Project Review Comments

Back to List


Project Name
Falcon Meadows at Bent Grass PUD Preliminary Plan
Description
267 single-family residential lots and a 7 acre park site
Location
Parcels
5301000019 5301000019 5301000020 5301000020 5301000021 5301000021 5301000023 5301000023 5301000036 5301000036 5301000037 5301000037 5301201061 5301201061 5301201062 5301201062 5301201063 5301201063 5301204005 5301204005 5301204006 5301204006
Applicant
N.E.S.
Andrea Barlow ( abarlow@nescolorado.com )
(719) 471-0073
Andrea Barlow ( abarlow@nescolorado.com )
(719) 471-0073
EA Number
19221
File Number
PUDSP205
Project Manager
Kari Parsons
Status
Closed
Created
12/2/2019 11:18:05 AM

View: Project Documents



Review Comments (95)

Link Agency Comment
PCD Engineering Division
9/16/2021 1:28:37 PM
Provide the PDB-BMP agreement with County Attorney's revisions and signatures.

Comments have been provided on the MDDP (MDP-21-001).

The Engineering documents have been accepted and signed off and are available on EDARP.


-- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877
9/16/2021 1:28:37 PM
PCD Project Manager
8/19/2021 9:06:52 AM
MDDP to be completed/approved with first final plat 8/19/2021 9:06:52 AM
PCD Engineering Division
8/10/2021 5:35:38 PM
The Engineering documents have been accepted and signed off.

They will be available on EDARP once uploaded by the Planner/PM.

Provide the PDB-BMP agreement with County Attorney's revisions and signatures.


-- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877
8/10/2021 5:35:38 PM
View County Attorney - Development Review
7/30/2021 10:09:10 AM
Just a few minor edits to the Detention Maintenance Agreement. 7/30/2021 10:09:10 AM
PCD Project Manager
7/29/2021 4:39:21 PM
Planning defers to engineering. 7/29/2021 4:39:21 PM
View PCD Engineering Division
7/21/2021 4:10:51 PM
(Utility Plan redlines summary) 7/21/2021 4:10:51 PM
View PCD Engineering Division
7/21/2021 4:10:17 PM
(Utility Plan redlines) 7/21/2021 4:10:17 PM
View PCD Engineering Division
7/21/2021 4:09:10 PM
(PDR redlines summary) 7/21/2021 4:09:10 PM
View PCD Engineering Division
7/21/2021 4:06:08 PM
(PDR redlines) 7/21/2021 4:06:08 PM
View PCD Engineering Division
7/21/2021 3:59:02 PM
See comment memo and redlines.

The following items need revisions and resubmittal:
- Preliminary Drainage Report
- Utility CDs
- PDB-BMP Agreement (See County Attorney's redlines)

-- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877
7/21/2021 3:59:02 PM
PCD Project Manager
7/16/2021 1:19:25 PM
Please note that the pond agreement needs to be revised based on the CAO. Does applicant still seek to modify Condition No. 10? The TIS requires the improvements, and the area of said improvements is not yet been annexed into the City per Todd Frisbees email. 7/16/2021 1:19:25 PM
County Attorney - Development Review
7/12/2021 11:41:10 PM
Please add Better Land LLC as a signatory to the Detention Maintenance Agreement. Please make sure that Exhibit B is a legal description and depiction of the future Tract A. 7/12/2021 11:41:10 PM
EPC Stormwater Review
7/6/2021 9:18:13 AM
Per previous comment: EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks. 7/6/2021 9:18:13 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
6/9/2021 2:42:04 PM
(Utility CDs redlines) 6/9/2021 2:42:04 PM
View PCD Engineering Division
6/9/2021 2:42:53 PM
See comment memo and redlines.

The following items need revisions and resubmittal:
- Preliminary Drainage Report
- Utility CDs
- PDB-BMP Agreement (See County Attorney's redlines)

-- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877
6/9/2021 2:42:53 PM
PCD Project Manager
5/18/2021 3:10:07 PM
Remove the red stamps that state not for construction that were added to the Pages on the PUDSP plan set. This is for approval so stamp needs to be removed. 5/18/2021 3:10:07 PM
PCD Project Manager
5/18/2021 2:50:17 PM
Planning Staff is waiting the ok from engineering to schedule item for PC, and BOCC. Applicant has prioritized grading plan approval before the PUDSP review by engineering. 5/18/2021 2:50:17 PM
View County Attorney - Development Review
5/4/2021 10:09:25 AM
Changes to Detention Maintenance Agreement attached. 5/4/2021 10:09:25 AM
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
4/28/2021 4:29:58 PM
Hey Kari,

All action items have been addressed and approval can be recommended from CSU.

Thanks,

Ryne Solberg
4/28/2021 4:29:58 PM
County Attorney - Water
4/26/2021 1:27:00 PM
Requirement C of the County Attorney's Office water review dated 1/25/21 has been addressed, ie. Water Resources Report has been corrected to reflect correct number of lots and acre-feet. All matters have now been addressed as requested by County Attorney-Water Review. Thank you. 4/26/2021 1:27:00 PM
View PCD Engineering Division
4/12/2021 9:55:51 AM
(O&M redlines) 4/12/2021 9:55:51 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
4/12/2021 9:55:21 AM
(PDR redlines summary) 4/12/2021 9:55:21 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
4/12/2021 9:54:43 AM
(PDR redlines) 4/12/2021 9:54:43 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
4/12/2021 9:54:07 AM
(MDDP redlines summary) 4/12/2021 9:54:07 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
4/12/2021 9:53:37 AM
(MDDP redlines) 4/12/2021 9:53:37 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
4/12/2021 9:52:49 AM
(PUDSP redlines summary) 4/12/2021 9:52:49 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
4/12/2021 9:52:22 AM
(PUDSP redlines) 4/12/2021 9:52:22 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
4/12/2021 9:48:45 AM
See comment letter and redlines. Provide the signed/completed items highlighted in blue on the Engineering Final Submittal Checklist. 4/12/2021 9:48:45 AM
View EPC Stormwater Review
4/12/2021 8:52:46 AM
SWMP Checklist V_3 4/12/2021 8:52:46 AM
View EPC Stormwater Review
4/12/2021 8:52:27 AM
GEC Checklist V_3 4/12/2021 8:52:27 AM
EPC Stormwater Review
4/12/2021 8:51:58 AM
Review 3: EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents.
- GEC Checklist
- GEC Plan
- SWMP Checklist

Please sign, date, and resubmit the attached final GEC Checklist and SWMP Checklist.

EPC Stormwater has no further comments at this time. Thanks.

Reviewed by:
Glenn Reese, P.E.
Stormwater Engineer I
glennreese@elpasoco.com
4/12/2021 8:51:58 AM
County Attorney - Water
4/7/2021 6:24:13 PM
Colorado Division of Water Resources submitted revised letter dated 1/25/21 correcting the number of lots to 267 and corrected water demand to 95.16 acre-feet/year; therefore, Requirement B of County Attorney water review dated 1/25/21 has been satisfied.

Requirement C remains unaddressed, ie. Water Resources Report needs to be corrected to reflect correct number of lots and acre-feet prior to recording final plat. Thank you.
4/7/2021 6:24:13 PM
PCD Project Manager
4/7/2021 12:29:54 PM
Planning Staff has no further comments. The pond agreement is in review with the CAO. If engineering agrees, Staff will schedule the PC hearing May 6th and BoCC hearing May 25th. Please confirm those dates will work with applicant/owner. 4/7/2021 12:29:54 PM
View PCD Engineering Division
2/23/2021 5:49:11 PM
(MDDP redlines summary) 2/23/2021 5:49:11 PM
View PCD Engineering Division
2/23/2021 5:48:38 PM
(MDDP redlines) 2/23/2021 5:48:38 PM
View PCD Engineering Division
2/23/2021 5:48:00 PM
MDDP ONLY - See comment letter and redlines.

-- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877
2/23/2021 5:48:00 PM
PCD Project Manager
2/16/2021 10:49:15 AM
(2021 REFERANCE ONLY) Criteria for Approval. In approving a preliminary plan, the BoCC shall find that:
• The proposed subdivision is in general conformance with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Master Plan;
• The subdivision is consistent with the purposes of this Code;
• The subdivision is in conformance with the subdivision design standards and any approved sketch plan;
• A sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards [C.R.S. § 30-28-133(6)(a)] and the requirements of Chapter 8 of this Code (this finding may not be deferred to final plat if the applicant intends to seek administrative final plat approval);
• A public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, the system complies with state and local laws and regulations, [C.R.S. § 30-28-133(6) (b)] and the requirements of Chapter 8 of this Code;
• All areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified and the proposed subdivision is compatible with such conditions. [C.R.S. § 30-28-133(6)(c)];
• Adequate drainage improvements complying with State law [C.R.S. § 30-28-133(3)(c)(VIII)] and the requirements of this Code and the ECM are provided by the design;
• The location and design of the public improvements proposed in connection with the subdivision are adequate to serve the needs and mitigate the effects of the development;
• Legal and physical access is or will be provided to all parcels by public rights-of-way or recorded easement, acceptable to the County in compliance with this Code and the ECM;
• The proposed subdivision has established an adequate level of compatibility by (1) incorporating natural physical features into the design and providing sufficient open spaces considering the type and intensity of the subdivision; (2) incorporating site planning techniques to foster the implementation of the County's plans, and encourage a land use pattern to support a balanced transportation system, including auto, bike and pedestrian traffic, public or mass transit if appropriate, and the cost effective delivery of other services consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations of the County; (3) incorporating physical design features in the subdivision to provide a transition between the subdivision and adjacent land uses; (4) incorporating identified environmentally sensitive areas, including but not limited to, wetlands and wildlife corridors, into the design; and (5) incorporating public facilities or infrastructure, or provisions therefore, reasonably related to the proposed subdivision so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of County services and facilities;
• Necessary services, including police and fire protection, recreation, utilities, open space and transportation system, are or will be available to serve the proposed subdivision;
• The subdivision provides evidence to show that the proposed methods for fire protection comply with Chapter 6 of this Code; and
• The proposed subdivision meets other applicable sections of Chapter 6 and 8 of this Code.
2/16/2021 10:49:15 AM
PCD Project Manager
2/16/2021 10:47:33 AM
LOI- The PUD Criteria was left out of the LOI: Please address both PUD (listed below) Section 4.2 of LDC criteria in the LOI...
Approval Criteria For PUD Zoning. The Planning Commission and BoCC shall determine that the following criteria have been met to approve a PUD zoning district:
• The proposed PUD District zoning advances the stated purposes set forth in this Section;
• The application is in general conformity with the Master Plan;
• The proposed development is in compliance with the requirements of this Code and all applicable statutory provisions and will not otherwise be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the present or future inhabitants of El Paso County;
• The subject property is suitable for the intended uses and the use is compatible with both the existing and allowed land uses on the neighboring properties, will be in harmony and responsive with the character of the surrounding area and natural environment; and will not have a negative impact upon the existing and future development of the surrounding area;
• The proposed development provides adequate consideration for any potentially detrimental use to use relationships (e.g. commercial use adjacent to single family use) and provides an appropriate transition or buffering between uses of differing intensities both on-site and off-site which may include innovative treatments of use to use relationships;

• The allowed uses, bulk requirements and required landscaping and buffering are appropriate to and compatible with the type of development, the surrounding neighborhood or area and the community;

• Areas with unique or significant historical, cultural, recreational, aesthetic or natural features are preserved and incorporated into the design of the project;
• Open spaces and trails are integrated into the development plan to serve as amenities to residents and provide a reasonable walking and biking opportunities;
• The proposed development will not overburden the capacities of existing or planned roads, utilities and other public facilities (e.g., fire protection, police protection, emergency services, and water and sanitation), and the required public services and facilities will be provided to support the development when needed;
• The proposed development would be a benefit through the provision of interconnected open space, conservation of environmental features, aesthetic features and harmonious design, and energy efficient site design;
• The proposed land use does not permit the use of any area containing a commercial mineral deposit in a manner which would unreasonably interfere with the present or future extraction of such deposit unless acknowledged by the mineral rights owner;
• Any proposed exception or deviation from the requirements of the zoning resolution or the subdivision regulations is warranted by virtue of the design and amenities incorporated in the development plan and development guide; and
• The owner has authorized the application.
2/16/2021 10:47:33 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
2/2/2021 5:11:39 PM
(PDR redlines summary) 2/2/2021 5:11:39 PM
View PCD Engineering Division
2/2/2021 5:10:44 PM
(PDR redlines) 2/2/2021 5:10:44 PM
View PCD Engineering Division
2/2/2021 5:09:16 PM
(Engineering PUDSP Plan redlines) 2/2/2021 5:09:16 PM
View PCD Engineering Division
2/2/2021 5:07:45 PM
See comment letter and redlines. Please submit all items highlighted in blue on the Engineering Final Submittal Checklist. 2/2/2021 5:07:45 PM
View EPC Parks Department
2/1/2021 9:00:52 PM
See attached administrative review comments on behalf of El Paso County Parks. 2/1/2021 9:00:52 PM
View PCD Project Manager
1/27/2021 3:09:18 PM
PUD Planning Only 1/27/2021 3:09:18 PM
View PCD Project Manager
1/27/2021 3:08:50 PM
LOI Planning only 1/27/2021 3:08:50 PM
Colorado Geological Survey
1/26/2021 4:06:07 PM
RMG has provided a Response to CGS Comments (December 10, 2020) and a revised Soils and Geology Study (December 10, 2020). CGS concurs with the approach as stated in the response letter (p.2), “…to restrict construction to non-basement foundation types in areas where groundwater is anticipated to be shallower than 14 feet below ground surface (Lots 1-91, 105-108, 133-146, 195-213, and 22-266 as presented on the Engineering and Geology Map, Figure 10), unless performance of a groundwater monitoring program at some future date indicates that the lots are suitable for basement construction.”

CGS has no objection to the approval of the Preliminary Plan provided:
• the lot numbers with basement restrictions be indicated either in the General Notes or elsewhere on the plans: and,
• it is noted that basement restrictions may be removed based on results of a future groundwater monitoring program.

Submitted 1/26/2021 by Jonathan R. Lovekin, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist, Colorado Geological Survey, jlovekin@mines.edu
1/26/2021 4:06:07 PM
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
1/26/2021 9:06:55 AM
1. Raylan Loop is not an approved suffix. E-9-1-1 stated to change to Way or Lane July 23, 2020. When Sarin Trail crosses over Bent Grass Meadows Drive, should the street name stay the same? All the other streets are consistent but this one. An email from El Paso/Teller County 9-1-1 Authority, reserving the street name is required to be emailed to the Enumerations department. Amy@pprbd.org

2. If you are going to need an address for lot 195 and tract M, please show the street name Silky Thread Road on pages 3 of 11 & 4 of 11.

3. Tax schedule numbers for this project should be 53010-00-019, 53012-01-061, 53042-01-063, 53012-04-005, 53010-00-023, and 53010-00-016
STANDARD ENUMERATIONS COMMENTS-DEVELOPMENT PLAN:

1. For assignment of addressing for lots and tracts, place an addressing marker (xxx) where they are intended to be utilized. Lot marker placement to be front door. This was not received.

2. Once the development plan is approved contact this department and will be placed on a list to be addressed.

Amy Vanderbeek
Enumerations Plans Examiner
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org
1/26/2021 9:06:55 AM
View Colorado Division of Water Resources
1/25/2021 9:18:46 AM
1/25/2021 9:18:46 AM
View County Attorney - Water
1/25/2021 9:09:52 AM
1/25/2021 9:09:52 AM
View EPC Stormwater Review
1/19/2021 1:19:53 PM
SWMP Checklist V_2 1/19/2021 1:19:53 PM
View EPC Stormwater Review
1/25/2021 8:13:03 AM
GEC Plan V_2 1/25/2021 8:13:03 AM
View EPC Stormwater Review
1/19/2021 11:52:08 AM
GEC Checklist V_2 1/19/2021 11:52:08 AM
EPC Stormwater Review
1/19/2021 11:51:21 AM
Review 2: EPC Stormwater comments have been provided on the following uploaded documents:
- GEC Checklist
- GEC Plan
- SWMP Checklist

EPC Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following document.
- SWMP

Reviewed by:
Glenn Reese, P.E.
Stormwater Engineer I
glennreese@elpasoco.com
1/19/2021 11:51:21 AM
View Colorado Parks and Wildlife
1/11/2021 12:20:15 PM
1/11/2021 12:20:15 PM
View EPC Environmental Services
1/7/2021 3:06:22 PM
1/7/2021 3:06:22 PM
View Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
1/7/2021 10:40:34 AM
1/7/2021 10:40:34 AM
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
1/6/2021 11:38:12 AM
The Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD does not have any comments at this time but respectfully reserves the right to comment in the future if needed. 1/6/2021 11:38:12 AM
View Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
1/5/2021 3:35:11 PM
Hey Kari,

Attached is the review memo for the subject application. The one action item was not addressed and still remains applicable. Let me know if you need anything else moving forward.

Thanks,

Ryne Solberg
rsolberg@csu.org
1/5/2021 3:35:11 PM
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
1/5/2021 1:36:31 PM
No additional comments

G. west
1/5/2021 1:36:31 PM
RBD Floodplain
1/5/2021 10:29:00 AM
According to the grading plan no work or improvements are proposed within the FEMA SFHA,
FEMA BFEs will be required on the final plat, but are not necessary on this PUD Preliminary Plan
1/5/2021 10:29:00 AM
View EPC Parks Department
10/26/2020 2:25:38 PM
See attached comments endorsed by the El Paso County Park Advisory Board on October 14, 2020. 10/26/2020 2:25:38 PM
View PCD Engineering Division
10/12/2020 11:23:36 AM
(Utility CDs redlines) 10/12/2020 11:23:36 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
10/12/2020 11:20:32 AM
(Utility CDs redlines) 10/12/2020 11:20:32 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
10/12/2020 11:18:43 AM
(PDSG/ROA redlines) 10/12/2020 11:18:43 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
10/12/2020 11:16:09 AM
(PDR redlines summary) 10/12/2020 11:16:09 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
10/12/2020 11:15:42 AM
(PDR redlines) 10/12/2020 11:15:42 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
10/12/2020 11:14:57 AM
(PUD/SP redlines) 10/12/2020 11:14:57 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
10/12/2020 11:14:24 AM
(TIS redlines summary) 10/12/2020 11:14:24 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
10/12/2020 11:13:40 AM
(TIS redlines) 10/12/2020 11:13:40 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
10/12/2020 11:13:06 AM
(LOI redlines) 10/12/2020 11:13:06 AM
View PCD Engineering Division
10/12/2020 11:23:03 AM
See comment letter and redlines.

-- Jeff Rice - 719-520-7877
10/12/2020 11:23:03 AM
Woodmen Hills Metro
10/9/2020 12:40:26 PM
Woodmen Hills Metropolitan District approves the project as presented. 10/9/2020 12:40:26 PM
View EPC Health Department
10/6/2020 9:16:01 AM
10/6/2020 9:16:01 AM
View PCD Project Manager
9/29/2020 4:52:14 PM
Soils and Geology Summary comments- Planning only 9/29/2020 4:52:14 PM
View PCD Project Manager
9/29/2020 4:50:09 PM
PUDSP Planning Comments only 9/29/2020 4:50:09 PM
View PCD Project Manager
9/29/2020 4:49:42 PM
GEC Planning comments only 9/29/2020 4:49:42 PM
View PCD Project Manager
9/29/2020 4:49:11 PM
There is a discrepancy in the number of lots/tracts and water demand among the sub summary form, State water form and LOI. LOI Comments Planner only attached. 9/29/2020 4:49:11 PM
EPC Code Enforcement
9/21/2020 7:38:39 AM
No comment. 9/21/2020 7:38:39 AM
View Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
9/18/2020 4:46:50 PM
9/18/2020 4:46:50 PM
View EPC Parks Department
9/17/2020 4:55:22 PM
See attached preliminary comments on behalf of El Paso County Parks. This application will be presented to the Park Advisory Board on October 14, 2020. 9/17/2020 4:55:22 PM
View Colorado Division of Water Resources
9/17/2020 9:15:40 AM
9/17/2020 9:15:40 AM
View EPC Stormwater Review
9/14/2020 9:17:38 AM
SWMP V_1 9/14/2020 9:17:38 AM
View EPC Stormwater Review
9/14/2020 9:17:01 AM
SWMP Checklist V_1 9/14/2020 9:17:01 AM
View EPC Stormwater Review
9/14/2020 9:15:08 AM
GEC V_1 9/14/2020 9:15:08 AM
View EPC Stormwater Review
9/14/2020 9:14:09 AM
GEC checklist V_1 9/14/2020 9:14:09 AM
EPC Stormwater Review
9/14/2020 9:13:47 AM
Review 1: Stormwater comments have been provided on the following uploaded documents:
- GEC Checklist
- GEC Plan
- SWMP Checklist
- SWMP

Reviewed by:
Glenn Reese, P.E.
Stormwater Engineer I
glennreese@elpasoco.com
9/14/2020 9:13:47 AM
Colorado Geological Survey
9/11/2020 11:23:09 AM
The site is adjacent to an intermittent but active stream channel. The geologic and soils report identifies areas of seasonally wet ground and reports encountering groundwater in June 2020 at depths of 7.5 to 28 feet beneath the site. The soils and foundation report also encountered groundwater at reported depths of 14 to 28 feet in April 2019. CGS recommends that, per county code and engineering criteria manual, a discussion of seasonal variations of groundwater levels be provided that is based on a monitoring program that establishes the extent of groundwater fluctuation that can occur at this site. The distribution and occurrence of groundwater (type of aquifer) should be discussed along with the effect of topography and proximity to the active stream channel on the groundwater gradient. Feasibility of basements and other below grade construction should be evaluated on a preliminary basis based on expected (measured) seasonal groundwater fluctuations and anticipated site grading. Additionally, the potential for shallow perched groundwater developing on the bedrock surface should be discussed.
RMG states that relevant and current information about groundwater levels can only be done after site development. Groundwater levels typically rise after development and measurements of variations in groundwater provide a basis that can be used to anticipate future groundwater levels. This can be used with site grading plans to determine areas where basements or other below grade construction may not be feasible or where drains may be needed. Additionally, variations in shallow groundwater levels and potential for perched groundwater at this site are geologic hazards that must be evaluated as part of the approval process prior to development.
Additional site-specific soils and engineering investigations will be required to further evaluate the identified expansive/compressible soils, depth to bedrock and groundwater, and to further identify the potential for perched groundwater developing on the bedrock surface. However, site-specific soils and engineering investigations are typically done when pulling a permit for individual lot development. Groundwater encountered during these investigations is a "snapshot" only, and this type of investigation does not determine seasonal variations. Groundwater monitoring to determine seasonal fluctuations is not common practice at the time of site-specific investigations. As specified by county code identifying the seasonal variations in groundwater levels and determining mitigation for this geologic hazard should be done prior to development. By not addressing this issue it becomes the homeowner who eventually learns if basements were feasible or not.
9/11/2020 11:23:09 AM
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
9/10/2020 10:39:18 AM
1. Please email Enumerations the phases for future addressing purposes. Amy@pprbd.org
2. Is the name of this first phase Bent Grass West or Falcon Meadows at Bent Grass?
STANDARD ENUMERATIONS COMMENTS-DEVELOPMENT PLAN:

1. For assignment of addressing for lots and tracts, place an addressing marker (xxx) where they are intended to be utilized. Lot marker placement to be front door.

2. Provide a 100 scale copy or larger of the entire APPROVED development to this department so that addressing can be assigned. Once received, the DP will be placed on a list to be addressed. (Can I please get you to mail a copy of the entire development on 1 large sheet of paper to the Building Department, for addressing purposes)?

3. An email from El Paso/Teller County 9-1-1 Authority, reserving the street name is required to be emailed to the Enumerations department. Amy@pprbd.org
9/10/2020 10:39:18 AM
View Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
9/1/2020 2:24:12 PM
9/1/2020 2:24:12 PM
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
9/1/2020 7:54:33 AM
Street names previously approved via email with Grant Dennis.
No further action required by E911.

G. West
9/1/2020 7:54:33 AM
View EPC Environmental Services
8/27/2020 12:43:13 PM
8/27/2020 12:43:13 PM
View Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
8/25/2020 2:22:54 PM
Please see the attached memo for comments.
-Kyle Schelhaas, 719-668-8126, kschelhaas@csu.org
8/25/2020 2:22:54 PM
View Falcon Fire Protection District
8/21/2020 3:58:55 PM
8/21/2020 3:58:55 PM
RBD Floodplain
8/21/2020 10:27:57 AM
floodplain modifications will require a CLOMR/LOMR 8/21/2020 10:27:57 AM
County Attorney - Water
8/21/2020 8:53:22 AM
County Attorney's Office will review for water sufficiency once Colorado Division of Water Resources submits their findings regarding this project. Thank you. 8/21/2020 8:53:22 AM