Sand Creek; • 20-foot setback from crest of Sand Creek Slopes be drawn on the plans specifically for Lot 12 (as shown on the Preliminary Plan and Lot 34 on the Grading Plan); and, • Drain systems in tributary drainage's that will be filled in by development. Additionally, we recommend erosion control measures account for scour erosion from Sand Creek as determined by the Civil Engineer. We applaud the use of a geologic hazard disclosure statement on the plans. We recommend that this statement include all the geologic hazards identified at the site, including radon and erosion, as well as the others listed in Entech’s report. The current statement lists some lots considered at risk to some hazards. We do not think the lots listed are the only ones at risk from these identified hazards or the other ones not listed. Due to the limited number of borings (4) drilled we do not believe the individual hazards for 212 lots can be determined at this phase in the project. We recommend that, unless more detailed subsurface investigations are conducted that individual lot numbers not be used in this statement on the Preliminary Plan. Entech identifies shallow groundwater, the potential for shallow groundwater and seasonally wet areas and shallow bedrock. Feasibility of basements due to shallow groundwater, seasonally shallow groundwater and perched groundwater on shallow bedrock is not discussed in Entech’s report. CGS recommends that this issue be addressed prior to development of final plans. Should basements be desired we recommend a systematic groundwater monitoring program measuring the extent of seasonal fluctuations (through on full spring, summer and fall season) to obtain groundwater data that can be used to determine feasibility of basements. This data will be useful whatever grades determined in the final grading plan. Additionally, we recommend that the Civil Engineer evaluate if a gravity or pumped system may be necessary as part of a groundwater collection system (underdrains), especially if basements are considered. |
8/23/2020 12:39:42 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
8/21/2020 7:48:18 AM |
Engineering Development Review has the following comments: 1. Concur with Traffic Engineering comment that developer must construct 10' trail on the west side of Marksheffel Rd. 2. The developer will be responsible for constructing Marksheffel Rd. adjacent to this development. As Marksheffel enters City limits on the south, it must have a pavement top width of 64', City Std. Type 1 Curb/Gutter, 10' trail on the west side and 6' detached sidewalk on the east side. 3. Construction plans must be submitted to the City for review/approval for all street construction and public improvements if this development is to be annexed into the City of Colorado Springs. 4. Geological hazard report will have to be submitted to the City for review and approval if this development is to be annexed into the City of Colorado Springs. Joel Dagnillo, P.E. Engineering Development Review City of Colorado Springs (719)385-5412 Joel.dagnillo@coloradosprings.gov |
8/21/2020 7:48:18 AM | |
|
Woodmen Hills Metro
8/20/2020 1:05:36 PM |
Sterling Ranch is outside the boundaries of Woodmen Hills Metropolitan District. WHMD has no comment at this time. | 8/20/2020 1:05:36 PM | |
|
Falcon Fire Protection District
8/20/2020 10:06:33 AM |
not within the boundaries of the Falcon Fire District. No comments provided by Falcon Fire. | 8/20/2020 10:06:33 AM | |
| View |
Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)
8/20/2020 9:04:52 AM |
Our last review of the Final Plat for Sterling Ranch Filing No. 2 (Phase 1), dated July 9, 2020 (also attached here), remains valid for this application as well. We have no further comments at this time. | 8/20/2020 9:04:52 AM |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
8/20/2020 7:58:12 AM |
Per E-9-1-1 comments 2 new street names are needed for School House Drive & Ennis Drive locations once the street makes a turn. Provide Enumerations with the email from El Paso/Teller 9-1-1 Authority approving the 2 new street names. No further comments at this time. |
8/20/2020 7:58:12 AM | |
|
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
8/19/2020 3:14:01 PM |
The Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD does not have any comments at this time but reserves the right to comment in the future. | 8/19/2020 3:14:01 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
8/19/2020 3:03:00 PM |
This development relies on future Pond W5 for Full Spectrum Detention. The outfall and spillway for Pond W5 extend into the City. SWENT requests that the approval of any construction drawings for developments tributary to this pond not occur until after City approval of the pond outfall. Anna Bergmark Stormwater Enterprise City of Colorado Springs 30 S. Nevada Ave., Suite 401 Colorado Springs, CO 80901 (719) 385-5613 office (719) 619-9427 Cell Anna.Bergmark@coloradosprings.gov |
8/19/2020 3:03:00 PM | |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
8/19/2020 11:29:00 AM |
8/19/2020 11:29:00 AM | |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
8/17/2020 2:21:46 PM |
SWMP V_2 | 8/17/2020 2:21:46 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
8/17/2020 2:20:55 PM |
SWMP Checklist V_2 | 8/17/2020 2:20:55 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
8/17/2020 2:20:42 PM |
PBMP Form V_2 | 8/17/2020 2:20:42 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
8/17/2020 2:20:12 PM |
GEVC V_2 | 8/17/2020 2:20:12 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
8/17/2020 2:19:28 PM |
GEC Checklist V_2 | 8/17/2020 2:19:28 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
8/17/2020 2:19:05 PM |
FAE V_2 | 8/17/2020 2:19:05 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
8/17/2020 2:18:47 PM |
Drainage V_2 | 8/17/2020 2:18:47 PM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
8/17/2020 2:17:27 PM |
Review 1: Stormwater comments have been provided on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report - FAE - GEC Checklist - GEC Plan - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP Checklist - SWMP Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer I glennreese@elpasoco.com |
8/17/2020 2:17:27 PM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
8/13/2020 9:16:25 PM |
No comments from County Attorney's Office - Development Review at this time. | 8/13/2020 9:16:25 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
8/13/2020 8:03:53 AM |
No apparent conflicts – recommend approval. This site is outside of CSU service territory for Water and Wastewater, no comments will be provided on utilities outside of our service territory. -Kyle Schelhaas, 719-668-8126, kschelhaas@csu.org |
8/13/2020 8:03:53 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
8/13/2020 8:03:17 AM |
8/13/2020 8:03:17 AM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
8/6/2020 9:49:20 AM |
8/6/2020 9:49:20 AM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
8/6/2020 9:48:43 AM |
8/6/2020 9:48:43 AM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
8/5/2020 8:53:08 AM |
Street names previously approved. Please note the following Ennis Dr – Should take on new name at 90 degree turn School House Dr – Should take on new name at 90 degree turn Thank you Justin |
8/5/2020 8:53:08 AM | |
|
Academy SD 20 Building Fund
8/5/2020 7:51:46 AM |
Academy District 20 is in receipt of file number SP203 for approval of the Sterling Ranch II Preliminary Plan. The District is requesting land dedication in lieu of fees per the existing county code for all residential units to be developed in Sterling Ranch II. The District has previously met with representatives of Sterling Ranch and identified future school sites in the Sterling Ranch development. If you need additional information, please contact me. Don Smith Planning Consultant 719-492-4972 donald.smith@asd20.org |
8/5/2020 7:51:46 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
8/4/2020 7:31:00 AM |
Traffic Engineering has the following comments: 1- The developer will be responsible to construct a 10 foot multi-use trail on the west side of the future Marksheffel Road. 2- Prior to construction plans approval, the developer is required to remit the amount of $75,000 for the future anticipated traffic signal at the intersection of Marksheffel Road with Vollmer Road. 3- Prior to construction plans approval, the developer is required to remit the amount of $150,000 for the future anticipated traffic signal at the intersection of Marksheffel Road with Sterling Ranch Road. Zaker Alazzeh, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager City of Colorado Springs (719) 385-5468 Zaker.Alazzeh@coloradosprings.gov |
8/4/2020 7:31:00 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Water
8/3/2020 11:17:32 AM |
County Attorney's Office will review for water sufficiency after receipt of Colorado Division of Water Resources findings. Thank you. | 8/3/2020 11:17:32 AM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
7/31/2020 2:07:12 PM |
typo in the floodplain note "reminder" , also the zone is AE not A |
7/31/2020 2:07:12 PM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
7/31/2020 12:14:23 PM |
7/31/2020 12:14:23 PM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
7/31/2020 12:13:23 PM |
7/31/2020 12:13:23 PM |
EDARP