Project Review Comments

Back to List

Project Name
Lot 2 Claremont Business Park
Description
Site Development Plan for 2 new 10,000 sq ft commercial structures.
Location
Parcels
5408101027 5408101027
Applicant
Hammers Construction
Lisa Peterson ( lpeterson@hammersconstruction.com )
(719) 570-1599 x105 Lisa Peterson ( lpeterson@hammersconstruction.com )
(719) 570-1599 x105
File Number
PPR192
Project Manager
Lindsay Darden
Status
Closed
Created
11/13/2018 3:32:12 PM

View: Project Documents


Review Comments (50)
Link Agency Comment
PCD Project Manager
9/29/2019 8:26:23 PM 		Lisa,
These comments were not addressed. Please contact me if you have questions. I will try to call you in the morning to discuss.

- It has been brought to my attention that the abbreviated project title for the documents could be confusing to those who are unfamiliar with the project. Please revise the title block of the site plan set and all other drawings to Lot 2 Claremont Business Park (Do not abbreviate Claremont Business Park as CBP in the Title Block)

- Revise the sheet numbering of the title page of the site plan to reflect the accurate page numbers for all the sheets that will ultimately be included in the complete site plan set. Currently there are a lot of page number discrepancies that do not match the title page. The first sheet of the site plan has a drawing index that refers to all the project sheets as numerical pages. The page numbers on the drawing index should be on each of those plans so everything corresponds. For example, instead of Grading 1-4, you could do GEC Coversheet as sheet 3a, GEC Plan as sheet 3b, GEC Details as sheets 3C-D. The grading sheets should reflect those page numbers to match the drawing index. 		9/29/2019 8:26:23 PM
PCD Engineering Division
9/27/2019 9:18:58 PM 		Engineering documents will be uploaded when approved by the ECM administrator 9/27/2019 9:18:58 PM
PCD Project Manager
9/15/2019 6:59:04 PM 		- It has been brought to my attention that the abbreviated project title for the documents could be confusing to those who are unfamiliar with the project. Please revise the title block of the site plan set and all other drawings to Lot 2 Claremont Business Park.

- Revise the sheet numbering of the title page of the site plan to reflect the accurate page numbers for all the sheets that will ultimately be included in the complete site plan set. Currently there are a lot of page number discrepancies that do not match the title page. 		9/15/2019 6:59:04 PM
PCD Engineering Division
9/10/2019 4:49:24 PM 		Comments provided by Elizabeth Nijkamp, 719-520-7852.

GEC plan: You have titled he plan CBP Lot 2-1A, this name is not sufficient to determine where this lot is located. The Vicinity map is not clear enough to also be a location map. In order to find and understand where this site is located one must go into the document and look for cross streets. Please name the document something that will locate the site. An address, and or a TSN would be helpful. There is no mention as to what "CBP" means. The VTC should be called out on the plan with hatch, as shown in the detail. A key or legend should be shown on sheet 2. The area of the SSA should be delineated, there appears to not be any boundaries. The dimensions of the rip rap pads should be called on the plan. the erosion control mat should be added to the legend and a detail added. The 42" pipe adjacent to Meadowbrook parkway is privately owned. a note will be added under the ECM administrators approval that approval of this document does not give you permission to cut into that pipe. Permission by the owner may be required.
you call out edge of asphalt in a few locations, some of which are in the middle of drive isles. Please clarify what the intent is for the entire site. It appears as if the parking and drive isles are to be asphalt and the other area is to be crushed asphalt. is that correct?

FDR:
In general the FDR is confusing with the nomenclature used where you call the site "Claremont Business Park filing no 2, lot 2-1A. The site is platted as "Lot 2, Claremont Business Park filing No. 1A" or "Claremont Business Park filing No. 1A, Lot 2". Please correct this reference at all locations.

First full paragraph on the top of page 6 calls out that a sand filter basin is proposed for Claremont Commercial Subdivision filing no 2. Please reference the current plat name of this area as well, because it is not platted as Claremont Commercial sub fil no 2 at this time, and we have no assurance that it will be, we should call out both names please.

The Claremont Business Park filing no 2 FDR (which your report refers to as 'MDDP' (which it is not an MDDP)) and the FDR for filing 1 calls out a 24" stub out of the inlet adjacent to your site. Please explain why you are not connecting into that anticipated stub. Please confirm that the 42" pipe that you are connecting into has the capacity due to the fact that the referenced FDR anticipated that your flow will enter the inlet, and not connect into the 42" pipe. Please call out the ownership of the 42" pipe.

The Claremont business park filing 1A and filing 2 FDR's did not anticipate this much impervious surface for this lot. the bottom of page 6, top of page 7 (of your report) calls out the cumulative runoff, but doesn't address your specific lot and the anticipated C value. Please call out what the original C value was calculated as (in the filing 1A and filing 2 FDR) and what your new C value is and call out the additional flow and state if the downstream and the 42" pipe can handle the added Q for the area of this lot.

Please explain how you got a weighted C value for basins A and B when the basins are 100% impervious. Please update all calculations (for each basin) for the weighed C and provide a single weighted C for the entire site, and (as stated above) compare to the previous reports assumptions. 		9/10/2019 4:49:24 PM
View PCD Project Manager
8/20/2019 5:44:02 PM 		See financial Assurance redlines 8/20/2019 5:44:02 PM
View PCD Project Manager
8/20/2019 5:43:39 PM 		See GEC redlines 8/20/2019 5:43:39 PM
PCD Project Manager
8/20/2019 5:35:57 PM 		We reviewed your landscape alternative request. We looked through our records and we cannot find evidence of that landscape exhibit that you have attached showing the four locations of planting. Nor can we see evidence of those areas being installed from the aerial photography.

Looking at the property line and where the retaining wall is, it appears there is plenty of room to put the trees on the top side of the wall where they would effectively screen views into the site from Highway 24. Alternatively because views heading south from Marksheffel into the site, we would consider an alternative request that relocates those 13 trees along the north property line of the site to screen those asphalt areas behind the buildings. 		8/20/2019 5:35:57 PM
View PCD Engineering Division
8/15/2019 5:16:24 PM 		Review 4 comments on the following documents will be uploaded by the project manager:
-Grading and Erosion Control Plan: The EPC standard GEC notes that were attached in the previous review comment were not used. Please use the attached standard GEC notes on the plans.
-Financial Assurance Estimate

Please submit engineering documents signed by both the engineer and owner/developer.


Engineering comments on the following documents have been resolved
-Site Plan


Reviewed by:
Daniel Torres
danieltorres@elpasoco.com 		8/15/2019 5:16:24 PM
View PCD Project Manager
7/24/2019 11:40:33 AM 		Please address GEC comments. 7/24/2019 11:40:33 AM
View PCD Project Manager
7/24/2019 11:40:12 AM 		Please address site plan comments (see page 2) 7/24/2019 11:40:12 AM
View PCD Project Manager
7/24/2019 11:39:42 AM 		Please address Financial Assurance Redlines 7/24/2019 11:39:42 AM
PCD Project Manager
7/24/2019 7:35:08 AM 		1. Thanks for providing trash enclosures. Add a note to the trash enclosure detail that enclosure height shall be sufficient to screen the height of the dumpster or refuse containers located inside the enclosure. Usually 8" taller than items to be screened is sufficient.

2. Add the ADA path of travel from the parking spaces to the building entrance on the ADA exhibit.

3. Thanks for providing the bike racks. Ensure there is a minimum of 2' between the side of the U-rack and the side of the building since those racks are designed to allow a bike to be parked on each side of the inverted U.

4. Repeat comment- beside each tree planting size (both evergreen and deciduous), specify if it will be installed as a B&B or container.

5. HWY 24 Roadway Landscape Requirement - since we have not been able to determine exactly what variations were approved for this area in the past, if you want to propose alternative landscaping that is consistent with what was provided on the other parcels adjacent to HWY 24, please provide a detailed request that describes and/or documents what has been done on the other parcels (you can also submit photos to help with your description) and then detail what you feel is an appropriate alternative for this site so we can review with the PCD Director. 		7/24/2019 7:35:08 AM
PCD Engineering Division
7/22/2019 5:25:56 PM 		Review 3 comments on the following documents will be uploaded by the project manager:
-Site Plan (minor comment from review 2 was not addressed)
-Grading and Erosion Control Plan (please use new grading and erosion control notes)
-Financial Assurance Estimate (minor comment)

Engineering comments on the following documents have been resolved
-Drainage Report


Please submit signed engineering documents upon resubmittal.


Reviewed by:
Daniel Torres
danieltorres@elpasoco.com 		7/22/2019 5:25:56 PM
Colorado Springs Airport Advisory Commission
7/18/2019 3:49:54 PM 		Airport staff has no additional comments beyond those previously provided. 7/18/2019 3:49:54 PM
View EPC County Attorney's Office
7/16/2019 2:58:16 PM 		Comments to Detention Maintenance Agreement have been addressed. Final version is attached. 7/16/2019 2:58:16 PM
View PCD Project Manager
6/12/2019 4:13:35 PM 		Please see comment on GEC. 6/12/2019 4:13:35 PM
View PCD Project Manager
6/12/2019 4:13:02 PM 		See comments on financial assurance. 6/12/2019 4:13:02 PM
View PCD Project Manager
6/12/2019 4:12:38 PM 		See comments on drainage report 6/12/2019 4:12:38 PM
View PCD Project Manager
6/12/2019 4:10:29 PM 		Please see comment on elevations. 6/12/2019 4:10:29 PM
View PCD Project Manager
6/12/2019 4:09:56 PM 		See comment on Letter of Intent. 6/12/2019 4:09:56 PM
View PCD Project Manager
6/12/2019 4:09:36 PM 		See comments on Landscape Plan. 6/12/2019 4:09:36 PM
View PCD Project Manager
6/12/2019 4:08:53 PM 		See comment on ADA exhibit. 6/12/2019 4:08:53 PM
View PCD Project Manager
6/12/2019 4:08:29 PM 		See redlines on the site plan. 6/12/2019 4:08:29 PM
Colorado Springs Airport Advisory Commission
6/5/2019 12:43:57 PM 		Airport staff has no additional comments beyond those already provided. 6/5/2019 12:43:57 PM
PCD Engineering Division
6/5/2019 1:01:07 PM 		Review 2 comments on the following documents will be uploaded by the project manager:
-Site Plan (minor comment)
-Drainage Report
-Grading and Erosion Control Plan
-Financial Assurance Estimate

Submit the following:
Deviation request for drainage area not captured in the water quality facility. The project manager will add a slot to upload the deviation request form upon resubmittal.

Engineering comments on the following documents have been resolved
-O&M
-SWMP

Reviewed by:
Daniel Torres
danieltorres@elpasoco.com 		6/5/2019 1:01:07 PM
PCD Project Manager
6/1/2019 11:45:09 AM 		I should not be listed as the planner on this one. 6/1/2019 11:45:09 AM
EPC County Attorney's Office
5/29/2019 12:37:28 PM 		Exhibit A to the Detention Maintenance Agreement must be a legal description of the parcel. 5/29/2019 12:37:28 PM
View EPC Health Department
2/10/2019 9:38:24 PM 		2/10/2019 9:38:24 PM
View PCD Project Manager
2/7/2019 8:41:25 AM 		Drainage Report Redlines 2/7/2019 8:41:25 AM
View PCD Project Manager
2/7/2019 8:40:52 AM 		Elevations Redlines 2/7/2019 8:40:52 AM
View PCD Project Manager
2/7/2019 8:40:29 AM 		Financial Assurance Redlines 2/7/2019 8:40:29 AM
View PCD Project Manager
2/7/2019 8:40:02 AM 		Floor plans Redlines 2/7/2019 8:40:02 AM
View PCD Project Manager
2/7/2019 8:39:27 AM 		GEC Redlines 2/7/2019 8:39:27 AM
View PCD Project Manager
2/7/2019 8:39:07 AM 		Landscape Redlines 2/7/2019 8:39:07 AM
View PCD Project Manager
2/7/2019 8:38:31 AM 		Letter of Intent Redlines 2/7/2019 8:38:31 AM
View PCD Project Manager
2/7/2019 8:38:10 AM 		Lighting Redlines 2/7/2019 8:38:10 AM
View PCD Project Manager
2/7/2019 8:37:51 AM 		O & M Redlines 2/7/2019 8:37:51 AM
View PCD Project Manager
2/7/2019 8:37:26 AM 		Site Plan Redlines 2/7/2019 8:37:26 AM
View PCD Project Manager
2/7/2019 8:37:06 AM 		SWMP - Redlines 2/7/2019 8:37:06 AM
View PCD Project Manager
2/7/2019 8:36:29 AM 		ADA Redlines 2/7/2019 8:36:29 AM
PCD Engineering Division
2/5/2019 5:08:17 PM 		Review 1 comments on the following documents will be uploaded by the project manager:
-Letter of Intent
-Site Plan
-Drainage Report
-Grading and Erosion Control Plan
-Financial Assurance Estimate
-O&M
-SWMP 		2/5/2019 5:08:17 PM
PCD Project Manager
2/7/2019 8:43:59 AM 		Is outdoor storage (storage of vehicles raw materials, supplies, finished or semi-finished products or equipment proposed in the fenced and gated areas adjacent to the proposed buildings? If so, it shall meet the standards of LDC 5.2.37

Standard Comments:
1. Please add the PCD file # to all plans and reports.
2. A separate sign permit will be required for any proposed signage.
3. A separate driveway permit will be required for the new access cut.
4. Prior to beginning construction pre-construction meeting is required. At the pre-construction meeting you must provide collateral to match that of the approved financial assurance form.
5. Prior to receiving CO approval PCD will complete an inspection to ensure all proposed improvements have been installed (landscaping, sidewalks, parking, etc.).
6. Any alteration of the site not in conformance with the approved site development plan in the future will require review by PCD. 		2/7/2019 8:43:59 AM
Central Marksheffel Metro
2/5/2019 11:31:03 AM 		In response to the proposed project this parcel will be subject to the Central Marksheffel Metropolitan Commercial District fee’s and mill levies.
At time of Building Permit, the following fee is due $1.50/square foot of each 10,000 Square Foot Building

Made Payable to Central Marksheffel Metro District

Building 1 10,000 sq ft x $1.50 = $15000.00
Building 2 10,000 sq ft x $1.50 = $15000.00

Total $30,000

TAX ID 54081-01-027
Lot 2 1495 Woolsey Heights Claremont Business Park F1A 		2/5/2019 11:31:03 AM
View Cimarron Hills Fire
2/4/2019 7:47:35 PM 		Please see attached fire department review letter. 2/4/2019 7:47:35 PM
View Colorado Springs Airport Advisory Commission
2/4/2019 5:07:01 PM 		Attached is a summary sheet with comments for the subject land use item that will be presented at the Airport Advisory Commission on Wednesday, February 27, 2019. 2/4/2019 5:07:01 PM
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
2/4/2019 9:55:01 AM 		Hey Lindsay,

I have finished with CSU's review for the subject application. There are no action items at this time and approval is recommended. Let me know if you need anything further from me.

Thanks,

Ryne 		2/4/2019 9:55:01 AM
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
2/1/2019 11:21:56 AM 		Regarding a request for a development plan for 2 warehouse buildings on parcel 54081-01-027, Enumerations has the following comments:

1. The addresses shown on the plan drawings match those assigned by Enumerations. If these buildings are to be multi-tenant, then any building plans submitted for review/permit should include secondary addressing which conforms to RBD guidelines.



Floodplain has no comment or objection.

Brent Johnson
Enumerations Plans Examiner
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
O: 719-327-2888 E: brent@pprbd.org W: pprbd.org 		2/1/2019 11:21:56 AM
Cherokee Metro Dist
1/28/2019 11:38:45 AM 		This development is within the service boundary of the Cherokee Metropolitan District. The developer is aware of the separate development review process required by the District. ~ Jonathon Smith 1/28/2019 11:38:45 AM
Central CO Conservation District
1/23/2019 11:59:15 AM 		The Central Colorado Conservation District board of supervisors have no comments at this time. 1/23/2019 11:59:15 AM
View EPC County Attorney's Office
1/22/2019 3:02:22 PM 		Comments to Detention Maintenance Agreement attached. 1/22/2019 3:02:22 PM