View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
County Attorney - Development Review
7/14/2020 4:08:55 PM |
No further comments from County Attorney's Office - Development Review. | 7/14/2020 4:08:55 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
7/7/2020 4:06:57 PM |
See county attorney comments on detention maintenance agreement, make amendment and resubmit with signatures, please. | 7/7/2020 4:06:57 PM | |
| View |
County Attorney - Development Review
7/7/2020 3:54:09 PM |
Proposed changes to the Detention Maintenance Agreement are attached. | 7/7/2020 3:54:09 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/30/2020 11:28:09 AM |
PCD Engineering Steve Kuehster, cell, 719-243-8055 Applicant is advised they will need to Post a Financial Assurance prior to construction for the amount shown on the FAE. A Letter of Responsibility is not allowed, per the County Engineer and County's MS4 requirements. No further comments. attached is the engineering final submittal checklist for our use. |
6/30/2020 11:28:09 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
6/30/2020 10:54:54 AM |
Stormwater comments have been resolved. Reviewed by: Christina Furchak Stormwater Engineer III christinafurchak@elpasoco.com |
6/30/2020 10:54:54 AM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
6/4/2020 3:32:30 PM |
6/4/2020 3:32:30 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
6/4/2020 12:02:39 PM |
No additional comments from planning see engineer and stormwater comments Prior to ground disturbance a Pre-construction meeting required with Brad Walters, bradwalters@elpasoco.com |
6/4/2020 12:02:39 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/4/2020 11:02:25 AM |
Steve Kuehster, PCD Engineering, Comments provided on the following documents: Drainage Letter, V3, Financial Assurance V3, Letter of Responsibility V3. Additionally see comments provided El Paso County Stormwater Department. It was noted that most of the Version 3 documents need signed and sealed. Attached is a Final Engineering Submittal checklist. |
6/4/2020 11:02:25 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
6/2/2020 11:35:51 AM |
Stormwater comments have been resolved on the following documents: - ESQCP - FAE - O&M - PBMP - GEC - GEC Checklist - SWMP - SWMP Checklist Please provide the following documents: - MS4 (the revised PBMP was previously uploaded in its place) - Pond Maintenance Agreement Reviewed by: Christina Furchak Stormwater Engineer III christinafurchak@elpasoco.com |
6/2/2020 11:35:51 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
6/1/2020 12:50:36 PM |
No comments from County Attorney's Office at this time. | 6/1/2020 12:50:36 PM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
4/23/2020 11:14:09 AM |
Re-attached original comments from December, 2019. There are 2 comments requiring a response prior to approval consideration. | 4/23/2020 11:14:09 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/16/2020 11:26:39 AM |
If collateral for the FAE is not being proposed, then a Letter of Responsibility is required with next submittal. | 4/16/2020 11:26:39 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/16/2020 11:15:12 AM |
Comments on Site Development Plan attached. See Stormwater review comments See Engineer comment letter and any documents needing signature need to be uploaded |
4/16/2020 11:15:12 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
4/15/2020 2:03:59 PM |
See Comment Letter Steve Kuehster 719-520-6813 719-243-8055 cell |
4/15/2020 2:03:59 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/13/2020 2:25:34 PM |
SWMP Checklist_V1 | 4/13/2020 2:25:34 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/13/2020 3:24:57 PM |
SWMP_V1 | 4/13/2020 3:24:57 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/13/2020 2:24:48 PM |
GEC Checklist_V1 | 4/13/2020 2:24:48 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/13/2020 2:24:25 PM |
GEC_V2 | 4/13/2020 2:24:25 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/13/2020 2:24:00 PM |
PBMP_V1 | 4/13/2020 2:24:00 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/13/2020 2:23:32 PM |
OM&M_V1 | 4/13/2020 2:23:32 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/13/2020 2:23:04 PM |
FAE_V1 | 4/13/2020 2:23:04 PM |
| View |
EPC Stormwater Review
4/13/2020 2:22:37 PM |
ESQCP_V1 | 4/13/2020 2:22:37 PM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
4/13/2020 12:46:04 PM |
Stormwater comments have been provided on the following uploaded documents: - ESQCP_V1 - FAE_V1 - OM&M_V1 - PBMP_V1 - GEC_V2 - GEC Checklist_V1 - SWMP_V1 - SWMP Checklist_V1 Please provide the following documents: - MS4 Reviewed by: Christina Furchak Stormwater Engineer III christinafurchak@elpasoco.com |
4/13/2020 12:46:04 PM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
12/15/2019 7:26:54 PM |
12/15/2019 7:26:54 PM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
10/25/2019 1:17:58 PM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments - See Attached Documents (No PAB Endorsement Necessary) | 10/25/2019 1:17:58 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/17/2019 12:42:59 PM |
GEC_V1 | 10/17/2019 12:42:59 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/17/2019 12:42:42 PM |
Drainage Letter_V1 | 10/17/2019 12:42:42 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/16/2019 1:52:46 PM |
See attached redlines. Key Points: See comments from Fort Carson in regards to baffles Landscape waiver denied, an Alternative Landscape Plan may be requested but a waiver of requirements cannot be requested. See engineer comments, this is preliminary review as many documents that are needed for review need to be submitted and those comments will be made on next review. |
10/16/2019 1:52:46 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/16/2019 1:50:53 PM |
SDP_V1 | 10/16/2019 1:50:53 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/16/2019 1:50:34 PM |
LOI_V1 | 10/16/2019 1:50:34 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/16/2019 1:17:05 PM |
See Comment Letter. Comments were Cursory pending a complete submittal. Steve Kuehster |
10/16/2019 1:17:05 PM |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
10/14/2019 9:28:36 AM |
Regarding a request for approval of a site development plan for a CSPD firing range at 15905 Sniper Lane, Enumerations has the following comments: 1. The classroom building proposed for this parcel should use the address of 15905 Sniper Ln. The future control buildings and shelter canopies will require separate addresses and permits. These addresses can be assigned either in advance or at the time of plan review. Floodplain has the following comments: 1. The floodplain area shown on page AS102 does not match our floodplain overlay. The area shown on page AS102 is much larger and in a different location than what we show. Our overlay indicates that all proposed structures are outside of the floodplain area and will not require a floodplain development permit. Contact Floodplain Administrator Keith Curtis (keith@pprbd.org, 719-327-2898) with any questions regarding the floodplain in this area. Brent Johnson Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2888 E: brent@pprbd.org W: pprbd.org |
10/14/2019 9:28:36 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
10/11/2019 12:20:50 PM |
No comments from County Attorney's Office at this time. | 10/11/2019 12:20:50 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Planning & Community Development
10/11/2019 10:50:03 AM |
The City of Colorado Springs Planning and Development Department has no comments or concerns, assuming that CSPD, CSU and Fountain have been fully coordinated with | 10/11/2019 10:50:03 AM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
10/10/2019 10:18:37 AM |
10/10/2019 10:18:37 AM | |
|
Ft. Carson, Directorate of Public Works, Master Planning
10/4/2019 8:22:49 AM |
he 4th Infantry Division and the US Army Garrison Safety office are opposed to this development. This CSPD Training Range as it is designed poses a critical safety risk to Fort Carson personnel. The Surface Danger Zone, (SDZ), for 5.56/.223 and 7.62/.308 ball ammunition is provided as an attachment. These SDZs show the potential for injury with deadly consequences. These impact zones would extend beyond across Route 1 and encompass Range 117 and Range 119. The dirt backstop is insufficient and would not meet the requirement to capture all rounds within the range footprint. One alternative would be for the CSPD to design baffles into the design as a means of mitigation into the project. The baffles would prevent the projectiles from travelling the maximum distance that they are capable of. This maximum distance is used when calculating the surface danger zones. The example provided below from the Department of Energy Range Design Criteria, a partially baffled outdoor range can reduce the SDZ by one half on the maximum range of the most powerful cartridge used. “To change the size and shape of an SDZ, baffles may be installed. Partial and full baffle systems consist of the following components: overhead baffles, a canopy shield over firing points, bullet impact berm, and side berms, sidewalls, or side baffles. A fully baffled range must be constructed so all direct fire can be contained within the range (see Figures 7 and 8).” https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/05/f1/Range_Design_Criteria.pdf This response was routed through the: 4th Infantry Division Safety Office U. S. Army Garrison Safety Office Director of Plans, Training, Mobilization and Safety Fort Carson Range Operations Directorate of Public Works |
10/4/2019 8:22:49 AM | |
| View |
Ft. Carson, Directorate of Public Works, Master Planning
10/4/2019 8:22:02 AM |
10/4/2019 8:22:02 AM | |
| View |
Ft. Carson, Directorate of Public Works, Master Planning
10/4/2019 8:21:32 AM |
10/4/2019 8:21:32 AM | |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
10/4/2019 7:17:03 AM |
I have no review comments Al | 10/4/2019 7:17:03 AM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
10/1/2019 9:09:46 AM |
All street names previously approved. No action for 911. Thank you. Justin |
10/1/2019 9:09:46 AM |
EDARP