EDARP
Project Review Comments
- Project Name
- New Breed Ranch Filing No. 3
- Description
- Location
- Parcels
- 6210000002 6210000002
- Applicant
-
New Breed Ranch Inc.
Jerome Hannigan ( hannigan.and.assoc@gmail.com )
(719) 481-8292 Jerome Hannigan ( hannigan.and.assoc@gmail.com )
(719) 481-8292 - EA Number
- EA2214
- File Number
- SF247
- Project Manager
- Joe Letke
- Status
- Active
- Created
- 2/15/2022 9:38:46 AM
View: Project Documents
| Agency | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
EPC Sheriff's Department
5/15/2024 2:53:37 PM |
No Issues EPSO | 5/15/2024 2:53:37 PM | |
| View |
Parks Advisory Board
5/10/2024 8:32:44 AM |
El Paso County Parks and Community Services Department, Final Comments - Please See Attached Documents (Endorsed by the Park Advisory Board on 05/08/2024) | 5/10/2024 8:32:44 AM |
| View |
County Attorney - Development Review
4/24/2024 1:46:47 PM |
Requested edits to SIA attached. | 4/24/2024 1:46:47 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/24/2024 7:35:09 AM |
GEC Checklist | 4/24/2024 7:35:09 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/24/2024 7:34:11 AM |
Erosion and Stormwater Quality Control Permit (ESQCP) | 4/24/2024 7:34:11 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/24/2024 7:33:32 AM |
PBMP Applicability Form | 4/24/2024 7:33:32 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/24/2024 7:32:50 AM |
SWMP | 4/24/2024 7:32:50 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/24/2024 7:32:20 AM |
SWMP Checklist | 4/24/2024 7:32:20 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/24/2024 7:31:34 AM |
Drainage Report | 4/24/2024 7:31:34 AM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/23/2024 5:28:40 PM |
Grading and Erosion Control Plan | 4/23/2024 5:28:40 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/23/2024 5:27:49 PM |
Construction Drawings | 4/23/2024 5:27:49 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/23/2024 5:27:31 PM |
Finacial Assurance Forms | 4/23/2024 5:27:31 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/23/2024 5:27:10 PM |
Traffic Memo | 4/23/2024 5:27:10 PM |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/23/2024 5:26:47 PM |
Final Plat Drawings | 4/23/2024 5:26:47 PM |
|
PCD Engineering Division
4/23/2024 5:10:36 PM |
Review 1 comments on the following documents will be uploaded by the project manager: -CD's -FDR -Final Plat -FAE -GEC -TIS reviewed by: Hao Vo, Engineer II haovo@elpasoco.com Daniel Torres danieltorres@elpasoco.com |
4/23/2024 5:10:36 PM | |
| View |
PCD Project Manager
4/23/2024 4:50:10 PM |
Water Resources Report | 4/23/2024 4:50:10 PM |
|
PCD Project Manager
4/23/2024 4:49:34 PM |
Planning has comments on the following documents: -Letter of Intent (one comment: please add County File No. SF247) -Final Plat Drawings -Water Resources Report Joe Letke Planner II 719-520-7964 |
4/23/2024 4:49:34 PM | |
|
Colorado Geological Survey
4/23/2024 9:42:28 AM |
With this referral, we received the Final Plat (Hannigan and Associates, Inc., 3/30/2024), Letter of Intent (Hannigan and Associates, Inc., 3/23/2024), Soil and Geology Study and Wastewater Study (Rocky Mountain Group (RMG), 5/23/2023), and other documents. The site does not contain steep slopes or flood hazards, nor is it exposed to any geologic hazards that preclude the proposed 34.7-acre parcel. RMG’s characterization of the geologic hazards associated with the site is valid. CGS, therefore, has no objection to the approval of the final plat as proposed. We offer the following comments: As page 16 of RMG’s report states, “The most significant geologic constraints to development recognized at this site are potentially expansive soils and the potential for seasonal groundwater.” RMG did not encounter groundwater in the test holes nor observed water flowing in the drainageway during their investigation. CGS agrees with RMG that seasonally wet areas (drainageway in eastern portion of site) should be avoided by structures and OWTS. Additionally, these areas can be associated with accelerated erosion requiring setbacks. Once the residential structure locations have been identified and prior to building permit application, a site-specific geotechnical investigation consisting of drilling, sampling, lab testing, and analysis will be needed to characterize soil and bedrock engineering properties such as density, strength, water content, and swell/consolidation potential; identify potentially moisture-sensitive (expansive and collapsible) soils and expansive claystone bedrock; determine depths to groundwater and bedrock; verify the feasibility of a full-depth basement, if planned; and provide earthwork, foundation, floor system, surface and subsurface drainage, and pavement recommendations for design purposes. Submitted 4/23/2024 by Amy Crandall, Engineering Geologist, Colorado Geological Survey (303-384-2632 or acrandall@mines.edu) |
4/23/2024 9:42:28 AM | |
| View |
EPC Parks Department
4/19/2024 8:34:02 AM |
El Paso County Parks and Community Services Department, Preliminary Comments - Please See Attached Documents (To be presented to the El Paso County Park Advisory Board for endorsement on May 8, 2024) | 4/19/2024 8:34:02 AM |
|
EPC Stormwater Review
4/22/2024 3:56:02 PM |
Review 1: EPC DPW Stormwater comments have been provided (in orange text boxes) on the following uploaded documents (to be uploaded by the Project Manager): - Drainage Report - ESQCP - Final Plat - FAE - GEC Plan - GEC Checklist - PBMP Applicability Form - SWMP - SWMP Checklist Please provide the following documents upon resubmittal (the planner will send an upload request): - O&M Manual - Private Detention Basin / Stormwater Quality BMP Maintenance Agreement - SDI Form or MHFD_Detention Calcs Reviewed by: Mikayla Hartford Stormwater Engineer I MikaylaHartford@elpasoco.com |
4/22/2024 3:56:02 PM | |
| View |
El Paso County Conservation Dist
4/16/2024 2:17:21 PM |
Please see attached .PDF for comments. Thanks! | 4/16/2024 2:17:21 PM |
|
PCD Administrative Notice
4/12/2024 3:58:56 PM |
On 4/12/2024, PCD mailed "Notice of Application" letters to surrounding property owners within a 500-foot range (21 addresses). Copies of the notice, mailing labels, and selected range have been uploaded to the EDARP file. Cost of postage to be billed to the applicant = $13.44. MB | 4/12/2024 3:58:56 PM | |
|
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department
4/11/2024 10:28:16 AM |
1. Note: no direct access from Meadow Run Circle therefore, no addresses will be given on this street for lot 1 & 7. 2. For assignment of addressing for lots and tracts, place addressing marker (xxx) where they are intended to be utilized. Addressing marker for lots should be front door. 3. Contact the Enumerations department to have the addresses assigned to the lots. Addressing an area is a first come first serve process. Please allow sufficient amount of time for this process. 4. Standard Final Plat comments: a. Enumerations will review the pre-plat (mylar) prior to plat for address placement, street names, and title block. b. A $10.00 per lot and tract platting fee will be due at the time of the review of the pre-plat, (two addresses per lot and tract). If an address is not needed on a tract, then no fee applies. Check should be made out to PIKES PEAK REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT or PPRBD. Paid directly to the Enumerations Department. As of December 5th 2023, the fee for all credit/debit cards has changed from the flat 2.95% fee to the following: Over the phone Credit/Debit Card payments will be 2.3% and In-Person Debit Card payments will be 1.5% (in-person only). c. A copy of the final recorded plat is required prior to plan submittal for RESIDENTIAL. A copy of the final recorded plat is required prior to approval in the Enumerations department on any COMMERCIAL plan submittal. Please email the Enumerations staff member that reviewed your project. Amy@pprbd.org; Brent@pprbd.org; or BeckyA@pprbd.org d. Pre-plat reviews can be reviewed via “pdf” or in-person. The pre-plat will be stamped by Enumerations for accuracy and returned to the applicant and the planner. All payments to be mailed to RBD via a check or credit card payment over the phone. Plats should not be recorded prior to Enumerations stamping the pre-plat and receiving payment of plat fees. If any pre-plat changes occur, even if changes do not apply to Enumerations, we still need to re-stamp the pre-plat. The Enumerations stamped pre-plat copy should match the recorded document minus a few signatures. If you would like an in-person review, please make an appointment on our website, https://www.pprbd.org/Home/BookAppt Amy Vanderbeek Enumerations Plans Examiner Pikes Peak Regional Building Department O: 719-327-2930 E: Amy@pprbd.org |
4/11/2024 10:28:16 AM | |
|
County Attorney - Water
4/11/2024 10:01:14 AM |
Please upload an updated letter finding sufficiency from the State Engineer's Office contemplating only Filing No. 3. Thank you. | 4/11/2024 10:01:14 AM | |
| View |
EPC Environmental Services
4/5/2024 10:32:06 AM |
4/5/2024 10:32:06 AM | |
|
Colorado Department of Transportation - Pueblo Office
4/4/2024 7:13:47 AM |
CDOT has no comment regarding this development. | 4/4/2024 7:13:47 AM | |
|
Black Forest Land Use Committee
4/3/2024 8:46:44 PM |
The Black Forest Land Use Committee recommends approval of this filing. | 4/3/2024 8:46:44 PM | |
|
RBD Floodplain
4/3/2024 9:44:34 AM |
no floodplain on or within 300ft of platted lots, no further comment | 4/3/2024 9:44:34 AM | |
|
911 Authority - El Paso/Teller County
4/3/2024 8:49:31 AM |
Comments for E911 os follows: Old Arena Way – Acceptable and reserved for this project. No other action for E911 on this submittal. Thank you. Justin |
4/3/2024 8:49:31 AM | |
|
Academy SD 20 Building Fund
4/3/2024 7:03:29 AM |
Academy District 20 is in receipt of File # SF247 for approval of the New Breed Ranch Filing No. 3. . The District is requesting fees in lieu of land dedication per the existing County Code for all residential units within this development. The District is able to serve each student who is a resident of District 20. If you need additional information, please contact me. Don Smith Planning Consultant |
4/3/2024 7:03:29 AM | |
|
Black Forest Fire Protection District
4/2/2024 5:15:07 PM |
We note the Fire Protection report does not meet current county expectations regarding how the applicant will meet the LDC and ECM. We also note that the applicant has accurately described an existing cistern in very close proximity to the subdivision. The fire protection report is based upon outdated information and prior expectations of County. The County having jurisdiction will need to determine if report is otherwise acceptable considering it appears applicant began process under prior county guidance. | 4/2/2024 5:15:07 PM |