View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Falcon Fire Protection District
3/25/2020 12:53:48 PM |
Falcon Fire District supports this rezone request. | 3/25/2020 12:53:48 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
3/17/2020 5:13:14 PM |
No further comments, scheduling for PC for 4/7/2020 | 3/17/2020 5:13:14 PM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
3/17/2020 12:47:05 PM |
Review 3: Engineering comments have been resolved. The project manager will upload the TIS when it has been accepted by the ECM Administrator. reviewed by: Daniel Torres danieltorres@elpasoco.com |
3/17/2020 12:47:05 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
2/10/2020 9:41:39 AM |
TIS_V3, See redlines attached | 2/10/2020 9:41:39 AM |
|
PCD Project Manager
2/10/2020 9:40:21 AM |
See comments from engineering in regards to the TIS, adjust, and resubmit with signatures. Cannot schedule for public hearing until the TIS issues are resolved with engineering. |
2/10/2020 9:40:21 AM | |
|
PCD Engineering Division
2/6/2020 7:37:24 AM |
Review 2 comments on the following documents will be uploaded by the project manager: -Traffic Study Please provide signed engineering documents for approval. reviewed by: Daniel Torres danieltorres@elpasoco.com |
2/6/2020 7:37:24 AM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
1/29/2020 12:36:32 PM |
1/29/2020 12:36:32 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/4/2019 12:45:37 PM |
Summary of comments, see attached | 12/4/2019 12:45:37 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/4/2019 12:45:17 PM |
Traffic Impact Study, see redlines | 12/4/2019 12:45:17 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
11/25/2019 3:59:26 PM |
Review 1 comments on the following documents will be uploaded by the project manager: -Traffic Study reviewed by: Daniel Torres danieltorres@elpasoco.com |
11/25/2019 3:59:26 PM | |
|
County Attorney - Development Review
11/21/2019 10:41:43 AM |
No comments from County Attorney's Office at this time. | 11/21/2019 10:41:43 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Water
11/21/2019 10:30:48 AM |
No County Attorney water review required for zoning actions. | 11/21/2019 10:30:48 AM | |
|
Woodmen Hills Metro
11/20/2019 4:02:47 PM |
Woodmen Hills Metropolitan District has no objection to the zoning change. | 11/20/2019 4:02:47 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Airport Advisory Commission
11/14/2019 12:43:40 PM |
It appears that this land use item is outside of the extents of the Commercial Airport Overlay District and jurisdiction of the Airport and Airport Advisory Commission to provide comments on this item. | 11/14/2019 12:43:40 PM | |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
11/12/2019 2:30:30 PM |
11/12/2019 2:30:30 PM | |
|
Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD
11/12/2019 12:21:54 PM |
The Upper Black Squirrel Creek GWMD does not have any comments at this time. | 11/12/2019 12:21:54 PM | |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities, Dev, Svc.(includes water resources)
11/5/2019 10:23:13 AM |
Hey Gabe, I have finished with my review for the subject application. There are no action items and approval is recommended. Let me know if you need anything further me. Thanks, Ryne |
11/5/2019 10:23:13 AM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
10/31/2019 12:56:53 PM |
10/31/2019 12:56:53 PM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
10/31/2019 11:26:15 AM |
El Paso County Community Services / Parks Final Comments, Review #2 - Please See Attached Documents (Administrative submittal only - no PAB endorsement necessary) | 10/31/2019 11:26:15 AM |
|
Colorado Springs Planning & Community Development
10/30/2019 10:20:34 AM |
The Colorado Springs Comprehensive Planning Division has no formal comment, although from a general planning perspective, I would note that with these submittal materials the source of water and sewer service and capacity is not addressed. Similarly, there is no generalized access plan/concept provided with this submittal to support rezoning of the entire 57 acres to a traditional commercial zone which is comparatively the size of the entire Citadel Crossing shopping center. Not being familiar with the details of the CR zone district (i.e. whether and to what extent non commercial uses could be accommodated or even required on parts of this site), I'd also ask whether PUD zoning might not be a more logical choice. | 10/30/2019 10:20:34 AM |
EDARP