View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
6/22/2021 1:46:45 PM |
Dead tree located at the southeast side of the lot | 6/22/2021 1:46:45 PM |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
6/22/2021 1:45:39 PM |
All photos of CO inspection | 6/22/2021 1:45:39 PM |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
6/22/2021 1:35:26 PM |
2nd shipping container located in storage designated area | 6/22/2021 1:35:26 PM |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
6/22/2021 1:36:27 PM |
1st shipping container located on the northeast side of property (outside of the gate of the storage area) | 6/22/2021 1:36:27 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/17/2020 5:08:30 PM |
Site Inspection Results 7-17-20 | 7/17/2020 5:08:30 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/8/2019 2:34:51 PM |
All planning comments addressed. | 10/8/2019 2:34:51 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/8/2019 2:03:27 PM |
Landscape Sheet/Site Plan/Elevation Sheet: The elevation sheet and the landscape sheet show five doors on the north elevation. The site plan shows four doors. Please correct this discrepancy so all sheets agree. | 10/8/2019 2:03:27 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
10/7/2019 9:01:25 AM |
No additional comments. | 10/7/2019 9:01:25 AM | |
|
EPC County Attorney's Office
10/4/2019 12:46:24 PM |
Please submit Detention Pond Agreement and License Agreement in Word for ease of editing. They have not yet been reviewed. | 10/4/2019 12:46:24 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/23/2019 8:24:28 PM |
Several comments from last review cycle were not addressed and/or need further action: Landscape Comments: 1. A license agreement is required for the three hackberry proposed within the Amelia Street ROW. This license agreement should be obtained from El Paso County Public Works and a copy should be submitted with next review. 2. The scientific name for Russian Sage is Perovskia atriplicifolia rather than potentilla fruticose 'Gold Drop' . Please revise this in the Planting Schedule. 3. Please shift the proposed 6' tall ponderosa pine that is along the north property line southward so that it is proposed within the property lines for this project. Site Plan Comments: 1. Provide bicycle parking per the requirements of LDC 6.2.5(F)(1-3). 2. Advisory Comment: In the area where the HC parking was revised to provide the 8' wide aisle, now that there is one way traffic, you might have enough space for head in parking rather than parallel. This could provide an opportunity to provide the HC parking and then pick up a couple additional regular spaces and it might be better organized than the parallel parking shown. Elevations: 1. The South elevation still does not match the floorplan which shows a single door to the left of each overhead door/service bay. Revise for next submittal. Lighting Plan: 1. Thanks for resolving the tree/light conflicts. Check the pole light fixture in the outside storage/loading area. On the landscape plan it appears near the edge of the storage area. On the lighting plan it is in the middle of the storage area which, if accurate, might cause circulation issues. 2. Check the light levels at the property line at the south entrance to the parking lot. They should not exceed 0.1 foot-candles at property line adjacent to public ROW. |
9/23/2019 8:24:28 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
9/18/2019 11:18:25 AM |
comments provided by Elizabeth Nijkamp Final Drainage Report: Q's for DP's 1 and 2 do mot match between text and plan in the back of the report for the proposed conditions. Please update and resubmit for approval. all other comments for all other documents have been addressed for Engineering. |
9/18/2019 11:18:25 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 9:09:47 AM |
See Engineering Redline on Site Development Plan. | 9/3/2019 9:09:47 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 9:04:09 AM |
Revise the lighting plan to reflect the current parking lot layout and revised building orientation. | 9/3/2019 9:04:09 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 9:03:08 AM |
Tree/Light Pole Conflicts: The finger island south of the building shows both a proposed tree and a pole light. This is a conflict so the light needs to be relocated so the tree island can remain. Check the distance between the light pole shown near the trash enclosure and the nearby tree that is proposed to ensure there is no conflict there. |
9/3/2019 9:03:08 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 8:53:53 AM |
The lighting cut sheets on the plan cannot be read when you zoom in on the lighting plan due to poor image quality. It is impossible to read the mounting or pole height or other information. | 9/3/2019 8:53:53 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 8:51:40 AM |
Label the property line on the lighting plan since we have to review foot candle readings at the property lines. Note that light levels at the property line adjacent to public right of way shall not exceed 0.1 foot candles. | 9/3/2019 8:51:40 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 8:48:36 AM |
The elevations no longer match the layout of the building shown on the site development plan. The building appears to have been flipped and the doors are not shown on the elevations as they are on the site plan layout. Please revise. | 9/3/2019 8:48:36 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 8:39:17 AM |
Label the building setbacks on the site development plan per the Code. They were shown on previous submittal and disappeared with this one. | 9/3/2019 8:39:17 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 8:12:20 AM |
Per LDC 6.2.5, at least one of the required HC spaces shall be "van accessible" and served by a pedestrian access aisle that is a minimum of 8 feet wide. Please label the van accessible space and show the required access. | 9/3/2019 8:12:20 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 8:10:08 AM |
Three hackberry are proposed within the Amelia Road ROW. A license agreement would be required to install trees in County ROW. We recommend shifting the trees eastward onto the subject site or apply for a license agreement. | 9/3/2019 8:10:08 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 8:05:16 AM |
Provide bicycle parking per the requirements of LDC 6.2.5(F)(1-3). | 9/3/2019 8:05:16 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 8:03:50 AM |
Please shift the proposed 6' tall ponderosa pine southward so that it is within the property lines of this project. | 9/3/2019 8:03:50 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 8:02:03 AM |
Provide a detail for the proposed fence and gate. Please note that chain link fencing with slats is not considered opaque for the purposes of screening outside storage. | 9/3/2019 8:02:03 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 7:58:24 AM |
The scientific name for Russian Sage is Perovskia atriplicifolia rather than potentilla fruticose 'Gold Drop' | 9/3/2019 7:58:24 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 8:06:47 AM |
Provide a detail for the waste handling area to demonstrate screening is sufficient per Section 6.2.2(G)(b) which indicates that refuse collection areas, including trash bins, shall be screened from view from adjacent properties and roads by an opaque wall or fence, architectural elements, dense evergreen plantings with a minimum planting height of 6 feet. Enclosure height shall be sufficient to screen the dumpsters or compactor within the enclosure. Also, is there sufficient turning area in the location where the waste handling enclosure is located for servicing? I wasn't sure if the other fence and gate perpendicular would impact access? |
9/3/2019 8:06:47 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 7:49:34 AM |
The site development plan reflects outside loading/storage area. Per Section 5.2.37, Outside storage shall be enclosed and concealed by a solid fence or wall at least 6 feet in heights or any combination of berms, shrubs, trees, fencing or walls which will provided at maturity ad minimum of 6 feet of height and 100% opaque screening for the area utilized as outside storage. I do not currently see how your landscape or site plan addresses this screening requirement. | 9/3/2019 7:49:34 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/3/2019 7:43:10 AM |
Ensure that the building SF is the same on all sheets. The landscape sheet reflects a 10,641 SF building and the Site Development Plan reflects a 10,800 SF building. | 9/3/2019 7:43:10 AM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
8/26/2019 3:28:17 PM |
comments provided by Elizabeth Nijkamp: Site development plan, with comment, shall be uploaded by the Project manager. FDR: please change out the drainage map at the back of the report per our phone conversation, with the updated design point Q values. SWMP: the checklist provided in the back of the report, appendix C, is not appropriate for this site. Please add text to the actual report per the email sent 8/22/19 by E. Nijkamp to Mike B. TIS: Please add PCD file number to front page of memo. |
8/26/2019 3:28:17 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
5/10/2019 10:43:06 AM |
5/10/2019 10:43:06 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/9/2019 5:38:31 PM |
Traffic Impact Study redlined document | 5/9/2019 5:38:31 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/9/2019 5:38:12 PM |
Stormwater Management Plan redlined document | 5/9/2019 5:38:12 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/9/2019 5:37:49 PM |
Grading and Erosion Control Plan redlined document | 5/9/2019 5:37:49 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/9/2019 5:37:13 PM |
Final Drainage Report redlined document | 5/9/2019 5:37:13 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/9/2019 5:36:24 PM |
Engineering comments have been resolved on the following documents: -Letter of Intent -Site Plan -FAE Review 2 Engineering comments can be found on the following documents: -ESQCP (Review 1 comments. ESQCP was not resubmitted for review 2) -Traffic Memo -Drainage Report -Grading and Erosion Control Plan -SWMP Please see attached the GEC and SWMP checklists. Make appropriate changes as noted on the checklist. |
5/9/2019 5:36:24 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
5/9/2019 3:06:30 PM |
Landscape plan redlined document | 5/9/2019 3:06:30 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
5/9/2019 1:44:31 PM |
Application is not signed. | 5/9/2019 1:44:31 PM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
5/7/2019 3:23:48 PM |
When submitting building plans to Regional Building department be clear on how many tenants will be in the building. If more the one, see our secondary addressing guide on the website to assign. Enumerations will review once assigned. | 5/7/2019 3:23:48 PM | |
|
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
3/12/2019 1:46:51 PM |
CDOT utilities has been in touch with the development and have no comments. | 3/12/2019 1:46:51 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Springs Airport Advisory Commission
2/28/2019 9:20:29 AM |
At the Airport Advisory Commission held on February 27, 2019, the Commissioner's approved the comments on the attached land use review summary but need clarification on light industrial use. What is proposed for this building? | 2/28/2019 9:20:29 AM |
| View |
EPC Health Department
2/22/2019 12:55:48 PM |
2/22/2019 12:55:48 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
2/13/2019 3:29:06 PM |
Traffic Impact study redlined document | 2/13/2019 3:29:06 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
2/13/2019 3:25:57 PM |
SWMP redlined document | 2/13/2019 3:25:57 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
2/13/2019 3:22:59 PM |
Grading and Erosion Control Plan redlined document | 2/13/2019 3:22:59 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
2/13/2019 3:19:18 PM |
Financial Assurance redlined document | 2/13/2019 3:19:18 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
2/13/2019 3:18:20 PM |
Drainage report redlined document | 2/13/2019 3:18:20 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
2/13/2019 3:17:36 PM |
ESQCP redlined document | 2/13/2019 3:17:36 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
2/13/2019 3:16:48 PM |
Application redlined document | 2/13/2019 3:16:48 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
2/13/2019 3:16:02 PM |
Letter of intent redlined document | 2/13/2019 3:16:02 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
2/13/2019 3:15:30 PM |
Floor Plans Redlined document | 2/13/2019 3:15:30 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
2/13/2019 3:14:47 PM |
Lighting Plan redlined document | 2/13/2019 3:14:47 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
2/13/2019 3:14:12 PM |
Site Development Plan redlined document | 2/13/2019 3:14:12 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
2/12/2019 5:28:10 PM |
Engineering comments can be found on the following documents: -ESQCP -Letter of Intent -Traffic Memo -Drainage Report -Site Plan -FAE -Grading and Erosion Control Plan -SWMP Please see attached the GEC and SWMP checklists. Make appropriate changes as noted on the checklist. |
2/12/2019 5:28:10 PM |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
2/12/2019 3:44:24 PM |
Enumerations/Floodplain has the following comments; 1. Lot 2 address is proposed to be 555 Amelia Street. Is more than one tenant proposed for this building. Addresses will need to be assigned prior to core & shell plan submittal to RBD. Contact this department prior to submittal for clarification. amy@pprbd.org 2. A copy of the final recorded plat will be required prior to plan approval in this department. |
2/12/2019 3:44:24 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Springs Airport Advisory Commission
2/12/2019 9:23:43 AM |
Attached is a summary sheet with comments for the subject land use item that will be presented at the Airport Advisory Commission on Wednesday, February 27, 2019. | 2/12/2019 9:23:43 AM |
|
Cimarron Hills Fire
2/10/2019 7:46:06 PM |
No additional comments at this time. | 2/10/2019 7:46:06 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
2/8/2019 11:47:49 AM |
Hey Len, Attached is the review memo for the subject application. CSU has no action items at this time and approval is recommended. Let me know if you need anything else from me. Thanks, Ryne |
2/8/2019 11:47:49 AM |
|
EPC County Attorney's Office
2/7/2019 11:42:36 AM |
Please submit the Detention Maintenance Agreement in Word for ease of editing. | 2/7/2019 11:42:36 AM |
EDARP