View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| View |
EPC Health Department
4/22/2020 11:57:09 AM |
4/22/2020 11:57:09 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Springs Planning & Community Development
4/17/2020 10:18:19 AM |
The City of Colorado Springs would like to provide these comments if they can still be accepted | 4/17/2020 10:18:19 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/7/2020 8:20:02 AM |
Traffic/Haul Redlines | 4/7/2020 8:20:02 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/7/2020 8:17:48 AM |
See attached for special use checklist. the legal description is not shown and graphically depicted on the plan. | 4/7/2020 8:17:48 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/7/2020 8:17:06 AM |
The setback requirements are 50 feet in the front, 30 on the sides, and 50 in the rear. Fences over 7 feet in height are considered structures and must meet the setback requirements for structures. Please revise the fence location to meet the setback. | 4/7/2020 8:17:06 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/7/2020 7:10:02 AM |
If the request is approved, staff anticipates a condition of approval regarding the paint color of the fence. Staff also anticipates conditions of approval precluding vehicles from being stacked on one another as well as specifically excluding any activities similar to a junk yard. |
4/7/2020 7:10:02 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/7/2020 6:37:38 AM |
Please also provide the El Paso County Mineral Certificate Form along with the affidavit. | 4/7/2020 6:37:38 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/7/2020 6:29:51 AM |
On the application you should have selected major special use. | 4/7/2020 6:29:51 AM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
4/3/2020 2:58:19 PM |
Regarding a request for approval of a special use for a Copart facility, Enumerations and Floodplain have no comments. Brent Johnson Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2888 E: brent@pprbd.org W: pprbd.org |
4/3/2020 2:58:19 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
4/2/2020 12:09:23 PM |
SWENT has no comments on this item. Jonathan Scherer by Chris Everhart |
4/2/2020 12:09:23 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
3/30/2020 3:47:03 PM |
Review 2 redline comments to the following document will be uploaded by the Project Manager: - Traffic Memo (Revise the document slot name from "Haul Route" to "Transportation Memorandum") Comments resolved on the following documents: - Letter of Intent. Reviewed by: Gilbert LaForce, PE gilbertlaforce@elpasoco.com |
3/30/2020 3:47:03 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
3/26/2020 12:43:04 PM |
1. Foreign Trade Zone Blvd right-of-way is within the City of Colorado Springs limits and the roadway is missing the top mat of asphalt and the bottom mat is in very poor condition. Therefore, this development is required to remove the existing asphalt and fully reconstruct the asphalt in Foreign Trade Zone Blvd adjacent to this development. Add a note to the Plot Plan drawing that states Foreign Trade Zone Blvd will be reconstructed to meet City of Colorado Springs standards. 2. Any damaged C&G adjacent to the proposed development will be removed and replaced. 3. The development will also require the installation of 5’ detached or 6’ attached sidewalk along Foreign Trade Zone Blvd adjacent to the development. The 5’ detached sidewalk will require at least a 7’ tree lawn area. Show and callout the required sidewalk on the Plot Plan drawing. 4. Drennan Road right-of-way is also with the City of Colorado Springs limits 5. Clearly identify where the City of Colorado Springs limits are located. 6. Add a note to the Plot Plan that states all the public improvements and construction plans along Foreign Trade Zone Blvd and Drennan Road will be reviewed, approved and inspected by the City of Colorado Springs Engineering Development Review Division. 7. All public improvements will be completed prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Patrick Morris Engineering Development Review Division City of Colorado Springs Patrick.morris@coloradosprings.gov 719-385-5075 |
3/26/2020 12:43:04 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Public Works
3/25/2020 2:24:22 PM |
Due to the poor condition of Foreign Trade Zone Blvd, a full reconstruction of the street using city standards will be required. Zaker Alazzeh, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager City of Colorado Springs (719) 385-5468 Zaker.Alazzeh@coloradosprings.gov |
3/25/2020 2:24:22 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Airport Advisory Commission
3/23/2020 2:38:39 PM |
Airport staff has no additional comments other than those already provided. | 3/23/2020 2:38:39 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
3/18/2020 8:33:30 AM |
Hey Nina, I have finished with my review for the subject application. CSU has no action items at this time and approval is recommended. Let me know if you need anything else from me. Thanks, Ryne |
3/18/2020 8:33:30 AM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
3/17/2020 8:13:33 AM |
3/17/2020 8:13:33 AM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
9/10/2019 5:53:10 PM |
9/10/2019 5:53:10 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
9/10/2019 11:25:38 AM |
LOI Redlines | 9/10/2019 11:25:38 AM |
|
USAFA Base Planner
9/9/2019 3:52:22 PM |
No comment from USAFA | 9/9/2019 3:52:22 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Fire Department
9/6/2019 8:06:35 AM |
Not in city limits nor CHFD jurisdiction. No comments. | 9/6/2019 8:06:35 AM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
9/5/2019 4:07:36 PM |
Review 1: No drainage comments with the special use application. Be advised that with the subsequent site development plan application drainage analysis is required. Specific submittal documents will be identified at that time. Redline comments to the Letter of Intent will be uploaded by the project manager. Reviewed by: Gilbert LaForce, PE gilbertlaforce@elpasoco.com |
9/5/2019 4:07:36 PM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
9/3/2019 10:06:30 AM |
Regarding a request for approval of a special use at 8655 Drennan Rd., Enumerations and Floodplain have no objections Brent Johnson Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2888 E: brent@pprbd.org W: pprbd.org |
9/3/2019 10:06:30 AM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
8/29/2019 11:50:02 AM |
8/29/2019 11:50:02 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Springs Airport Advisory Commission
8/28/2019 4:03:41 PM |
The attached land use review summary with comments was approved by the Airport Advisory Commission at the meeting held on August 28, 2019. | 8/28/2019 4:03:41 PM |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
8/27/2019 10:43:55 AM |
Hey Nina, I have finished with my review for the subject application. CSU has no action items at this time and approval is recommended. Thanks, Ryne |
8/27/2019 10:43:55 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
8/19/2019 4:19:07 PM |
Attached are CDOT's comment for this development proposal. | 8/19/2019 4:19:07 PM |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
8/19/2019 12:49:02 PM |
8/19/2019 12:49:02 PM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
8/19/2019 12:48:36 PM |
8/19/2019 12:48:36 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
9/10/2019 11:30:59 AM |
1. The property is not within a fire district. The applicant should consider annexation into a fire district or a formalized agreement for a fire district to serve this property in the event of an emergency. Fire protection provisions are tied to the following review criteria: The impact of the special use does not overburden or exceed the capacity of public facilities and services, or, in the alternative, the special use application demonstrates that it will provide adequate public facilities in a timely and efficient manner. Should fire protection not be provided, staff would nee to point out this deficiency in the staff report and at public hearing. If you have already established a mutual aid agreement, please provide a copy. 2. Please identify how water and sanitation will be provided. If by centralized service, please provide a will-serve letter. 3. Based upon the proposed use, there may be impacts to the County roadway system. Please provide a haul route. A traffic study will also further inform those impacts and will assist in determining that impacts are/can be mitigated properly. The resubmission request will be updated. 4. Should the request be approved, a site development plan will also be required. 5. You have filled out the incorrect application. As discussed at the EA meeting, this application will be elevated to a public hearing. Please fill out the type D application and resubmit. 6. The vicinity map does not show a major intersection in relation to the subject parcel. Please zoom out a bit to show a broader extent. 7. Staff highly recommends hosting a neighborhood meeting with those within the vicinity to let them know what is being proposed. Staff feels as though this will be advantageous to the applicant so that they may discover what concerns those in the area may have prior to the item being scheduled for a hearing. Staff recommends that you notify all those in the area, as the adjacent property owners are not residential and may not have the same concerns. 8. You have not provided a mineral right certification. Please view the mineral rights certification found in the special use packet, fill out, notarize, and resubmit. 9. The grayed version of the photo simulations provide a distorted view. Please provide versions without the shading. Photo #4 does not seem to show the full extent of the property but only the closest boundary. 10. The special use map checklist identifies the minimum amount of information that is to be provided. You have not included the boundary description of the subject parcel. Please add. There is a dashed line going through the property but it has not been identified what that dashed line represents. 11. Be aware that a fence over 7' in height is considered a structure that must meet all setback requirements and obtain a building permit. 12. Please provide a better graphic of what the fence will look like. A photograph of an example along with the fence detail may help staff determine if the fencing will be compatible with the surrounding area. 13. Your landscaping plan shows that you will be providing less landscaping than what is required. Section 6.2.2 allows the PCD Director to approve an alternative landscape plan. The PCD Director will not be supportive of an alterative landscaping plan that decreases the amount of landscaping required. As discussed at the EA, mitigation and screening will be a critical component in the review of this proposal. As discussed in the EA, staff recommends that the applicant provide more screening than what the LDC requires in Chapter 6 for permitted uses. Staff does not feel as though the proposed screening adequately addresses the potential visual/glare impacts from the large 80 acre storage area on surrounding properties due to there being a gentle slope to the parcel. General comment: staff appreciates you submitting a survey with all encumbrances identified in the title commitment as an additional document. |
9/10/2019 11:30:59 AM |
EDARP