View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| View |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
1/15/2019 1:18:24 PM |
1/15/2019 1:18:24 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/2/2018 9:56:04 AM |
no further comments, letter of hearing will be sent on a future date | 10/2/2018 9:56:04 AM | |
| View |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
8/9/2018 3:16:18 PM |
8/9/2018 3:16:18 PM | |
| View |
Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)
8/4/2018 3:32:41 PM |
8/4/2018 3:32:41 PM | |
| View |
Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)
8/4/2018 3:32:27 PM |
8/4/2018 3:32:27 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
6/20/2018 7:23:05 AM |
6/20/2018 7:23:05 AM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
6/9/2018 4:04:19 PM |
6/9/2018 4:04:19 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
6/8/2018 2:38:55 PM |
Letter of Intent needs updating to reflect comments from PUD-18-003 or a separate Letter of Intent can be written for this rezoning application | 6/8/2018 2:38:55 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
6/7/2018 4:37:35 PM |
Review 2: No additional comments. See the PUD and SP application for comments to the traffic impact study. | 6/7/2018 4:37:35 PM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
5/29/2018 3:36:31 PM |
El Paso County Community Services/Parks Final Comments (Review #2) | 5/29/2018 3:36:31 PM |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
5/22/2018 4:08:15 PM |
Revised comments for P181, PUD183, SP181 | 5/22/2018 4:08:15 PM |
| View |
Northern EPC Coalition of Community Organizations, Inc. (NEPCO)
5/9/2018 3:54:06 PM |
5/9/2018 3:54:06 PM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
3/30/2018 11:49:00 AM |
El Paso County Community Services/Parks Preliminary Comments | 3/30/2018 11:49:00 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
3/29/2018 8:12:14 AM |
Revise the letter of intent to include discussion/justification in support of how the request meets the last two approval criteria for map amendment (rezoning): "The proposed land use or zone district is compatible with the existing and permitted land uses and zone districts in all directions; and The site is suitable for the intended use, including the ability to meet the standards as described in Chapter 5 of the Land Development Code, for the intended zone district." |
3/29/2018 8:12:14 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
3/29/2018 7:56:39 AM |
See attached copy of the Tri-Lakes Area Concept Plan referenced in the Letter of intent and discussed in Staff comments. | 3/29/2018 7:56:39 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
3/29/2018 7:54:32 AM |
See attached redline comments on the zoning map. | 3/29/2018 7:54:32 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
3/29/2018 7:53:29 AM |
See attached redline comments on the letter of intent. Please discuss with staff prior to making revisions to ensure the scope and intent of the comments are understood and properly addressed in the required revision. The land use recommendations of the West Cherry Creek state: “Development emphasis should be on rural and/or rural residential uses that focus on harmonizing with the natural rolling hills and open character of the area. This Sub-Area should remain primarily rural and/or rural residential with lot sizes averaging a minimum of five acres exclusive of roads and tracts not devoted to open space areas. Large lot clustering options, utilizing minimum 2 ½ acre lots should be considered only if there is strict adherence to this overall density approach and if adequate mechanisms for implementation are available.” Revise the discussion in the letter of intent referencing the recommendations of the plan in support of 2.5 acre zoning/densities/developments. The plan defines rural residential development as: “Land development and uses which are characterized by predominantly residential lots or parcels ranging from 2.5 to 10.0 acres in area. The areas are typically provided with a less-than-urban level of services (i.e. individual wells and septic systems, some unpaved roads) and allowing for only a limited amount of supporting local commercial, office or industrial 'development. Designation in the rural residential category does not automatically imply the acceptability of lots as small as 2.5 acres.” The area is depicted as low density which may is defined by 2.5- 10 acre densities; however, the plan states 2.5 acre densities are not inherently support 2.5 acre densities. Provide additional justification that includes an accounting of the 2.5 acre densities in the sub-area and densities and lots in the immediate development area. |
3/29/2018 7:53:29 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
3/26/2018 11:06:15 AM |
Review 1 redline comments to the Traffic Study is attached. | 3/26/2018 11:06:15 AM |
| View |
EPC Health Department
3/22/2018 10:46:51 AM |
3/22/2018 10:46:51 AM | |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
3/7/2018 2:55:23 PM |
3/7/2018 2:55:23 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
3/5/2018 11:23:12 AM |
3/5/2018 11:23:12 AM |
EDARP