Submit Public Comment
Project
- File Number
- AL261
- Project Name
- 10765 KINCH CT Stealth Tower
- Description
- New stealth tower in the rr-5 zone district, special use and SDP required. Tower designed to look like tree
- Applicant
- Tower Ventures
- Project Manager
- Kylie Bagley
- Status
- Active
| Comment by | Comment | |
|---|---|---|
|
OPPOSE
Name: Robert and Margene Horne Date: 2/12/2026 3:41:53 PM |
We oppose this project completely. We have lived here close to 40 years and we do not need a cell phone tower. The damage to the land will again displace our wildlife, wildflowers and small animals. The trees in the cell phone area are easily 100 to over 200 years in existence! We do not want to destroy these trees for technology. Currently we have excellent and adequate cell phone coverage for many years, there is no need for another tower! |
|
|
OPPOSE
Name: Matt Powell Date: 2/12/2026 1:25:59 PM |
We bought our 5-acre lot from Paul and Amy Kinch in October 2023. We were unaware of the tower until January 2025 after speaking with a neighbor. No disclosures were provided during the sale, even though Amy signed the lease in 2022. On May 7, 2024, the county mailed notices to neighboring property owners but failed to include us, later admitting by email in 2025 that we should have been notified and it was their mistake we weren’t on the list. We began building our home in August 2024. We would never have purchased or built on this property had the tower been properly disclosed or had we received required notice. These procedural issues raise serious concerns that may have legal implications. We also oppose it for health, safety, and the significant visual impact above the tree line from our home. | |
| View |
OPPOSE
Name: Tom Sauer Date: 2/10/2026 2:33:45 PM |
Zoomed out view without tower |
| View |
OPPOSE
Name: Tom Sauer Date: 2/10/2026 2:33:22 PM |
Zoomed out view with Tower |
| View |
OPPOSE
Name: Tom Sauer Date: 2/10/2026 2:33:00 PM |
View 4 of 4 |
| View |
OPPOSE
Name: Tom Sauer Date: 2/10/2026 2:32:29 PM |
View 3 of 4 |
| View |
OPPOSE
Name: Tom Sauer Date: 2/10/2026 2:27:22 PM |
View 2 of 4 |
| View |
OPPOSE
Name: Tom Sauer Date: 2/10/2026 2:26:58 PM |
View 1 of 4 |
| View |
OPPOSE
Name: Tom Sauer Date: 2/10/2026 2:25:10 PM |
|
| View |
OPPOSE
Name: Kathy Offutt & Clag Offutt Date: 2/5/2026 10:42:04 AM |
|
| View |
OPPOSE
Name: Dean and Dawn Venezia Date: 2/5/2026 10:41:42 AM |
|
|
OPPOSE
Name: Alisa Werner Date: 2/5/2026 7:48:43 AM |
In my initial comment I forgot to add that as a cancer survivor I do not want consistent low level radiation exposure from the tower near our house. | |
|
OPPOSE
Name: Alisa Werner Date: 2/4/2026 8:31:14 PM |
As an owner and resident of a neighboring property to the project at 10765 Kinch Ct.Parcel No. 6224004020, I am strongly opposed to this project. Over the past 7 years we have been inundated with construction, noise, light pollution, and the horrendous re configuring of our mailboxes that are now dangerously located in the center of a four way stop to accommodate the development in our area. We in no way approve of another project and visual disruption to our area and property. | |
|
OPPOSE
Name: Danielle Dowling Date: 2/4/2026 8:37:04 AM |
This project was adamantly opposed by neighboring families, and the solution appears to be to just close that file to remove the opposition and allow these folks to start a clean new application that does not have all of our opposition statements. Please make sure to take all of the previous comments and concerns into account when reviewing this project. Our opposition has not changed even though the file number and project manager has. We have a beautiful property in Black Forest that will be severely impacted by this cell tower, as we are the adjoining property. A cell tower in this area is completely unnecessary and only for the profit of those don't even live here. I also have a child in the home to worry about. The health risks of these towers are extremely concerning, especially for children. This application needs to be shut down permanently or moved to a property that Amy Kinch actually owns. Please protect our beautiful area and the families that call it home | |
| View |
OPPOSE
Name: Danielle Riker Date: 2/2/2026 8:13:23 PM |
EDARP