View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
EPC Health Department
7/25/2019 5:22:38 PM |
Please see both sets of attached comments. | 7/25/2019 5:22:38 PM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
7/25/2019 5:20:46 PM |
7/25/2019 5:20:46 PM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
7/25/2019 5:20:00 PM |
7/25/2019 5:20:00 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
7/15/2019 11:37:35 AM |
Additional engineering comments remain, there will be a re-review fee. | 7/15/2019 11:37:35 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/15/2019 7:49:14 AM |
Review 6: SDI redlines. | 7/15/2019 7:49:14 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/15/2019 7:48:17 AM |
Review 6: SWMP redlines. See the back of report for markup summary. | 7/15/2019 7:48:17 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/15/2019 7:47:44 AM |
Review 6: Grading and Erosion Control Plan redlines. See the back of plans for markup summary. | 7/15/2019 7:47:44 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/15/2019 7:47:00 AM |
Review 6: Drainage Report redlines. See the back of report for markup summary. | 7/15/2019 7:47:00 AM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
7/11/2019 10:55:54 AM |
Review 6 comments: * SWMP: Pages 6 and 7 of the report is missing. Unable to verify if item 21 of the SWMP checklist (attached) has been addressed. Unresolved. Inform staff where in the SWMP item 21 was addressed. If it was not addressed then insert the following sentence at the end of the Owner Inspection and Maintenance of Constructed BMPs section of the SWMP (page 6): "Revisions shall be annotated on plan and initialed and dated by the Stormwater and EPC inspector." * Deviation Request for access onto an arterial road is pending with the PCD Engineering Manager. Any comments will be forwarded separately or if approved the deviation will be uploaded by the project manager. - Unresolved. Upload the revised deviation request. Comments were emailed directly to the traffic engineer on 6/19/2019. Comments emailed were: "This deviation has not been signed by the owner. Because of that, please have Jeff H. remove the check mark he has placed beside the section that is stating that a revision to the standard is required. No revision to the standards is required nor is one proposed. The justification can also be removed. Please have the owner sign and resubmit for approval." Redline comments on the following documents will be upload individually. * Drainage Report * Grading and Erosion Control Plan * Resubmit the SDI worksheet to match the current pond design * SWMP No additional comments on the following documents: - Site Plan - Financial Assurance Estimate. - Drainage Map - Street Construction Plans Reviewed by: Gilbert LaForce, P.E. gilbertlaforce@elpasoco.com |
7/11/2019 10:55:54 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/12/2019 5:37:23 PM |
Review 5 Drainage Report | 6/12/2019 5:37:23 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/12/2019 5:35:45 PM |
Review 5 Drainage Map | 6/12/2019 5:35:45 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/12/2019 5:35:25 PM |
Review 5 Street Construction Plans | 6/12/2019 5:35:25 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/12/2019 5:34:55 PM |
Review 5 SDI Worksheet | 6/12/2019 5:34:55 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/12/2019 5:34:34 PM |
Review 5 GEC | 6/12/2019 5:34:34 PM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
6/12/2019 5:34:13 PM |
Review 5 Site Plan | 6/12/2019 5:34:13 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
6/12/2019 5:33:28 PM |
Review 5 comments: - SWMP: Pages 6 and 7 of the report is missing. Unable to verify if item 21 of the SWMP checklist has been addressed. Item 8 of the SWMP checklist has been resolved. - Deviation Request for access onto an arterial road is pending with the PCD Engineering Manager. Any comments will be forwarded separately or if approved the deviation will be uploaded by the project manager. - Financial Assurance Estimate. Update based on any changes made to the plans. Redline comments on the following documents will be upload individually. - Site Plan - Drainage Report - Grading and Erosion Control Plan - Resubmit the SDI worksheet to match the current pond design - Street Construction Plans - Drainage Map No additional comments on the following documents: - O&M - TIS - MS4 Post Construction Form Reviewed by: Gilbert LaForce, P.E. gilbertlaforce@elpasoco.com |
6/12/2019 5:33:28 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
6/1/2019 8:36:21 AM |
Additional redlines may be added by the PCD Engineering Division. | 6/1/2019 8:36:21 AM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
3/19/2019 5:27:18 PM |
FAE Redlines | 3/19/2019 5:27:18 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
3/19/2019 5:26:58 PM |
Drainage Redlines | 3/19/2019 5:26:58 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
3/19/2019 5:26:37 PM |
O&M Redlines | 3/19/2019 5:26:37 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
3/19/2019 8:34:08 AM |
FAS Redlines | 3/19/2019 8:34:08 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
3/19/2019 8:33:39 AM |
GEC Redlines | 3/19/2019 8:33:39 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
3/18/2019 8:37:15 AM |
Review 4 comments on the following documents will be uploaded by the Project Manager: - O&M. (Review 1 and review 2 comments are not addressed) - See the attached checklist for unresolved items on the SWMP. (Comments are not addressed. The only change in the document were the dates.). - TIS (Review 3 comments uploaded on 12/11/18 are not addressed. This is the same document from the 3rd review). - Site Plan (Review 3 comments uploaded on 12/11/18 are not addressed.) - Drainage Report (Note: Drainage concept revised so no longer a pond-in-a-series) - Grading and Erosion Control Plan - Street Construction Plans (Review 3 comments uploaded on 12/11/18 are not addessed) - Financial Assurance Estimate - Resubmit the SDI worksheet to match the current pond design ** A majority of comments were unresolved. Similar to the previous review due to the extent and nature of comments, new comments may be generated in the resubmittal Comments resolved on the following documents: - MS4 Post Construction Form. |
3/18/2019 8:37:15 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/11/2018 12:07:41 PM |
FAS Redlines | 12/11/2018 12:07:41 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/11/2018 12:07:26 PM |
Construction Plan Redlines | 12/11/2018 12:07:26 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/11/2018 12:07:05 PM |
GEC Redlines | 12/11/2018 12:07:05 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/11/2018 12:06:46 PM |
Drainage Redlines | 12/11/2018 12:06:46 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/11/2018 12:06:20 PM |
TIS Redlines | 12/11/2018 12:06:20 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/11/2018 12:05:58 PM |
MS4 Redlines | 12/11/2018 12:05:58 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
12/11/2018 12:05:41 PM |
Site Development Redlines | 12/11/2018 12:05:41 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
12/11/2018 12:05:01 PM |
1. Please add the ADA route for each ADA space and parking area. 2. NOTE: There is an additional fee for a resubmittal beyond the third review listed in our fee sheet of $1837. The director may charge a fee for resubmittal for this project if not all outstanding comments are addressed with the next submission. 3. Please add parking detail chart as discussed in review meeting. Due to engineering comments the design may need to be amended. Additional new comments may be provided depending upon the redesign. |
12/11/2018 12:05:01 PM | |
| View |
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
12/6/2018 11:51:02 AM |
12/6/2018 11:51:02 AM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
12/6/2018 9:46:58 AM |
Due to the extent and nature of comments, new comments may be generated in the resubmittal. Review 3 comments on the following documents will be uploaded by the Project Manager: - Unresolved. O&M. (The uploaded document is the same document on the second review - see review 2 comments) - Unresolved. EPC MS4 Post Construction Form. (Remove the porous pavement since it's been removed from the current design) - TIS - Site Plan - Drainage Report - Grading and Erosion Control Plan - Street Construction Plans - Financial Assurance Estimate (will be reviewed once street construction plans are submitted) - See the attached checklist for unresolved items on the SWMP. (Applicant did not provide an updated report). Comments resolved on the following documents: - Geotech Report (Memo for detention facility foundation/embankment recommendation added in the drainage report appendix) |
12/6/2018 9:46:58 AM |
|
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
11/7/2018 11:03:20 AM |
CDOT request the review of a Traffic Impact Study for impacts related to the intersection of SH24 and Judge Orr Road. CDOT request the review of a drainage study or memo. |
11/7/2018 11:03:20 AM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
8/9/2018 3:27:45 PM |
Enumerations has the following comments: 1. Pages DP 4 & DP 5 are not matching up when printed out and pasted together. Please submit a 100 scale larger copy, on one sheet to this department in person for addressing purposes. 2. No further comments at this time. |
8/9/2018 3:27:45 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
8/9/2018 12:37:23 PM |
Site Development Redline | 8/9/2018 12:37:23 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
8/9/2018 12:36:48 PM |
GEC Redline | 8/9/2018 12:36:48 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
8/9/2018 12:36:27 PM |
Drainage Redline | 8/9/2018 12:36:27 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
8/9/2018 12:36:02 PM |
TIS Redline | 8/9/2018 12:36:02 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
8/9/2018 12:35:38 PM |
O&M Redline | 8/9/2018 12:35:38 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
8/9/2018 5:07:36 PM |
Current Planning NOTE: There is an additional fee for a resubmittal beyond the third review listed in our fee sheet of $1837. The director may charge a fee for resubmittal for this project if not all outstanding comments are addressed with the next submission. NOTE: Many of the previous comments have not been addressed. This project was submitted over 2 years ago and staff has reviewed 5 rounds of resubmissions to date. Staff recommends a meeting to discuss the comments if the applicant does not understand them, or is not sure how to resolve the comments. Please review all redline drawings in addition to the written comments below to ensure all comments are addressed. 1. Resolved 2. Resolved 3. Resolved. 4. Identify the areas calculated as open/recreational space with an appropriate symbol or designator. Response provided indicates County clarification needed. Section 4.2.5 RVP, Recreational Vehicle Park paragraph 10 requires that 8% of the total area of a recreational vehicle park shall be set aside as open space for park users. This area may not include area reserved for service facilities, setbacks or other non-usable areas. The plan indicates 13.9 acres of open space. The comment is clear. Designate where the open space is located. The detention pond and septic field, being areas reserved for service facilities shall not be included in this calculation. The open space area has been reduced and appears to not include the unusable area, but no specific open space/park area has been shown that is clearly usable and intended for the use of those staying in the park. Revise the letter of intent accordingly. 5. Resolved 6. Resolved. 7. Resolved 8. Resolved 9. Pending final comment from EPC Health. 10. Resolved. 11. Resolved 12. Resolved Additional comments: 13. Identify any proposed lighting associated with the RVP Paragraph 6 of Section 4.2.8 states “Road and sidewalks shall be adequately lighted, in conformance with Chapter 6…” See Section 6.2.3 (Page 6-16) for lighting requirements. See additional redlines. No lighting along sidewalk. No lighting in the RV storage area is shown for security. 14. Resolved 15. Resolved. 16. Resolved. 17. Resolved. 18. Resolved 19. Pending review 20. Provide a comment response letter with the next submittal. New additional comments 21. Table 4.6 (Page 4-14) clearly indicates that the required setbacks from RV to RV is 20 feet. See additional redlines. No scale was provided to confirm setback. 22. Resolved 23. Resolved |
8/9/2018 5:07:36 PM | |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
8/8/2018 7:37:00 PM |
Review 2 comments on the following documents will be uploaded by the Project Manager: * O&M * EPC MS4 Post Construction Form (Update the owner name and remove the porous pavement since it's been removed from the current design) * TIS * Site Plan * Geotech report (Per Chapter 11 Section 11.3.3 of the El Paso County Drainage Criteria Manual recommendations for the foundation preparation and embankment construction shall be submitted with the complete design analysis for all permanent detention facilities. This may be submitted as an addendum) * Drainage Report * Grading and Erosion Control Plan * Financial Assurance Estimate (will be reviewed once street construction plans are submitted) * See the attached checklist for unresolved items on the SWMP. * Based on the number of comments, additional comments may be generated with the resubmittal. * Street and roundabout construction plan is required. Comments resolved on the following documents: - ESQCP - SDI worksheet |
8/8/2018 7:37:00 PM |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:46:36 PM |
8/6/2018 2:46:36 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:46:15 PM |
8/6/2018 2:46:15 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:46:03 PM |
8/6/2018 2:46:03 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:45:45 PM |
8/6/2018 2:45:45 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:45:30 PM |
8/6/2018 2:45:30 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:45:18 PM |
8/6/2018 2:45:18 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:44:55 PM |
8/6/2018 2:44:55 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:44:41 PM |
8/6/2018 2:44:41 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:44:29 PM |
8/6/2018 2:44:29 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:44:17 PM |
8/6/2018 2:44:17 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:44:00 PM |
8/6/2018 2:44:00 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:43:49 PM |
8/6/2018 2:43:49 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:43:35 PM |
8/6/2018 2:43:35 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:43:21 PM |
8/6/2018 2:43:21 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:43:09 PM |
8/6/2018 2:43:09 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:42:58 PM |
8/6/2018 2:42:58 PM | |
| View |
EPC Code Enforcement
8/6/2018 2:42:46 PM |
8/6/2018 2:42:46 PM | |
|
Falcon Fire Protection District
8/1/2018 11:40:14 AM |
Falcon Fire has no new comments for this project. | 8/1/2018 11:40:14 AM | |
|
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
7/31/2018 1:25:59 PM |
Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. Cathy Mountain View Electric Association, Inc. |
7/31/2018 1:25:59 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/3/2018 11:40:19 AM |
Pond Agreement Redlines | 7/3/2018 11:40:19 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/3/2018 11:39:58 AM |
ESQCP Redlines | 7/3/2018 11:39:58 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/3/2018 11:39:40 AM |
O&M Redlines | 7/3/2018 11:39:40 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/3/2018 11:39:23 AM |
SDI Redlines | 7/3/2018 11:39:23 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/3/2018 11:39:03 AM |
SWMP Redlines | 7/3/2018 11:39:03 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/3/2018 11:38:42 AM |
Site Development Redlines | 7/3/2018 11:38:42 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/3/2018 11:38:21 AM |
Soils & Geo Redlines | 7/3/2018 11:38:21 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/3/2018 11:38:00 AM |
Drainage Redlines | 7/3/2018 11:38:00 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/3/2018 11:37:38 AM |
GEC Redlines | 7/3/2018 11:37:38 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
7/3/2018 11:36:55 AM |
FAS Redlines | 7/3/2018 11:36:55 AM |
| View |
PCD Engineering Division
7/2/2018 5:39:22 PM |
FYI: Per discussions/meetings the site plan is expected to be significantly revised with the resubmittal; therefore, review 1 is not a detailed review of the plan set. Additional comments will be generated with the resubmittal. * Based on the meeting with the applicant on June 21, 2018, the intent is to build the private access road to County standards with the intent that when this property and the adjacent property is subdivided in the future, the access road will be dedicated to the County for ownership and maintenance. Additionally, the current configuration plans for a shared access with the proposed PUD of the adjacent property. Therefore, a traffic impact study is required with this application. The TIS shall provide a recommendation for the roadway classification that the private access road must be designed and built to. Additionally, the TIS must provide a design analysis of the roundabout configuration to ensure it meets county standards. * Review 1 comments on the following documents will be uploaded by the Project Manager: - Pond Maintenance Agreement - ESQCP - O&M - EPC MS4 Post Construction Form - SDI - SWMP (Also see the attached checklist for unresolved items) - Site Plan - Geotech report - Drainage Report - Grading and Erosion Control Plan - Financial Assurance Estimate * Upload a copy of the State Non-jurisdictional Dam form. http://water.state.co.us/DWRIPub/Documents/ds_impound.pdf |
7/2/2018 5:39:22 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
6/18/2018 12:31:50 PM |
MDT Letter | 6/18/2018 12:31:50 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
6/18/2018 12:31:00 PM |
Site Development Redlines | 6/18/2018 12:31:00 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
6/18/2018 12:28:17 PM |
Additional comments from PCD Engineering are anticipated. | 6/18/2018 12:28:17 PM | |
| View |
Falcon Fire Protection District
6/13/2018 2:03:36 PM |
6/13/2018 2:03:36 PM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
6/12/2018 3:51:54 PM |
Regarding a request for approval of a development plan for an RV park and storage facility at 14010 Judge Orr Rd., Enumerations has the following comments: 1. Many of the secondary structures proposed for this development such as laundry/bathroom facilities, RV storage canopies, convenience store, etc. will require separate addresses and permits. Provide a copy of this development plan to Enumerations with the locations of all structures which will require building permits under the Regional Building Code highlighted so that these addresses can be established ahead of time to be used for submitting plans. 2. Each electricity and water pedestal will need to be associated with a space number. Enumerations does not assign space numbers. 3. Typically, in RV parks such as this, the internal drive aisles are not named roads and no road names are shown, however, the developer should verify with Justin Annan (jannan@elpasoteller911.org) with the 911 authority that no internal road names are required. Floodplain has the following comments: 1. As noted on the development plan, there is floodplain area in the north-east corner of this development. No structures are shown on the plan as being proposed for this area. If, however, the plan changes and structures are proposed within this floodplain area, the developer should contact Floodplain Administrator Keith Curtis (keith@pprbd.org, 719-327-2898) to discuss what is allowed in this floodplain area. Brent Johnson Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2888 E: brent@pprbd.org W: pprbd.org |
6/12/2018 3:51:54 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
6/12/2018 9:04:57 AM |
Subdivision The revised plan shows separate parcels less than 35 acres in size. Per the Colorado State Statute requirements this requires subdivision approval by the BoCC. |
6/12/2018 9:04:57 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
6/12/2018 7:39:47 AM |
Sign No sign plan was provided. Please provide a sign plan so that we may determine if the proposed signage meets the LDC requirements. Elevation No elevation drawings were provided. Please submit elevation drawing. Letter of Intent The letter of intent is requesting a rezoning, this is an application for a site development plan. Please revise. If any alternatives are being requested they should be included in the letter of intent. If any phasing plan is requested, it should be outlined in the letter of intent. Lighting The lighting plan does not include the RV storage area. It appears as though only building mount lighting is proposed and that there will be no lighting in common areas, in the private drives, or elsewhere. Please confirm. |
6/12/2018 7:39:47 AM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
6/12/2018 7:31:25 AM |
Application 1. Please select the application type as site development plan and not preliminary plan. 2. The number of spaces may be amended to accommodate the setback and open space requirements. Please update all application documents to reflect this, to include the application. |
6/12/2018 7:31:25 AM | |
| View |
EPC Health Department
6/10/2018 9:38:14 PM |
6/10/2018 9:38:14 PM | |
|
PCD Project Manager
6/7/2018 9:08:31 AM |
General 1. The park must comply with all RVP standards. 2. All necessary improvements (public and private) must be installed. Per 4.2.5.C.6, sidewalks are required. 3. A traffic study was previously submitted but is no longer included. Please upload a copy of the traffic study under "additional documents" 4. An additional fee will be charged for all future additional reviews. |
6/7/2018 9:08:31 AM | |
| View |
Mountain View Electric Association, Inc.
5/30/2018 4:43:33 PM |
5/30/2018 4:43:33 PM |
EDARP