View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
PCD Engineering Division
10/24/2019 3:05:08 PM |
Review 4: Comments are resolved on the traffic memo. Owner shall sign the Developer's Statement of the Traffic Memorandum and reupload. Reviewed by: Gilbert LaForce, PE gilbertlafoce@elpasoco.com |
10/24/2019 3:05:08 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/22/2019 6:05:13 PM |
All planning comments addressed. Thanks for the quick turnaround on the resubmittal of plans. Approval pending engineering comments addressed. | 10/22/2019 6:05:13 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/21/2019 9:09:02 PM |
Thanks for addressing the landscape comments. Just a couple more items to get this plan finalized for approval: I see that you revised the HC parking to provide the van accessible space on the site plan. The landscape plan still shows the old parking layout and all the sheets should match each other. Please revise. Site plan: One bay of parking has 16' length stalls proposed. These should be labeled compact on the site plan and also on the landscape plan so all sheets match each other. If parking is shown on other sheets, the layout should be consistent on all of them. |
10/21/2019 9:09:02 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
8/19/2019 9:25:58 AM |
Please re-upload the project application. When you revised the one sheet and uploaded it, it overrode the first application that you submitted with your initial project application so we only have one page. Please upload all pages of the application (includes signature page) for next submittal. | 8/19/2019 9:25:58 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
8/19/2019 9:22:47 AM |
Landscape Plan: Label the existing wood fence on the landscape plan and indicate the height of the fence. LDC 6.2.2(G)(2)(h)(iii): Landscaping only fulfills one requirement. Landscaping necessary to fulfill one requirement shall not be counted in fulfilling a different landscape requirement. LDC Section 6.2.2(E) Internal Landscaping: 5% of the total lot area shall be landscaped. A minimum of one tree is required for every 500 SF of required internal landscape area. Intent of internal landscape area is to provide relief from structures and hard surfaces through the use of plantings. Internal landscape shall be located accordance with the standards listed in LDC Section 6.2.2(E)(3)(b): Adjacent to building elevations which form the major public views of the building from adjacent roads and properties and to the users of the site; at all pedestrian entrances, within a plaza or courtyard between buildings or portions of buildings; in an area provided to separate building areas from parking areas; or in a similar location which substantially conforms to the purpose of the required internal landscape area. Label the areas and SF that you have counted toward internal landscaping on the plan. LDC Section 6.2.2(D)(2): Buffers are required along a lot, parcel, or tract line on the non-residential use property between the non-residential use and the residential use on the adjacent property. The required buffer should be a minimum of 15 feet wide and there should be one tree in the buffer for each 25 foot of common lot, parcel, or tract line. A minimum of 1/3 of the trees shall be evergreen. The existing trees along the 15' adjacent to residential use can be counted toward this requirement but you may need to add additional trees to meet the required number and the evergreen requirement. Show the proposed trees on the plan and also provide the requirements on the landscape calculation table under "Landscape Buffer and Screens" |
8/19/2019 9:22:47 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
8/19/2019 8:20:03 AM |
Site Development Plan: Ensure that ADA/Disabled Parking meets the dimensional standards from LDC Section 6.2.5(D)(2)(c). Specifically pedestrian access aisles for loading and unloading shall be a minimum of 5 feet wide and striped. At least one of every 8 required disabled parking spaces shall be designated "van accessible" and served by a pedestrian access aisle a minimum of 8 feet wide. Revise the site plan to show these features. | 8/19/2019 8:20:03 AM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
8/8/2019 11:08:16 AM |
Review 3: Incorrect document was uploaded for the Traffic Memo. Review 2 comments remain unresolved. Reviewed by: Gilbert LaForce, PE gilbertlaforce@elpasoco.com |
8/8/2019 11:08:16 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/26/2019 12:49:39 PM |
Site Development Plan | 7/26/2019 12:49:39 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/26/2019 12:48:43 PM |
Landscape plan | 7/26/2019 12:48:43 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
7/26/2019 11:16:24 AM |
Confirm that there is no proposed lighting in the letter of intent. | 7/26/2019 11:16:24 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
7/26/2019 10:45:01 AM |
Upload both pages of the application. Once a new submittal is made the previous one gets replaced. | 7/26/2019 10:45:01 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/25/2019 10:41:35 AM |
Review 2 comments to the traffic memo is attached. Include signatures on the resubmittal. |
7/25/2019 10:41:35 AM |
| View |
EPC Health Department
6/9/2019 8:08:35 PM |
6/9/2019 8:08:35 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
5/30/2019 4:18:09 PM |
Site Development Plan | 5/30/2019 4:18:09 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
5/30/2019 4:14:03 PM |
Confirm that there is no lighting being proposed | 5/30/2019 4:14:03 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
5/30/2019 4:12:46 PM |
Letter of intent | 5/30/2019 4:12:46 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
5/30/2019 4:12:15 PM |
Landscape Plan | 5/30/2019 4:12:15 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
5/30/2019 4:02:34 PM |
Elevations | 5/30/2019 4:02:34 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
5/30/2019 4:07:05 PM |
Floor Plans | 5/30/2019 4:07:05 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
5/30/2019 3:59:46 PM |
Application: Add parcel id number. Sign plan: An additional sign permit may be required for existing sign. |
5/30/2019 3:59:46 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
5/28/2019 10:44:07 AM |
Review 1 comments: 1. Add "PCD File No. PPR1921" at the bottom right of the site development plan sheet. 2. Identify the number of seats of the existing church in the letter of intent and site plan. 3. Per the Early Assistance meeting, a traffic memorandum is required. The traffic memo shall address the impact of the expansion on the adjacent road and provide recommendations. Contact the review engineer regarding the current number of seats. If the difference between existing and proposed number of seats is insignificant, the traffic memorandum may not be required. Reviewed by: Gilbert LaForce, P.E. gilbertlaforce@elpasoco.com |
5/28/2019 10:44:07 AM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
5/28/2019 7:20:42 AM |
Enumerations has no comment. | 5/28/2019 7:20:42 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
5/20/2019 10:48:27 AM |
See the attached memo for comments on PPR1921 (Apostolic Christian Church Addn). Let me know if there are any questions. | 5/20/2019 10:48:27 AM |
|
EPC County Attorney's Office
5/17/2019 3:29:29 PM |
No comment from the County Attorney's Office at this time. If it is determined that a Detention Maintenance Agreement is required, please resubmit for review. | 5/17/2019 3:29:29 PM | |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
5/14/2019 2:48:04 PM |
5/14/2019 2:48:04 PM |
EDARP