View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
3/23/2020 10:48:49 AM |
Please find the written letter of determination attached. A copy will be mailed to the two benefitted parcels, however due to the Covid 19 virus this may take up to a week. |
3/23/2020 10:48:49 AM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
2/19/2020 8:38:49 AM |
comments provided to Kyle in email dated 2/19/2020. Please resubmit cost recovery statement and spread sheet. |
2/19/2020 8:38:49 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
11/20/2019 4:55:24 PM |
11/20/2019 4:55:24 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
11/20/2019 4:52:55 PM |
11/20/2019 4:52:55 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
11/20/2019 4:53:48 PM |
Comments provided by Elizabeth Nijkamp. Comments provided on August 5 (as discussed on July 29) with respect to the cost recovery statement were intended to be placed within the cost recovery statement its self. Please add to the cost recovery statement the requested items, prior to doing so, please see comments to your response on the attached comment letter. Please update cost recovery statement as you see fit considering the attached documents. Please give me a call to set up a meeting if needed. total cubic yard of concrete for sidewalk and curb and gutter has been reduced to include 10% waste instead of the 12% shown on the spread sheet. items number 13-15 in the comment letter dated August 5, 2019 have no response. Please address the following three comments: 13. Please call out the plans (EPC file #) in which the construction BMP’s are located that you are requesting recovery. 14. Please provide the EPC file number to find a complete set of the landscape plans so that I can confirm the transplanted tree count. Or provide a full set of the plans. 15. Please add to the package the colored coded irrigations plans and associated plats to support the cost per square foot for the landscape value, as provided during Meeting dated 7/29/19. Please see attached spreadsheet with totals as calculated to date by PCD staff. |
11/20/2019 4:53:48 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/5/2019 6:00:19 PM |
8/5/2019 6:00:19 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/5/2019 5:59:47 PM |
8/5/2019 5:59:47 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
8/5/2019 5:58:58 PM |
comment letter attached. | 8/5/2019 5:58:58 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
5/28/2019 12:48:42 PM |
5/28/2019 12:48:42 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
5/28/2019 12:48:14 PM |
Comments provided by Elizabeth Nijkamp, 719-520-7852 Landscaping: (to include transplanted trees) The estimate from Bear claw was not signed and the numbers do not match the value of $70,866.25 being21% (where the estimate shows $471,193.00). Please provide the actual finalized scope of work (preferably for the exact work in the exact location for this request). It is also not clear where this work is located. It appears as if it is the street scape for Forest Lakes Drive. The estimates for All American are not signed. The Bear Claw, All American and the Kempton invoices/estimates all have irrigation. Please supply a justification as to why you would use all of these for your baseline when the All American estimate dated 1/5/16 clearly calls out Forest Lakes Drive. In general for the landscaping provide justification as to why you would calculate a unit cost as opposed to using invoices for the actual area that is applicable. Please provide the project number in which the landscaping for this section of road was approved. C&G Please take note of the highlighted area on the spread sheet. The total lineal foot of C&G requested is not consistent with the take offs for this section of road. Please clarify why your request is higher than the quantity take offs, or adjust the number to reflect the correct amount. Please confirm, under c&g prep, your reference of PPC invoice 1521-9 (highlighted on spread sheet and called out as document page 80). I do believe this was intended as invoice 1521-8. Please justify this cost. Please check both blue highlighted invoices. Stamped concrete: Please take note of the highlighted area on the spread sheet. The total square foot of stamped concrete requested is not consistent with the take offs for this section of road. Please clarify why your request is higher than the quantity take offs, or adjust the number to reflect the correct amount. Concrete: Please verify the take-off quantities vs the amount of concrete requested for both C&G and sidewalk. It appears as if you are requesting more concrete than the project required. Please justify the amount in this request or revise to match the amount calculated per take-offs from the plans. Once these values are consistent with each other please also check the dates of prep and placement (PPC invoices, JDS invoices, and Cornella) to confirm they are consistent with the dates on the concrete invoices. Paving: Please clarify which invoice you are requesting the value for the pavement. Please reference the numbering system that I have created (each sheet in the three packets of invoices has been assigned a number, starting at 1 and ending at 165). Page 95 is an estimate and is not signed by the developer and shows 23.73 for asphalt, page 98 is an invoice but shows 23.93 for the asphalt (where your spread sheet shows 23.75 for asphalt), and pages 99 and 100 are invoices but also shows 23.73 for asphalt. I think it is simply a typo on your spread sheet. |
5/28/2019 12:48:14 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
4/3/2019 9:43:41 AM |
Comments provided by Elizabeth Nijkamp, 719-520-7852. It is unclear how you arrived at the total cost requested. Please identify the amount requested for each invoice and resubmit. A spread sheet has been provided to Kyle Campbell with all invoices logged, please fill in the amount requested per invoice and do not combine multiple invoices on one line. |
4/3/2019 9:43:41 AM |
EDARP