View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
County Attorney - Development Review
2/13/2023 9:48:07 AM |
No comments at this time. | 2/13/2023 9:48:07 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
2/12/2023 1:46:27 PM |
No more comments. Staff is crafting the administratively approved 1041 permit. It will be posted shortly. | 2/12/2023 1:46:27 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
2/6/2023 2:28:00 PM |
Engineering Review Ver.2 Please see engineer comments on the following documents - Drainage Report MDDP. Updated Study not submitted. No change to previous comments on MDDP -Traffic Study not submitted or available. Unable to review current or future traffic impacts without TIS. -Stormwater review pending on applicability of future SWMP permits per new language added in V2 2.303.16. {Water Quality} Future Improvements or development will require the following documents based on SDP and applicability. Drainage Report Traffic Impact Study Grading & Erosion Control Plan & Checklist SWMP & Checklist ESQCP SDI PBMP Applicability Form MS4 Post Construction Detention / Water Quality Facility Documentation Form BMP O&M Agreement Construction Document (for public improvements) Thank you Edward Schoenheit, Engineer I E.P.C. Planning & Community Development 2880 International Circle Colorado Springs, CO. 80910 Office: 719.520.6813 Cell: 719.502.9659 https://planningdevelopment.elpasoco.com/ |
2/6/2023 2:28:00 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
12/28/2022 3:15:27 PM |
12/28/2022 3:15:27 PM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
11/11/2022 4:04:26 PM |
11/11/2022 4:04:26 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/31/2022 2:41:30 PM |
Letter of Intent Comments | 10/31/2022 2:41:30 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/31/2022 2:31:08 PM |
1041 Chapter 7.201 Review Comments- Please revise | 10/31/2022 2:31:08 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/31/2022 1:25:59 PM |
1041 Chapter 2.303 redlines. Please correct and provide missing information. | 10/31/2022 1:25:59 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
10/31/2022 1:16:14 PM |
GENERAL COMMENT APPLIES TO ENTIRE 1041: The 1041 sites the expansion; it does not approve construction ; it is not approving an airport master plan; nor is a 1041 a method for incorporating a project into the County Wide Master plan. The questions and responses should be holistic in answering as it relates to the expansion as a whole; a lot on info was inserted as filler from FAA guidelines that do not answer the questions. At the meeting Fall 2022, discussion of adding a school; fuel station; new hard surface runway, club were discussed but they are omitted from the responses- please clarify so this 1041 covers the complete future expansion. See redlines |
10/31/2022 1:16:14 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/31/2022 8:16:46 AM |
Parcel Map Enclosure 1 redlines | 10/31/2022 8:16:46 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
10/31/2022 1:20:56 PM |
1041 Application redlines (Please remove all language that discusses the request for the County to adopt the Meadowlake Airport Master Plan as a component of the El Paso County Master Plan throughout the application documents. A 1041 is site selection and expansion of airport NOT a master plan. This should bullet point the full expansion in addition to the information provided (Aviation school; paved run way; fuel station; restaurant-club; how many new hangars; plus turf runaway; and any other expansions that are on the wish list) |
10/31/2022 1:20:56 PM |
| View |
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
10/28/2022 1:53:50 PM |
Find our standard comments attached. | 10/28/2022 1:53:50 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
10/25/2022 6:40:47 PM |
Drainage Report MDDP | 10/25/2022 6:40:47 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
10/25/2022 6:41:54 PM |
Engineering Review Ver.1 Please see engineer comments on the following documents -1041 Documents Related to 2.303 (Items 1-23)_v1-To be uploaded by Planner/PM - Drainage Report MDDP Edward Schoenheit, Engineer I E.P.C. Planning & Community Development 2880 International Circle Colorado Springs, CO. 80910 Office: 719.520.6813 Cell: 719.502.9659 https://planningdevelopment.elpasoco.com/ |
10/25/2022 6:41:54 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Airport Advisory Commission
10/24/2022 10:43:26 AM |
This project is outside the Colorado Springs Airport Commercial Overlay and so no comments will be provided. | 10/24/2022 10:43:26 AM | |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
10/18/2022 9:07:15 AM |
Review 1: Since they are no construction plans or planned soil disturbances (at this point), EPC Stormwater has no comments on any of the uploaded documents at this time. Construction plans and ESQCP documents will be reviewed at the site development plan stage. Reviewed by: Glenn Reese, P.E. Stormwater Engineer II GlennReese@elpasoco.com |
10/18/2022 9:07:15 AM | |
|
Cherokee Metro Dist
10/17/2022 4:17:27 PM |
Does not affect Cherokee Metropolitan District | 10/17/2022 4:17:27 PM | |
|
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
10/17/2022 12:00:14 PM |
Mountain View Electric Association has no comment at this time. | 10/17/2022 12:00:14 PM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
10/17/2022 10:49:15 AM |
Documents available for our review for the site (38.951°, -104.5722°) include “Preliminary Engineering Geology and Surface Soils Evaluation” (Himmelreich, July 27, 2006). CGS concurs with the geologic interpretation, identification of hazards and constraints associated with the site geology, and the recommendation for site-specific soils and foundation investigations for each planned structure found in this report. As stated in the geologic hazard report, the site conditions are not unusual and the hazards and constraints associated with the site geology can be mitigated with commonly employed engineering methods, but these hazards and constraints must be evaluated for each planned structure. Site-specific soil and foundation investigations are essential for the mitigation design for the geologic conditions identified at the site. The Application for 1041 Permit page B-42 states “Future expansion of the airport, or simple development of airport property, at some future time, may require site specific surface and sub-surface drainage analysis.” The geologic hazard report relied on for this submittal states in numerous locations the need for “individual site analysis for each specific structure.” The need for individual site-specific analysis is stated for the identified geologic hazards associated with Shallow Groundwater and Subsurface Drainage, Expansive Soil and Bedrock, and Ground Subsidence. It would be prudent for the County to require, as recommended in the geologic hazard report, “site-specific soil and foundation investigations for each…structure.” This is necessary to design mitigation for the geologic conditions. This comment on page B-42 follows an excerpt from the “Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Program – Final Submittal” (Ground Engineering, November 20, 2014). • CGS recommends all geotechnical reports being relied on for mitigation of the geologic conditions associated with the airport expansion be submitted as part of our review (per requirements of County Code). For instance, the subsurface explorations conducted, boring logs, and laboratory testing along with the mitigation recommendations provided are part of the data required for a third-party review. The letter of intent states p.3 “As the need to expand the airport becomes apparent, actual construction plans will address specific County questions and concerns at that time.” • CGS recommends the County consider conditional approval of the application until such time as the specific County questions and concerns are addressed including the comments of this CGS review. • It would be prudent for the County to require, as recommended in the geologic hazard report, “site-specific soil and foundation investigations for each…structure.” This is necessary to design mitigation for the identified geologic conditions. Submitted 10/17/2022 by Jonathan R. Lovekin, Senior Engineering Geologist, Colorado Geological Survey: jlovekin@mines.edu |
10/17/2022 10:49:15 AM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
10/13/2022 10:45:55 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments - Please See Attached Documents (Administrative Comments - No PAB Endorsement Necessary) | 10/13/2022 10:45:55 AM |
| View |
Colorado Parks and Wildlife
10/12/2022 10:12:23 AM |
10/12/2022 10:12:23 AM | |
|
US Fish Wildlife, Ecological Svcs. (USDOI, Fish & Wildlife Svc.)
10/7/2022 3:16:48 PM |
Hello, Thank you for contacting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service). The Service has reviewed the Meadow Lake Airport Expansion project and has no concerns with this project resulting in impacts to species listed as candidate, proposed, threatened, or endangered. We appreciate your efforts to ensure the conservation of threatened and endangered species. Thank you for contacting us and please let me know if you have any further questions. Sincerely, Emily Berchem |
10/7/2022 3:16:48 PM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
10/7/2022 9:16:34 AM |
1. Contact Enumerations for any new structure that is proposed for address assignment. MMLA hanger/activities bldg., SRE Maintenance/storage bldg., Ground support equipment (GSE) storage-is this proposed to be a structure or carport like?, West-side Hanger-1 equipment storage shed, 1 private hanger, 2 private mobile homes (club house). Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org |
10/7/2022 9:16:34 AM | |
|
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
10/5/2022 5:45:36 PM |
The Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD does not have any comments at this time but respectfully reserves the right to comment on any future submittals. | 10/5/2022 5:45:36 PM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
10/5/2022 2:09:19 PM |
10/5/2022 2:09:19 PM | |
|
Peterson AFB
10/4/2022 11:30:34 AM |
Peterson SFB has no concerns with the proposed development at this time. | 10/4/2022 11:30:34 AM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
10/3/2022 11:19:30 AM |
No new streetnames requested with this submittal. No action for E911 at this time. Thank you. Justin. |
10/3/2022 11:19:30 AM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
9/26/2022 1:24:24 PM |
no work shown in the floodplain, no comment | 9/26/2022 1:24:24 PM |
EDARP