View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| View |
County Attorney - Water
7/19/2023 4:38:58 PM |
Please see 2nd Amended Water Supply Review and Recommendations. This Review replaces and supersedes those provided by this office on March 10, 2021 and April 20, 2022. | 7/19/2023 4:38:58 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
9/15/2021 3:38:24 PM |
Review 5: - Roundabout Analysis: Pending Review. Per the applicant, the roundabout analysis will be submitted on Friday 9/17 for review. - Comments resolved on the following document: * Traffic Impact Study * Deviation WBLT to MF access on Meadowbrook * Preliminary Plan - Upload signed copies of the following documents for final signature approval: * Preliminary Drainage Report * Grading and Erosion Control Plan * Financial Assurance Estimate Form (missing owner/applicant signature) * Pre-Development Site Grading and Right of Access Agreement Reviewed by: Gilbert LaForce, PE gilbertlaforce@elpasoco.com |
9/15/2021 3:38:24 PM | |
|
Cherokee Metro Dist
9/13/2021 2:42:35 PM |
The Crossroads at Meadowbrook development is included in Cherokee Metro District's service area and Cherokee has adequate water and wastewater treatment capacity to serve this customer. No comment on preliminary plan. Final approval is pending details of water and wastewater construction plans which are not included in this review set. Verify water and wastewater systems will be a public system and become Cherokee infrastructure after final as built inspection. |
9/13/2021 2:42:35 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
9/10/2021 4:05:21 PM |
9/10/2021 4:05:21 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
9/2/2021 1:36:08 PM |
Preliminary plan map -planning comments and majority of engineering comments ; please revise and email a pdf by 9/10/21 for PC hearing packet to stay on schedule. | 9/2/2021 1:36:08 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/2/2021 1:33:54 PM |
Staff is preparing the Staff report for the October 7th PC at 9am. The engineering docs must be resubmitted and approved before the PC. The Preliminary Plan Map (LOI if needed) must be resubmitted by 9/10/ to stay on tract for PC hearing. Please work diligently to address Gilberts comments and resubmit edited and signed docs. | 9/2/2021 1:33:54 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/2/2021 3:00:09 PM |
Review 4: Deviation for the WBLT into the MultiFamily access on Meadowbrook | 9/2/2021 3:00:09 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/1/2021 1:53:42 PM |
Review 4: Round about | 9/1/2021 1:53:42 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/2/2021 2:59:15 PM |
Review 4: Traffic Impact Study | 9/2/2021 2:59:15 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
9/2/2021 2:58:40 PM |
Review 4: Preliminary Plan | 9/2/2021 2:58:40 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
9/1/2021 1:28:06 PM |
Review 4 redline comments on the following documents will be uploaded separately: * Preliminary Plan * Traffic Impact Study * Roundabout Analysis * Deviation WBLT to MF access on Meadowbrook Comments resolved on the following document: - Deviation Request Multifamily driveway access to Meadowbrook - Deviation Request Multifamily driveway access to private road. - Deviation Request Private Road Cross Section Reviewed by: Gilbert LaForce, PE gilbertlaforce@elpasoco.com |
9/1/2021 1:28:06 PM | |
|
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
8/17/2021 12:37:17 PM |
Comments will be forthcoming. Arthur Gonzales - Access Manager | 8/17/2021 12:37:17 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/4/2021 3:11:52 PM |
Review 3: Deviation Request Multifamily driveway access to private road | 8/4/2021 3:11:52 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/4/2021 3:11:13 PM |
Review 3: Deviation Request Multifamily driveway access to Meadowbrook | 8/4/2021 3:11:13 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/4/2021 3:10:21 PM |
Review 3: Deviation Request Commercial driveway access to private road | 8/4/2021 3:10:21 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/4/2021 3:09:43 PM |
Review 3: - Deviation Request Private Road Cross Section | 8/4/2021 3:09:43 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/4/2021 3:08:14 PM |
Review 3: Roundabout analysis | 8/4/2021 3:08:14 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/4/2021 3:07:33 PM |
Review 3: Traffic Impact Study | 8/4/2021 3:07:33 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/4/2021 3:06:25 PM |
Review 3: Preliminary Plan | 8/4/2021 3:06:25 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
8/4/2021 1:57:44 PM |
Review 3 redline comments on the following documents will be uploaded separately: - Preliminary Plan - Traffic Impact Study - Roundabout Analysis - Deviation Request Private Road Cross Section - Deviation Request Commercial driveway access to private road - Deviation Request Multifamily driveway access to Meadowbrook - Deviation Request Multifamily driveway access to private road. Comments resolved on the following documents: * Soils and Geology Study * Drainage Report NOTICE: Submit documentation showing the adjacent property owner has given permission for the offsite grading shown on the grading and erosion control plan. Reviewed by: Gilbert LaForce, PE gilbertlaforce@elpasoco.com |
8/4/2021 1:57:44 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/22/2021 4:45:04 PM |
Planning comments- preliminary plan - minor | 7/22/2021 4:45:04 PM |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
7/13/2021 9:51:04 AM |
Colorado Geological Survey review of the resubmittal for Crossroads at Meadowbrook Mixed-Use Preliminary Plan SP2011 (Amy Crandall, P.E., acrandall@mines.edu): No new or updated geologic or geotechnical information is included with the available referral documents. CGS provided review comments for this project on March 22, 2021 that remain valid and are generally repeated here. The applicant acknowledged these comments (“Noted”) in their June 21, 2021 Agency Review Comments. The letter of intent (Kimley-Horn & Associates, Revised June 25, 2021) indicates the applicant proposes to subdivide 29.04 acres into 10 commercial lots, one multi-family lot (apartment building), and 3 tracts for stormwater detention/water quality. However, RMG’s revised soils and geology study (Rocky Mountain Group Job No. 177025, revised March 3, 2021) states that the proposed development will consist of 11 commercial lots. RMG should be provided with the updated plans to review and comment as appropriate. According to the Geologic Map of the Elsmere Quadrangle, a gravel pit once existed within the northwestern portion of the site. The pit is also evident in LiDAR-derived imagery. The Grading and Erosion Control plans (Civil Consultants, Inc., February 2021) show that this area may be filled during grading operations. Since organic debris and illegally dumped trash often collect within mining pits, CGS recommends this area be further evaluated during site-specific geotechnical investigations to examine the potential presence of uncontrolled fill or other deleterious material. Any organic material, trash and debris within the pit must be removed and disposed of offsite. The project team should also consider variable subsurface conditions during planning and design of the proposed multi-family building within Lot 11 and design foundations appropriately. As noted in RMG’s soil and geology study (Rocky Mountain Group Job No. 177025, revised March 3, 2021) for the Crossroads Commercial development, the geologic constraints identified on the site include potentially hydrocompactive soils, seismicity, radon, and erosion. RMG states on page 11, “the silty to clayey sand generally possesses low hydrocompactive potential.” However, some of the limited testing done by RMG, such as blow counts, indicates hydrocompactive soil within the site. RMG indicates that eolian soil overlies the Dawson formation and the soil is at least 20 feet thick. The eolian (wind-deposited) soil types can exhibit hydrocompaction (settlement or collapse under loading and wetting). For instance, test boring 8 at 4 feet indicates a blow count of 1 blow per foot (dry density testing was not performed). CGS agrees with RMG on page 13 “that the geologic and engineering conditions can be satisfactorily mitigated through proper engineering design and construction practices.” Also, on page 17, “The foundation systems for proposed commercial structures, retaining walls greater than 4 feet and any retention/detention facilities should be designed and constructed based upon recommendations developed in a site-specific subsurface soil investigation.” It will be important that site-specific geotechnical investigations be performed for each proposed building before the issuance of building permits. The study should evaluate the potential for hydrocompaction throughout the soil profile. The test borings did not extend into the Dawson Formation, and the depth of bedrock is unknown. RMG did not mention that the Dawson Formation can contain highly expansive claystone. I assume this was due to RMG's assumption that the proposed buildings would be built without basements or other below-grade construction. If the developer offers full-depth basements for either residential or commercials uses, it would be prudent to verify the depth of bedrock and the potential for expansive soil/bedrock. In summary, CGS recommends that: • RMG is provided with the updated plans to review and comment as appropriate. • The area comprising the gravel pit be further evaluated during site-specific geotechnical investigations to examine the potential presence of uncontrolled fill or other deleterious material. • Site-specific geotechnical investigations be performed for each proposed building before the issuance of building permits. |
7/13/2021 9:51:04 AM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
7/6/2021 12:50:56 PM |
Review 3: EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - GEC Plan - GEC Checklist EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer I glennreese@elpasoco.com |
7/6/2021 12:50:56 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/15/2021 5:36:49 PM |
Review 2: Preliminary Drainage Report. Markup summary is available at the end of the document. | 4/15/2021 5:36:49 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/15/2021 5:34:36 PM |
Review 2: Geotech Report. Markup summary is available at the end of the document. | 4/15/2021 5:34:36 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/15/2021 5:33:50 PM |
Review 2: Traffic Impact Study. Markup summary is available at the end of the document. | 4/15/2021 5:33:50 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/15/2021 5:32:52 PM |
Review 2: Preliminary Plan. Markup summary is available at the end of the document. | 4/15/2021 5:32:52 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
4/15/2021 5:08:23 PM |
Review 2 redline comments on the following documents will be uploaded separately: * Preliminary Plan * Traffic Impact Study * Soils and Geology Study * Drainage Report NOTICE: Submit documentation showing the adjacent property owner has given permission for the offsite grading shown on the grading and erosion control plan. Comments resolved on the following documents: - Grading and Erosion Control - Financial Assurance Estimate - Deviation Request (Request for underground detention & WQ was withdrawn) Reviewed by: Gilbert LaForce, PE gilbertlaforce@elpasoco.com |
4/15/2021 5:08:23 PM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
4/8/2021 4:49:33 PM |
4/8/2021 4:49:33 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/6/2021 4:51:59 PM |
Preliminary Plan Planning Comments only. If you want to try and address these within the next 48 hours, I can switch the plan out in Bluebeam so the engineering staff member LaForce sees the revised plan. I noticed some of the previous engineering comments were not addressed with review 2. You may want to look at review 1 engineering comments and verify that both review 1 and 2 comments are addressed. | 4/6/2021 4:51:59 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/6/2021 4:49:06 PM |
Please see Cherokees comments and incorporate them into the LOI. Attached is planning LOI comments only. | 4/6/2021 4:49:06 PM |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
3/30/2021 10:04:30 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #2 - Please See Attached Documents (PAB Endorsed 01/13/2021) | 3/30/2021 10:04:30 AM |
| View |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
3/26/2021 3:31:36 PM |
3/26/2021 3:31:36 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Airport Advisory Commission
3/24/2021 6:02:49 PM |
Airport staff has no additional comments to provide on this item. | 3/24/2021 6:02:49 PM | |
|
Cherokee Metro Dist
3/23/2021 3:32:50 PM |
Comments on Preliminary Utilities PU0 Sheet 1 of 1 on attached | 3/23/2021 3:32:50 PM | |
| View |
Cherokee Metro Dist
3/23/2021 3:30:31 PM |
Comments on Letter of Intent attached | 3/23/2021 3:30:31 PM |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
3/22/2021 10:44:19 AM |
3/22/2021 10:44:19 AM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
3/22/2021 10:12:03 AM |
Colorado Geological Survey review of the resubmittal for Crossroads at Meadowbrook Mixed-Use Preliminary Plan SP2011 (Amy Crandall, P.E., acrandall@mines.edu): The letter of intent (Kimley-Horn & Associates) indicates the applicant proposes to subdivide 29.04 acres into 10 commercial lots, one multi-family lot (apartment building), and three tracts for stormwater detention/water quality. However, RMG’s revised soils and geology study (Rocky Mountain Group Job No. 177025, revised March 3, 2021) states that the proposed development will consist of 11 commercial lots. RMG should be provided with the updated plans to review and comment as appropriate. According to the Geologic Map of the Elsmere Quadrangle, a gravel pit once existed within the northwestern portion of the site. The pit is also evident in LiDAR-derived imagery. The Grading and Erosion Control plans (Civil Consultants, Inc., February 2021) show that this area may be filled during grading operations. Since organic debris and illegally dumped trash often collect within mining pits, CGS recommends this area be further evaluated during site-specific geotechnical investigations to examine the potential presence of uncontrolled fill or other deleterious material. Any organic material, trash and debris within the pit must be removed and disposed of offsite. The project team should also consider variable subsurface conditions during planning and design of the proposed multi-family building within Lot 11 and design foundations appropriately. CGS provided review comments for this project on January 5, 2021 that remain valid and are generally repeated here. As noted in RMG’s soil and geology study (Rocky Mountain Group Job No. 177025, revised March 3, 2021) for the Crossroads Commercial development, the geologic constraints identified on the site include potentially hydrocompactive soils, seismicity, radon, and erosion. RMG states on page 11, “the silty to clayey sand generally possesses low hydrocompactive potential.” However, some of the limited testing done by RMG, such as blow counts, indicates hydrocompactive soil within the site. RMG indicates that eolian soil overlies the Dawson formation and the soil is at least 20 feet thick. The eolian (wind-deposited) soil types can exhibit hydrocompaction (settlement or collapse under loading and wetting). For instance, test boring 8 at 4 feet indicates a blow count of 1 blow per foot (dry density testing was not performed). CGS agrees with RMG on page 13 “that the geologic and engineering conditions can be satisfactorily mitigated through proper engineering design and construction practices.” Also, on page 17, “The foundation systems for proposed commercial structures, retaining walls greater than 4 feet and any retention/detention facilities should be designed and constructed based upon recommendations developed in a site-specific subsurface soil investigation.” It will be important that site-specific geotechnical investigations be performed for each proposed building before the issuance of building permits. The study should evaluate the potential for hydrocompaction throughout the soil profile. The test borings did not extend into the Dawson Formation, and the depth of bedrock is unknown. RMG did not mention that the Dawson Formation can contain highly expansive claystone. I assume this was due to RMG's assumption that the proposed buildings would be built without basements or other below-grade construction. If the developer offers full-depth basements for either residential or commercials uses, it would be prudent to verify the depth of bedrock and the potential for expansive soil/bedrock. In summary, CGS recommends: • That the area comprising the gravel pit be further evaluated during site-specific geotechnical investigations to examine the potential presence of uncontrolled fill or other deleterious material. • That site-specific geotechnical investigations be performed for each proposed building before the issuance of building permits. Provided the developer follows RMG's recommendations and CGS’s recommendations outlined above, CGS has no objection to the preliminary plan's approval. |
3/22/2021 10:12:03 AM | |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
3/17/2021 4:01:05 PM |
GEC Checklist V_2 | 3/17/2021 4:01:05 PM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
3/17/2021 4:00:40 PM |
Review 2: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - GEC Plan...............(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Checklist EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - Drainage Report - ESQCP - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP Checklist - SWMP Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer I glennreese@elpasoco.com |
3/17/2021 4:00:40 PM | |
| View |
County Attorney - Water
3/10/2021 4:48:22 PM |
3/10/2021 4:48:22 PM | |
|
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
3/10/2021 10:07:54 AM |
Comments will be forthcoming - Arthur Gonzales | 3/10/2021 10:07:54 AM | |
|
Falcon Fire Protection District
3/4/2021 10:39:48 AM |
The Crossroads at Meadowbrook Mixed Use Preliminary Plan does not appear to be located within the boundaries of the Falcon Fire Protection District. No comments are provided by the Falcon Fire District on this project. | 3/4/2021 10:39:48 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/25/2021 4:38:23 PM |
Engineering comments in the following document are in blue: - Financial Assurance Estimate |
1/25/2021 4:38:23 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/25/2021 4:37:47 PM |
Engineering comments in the following document are in blue: - Deviation Request |
1/25/2021 4:37:47 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/25/2021 4:37:09 PM |
Engineering comments in the following document are in blue, Stormwater Team are in orange: - Preliminary Drainage Report |
1/25/2021 4:37:09 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/25/2021 4:36:16 PM |
Engineering comments in the following document are in blue, Stormwater Team are in orange: - Grading and Erosion Control Plan |
1/25/2021 4:36:16 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/25/2021 4:35:17 PM |
Engineering comments in the following document are in blue: - Soils and Geotech Study |
1/25/2021 4:35:17 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/25/2021 4:34:29 PM |
Engineering comments in the following document are in blue: - Traffic Impact Study |
1/25/2021 4:34:29 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
1/25/2021 4:33:53 PM |
Engineering comments in the following document are in blue: - Preliminary Plan |
1/25/2021 4:33:53 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
1/25/2021 4:09:56 PM |
Review 1 redline comments on the following documents will be uploaded separately: - Preliminary Plan - Traffic Impact Study - Soils and Geology Study - Grading and Erosion Control - Drainage Report - Deviation Request - Financial Assurance Estimate Based on the quantity and nature of the comments, the resubmittal will be treated as a first review. Expect additional comments. Reviewed by: Gilbert LaForce, PE gilbertlaforce@elpasoco.com |
1/25/2021 4:09:56 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
1/21/2021 2:53:55 PM |
1/21/2021 2:53:55 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
1/20/2021 7:58:10 AM |
PCD Engineering staff, Gilbert LaForce will provide his comments shortly. Planning staff comments uploaded only. | 1/20/2021 7:58:10 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/20/2021 7:57:24 AM |
TIS Outsourced redlines | 1/20/2021 7:57:24 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/20/2021 7:52:40 AM |
Water & wastewater commitment letter- questions to be addressed identified. Crossroads Metro will construct infrastructure and than Cherokee will accept correct? | 1/20/2021 7:52:40 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/20/2021 7:46:58 AM |
wastewater report comments | 1/20/2021 7:46:58 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/20/2021 7:46:22 AM |
Water Report- some clarification needed | 1/20/2021 7:46:22 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/20/2021 7:36:58 AM |
Subdivision Summary Form comments. Please make sure all documents in submittal have same acreages for lots, tracts, private roads, dedications, areas to be zoned RM30 and to remain Commercial. Please make sure that the rezone to RM 30 is also consistent. | 1/20/2021 7:36:58 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/20/2021 7:34:47 AM |
Preliminary Plan Planning Comments Only | 1/20/2021 7:34:47 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/20/2021 7:34:13 AM |
Letter of Intent- Preliminary Plan Planning only | 1/20/2021 7:34:13 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/20/2021 7:33:30 AM |
FAE- Changes may be needed pending decisions related to landscape, and pending noise study (Planning comments only) | 1/20/2021 7:33:30 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
1/20/2021 7:32:37 AM |
Fire Commitment should address support for waivers and (traffic deviations) | 1/20/2021 7:32:37 AM |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
1/14/2021 9:45:54 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments - Please See Attached Documents (PAB Endorsed 01/13/2021) | 1/14/2021 9:45:54 AM |
| View |
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
1/12/2021 12:42:30 PM |
1/12/2021 12:42:30 PM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
1/6/2021 2:38:55 PM |
No comments from County Attorney - Development Review at this time. | 1/6/2021 2:38:55 PM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
1/5/2021 4:26:39 PM |
Thank you for the submittal of the proposal referenced above. The application form and geotechnical report state the request is to subdivide 29.4 acres into 11 commercial lots. However, the plans label lot 11 as proposed multi-family. This review will assume lot 11, or 12.7 acres, will be developed into 360 apartments. The geotechnical report by RMG Engineers indicates the Dawson Formation underlies the site and eolian soil overlies the bedrock. Test borings indicate the soil is at least 20 feet thick. Borings did not extend into bedrock, and the depth of bedrock is unknown. The geotechnical report indicates that the sandy eolian soil may be hydrocompaction, but such risks are low. However, some of the limited testing done by RMG, such as blow counts, indicates hydrocompactive soil underlies part of the site. I do agree with RMG that this geologic constraint can be mitigated on a lot by lot basis. It will be important that a detailed soil and foundation investigation be done for each proposed building before the issuance of building permits. The study should evaluate the potential for hydrocompaction throughout the soil profile. As noted above, test borings did not encounter the Dawson Formation, and the depth to bedrock is unknown. RMG did not mention that the Dawson Formation can contain highly expansive claystone. I assume this was due to RMG's assumption that the proposed commercial buildings would be built without basements or other below-grade construction. If the developer offers full-depth basements for either residential or commercials uses, it would be prudent to verify the depth of bedrock and the potential for expansive soil/bedrock. In summary, provided that the developer follows RMG's recommendations and recommendations outlined above, CGS has no objection to the preliminary plan's approval. |
1/5/2021 4:26:39 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Parks and Wildlife
1/4/2021 10:24:08 AM |
1/4/2021 10:24:08 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Division of Water Resources
12/31/2020 4:58:44 PM |
12/31/2020 4:58:44 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Springs Airport Advisory Commission
12/31/2020 2:24:29 PM |
The attached land use review summary with comments will be presented at the January 27, 2020 Airport Advisory Commission meeting. | 12/31/2020 2:24:29 PM |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
12/31/2020 2:01:12 PM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Preliminary Comments - Please See Attached Documents (To Be Presented to the Park Advisory Board for Endorsement on 01/13/2021) | 12/31/2020 2:01:12 PM |
| View |
Cherokee Metro Dist
12/30/2020 2:53:20 PM |
Cherokee comments on Wastewater Report See attached scanned sheets 3, 4, and 17 |
12/30/2020 2:53:20 PM |
|
Cherokee Metro Dist
12/30/2020 2:26:09 PM |
Cherokee comment to Preliminary Plan Drawings Sheet 1 - note 20 is inaccurate, out of date, and not needed for Preliminary Plan Notes. Recommend deleting. |
12/30/2020 2:26:09 PM | |
|
Cherokee Metro Dist
12/30/2020 2:20:17 PM |
Cherokee comment on Water Resources Report Cherokee Metropolitan District prepared a commitment letter for the crossroads mixed use development based upon a plan for the apartment portion of the development which included 306 units. In the development’s water resource report, the number of units has increased to 360. The initial commitment was made based on the initial number of units and El Paso County’s presumptive use value of 0.20 Acre-Feet per Year (AFY). When the water resource report adjusted up the number of units, the water use per unit was proportionally adjusted down to 0.17 AFY in order to remain in line with the water commitment. This water demand per unit is no longer in line with the county’s presumptive use value, however, the District’s average use per multi family unit was 0.15 AFY for the last 5 years. Adding a 5-10% loss factor between produced water and billed consumption, the 0.17 AFY number arrived at in the water resource report is in line with CMD’s expected use. The water commitment volume from CMD to this development remains valid, but the per unit use represented in the water resource report is now below El Paso County’s normal presumptive use value. |
12/30/2020 2:20:17 PM | |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
12/30/2020 10:00:41 AM |
SWMP_v1 | 12/30/2020 10:00:41 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
12/30/2020 9:59:59 AM |
SMWP Checklist_v1 | 12/30/2020 9:59:59 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
12/30/2020 9:59:42 AM |
PBMP Form_v1 | 12/30/2020 9:59:42 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
12/30/2020 9:59:28 AM |
GEC Checklist_v1 | 12/30/2020 9:59:28 AM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
12/30/2020 9:59:12 AM |
ESQCP_v1 | 12/30/2020 9:59:12 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
12/30/2020 9:58:53 AM |
Review 1: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents: - Drainage Report....(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - ESQCP - GEC Plan...............(to be uploaded by PM with PCD comments) - GEC Checklist - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP Checklist - SWMP Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer I glennreese@elpasoco.com |
12/30/2020 9:58:53 AM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
12/29/2020 3:15:14 PM |
1. Preliminary Plan appears to include 10 commercial lots (lots 1-10), 1 multi-family residential (lot 11), and three tracts (A, B and C). 2. The letter of intent shows Lot 11 is slated to be multi-family residential and might need an internal street within lot 11. Enumerations will have further comments when this lot reaches the DP stage. 3. Will lots 1-3 and 10 access from Meadowbrook Parkway? If yes, then they can have addresses assigned off of Meadowbrook Pkwy. If no, then they will get addresses assigned from the internal street. How are lots 4 and 5 being accessed? The plan does not show any access easement for these lots. 4. Floodplain, the map number is incorrect under Note #19. Correct number is 08011C0754G. 5. For assignment of addressing for lots and tracts, place an addressing marker (xxx) where they are intended to be utilized. Lot marker placement to be front door. 6. Provide a 100 scale copy or larger of the entire APPROVED development to this department so that addressing can be assigned. Once received, the DP will be placed on a list to be addressed. 7. It appears at least two street names are needed, provide a list of proposed street names to Justin Annan jannan@elpasoteller911.org, and Glenn West gwest@elpasoteller911.org with El Paso/Teller County 911 Authority. An email from E-911 showing street names is required for Enumeration approval. Becky Allen Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-799-2707 W: pprbd.org |
12/29/2020 3:15:14 PM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
12/21/2020 8:03:40 AM |
Streets depicted in drawings are lacking names. Street naming information can be found at http://elpasoteller911.org/191/Street-Name-Database Thank you Justin |
12/21/2020 8:03:40 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
12/17/2020 8:55:22 AM |
Hey Kari, I have finished with the review for CSU and there are no action items, approval can be recommended. Let me know if you have any questions moving forward. Thanks, Ryne rsolberg@csu.org |
12/17/2020 8:55:22 AM | |
|
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
12/16/2020 4:24:31 PM |
Comments will be forthcoming. | 12/16/2020 4:24:31 PM | |
|
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
12/16/2020 12:26:04 PM |
Crossroads at Meadowbrook is not within the Mountain View Electric service area. Cathy Mountain View Electric Association, Inc |
12/16/2020 12:26:04 PM | |
|
County Attorney - Water
12/14/2020 12:29:21 PM |
County Attorney's Office will provide review of water sufficiency following receipt of findings from Colorado Division of Water Resources. Thank you. | 12/14/2020 12:29:21 PM | |
|
Falcon Fire Protection District
12/14/2020 11:03:50 AM |
no additional comments provided by Falcon Fire District. | 12/14/2020 11:03:50 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
12/11/2020 3:49:50 PM |
12/11/2020 3:49:50 PM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
12/11/2020 3:41:48 PM |
12/11/2020 3:41:48 PM |
EDARP